Canada: Supreme Court Of Canada Allows Suits Against Police For Negligent Investigations

Last Updated: November 9 2007

Article by Bradley Berg, Allison Thornton and Shashu Clacken, © 2007, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Litigation, October 2007

"Recognizing an action for negligent police investigation may assist in responding to failures of the justice system, such as wrongful convictions or institutional racism. The unfortunate reality is that negligent policing has now been recognized as a significant contributing factor to wrongful convictions in Canada."
Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin,
Hill v. Hamilton Wentworth Regional Police Services Board

On October 4, 2007, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down its decision in Hill v. Hamilton Wentworth Regional Police Services Board (No. 31227) (Hill). The Court ruled that the police in Canada are not immune from civil liability for negligence in their investigations, and that innocent people harmed by a shoddy investigation can sue for damages.

Blakes is pleased to have been selected by the intervener Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) to argue this important case on police powers and accountability. Prior to this decision, Ontario had stood apart from other common law jurisdictions (including the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, the United States, and all other Canadian provinces except Quebec) in supporting the right to sue for negligent investigation.

The Appellant, Jason George Hill, is an aboriginal man who was wrongfully convicted and spent more than 20 months in prison in relation to bank robbery charges. Mr. Hill successfully appealed from his conviction and was acquitted after a new trial. He then sued the police alleging, among other things, negligence on the basis of witness contamination, improper recording and interviewing techniques, structural bias in a photo line-up (in which Mr. Hill was the only non-Caucasian) and police failure to re-investigate after learning of potentially exculpatory evidence. The trial judge dismissed Mr. Hill’s negligence claim, holding that the police’s conduct did not fall below the applicable standard of care.

Mr. Hill appealed and the Ontario Court of Appeal convened a five-member panel to re-examine whether Ontario should continue to recognize the tort of negligent investigation by police. The Court of Appeal conducted an extensive analysis and unanimously upheld the recognition of the tort. However, the Court of Appeal divided on the application of the law to Mr. Hill’s case, finding against him in a 3:2 decision and dismissing his claim.

Mr. Hill appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada. The police cross-appealed, arguing against the existence of the tort. By a 6:3 majority, the Court concluded that the tort should be recognized for all of Canada. Chief Justice McLachlin, for the majority, held that a police officer can be held liable if his/her investigatory conduct falls below the standard of a reasonable police officer such that harm is caused to the suspect. However, in the result, all nine judges found against Mr. Hill on the facts and dismissed his claim.

Following the tort analysis in Anns v. Merton London Borough Council (1978 House of Lords), the Chief Justice determined that a duty of care exists. First, it is reasonably foreseeable that negligent police investigation may cause harm to the suspect under investigation. Second, the relationship between the police and the suspect is sufficiently close and direct, since the suspect is singled out and investigated. Additional considerations supporting the finding of a proximate relationship giving rise to a duty of care included the risks to the suspect’s freedom and reputation, the failure of other tort actions and government compensation schemes to provide an adequate remedy to victims of negligent police investigation, and the benefit to the public interest from potentially minimizing wrongful convictions and institutional racism.

The Chief Justice noted that police owing a duty of care to targeted suspects is in keeping with Charter values of liberty and fair process, and she found no compelling policy reasons to negate the duty of care. She dismissed arguments advanced by the Police Services Board and by the Crown as intervener that exposing the police to liability for negligence would open the floodgates to nuisance lawsuits and create a chilling effect on police that would interfere with their ability to do their jobs effectively. The Chief Justice noted that targeted suspects form a limited class of potential plaintiffs, a class further limited by the requirement to establish compensable harm. Moreover, the evidence appeared to the contrary: there had not been a large number of police negligence suits to date in Ontario or Quebec (where the civil law equivalent of negligent investigation has existed for many years). On the chilling effect point, McLachlin C.J. acknowledged that, conceivably, police might become more careful in conducting investigations, but pointed out that this is "not necessarily a bad thing". She also acknowledged the point made by CCLA in its submissions that police officers are almost always indemnified from personal civil liability in the course of performing their professional duties, which decreases the likelihood that they will recoil out of fear of lawsuits.

Also at issue in Hill was the standard of care to which police should be held. The majority of the Supreme Court, like the Ontario Court of Appeal below, concluded that the proper standard was that of "the reasonable police officer in like circumstances", rather than a higher standard such as gross negligence. The Chief Justice was careful to note that the standard is not perfection. This standard takes into account factors like urgency, prevailing practices and the discretion inherent in police investigation. Indeed, this was borne out by the Court’s unanimous dismissal of the appeal in Hill on its facts. While the investigation of the case against Mr. Hill was undoubtedly flawed, it was found not to breach the standard of care as judged by the standards of the day and what the officers knew and believed at the time of that investigation.

The Hill decision is a victory for police accountability in Canada, a cause championed by the CCLA for decades. The CCLA intervened as part of its mandate to promote the development of the common law in a manner that preserves civil liberties and protects individual freedom and dignity against unreasonable invasion by public authorities.

The CCLA was represented by Blakes on a pro bono basis, with Bradley Berg and Allison Thornton appearing as counsel, assisted by then articling student Shashu Clacken.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

3 Nov 2016, Other, Vancouver, Canada

“Risk” is the new black. It’s on the lips of every CEO, CFO, GC and board member — as it should be. Can you spot it? How do you analyze it? Are you equipped to manage it?

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.