Canada: Replacing An Insolvent Operator – Court Upholds Capl "Immediate Replacement" Right

In Bank of Montreal v Bumper Development Corporation Ltd, 2016 ABQB 363 ("Bumper"), the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench enforced the "immediate replacement" provision in the Canadian Association of Petroleum Landmen ("CAPL") 2007 Operating Procedure ("CAPL 2007") for an insolvent operator. This provision provides for immediate replacement of an operator upon the occurrence of certain specified events, including the commencement of insolvency proceedings. Notably, the Court enforced this right notwithstanding the fact that the non-operating party did not act immediately to enforce its rights and prevented conveyance of operatorship with the sale of the operator's assets. Further, the Court acknowledged it would have lifted the stay of proceedings against the insolvent operator to allow the non-operating partner to replace the insolvent operator.

The decision in Bumper addresses a number of items that may be of interest to operators, creditors, working interest and facility partners, and other industry participants:

  • the importance of the wording of the "stay of proceedings" (the "Stay") provisions in a receivership order and its impact on the enforcement of contractual rights such as the "immediate replacement" right contemplated in CAPL 2007;
  • establishing that the replacement of an insolvent operator under CAPL 2007 does not constitute the "enforcement of a right or remedy" for the purposes of a receivership order;
  • illustrating prospective problems that receivers, monitors, debtors and/or secured creditors may face when attempting to convey operatorship along with the associated assets of an insolvent operator; and
  • discussing differences in enforcement of contractual rights between the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, RSC 1985, c B-3 (the "BIA") and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, RSC 1985, c C-36 (the "CCAA") as it relates to replacing an insolvent operator under these respective statutes.


Bumper focused on a dispute between Eagle Energy Inc. ("Eagle") and Forent Energy Ltd. ("Forent") regarding the right to operatorship held by Bumper Development Corporation Ltd. ("Bumper") with respect to certain oil and gas producing wells near Twinning, Alberta (the "Wells"). The Court considered whether Eagle could enforce the "immediate replacement" provision in its operating agreement with Bumper subsequent to Bumper being placed into receivership by its primary secured creditor, the Bank of Montreal ("BMO"). BMO successfully obtained a receivership order against Bumper and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Bumper Development Corporation, on February 16, 2016 (the "Receivership Order") pursuant to section 243 of the BIA.

The CAPL Replacement Right

Eagle and Bumper were parties to two agreements which contemplated the ability of a counterparty to replace an insolvent operator: 1) a joint operating agreement relating to the Wells which incorporated CAPL 2007 (the "JOA"); and 2) an agreement for the construction, ownership and operation (the CO&O, and together with the JOA, the "Agreements") of the Twinning 16-20-31-24 W4M Battery (the "Battery", together with the Wells, the "Bumper Assets"). The JOA, incorporated CAPL 2007 to govern certain rights between Bumper, as operator, and Eagle as the non-operating party. CAPL 2007 includes the following provision contemplating the immediate replacement of an operator:

2.02 Replacement of Operator

A. Immediate Replacement – the Parties acknowledge that the Operator's ability to fulfill its duties and obligations for the Parties' benefit is largely dependent on its ongoing financial viability and that the Operator may not seek relief at law, in equity, or under the Regulations to prevent its replacement in accordance with this Subclause. The Operator will be replaced immediately after service of notice from the Non-Operator to the other Parties to such effect if:

(a) the Operator becomes bankrupt or insolvent, commits or suffers any act of bankruptcy or insolvency, is placed in receivership or seeks debtor relief protection under applicable legislation (including the [BIA] and the [CCAA]), and it will be deemed to be insolvent for this purpose if it is unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the usual course of business or if it does not have sufficient assets to justify its cumulative liabilities in full...

The CO&O included a similar clause, which contemplated that Bumper would immediately cease to be operator upon becoming bankrupt or insolvent, committing an act of bankruptcy or insolvency, or being placed in receivership or a receiver/manager being appointing with respect to Bumper's property (Bumper para 6).

Pursuant to the provisions in the Agreements, Eagle provided the Receiver with the required notice of Eagle's intention to assume operatorship of the Bumper Assets. The Receiver responded that, pursuant to the provisions of the Receivership Order, the notices from Eagle were stayed and that Bumper remained the operator of the Bumper Assets. During the process of marketing the Bumper Assets, Eagle made an agreement with the Receiver that the latter would not entertain an offer purporting to convey operatorship of the Bumper Assets to any persons except Eagle. The arrangement between Eagle and the Receiver contemplated that, if Eagle were not the successful bidder, that the purchase and sale agreement for the Bumper Assets would include a condition of closing requiring an electronic transfer of Bumper's operating licence for the Bumper Assets directly from Bumper to Eagle. Forent was the successful bidder for the Bumper Assets, and the Court approved the sale of the Bumper Assets to Forent without prejudice to Eagle's right to challenge operatorship. Eagle's challenge was heard by Macleod J on May 24, 2016.

The Court found that the Agreements clearly entitled Eagle to be the operator of the Bumper Assets upon Bumper becoming insolvent or being placed into receivership (Bumper at para 17). In this respect the Court cited Tri-Star Resources Ltd v JC International Petroleum Ltd. (1986), [1987] 2 WWR 141 (ABQB) where the Court held that the plain language of the operating agreement (which incorporated the a previous versions of CAPL 2007) must govern. In Bumper, Macleod J held that, "had Eagle pursued its right to be Operator at the time of the granting of the [Receivership] Order or soon thereafter, I can think of no reason why this Court would not have acceded to Eagle's request to lift the stay and grant a declaration with respect to both the wells and the battery" (Bumper at para 18). This decision was on the basis that Eagle's right to operate arises under a contract which pre-dates the Receivership Order and, as such, the Court found no reason to interfere with the contractual rights of Eagle under the Agreements which were not subject to the security of Bumper's creditors.

With respect to the question of delay, the Court found that Eagle acted reasonably in light of the receiver's response and negotiated a deal with the receiver to protect Eagle's contractual rights to operatorship under the Agreements. According to that arrangement, the Court found that Eagle believed it would be the operator under the Agreements even if it were not the successful bidder for the underlying assets (Bumper at para 23). Because of that arrangement, the Court found that Forent could not have a reasonable expectation that it was purchasing operatorship of the Bumper Assets. As such, the Court saw it as unfair to deprive Eagle of its clear contractual right to be operator of both the Wells and the Battery: "[t]o do so would be tantamount to appropriating Eagle's right for the benefit of [Bumper's] creditors" (Bumper at para 23).

Exercising a Right or Remedy

Bumper differs from a historical line of cases that restrict contractual counterparties of an insolvent entity from enforcing contractual rights on the basis that doing so constitutes a "right" or "remedy" which is subject to a stay of proceedings (see for e.g. Baytex Energy Ltd v Sterling Eagle Petroleum Corporation, 2012 ABQB 539 ("Baytex") and Re Skyservice Airlines Inc, 2011 ONSC 703 ("Skyservice"). Paragraph 9 of the Receivership Order pertaining to Bumper, titled "No Exercise of Rights or Remedies" provided that: "all rights and remedies (including, without limitation, set-off rights) against [Bumper],the Receiver, or affecting the Property, are hereby stayed and suspended except with the written consent of the Receiver or leave of this Court" (Bumper at para 4).

Although there was similar wording in the receivership orders contemplated in Skyservice and Baytex, the courts both restrained counterparties from enforcing certain contractual provisions on the basis that the questioned actions constituted the enforcement of a "right" or "remedy" that was stayed by those receivership orders. In Skyservice, lessors were attempting to terminate aircraft leases, and in Baytex, an operator of certain oil and gas properties purported to deliver notices of abandonment to a working interest participant once the latter was placed in receivership.

Immediate Replacement under BIA and CCAA Proceedings – Different Outcomes?

The Court specifically distinguished Bumper from Norcen Energy Resources Ltd v Oakwood Petroleums Ltd. (1988), 92 AR 81 (ABQB) ("Norcen"), which was a case in which the operator was subject to the CCAA. This suggests that the outcome of a party attempting to enforce its right under CAPL 2007 (or its successor or predecessor agreements) to replace an insolvent operator may be unsuccessful where the operator is subject to CCAA. In Norcen, the Court rejected a joint operator's attempt under the previous CAPL operating agreement, containing virtually the same wording as Section 2.02 of CAPL 2007, to assert a right to operatorship.

This decision was based on the difference in the legislative purposes of the CCAA as compared to the BIA. While the CCAA is primarily used to attempt to restructure a company's affairs, the BIA mechanisms are used to liquidate and wind-up a company. In Norcen, the Court accepted testimony that removing the insolvent company as operator would be fatal in attempting to restructure its affairs. It is unclear what the Court in Bumper would have done had there been evidence that the removal of the operatorship would have materially and adversely impacted the marketing and sale of Bumper's assets.


Bumper represents a departure from how courts have previously interpreted actions of contractual counterparties attempting to enforce rights under agreements with an insolvent entity. The decision in Bumper suggests that receivership orders may need to specifically mention actions that the receiver and debtor wish to prevent contractual counterparties from taking in order to successfully have such actions captured by the stay of proceedings. Non-operating parties should be aware of what rights they have to operatorship in the event of insolvency of the operating party and whether such rights are to be transferred on to third parties acquiring the insolvent party's assets. Purchasers of assets out of a receivership process should ensure they are aware of any outstanding claims by non-operators to transfer operatorship, as operatorship may not be something that the receiver can transfer as part of the sale.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions