Canada: Local Authorities' General Power Of Competence Can Turn Into A Duty

Last Updated: November 15 2016
Article by John P. Cooper and Ravi K. Randhawa

Most Read Contributor in Canada, October 2018

Local authorities are creatures of statute and therefore may only carry out those functions that they are statutorily empowered to carry out.

With regard to the provision of adult social care, the functions of local authorities can be classified into duties, under which the local authority is obliged to provide the relevant service, and powers under which the local authority is permitted to provide the relevant service but does not have an obligation to do so.

In its recent judgment in R (on the application of GS) v London Borough of Camden, the High Court considered the scope of local authorities' general power of competence. This is the discretionary power under section 1 of the Localism Act 2011 which provides that, subject to certain limitations, a local authority is able to do anything that an individual generally may do.

In considering the scope of the power, the court concluded that the general power is, in certain cases - and on this occasion by virtue of the Human Rights Act 1998 - capable of being 'converted into a duty' on the local authority to provide a service.


The brief facts of the case are that GS (an EEA national) requested the London Borough of Camden (Camden) to provide her with accommodation on the basis that she had a need for care and support which Camden was required to provide to her under the Care Act 2014.

GS suffered from physical and mental health problems, and she claimed that the benefits income she received (the Personal Independence Payment - the only benefit to which she was entitled) was insufficient for her to secure accommodation. Accommodation, she argued, was a need for care and support, and accordingly Camden was required to provide it under the Care Act 2014.

Camden assessed GS' needs, initially under the National Assistance Act 1948 and again (in October 2015) under the newly-commenced Care Act 2014 (the successor to National Assistance Act 1948). It ultimately concluded that she did not have any need for care and support within the meaning of the latter.

In challenging this decision, GS argued that Camden:

  1. had made errors in the assessment and had therefore got the law wrong when assessing her needs and determining that she did not have an eligible need for care and support;
  2. had failed to provide advice and information as required under section 24 of the Care Act; and
  3. should, in any event, have exercised either its specific power under the Care Act 2014 or its general power of competence under the Localism Act 2011 to provide accommodation, since not to do so breached her rights under the European Convention of Human Rights (the Convention).

Is need for accommodation alone a need for care and support?

The first question the court considered was whether a need for accommodation alone amounts to a requirement for 'care and support' pursuant to the Care Act.

In this context, the court tested whether case law (M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 and R (SL) v Westminster CC [2013] UKSC 27) decided under the National Assistance Act 1948 applied in respect of this case, given that the Act referred to 'care and assistance' while its successor, the Care Act 2014, referred to 'care and support'.

It concluded that the case law did apply (nothing turned on the change) and confirmed that a need for accommodation alone was not a need for 'care and support'. This was on the basis that the provision of care and support does not encompass a general power to provide housing (the relevant powers in this area are found in, and subject to, other parts of the local authority statutory framework).

Care and support means looking after, and involves doing something which the person cannot or should not be expected to do for themselves. None of the outcomes specified in the 'eligibility criteria' supported accommodation as being a need.

General power of competence

GS had argued that, even if Camden did not have a statutory duty to provide accommodation because she did not meet the eligibility criteria, it nonetheless had a general power to do so under the Localism Act 2011 and should therefore provide accommodation to her under that power. The court's treatment of this argument has potentially wider reaching implications.

Two questions arose in this respect:

  1. whether the general power of competence was applicable in the circumstances of the case; and
  2. if so, whether the power was converted into a duty such that it had to be exercised in order to avoid a breach of GS' rights under the Convention.

Was the general power of competence applicable?

The general power of competence in section 1 of the Localism Act 2011 is subject to some limitations. Potentially relevant to this case were the limitations that the general power does not enable Camden to do something which it is otherwise prevented from doing:

  • by a statutory provision in effect prior to the general power of competence coming into force (a "pre-commencement limitation");
  • by a statutory provision that comes into effect after the general power is in force but only if that latter statutory provision is expressed to apply to the general power - whether specifically, or because it applies to all of Camden's powers, but with exceptions that do not include the general power, (a "post-commencement limitation").

The parties were generally agreed that the Care Act 2014 did not contain a post-commencement limitation.

However, Camden contended that the court should nonetheless follow certain principles which were applied in an earlier case in respect of a pre-commencement limitation.

It argued that, although there was no express post-commencement limitation, the restrictions imposed on the scope of Camden's powers under the Care Act 2014 applied equally to the scope of the general power of competence. This was on the basis that:

  • the Care Act sets out the statutory scheme for meeting GS' care and support needs;
  • the statutory scheme excluded GS from being provided with the social care services sought;
  • the Localism Act could not be used to avoid the application of the provisions in the Care Act; and
  • the general power of competence did not therefore apply in the circumstances of the case.

The court disagreed.

It noted that the difference between the pre-commencement limitation and the post-commencement limitation is that Parliament must have intended that any post-commencement limitation on the general power of competence would be specifically stated.

The Care Act 2014 had come into force after the general power of competence and did not expressly include any prohibition, restriction, or limitation that applied to the general power of competence.

Had Parliament intended that the general power of competence could not be used to provide care and support services which were excluded under the Care Act 2014, it would have expressly provided for that limitation in the latter Act. That Parliament had not done so meant that Camden was wrong to say that the Care Act provided a comprehensive statutory scheme under which it was prevented from exercising the general power of competence for the purpose of providing the social care services sought by GS. The general power of competence was available to Camden.

Turning the power into a duty

Having decided that the general power of competence was available, the court went on to consider whether the power had been 'converted into a duty' and whether it was a matter of obligation to exercise that general power in order to avoid a breach of GS' rights under the Convention.

In this regard, because Camden considered that it had no power to provide the services sought by GS it had not, when making its original decision, considered the question of whether there would be any potential breaches of GS' Convention rights. Before the court Camden accepted that, if its failure to act caused a breach of the Convention rights, then it would have to act. However, it submitted that its failure to act did not have that effect because GS' income was sufficient to avoid any such breaches.

Taking into consideration the entirety of GS' circumstances (including her potential social isolation, physical disabilities, pain, mental health condition and physical difficulties), the court concluded that if GS became homeless there would be a breach of Article 3 of the Convention (that is, the homelessness would result in serious suffering and be inhuman and degrading). It also concluded that GS would become homeless because the income she received was, contrary to Camden's submissions, insufficient to fund available and suitable accommodation.

The court concluded, therefore, that in the circumstances of the case, the general power of competence had effectively been converted into a duty. That is, Camden had a duty to act to the extent it was necessary to avoid a breach of GS' Convention rights and had the capacity to act by way of exercising the general power of competence.

Camden's decision not to exercise the general power was therefore unlawful.


The judgment of the court serves as an important reminder to local authorities that a seemingly discretionary power may in certain circumstances, particularly where Convention rights could be in play, be a power that must be exercised.

In this respect, the decision will have particular significance on the role and responsibilities of local authorities in providing assistance to persons that would not otherwise be entitled to assistance under other specific statutory schemes such as the Care Act or the Housing Acts.

It also highlights the need for local authorities to consider all of the powers that are available to them when making decisions and reaching conclusions about the scope and extent of their functions.

To date, most local authorities will have considered the general power of competence broadly helpful because it provides the legal basis to do those things that they want to do and could not otherwise have done.

Going forward, this needs to be balanced by an understanding that it may also provide the legal basis for them to do things that they would otherwise not have wanted to do or considered doing. In accordance with the judgment in GS, the general power of competence may therefore prove to be a double-edged sword.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions