Canada: Foreign State-Owned Investors Spark “National Security” Concerns

Last Updated: October 23 2007

Article by Cliff Sosnow, Eric Elvidge, Elysia Van Zeyl, Alexis Von Finckenstein, © 2007, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on International Trade, October 2007

Canada Signals its Intention to Place Restrictions on Foreign Investment

Foreign state-owned enterprises hoping to invest in Canadian industry may face an additional hurdle in the near future. In a recent address to the Vancouver Board of Trade, Minister of Industry Jim Prentice indicated that the federal government intends to revise the Investment Canada Act (ICA), citing the need to examine acquisitions by so-called state-owned enterprises and the absence of a national security review mechanism as concerns necessitating a full review of the ICA this fall.

Minister Prentice’s statements illustrate the government’s intent to strike a difficult balance between maintaining Canada’s free-market system that encourages foreign investment while protecting Canada’s industries and resources from enterprises whose objectives may not be strictly commercial.

Somewhat puzzling is the government’s simultaneous praise for Canada’s accessible investment climate and calls for tighter controls on that same investment environment. There was an explicit recognition of the numerous benefits Canada enjoys because of foreign investment, including job creation, enhanced innovation and increased productivity. Despite these benefits and the government’s position that the ICA has been working well, the Minister stated "[F]ree markets do not mean a free pass. Canada is open for business, but it’s not for sale. And like other countries around the world, it’s important that we have safeguards in place to protect our interests." He concluded that the ICA needs some updating to ensure "that we are maximizing the benefits of foreign investment for Canadians while retaining our ability to protect our national interests." Minister Prentice framed the national interest sought to be protected as "national security."

The Canadian government’s concern regarding foreign state-owned enterprises stems from the observation that certain of these enterprises fail to comply with market principles and fail to adhere to transparent corporate governance practices. In addressing these concerns, the government is considering the introduction of guidelines for foreign state-owned enterprises and a national security test to be incorporated into foreign investment reviews under the ICA.

It is not yet clear whether Minister Prentice intends to fold the new guidelines for foreign state-owned enterprises into the current "net benefit" test under the ICA, or whether it will entail new criteria. The net benefit test that is currently used during investment reviews examines the effect that the proposed investment will have on economic activity, productivity and competition in Canada, compatibility with Canadian national industrial and cultural policies, as well as the impact on employment, resource processing and Canadian export activity. On past occasions, Minister Prentice has indicated his opinion that the net benefit test is broad enough to allow him to stipulate that transactions must be transparent and comply with market principles.

The address was sparse on specifics about what a national security test might entail or when a bill will be officially introduced in Parliament. Further, it is also unclear at this point whether this national security test will fall within the scope of the current net benefit test as an amendment to the test or whether amendments will be required to the ICA to create an entirely new category of review. Minister Prentice did say that any legislative or policy changes would not apply to take-overs currently in progress.

Adding an additional layer to this complexity, in July 2007 the federal government established a review panel and charged it with the responsibility of examining the key elements of Canada’s foreign investment legislation and competition policies. The core mandate of the panel is to review the ICA and the Competition Act. Among the issues the panel will be considering are the treatment of state-owned enterprises, the possibility of a national security review clause and sectoral investment restrictions (i.e., in telecommunications, mining and resources, etc.). The panel’s report, which is scheduled to be released in June 2008, is expected to provide recommendations on how foreign investment can be used to strengthen Canadian businesses. Minister Prentice indicated that further details regarding the proposed changes to the substance of reviews under the ICA will be announced prior to the completion of the panel’s report. This urgency results from the position, as expressed by the Minister, that state-owned enterprises and national security are a high priority and need to be addressed immediately. It is unknown at this time how the panel’s examination of the same issues and the recommendations based on their examination of the issues will fit into the government’s analysis and timelines.

Amendments to the ICA: Compliance with Canada's International Trade Obligations

An examination of the net benefit test and its modifications, consideration of a national security test and the application of criteria for the review of investments by state-owned enterprises invariably raise, as Minister Prentice correctly points out, complex compliance issues regarding Canada’s international obligations under the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). In considering changes to the treatment of foreign state-owned enterprises under the ICA, he pledged to look carefully at the provisions in other G8 countries, as well as in Canada’s NAFTA and WTO obligations. Proposed modifications to the net benefit test as it applies to certain state-owned enterprises or the application, out of a whole cloth, of a new national security test to review foreign investments by state-owned enterprises raise compelling questions about compliance with WTO and NAFTA investment rules.

Under the NAFTA (and indeed under the WTO), Canada has agreed to provide equal treatment to investors from NAFTA countries with certain specific exceptions. Using NAFTA as an example, Article 1102 requires each NAFTA country to place all NAFTA investors on an even playing field with regards to the establishment, acquisition, expansion, management, conduct, operation, and sale or other disposition of investments (the "national treatment" standard). Investors from Mexico and the United States, for example, are to be treated no less favourably than Canadian investors acquiring existing Canadian businesses or establishing new businesses in Canada. Although the goals of a policy that limits investments to entities that show transparency, demonstrate good governance practices and operate according to free-market principles are laudable, placing limits on the ability of state-owned enterprises to invest in Canadian businesses may raise legitimate trade law compliance issues given the obligations Canada has undertaken with respect to its North American neighbours (and countries under the WTO).

The issue of compliance with international trade law obligations is particularly germane regarding the net benefit test and the national security review question. Non-conforming measures (i.e., measures that are otherwise inconsistent with international obligations) that existed at the time the NAFTA came into effect may remain in force; however, laws cannot be amended to become less consistent with NAFTA rules, including the investment rules under NAFTA Article 1102. Canada’s schedule under Annex I of the NAFTA outlines Canada’s reservations regarding national treatment. Canada has reserved the discretion to review foreign investments further to the net benefit test of the ICA that rise beyond specified monetary thresholds and that affect Canada’s cultural heritage or national identity. It is not clear whether the application of new guidelines to certain foreign state-owned enterprises would increase the level of inconsistency of the net benefit test.

Similarly, a national security test currently exists under the NAFTA and it applies to all NAFTA rules including the national treatment standard in Article 1102. Canada, as expressed in Article 2102, has the ability to take non-conforming actions that are necessary for the protection of national security interests. The national security exception in the NAFTA generally addresses concerns relating to the international traffic in arms and ammunition, the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and measures that must be taken for national security in times of war or international conflict. It is uncertain whether the Minister’s proposed imposition of a national security test under the ICA is consistent with the way the national security exception is cast in the NAFTA. If it is not, then questions arise as to whether a new test applicable to ICA reviews is NAFTA (and WTO) consistent.

Prudence suggests that foreign general counsel and CEOs diligently examine the new tests to ensure that amendments to the ICA are consistent with Canada’s international trade obligations.

Impact on Investment Review Process for Foreign Investors

Apart from the trade law implications and assuming the proposed amendments are NAFTA and WTO compliant, the adoption of new rules designed to address concerns related to investors owned or controlled by a foreign state and national security interests will have a measurable impact on the investment review process for foreign investors.

Currently, the acquisition of control of a Canadian business, and the establishment of a new Canadian business, by a non-Canadian are subject to the ICA. Transactions that do not exceed prescribed monetary thresholds are subject to a simple notification requirement. Where the monetary thresholds are exceeded (or where the proposed investment falls within a prescribed business activity related to Canada’s cultural heritage or national identity), the proposed investment is subject to a substantive review.

A reviewable transaction may not be completed unless the relevant Minister is satisfied, in part based upon negotiated undertakings provided by the investor, that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada. As earlier indicated, the ICA requires the Minister, in determining net benefit, to take into account a number of specific factors. At the moment, these factors do not address either state-owned or controlled investors or national security interests.

As earlier noted, it is not clear from the public announcements made to date by Minister Prentice how the ICA might be amended to deal with a proposed investor that is owned or controlled by a foreign state. Minister Prentice highlighted the government’s interest in ensuring that such investors operate under the same standards as any other commercial enterprise operating in Canada, "including those related to transparency, good governance practices and whether they operate according to free market principles." One can easily imagine that such standards might well constitute the subject matter of new forms of undertakings beyond the scope of those that the Minister has traditionally required in connection with the approval of a proposed transaction.

Similarly, regarding Minister Prentice’s comments on national security interests in an amended ICA, it will be very important that any test ultimately enacted indeed be explicit. The previous federal government also proposed changes to the ICA legislation to permit the review of a proposed investment based on national security concerns. However, that proposed legislation (which was never enacted) rightly attracted criticism on the basis that the term "national security" was not defined. As a result, the proposals not only could potentially have been very broad in application, they could also have allowed significant government discretion.

Regardless of how these proposed new rules might ultimately be drafted, it is almost certain that the practical impact on the investment review process for foreign investors will be more delay and negotiation. Even under the current regime, it is often difficult to obtain the Minister’s approval before the expiration of the initial waiting period of up to 45 days set out in the ICA. As a result, the initial waiting period often is extended. In future, if new rules dealing with state-owned or controlled investors and national security interests are in fact adopted, it is likely that negotiations with government officials will simply take longer, and involve a more extensive set of undertakings, before the Minister ultimately makes his "net benefit" determination.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

12 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Stories aren’t falsehoods. Stories are the root of all effective human communications: they motivate, animate and clarify. If you aren’t telling stories, you probably aren’t getting your point across.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions