Canada: Agricultural Law Netletter - September 7, 2016


* The Supreme Court of British Columbia has dismissed a petition for a declaration brought by two British Columbia tree farmers that using land they owned within British Columbia's Agricultural Land Reserve for a commercial wedding business was "agri-tourism", and therefore a permitted farm use under British Columbia's Agricultural Land Commission Act and the Regulations thereunder. In a thorough and comprehensive decision, the Court concludes that the provincial Agricultural Land Commission had the exclusive jurisdiction to decide whether or not the proposed use fell within the definition of agri-tourism under the Regulations and that the Court should not usurp the Commission's exclusive jurisdiction by granting declaratory relief. The Court also provides a detailed analysis of the definition of "agri-tourism" under the Regulations. (Walters v. Agricultural Land Commission, CALN/2016-021, [2016] B.C.J. No. 1861, Supreme Court of British Columbia)


Walters v. Agricultural Land Commission;


Full text: [2016] B.C.J. No. 1861;

2016 BCSC 1618,

Supreme Court of British Columbia,

Donegan, J.,

August 31, 2016.

British Columbia Agricultural Land Reserve -- Definition of Agri-tourism -- Exclusive Jurisdiction of Provincial Agricultural Land Commission -- Availability of Declaratory Relief.

Karen Walters and Jeryl Walters (the "Walters") petitioned the Supreme Court of British Columbia for a declaration that a wedding business they carried on their land was "agri-tourism", and therefore a permitted farm use under s. 2(2) of British Columbia's Agriculture Land Reserve Use, Subdivision and Procedural Regulation, BC Reg. 171/202 (the "Regulation").

The Walters own a 79 acre property at Notch Hill, British Columbia, in the Columbia Shuswap Regional District. The property is in the British Columbia Agricultural Land Reserve.

The Walters had, for many years, operated a tree farm on the land from which they harvested flora-culture products including pine cones, willow, moss and other wild floral products in the winter months for sale to wholesalers, flower shops and individuals.

They subsequently decided to start a wedding business on their property called "Rustic Weddings" which they advertised on social media.

The Walters deposed that they held 12 weddings in 2014 and that 8 weddings had been booked for 2015 and that they only offered wedding services between May and August.

The Walters also deposed that they used the weddings to promote and market their floral products.

On July 3, 2014, a Bylaw Officer for the Columbia Shuswap Regional District (the "Regional District") wrote a letter to the Walters indicating that the Regional District had received a complaint about the use of their property for weddings and that, in the Bylaw Officer's view, doing so would put them in non-compliance with the Regional District's Zoning Bylaw as well as the Regulation. The Bylaw Officer recommended the Walters submit a non-farm use application to the Land Commission.

On July 14, 2014, a Land Commission Enforcement Officer wrote the Walters advising them that the use of land within the Agricultural Land Reserve for commercial weddings is not considered a farm use or a permitted non-farm use under the Regulations and that the land had not been approved for non-farm use. The use was therefore in contravention of s. 20 of the Land Commission Act and an offence.

The Land Commission Enforcement Officer invited the Walters to make an application to bring their property into compliance as an approved non-farm use under the Regulations and requested that commercial weddings on the property cease until the property was brought into compliance.

The Regional District took the position that if the Land Commission permitted this non-farm use, the Walters could then apply for an application for a zoning amendment to permit compliance with the Regional District's Zoning Bylaw.

The Walters responded to the Commission that, in their view, the wedding business was agri-tourism and that a non-farm use application was not necessary.

The Commission's Officer questioned the Walters' description of their wedding business, pointed out inconsistencies between the information they provided to the Commission, and information posted by the Walters on social media (including the Walters' statements that they only used existing buildings for weddings, and that they only offered wedding services from May to August), and asked for further information.

The Walters refused to comply with the Land Commission's request for information and, on June 2, 2015, filed their petition for declaratory relief.

Section 20(1) of the Agricultural Land Commission Act, S.B.C. 2002, c. 36 (the "Act") prohibits the use of agricultural land for non-farm use unless permitted by the Act. Section 1 of the Act defines "non-farm use" as "use of land other than a farm use". "Farm use" is defined as follows:

"farm use" means an occupation or use of land for farm purposes, including farming of land, plants and animals and any other similar activity designated as farm use by regulation, and includes a farm operation as defined in the Farm Practices Protection (Right to Farm) Act;

Section 2(2)(e) of the Regulation designates "agri-tourism" as a farm use. Subsection (e) provided as follows when the petition was filed:

(e) agri-tourism activities, other than accommodation, on land that is classified as a farm under the Assessment Act, if the use is temporary and seasonal, and promotes or markets farm products grown, raised or processed on the farm;

The Regulation was subsequently amended to define agri-tourism as follows:

"agri-tourism" means

  1. an activity referred to in subsection (4)

    1. that is carried out on land that is classified as a farm under the Assessment Act,
    2. to which members of the public are ordinarily invited, with or without a fee, and
    3. in connection with which permanent facilities are not constructed or erected, and
  1. services that are ancillary to activities referred to in paragraph (a);

(4) Agri-tourism on a farm means the following:

  1. an agricultural heritage exhibit displayed on the farm;
  2. a tour of the farm, an education activity or demonstration in respect of all or part of the farming operations that take place on the farm, and activities ancillary to any of these;
  3. cart, sleigh and tractor rides on the land comprising the farm;
  4. subject to section 2(2)(h), activities that promote or market livestock from the farm, whether or not the activity also involves livestock from other farms, including shows, cattle driving and petting zoos;
  5. dog trials held at the farm;
  6. harvest festivals and other seasonal events held at the farm for the purpose of promoting or marketing farm products produced on the farm;
  7. corn mazes prepared using corn planted on the farm.

The Land Commission took the position that the Court should not consider the interpretion of the Regulation, and that the Court should dismiss the petition and refuse to grant declaratory relief on the grounds that the Walters were improperly asking the Court to assume or usurp the jurisdiction of the Land Commission and were attempting to circumvent the legislative process.

Decision: Donegan, J. dismissed the Walters' petition [at para. 142].

Donegan, J. observed that the following requirements had to be satisfied in order to meet the definition of agri-tourism in the Regulation [at para. 55 to 65]:

  1. The Similarity Requirement (Act, s. 1): The specific use of the land at issue must first be found to be similar to "farming of lands, plants and animals" [at para. 56 and 57].
  2. The Tourist Requirement (Regulation, s. 1 and 2(2)(e)): The definition of "agri-tourism" gives rise to three requirements: the tourist requirement, the accessory requirement and the property assessment classification requirement. The proposed use must be a "tourist activity, service or facility" [para. 58].
  3. The Accessory Requirement (Regulation, s. 1 and 2(2)(e)): A tourist activity, service or facility must be "accessory to the land" that is classified as a farm [para. 59].
  4. The Property Assessment Classification Requirement (Regulation, s. 1 and 2(2)(e)): The tourist activity, service or facility must be accessory to the land is "classified as a farm under the Assessment Act". Standards for farmland classification for assessment purposes are prescribed under the Assessment Act and the Farmland Classification Regulations [para. 60].
  5. Temporary and Seasonal Requirement (Regulation, s. 2(2)(e)): The Regulation requires that the agri-tourism activities must be both temporary and seasonal [para 61].
  6. The Promotional or Marketing Requirement (Regulation, s. 2(2)(e)): The Regulation requires that the agri-tourism activity must promote or market products grown, raised or processed on the farm [para. 62 and 63]
  7. The Farm Products Requirement (Regulation, s. 1 and 2(2)(e)): There must be "farm products" that are promoted or marketed - that is a commodity that is produced from a farm use [para. 64].
  8. The Geographic Requirement (Regulation, s. 1 and 2(2)(e)): The farm products that are promoted and marketed must be grown, raised or processed on the farm.

Donegan, J. further observed that property owners who wished to use their land for "non-farm use" have the option of applying to the Commission to permit a non-farm use [at para. 66 to 70].

Donegan, J. concluded that a petition for a declaration under Rule 2-1(2) of the British Columbia Supreme Court Civil Rules is inappropriate where serious questions of law or fact are raised; where a decision will not end the matter but requires further proceedings to be pursued; and where the application involves not the interpretation but the enforcement of a contract [at para. 87]. The Walters' petition involved serious questions of law and fact; facts which were in dispute and the construction of the legislation which would not resolve the matter [at para. 108 to 112]. The petition was therefore not properly brought [at para. 114].

Donegan, J. also concluded that even if the petition had been properly commenced she would have declined to exercise her discretion to grant a declaration because doing so would have usurped the jurisdiction of the Land Commission, and that even if the Commission did not have exclusive jurisdiction, the Walters had adequate remedies under the Act [at para. 115 to 132].

With respect to the Commission's exclusive jurisdiction, Donegan, J. stated, at para. 121 to 123 and 125, 127 to 129:

[121] In general terms, this court has held that the Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over questions involving non-farm use and issues pertaining to the exclusion of land from the ALR: [Tree to Me Agricultural Products Inc. v. British Columbia (Agricultural Land Commission), 2010 BCSC 1647 and Boundary Bay Conservation Committee v. British Columbia (Agricultural Land Commission), 2008 BCSC 946]. Specifically, whether a particular use meets the requirements of s. 2(2)(e) of the Regulation (with the exception of the property assessment classification requirement), is within the Commission's exclusive jurisdiction: [Heather Hills Farm Society v. British Columbia (Agricultural Land Commission), 2015 BCSC 1108 at paras. 49-50].

[122] The legislature has clearly assigned jurisdiction to questions such as the one posed in the case at bar to the Commission. I agree with Mr. Justice Smith's findings at para. 47 in Heather Hills. His remarks bear repeating:

[47] The regulation at issue was enacted pursuant to the Commission's constating statute and provides an extended definition of farm use by permitting and defining agri-tourism. The question of whether that extended definition applies to any particular use is one of fact that the Commission must consider in light of its agricultural expertise, its general policies and its overall mandate to preserve agricultural land and encourage farming.

[123] The expertise of the Commission in such matters has been well canvassed in the jurisprudence. In regard to the particular expertise of the Commissioners, the evidence establishes that they are particularly well suited to grapple with these issues as its members include farmers, individuals with knowledge of agri-tourism, members of various farm-related organizations, participants in the forestry industry, greenhouse industry, ranchers and others.

[125] What the petitioners have chosen to do, by seeking this declaratory relief, is to completely circumvent the legislative regime...

[127] The petitioners' approach here deprives the court of the benefit of a thorough record. Whether a judicial review were from the Commissioner's decision on appeal or directly from an order, the court would have the benefit of a record of either one or two sets of reasons from the Commission level. In this petition, all that is before the court is a very brief affidavit from Ms. Walters exhibiting a land title search print-out and two letters. As the respondent points out, the petitioners provided no photographs, no

explanation for the differences between their conclusory statements and their online postings and advertisements and no responses to the detailed, legitimate questions Ms. Henderson asked in her November 6, 2014 letter.

[128] the petitioners' approach in this case not only sidesteps the necessary evidentiary record, it also sidesteps the Commission's important power in s. 49 of the ALCA to enter onto land, make inspections and order the production of documents. This gathering of information is a critical tool for the decision-maker. It enables the Commission official to learn more about the actual or alleged farm operations or non-farm uses of a particular property, so that the Commission can properly exercise its statutory powers of decision.

[129] The process the petitioners have chosen also runs afoul of the Supreme Court of Canada's caution in Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission), 2012 SCC 10. The Court warned against premature judicial intervention into ongoing administrative proceedings...

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions