Canada: Supreme Court Of Canada Upholds Finding Of No Misrepresentation In Danier Leather Prospectus

Last Updated: November 9 2007

Article by Nigel Campbell, Chris Javornik And Bruce O’Toole, © 2007, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Corporate Finance, October 2007

In a decision that should be carefully considered by public company issuers, directors and officers, and securities underwriters, the Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeal from the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in the Danier Leather case. This ruling has important implications for public offerings of securities in Ontario and the standards for disclosure and representations in prospectuses.

The Facts

This case arose from the Danier Leather initial public offering (IPO) in May 1998. As part of the IPO, Danier filed a prospectus dated May 6, 1998 that included a forecast of revenue and earnings for the company’s fourth quarter of its fiscal year ending June 27, 1998. The prospectus contained customary cautionary language stating that Danier had used certain assumptions in preparation of the forecast that could turn out to be inaccurate and that there was no guarantee that the forecast would be achieved. A few days before the IPO closed, however, internal company analysis showed that Danier’s fourth quarter revenue and earnings were lagging behind the forecasted figures in the prospectus. Management did not disclose this shortfall, believing that the prospectus forecast would be achieved by year-end. The IPO closed on May 20, 1998.

On June 4, 1998, after further analysis, Danier issued a revised forecast reflecting the lower projected revenue and net earnings for its fourth quarter, which precipitated a significant decline in its share price. On July 6, 1998, Danier announced its results for the fourth quarter. The results exceeded the revised forecast of June 4 and almost matched the prospectus forecast. Danier’s share price rose, but not to the IPO issue price.

Notwithstanding the fact that Danier had substantially achieved the forecasted results in its IPO prospectus, a class action was commenced against Danier, and its CEO and CFO personally, under section 130 of the Securities Act (Ontario), for prospectus misrepresentation.

Trial Decision

The action was certified as a class action and, after a lengthy trial, the trial judge (Lederman J.) held Danier, as well as its CEO and CFO, liable for statutory misrepresentation. The trial judge concluded that the prospectus impliedly represented that the forecast was objectively reasonable, both on May 6 (the date of the prospectus) and on May 20 (the date the IPO closed). He also determined that the company’s poor fourth quarter revenue and earnings, which had come to light a few days prior to the IPO closing, were material facts that Danier was required to disclose in an amendment to the prospectus. The trial judge awarded the plaintiffs substantial damages, as well as legal costs of CAD 7 million at trial, including a staggering CAD 1 million premium to be paid by the defendants to plaintiffs’ class action counsel.

Court Of Appeal Decision

In overturning the Trial Decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal (Laskin, Goudge and Blair JJ.A.) made three key decisions. First, the Appeal Court held that issuers are not required to disclose in a prospectus amendment a "material fact" occurring after the date a securities regulator issues a receipt for the final prospectus but prior to completion of the distribution under the prospectus, provided that the material fact does not constitute a "material change". (A "material fact" is currently defined in the Securities Act (Ontario) to mean a fact that would reasonably be expected to have a significant effect on the market price or value of an issuer’s securities; a "material change" is defined more narrowly and refers to a change in the business, operations or capital of the issuer that would reasonably be expected to have a significant effect on the market price or value of the issuer’s securities.) Second, the Appeal Court stated that courts should not readily second-guess the decisions made by directors and officers who act reasonably in forecasting sales based on years of hands-on retail experience (i.e., the Business Judgment Rule). Third, the Court of Appeal found that there was no implied representation in the Danier prospectus that the forecast in the prospectus was objectively reasonable.

Our December 2005 Blakes Bulletin on Securities Law discusses the Court of Appeal decision in detail and is available on Blakes Web site at in our "Publications – Corporate Finance & Securities Regulation" section.

Supreme Court Of Canada

In its unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the outcome of the Court of Appeal’s decision, but in doing so it refined and differed in some respects from the Court of Appeal’s reasoning.

1. No Continuing Obligation To Disclose New "Material Facts" Prior To Completion Of Distribution

The Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeal decision that issuers are not required to disclose in a prospectus amendment a "material fact" occurring after the date a securities regulator issues a receipt for the final prospectus but prior to completion of the distribution under the prospectus, provided that the material fact does not constitute a "material change".

This decision relates to prospectus disclosure requirements under the Securities Act (Ontario) and does not apply to public companies’ continuous disclosure obligations under applicable securities laws and stock exchange rules, such as the Toronto Stock Exchange’s requirement for listed issuers to disclose both material facts and material changes.

2. Business Judgment Rule Does Not Apply To Statutory Disclosure Obligations

As noted above, in overturning the trial judge’s decision, the Court of Appeal invoked the Business Judgment Rule and its deference to directors’ and officers’ business decisions. The Supreme Court made a point to explicitly reject the proposition that a disclosure obligation under securities laws should be qualified or, in the words of the Supreme Court, "undermined", by the Business Judgment Rule.

The Business Judgment Rule provides that where directors and officers act reasonably in discharging their duties, even if they turn out to be wrong, courts will not readily second-guess their decisions. The traditional justifications of the Business Judgement Rule, as identified by the Supreme Court, are that management has more expertise than the court in making business decisions and managers need freedom to take reasonable risks without having to worry about being second-guessed by the courts.

The Supreme Court held that the traditional justifications for the Business Judgment Rule argued against its application to statutory disclosure obligations. The Supreme Court recognized that forecasting is a matter of business judgment but held that disclosure is a matter of legal obligation for the courts to evaluate.

By excluding the Business Judgment Rule from the context of disclosure decisions, the Supreme Court has mandated an objective rather than subjective standard with regard to the courts’ evaluation of disclosure obligations under securities laws.

3. Implied Representation That Forecasts Are Objectively Reasonable

The Court of Appeal held that the question as to whether a prospectus contains a representation, whether explicit or implied, is a question of fact. The Court of Appeal agreed that in most cases a forecast in a prospectus can be taken to contain implied representations that the forecast represents management’s best judgment, that the forecast was prepared with reasonable care and skill, and that management believes the forecast to be reasonable. (In fact, in the Danier prospectus there was an express representation that the forecast represented management’s best judgment.) However, the Court of Appeal rejected the finding that there was an implied representation in the Danier prospectus that the forecast was "objectively reasonable" stating that no reader of the prospectus would conclude that Danier management was implicitly representing that its best judgment in the forecast was shared by other reasonable business people or by any other "objective" standard.

The Supreme Court did not agree with the Court of Appeal’s reasoning on this point. The Supreme Court determined that, as a matter of fact, the forecast was put forward as being objectively reasonable as of May 6, the date of the prospectus. However, unlike the trial judge, the Supreme Court found that the forecast was not put forward as being objectively reasonable as at any date after May 6. Since the trial judge found that the forecast was objectively reasonable as of May 6 (and the Supreme Court held that the objective reasonableness of the forecast on any following date was irrelevant in these circumstances), the appellants’ appeal of the Appeal Court’s decision on this ground was dismissed.

4. Plaintiff(s) In Commercial Class Actions Will Run Significant Cost Risks

The Supreme Court upheld the cost award in favour of Danier against the representative plaintiff. In doing so, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the "loser pay" principle in cost awards. This is likely to have a significant bearing on future class proceedings in this area, and represents a judicial recognition that class actions are often advanced by sophisticated and well-financed parties and counsel who should not be protected from the usual costs sanctions. As the Supreme Court acknowledged, "the David against Goliath scenario does not necessarily represent an accurate portrayal of the real conflict in modern class action litigation."

This decision may well give future plaintiff class action claimants cause to reconsider commencing a class action given the potential cost consequences of being unsuccessful in the litigation.

Additional Information

The full text of the Supreme Court of Canada ruling in Danier Leather is available on Blakes Web site at in our "Publications – Corporate Finance & Securities Regulation" section.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.