Canada: Replacing An Insolvent Operator – Court Upholds Capl "Immediate Replacement" Right

Last Updated: October 19 2016
Article by Matti Lemmens and Steven Bodi (Articling Student)

Most Read Contributor in Canada, September 2016

In Bank of Montreal v Bumper Development Corporation Ltd, 2016 ABQB 363 ("Bumper"), the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench enforced the "immediate replacement" provision in the Canadian Association of Petroleum Landmen ("CAPL") 2007 Operating Procedure ("CAPL 2007") for an insolvent operator. This provision provides for immediate replacement of an operator upon the occurrence of certain specified events, including the commencement of insolvency proceedings. Notably, the Court enforced this right notwithstanding the fact that the non-operating party did not act immediately to enforce its rights and prevented conveyance of operatorship with the sale of the operator's assets. Further, the Court acknowledged it would have lifted the stay of proceedings against the insolvent operator to allow the non-operating partner to replace the insolvent operator.

The decision in Bumper addresses a number of items that may be of interest to operators, creditors, working interest and facility partners, and other industry participants:

  • the importance of the wording of the "stay of proceedings" (the "Stay") provisions in a receivership order and its impact on the enforcement of contractual rights such as the "immediate replacement" right contemplated in CAPL 2007;
  • establishing that the replacement of an insolvent operator under CAPL 2007 does not constitute the "enforcement of a right or remedy" for the purposes of a receivership order;
  • illustrating prospective problems that receivers, monitors, debtors and/or secured creditors may face when attempting to convey operatorship along with the associated assets of an insolvent operator; and
  • discussing differences in enforcement of contractual rights between the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, RSC 1985, c B-3 (the "BIA") and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, RSC 1985, c C-36 (the "CCAA") as it relates to replacing an insolvent operator under these respective statutes.


Bumper focused on a dispute between Eagle Energy Inc. ("Eagle") and Forent Energy Ltd. ("Forent") regarding the right to operatorship held by Bumper Development Corporation Ltd. ("Bumper") with respect to certain oil and gas producing wells near Twinning, Alberta (the "Wells"). The Court considered whether Eagle could enforce the "immediate replacement" provision in its operating agreement with Bumper subsequent to Bumper being placed into receivership by its primary secured creditor, the Bank of Montreal ("BMO"). BMO successfully obtained a receivership order against Bumper and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Bumper Development Corporation, on February 16, 2016 (the "Receivership Order") pursuant to section 243 of the BIA.

The CAPL Replacement Right

Eagle and Bumper were parties to two agreements which contemplated the ability of a counterparty to replace an insolvent operator: 1) a joint operating agreement relating to the Wells which incorporated CAPL 2007 (the "JOA"); and 2) an agreement for the construction, ownership and operation (the CO&O, and together with the JOA, the "Agreements") of the Twinning 16-20-31-24 W4M Battery (the "Battery", together with the Wells, the "Bumper Assets"). The JOA, incorporated CAPL 2007 to govern certain rights between Bumper, as operator, and Eagle as the non-operating party. CAPL 2007 includes the following provision contemplating the immediate replacement of an operator:

2.02 Replacement of Operator

A. Immediate Replacement – the Parties acknowledge that the Operator's ability to fulfill its duties and obligations for the Parties' benefit is largely dependent on its ongoing financial viability and that the Operator may not seek relief at law, in equity, or under the Regulations to prevent its replacement in accordance with this Subclause. The Operator will be replaced immediately after service of notice from the Non-Operator to the other Parties to such effect if:

(a) the Operator becomes bankrupt or insolvent, commits or suffers any act of bankruptcy or insolvency, is placed in receivership or seeks debtor relief protection under applicable legislation (including the [BIA] and the [CCAA]), and it will be deemed to be insolvent for this purpose if it is unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the usual course of business or if it does not have sufficient assets to justify its cumulative liabilities in full...

The CO&O included a similar clause, which contemplated that Bumper would immediately cease to be operator upon becoming bankrupt or insolvent, committing an act of bankruptcy or insolvency, or being placed in receivership or a receiver/manager being appointing with respect to Bumper's property (Bumper para 6).

Pursuant to the provisions in the Agreements, Eagle provided the Receiver with the required notice of Eagle's intention to assume operatorship of the Bumper Assets. The Receiver responded that, pursuant to the provisions of the Receivership Order, the notices from Eagle were stayed and that Bumper remained the operator of the Bumper Assets. During the process of marketing the Bumper Assets, Eagle made an agreement with the Receiver that the latter would not entertain an offer purporting to convey operatorship of the Bumper Assets to any persons except Eagle. The arrangement between Eagle and the Receiver contemplated that, if Eagle were not the successful bidder, that the purchase and sale agreement for the Bumper Assets would include a condition of closing requiring an electronic transfer of Bumper's operating licence for the Bumper Assets directly from Bumper to Eagle. Forent was the successful bidder for the Bumper Assets, and the Court approved the sale of the Bumper Assets to Forent without prejudice to Eagle's right to challenge operatorship. Eagle's challenge was heard by Macleod J on May 24, 2016.

The Court found that the Agreements clearly entitled Eagle to be the operator of the Bumper Assets upon Bumper becoming insolvent or being placed into receivership (Bumper at para 17). In this respect the Court cited Tri-Star Resources Ltd v JC International Petroleum Ltd. (1986), [1987] 2 WWR 141 (ABQB) where the Court held that the plain language of the operating agreement (which incorporated the a previous versions of CAPL 2007) must govern. In Bumper, Macleod J held that, "had Eagle pursued its right to be Operator at the time of the granting of the [Receivership] Order or soon thereafter, I can think of no reason why this Court would not have acceded to Eagle's request to lift the stay and grant a declaration with respect to both the wells and the battery" (Bumper at para 18). This decision was on the basis that Eagle's right to operate arises under a contract which pre-dates the Receivership Order and, as such, the Court found no reason to interfere with the contractual rights of Eagle under the Agreements which were not subject to the security of Bumper's creditors.

With respect to the question of delay, the Court found that Eagle acted reasonably in light of the receiver's response and negotiated a deal with the receiver to protect Eagle's contractual rights to operatorship under the Agreements. According to that arrangement, the Court found that Eagle believed it would be the operator under the Agreements even if it were not the successful bidder for the underlying assets (Bumper at para 23). Because of that arrangement, the Court found that Forent could not have a reasonable expectation that it was purchasing operatorship of the Bumper Assets. As such, the Court saw it as unfair to deprive Eagle of its clear contractual right to be operator of both the Wells and the Battery: "[t]o do so would be tantamount to appropriating Eagle's right for the benefit of [Bumper's] creditors" (Bumper at para 23).

Exercising a Right or Remedy

Bumper differs from a historical line of cases that restrict contractual counterparties of an insolvent entity from enforcing contractual rights on the basis that doing so constitutes a "right" or "remedy" which is subject to a stay of proceedings (see for e.g. Baytex Energy Ltd v Sterling Eagle Petroleum Corporation, 2012 ABQB 539 ("Baytex") and Re Skyservice Airlines Inc, 2011 ONSC 703 ("Skyservice"). Paragraph 9 of the Receivership Order pertaining to Bumper, titled "No Exercise of Rights or Remedies" provided that: "all rights and remedies (including, without limitation, set-off rights) against [Bumper],the Receiver, or affecting the Property, are hereby stayed and suspended except with the written consent of the Receiver or leave of this Court" (Bumper at para 4).

Although there was similar wording in the receivership orders contemplated in Skyservice and Baytex, the courts both restrained counterparties from enforcing certain contractual provisions on the basis that the questioned actions constituted the enforcement of a "right" or "remedy" that was stayed by those receivership orders. In Skyservice, lessors were attempting to terminate aircraft leases, and in Baytex, an operator of certain oil and gas properties purported to deliver notices of abandonment to a working interest participant once the latter was placed in receivership.

Immediate Replacement under BIA and CCAA Proceedings – Different Outcomes?

The Court specifically distinguished Bumper from Norcen Energy Resources Ltd v Oakwood Petroleums Ltd. (1988), 92 AR 81 (ABQB) ("Norcen"), which was a case in which the operator was subject to the CCAA. This suggests that the outcome of a party attempting to enforce its right under CAPL 2007 (or its successor or predecessor agreements) to replace an insolvent operator may be unsuccessful where the operator is subject to CCAA. In Norcen, the Court rejected a joint operator's attempt under the previous CAPL operating agreement, containing virtually the same wording as Section 2.02 of CAPL 2007, to assert a right to operatorship.

This decision was based on the difference in the legislative purposes of the CCAA as compared to the BIA. While the CCAA is primarily used to attempt to restructure a company's affairs, the BIA mechanisms are used to liquidate and wind-up a company. In Norcen, the Court accepted testimony that removing the insolvent company as operator would be fatal in attempting to restructure its affairs. It is unclear what the Court in Bumper would have done had there been evidence that the removal of the operatorship would have materially and adversely impacted the marketing and sale of Bumper's assets.


Bumper represents a departure from how courts have previously interpreted actions of contractual counterparties attempting to enforce rights under agreements with an insolvent entity. The decision in Bumper suggests that receivership orders may need to specifically mention actions that the receiver and debtor wish to prevent contractual counterparties from taking in order to successfully have such actions captured by the stay of proceedings. Non-operating parties should be aware of what rights they have to operatorship in the event of insolvency of the operating party and whether such rights are to be transferred on to third parties acquiring the insolvent party's assets. Purchasers of assets out of a receivership process should ensure they are aware of any outstanding claims by non-operators to transfer operatorship, as operatorship may not be something that the receiver can transfer as part of the sale.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.