Peter Straszynski describes the recently-recognized rights of
trans people and outlines a number of steps employers can take to
ensure that their workplace policies comply with employment and
human rights laws in Ontario.
In 2012, the Ontario Human Rights Code was amended to
add "gender identity" and "gender expression"
as prohibited grounds of discrimination.
Under the Code, everyone has the right to define their
own gender identity and to be recognized and treated as that gender
without discrimination or harassment, whether or not they have
undergone surgery or have their identity documents up to date.
Employers who deliberately choose not to hire candidates because
they are "trans-people" are in direct violation of the
Discrimination can also be "indirect", however, where
an organizational rule may appear to be neutral on its face, but
ultimately has the effect of excluding trans-people.
Employers (and businesses generally) should be aware that:
Trans people should have access to
washrooms, change rooms and other gender specific services and
facilities based on their lived gender identity
Organizations must design or change
their rules, practices and facilities to avoid negative effects on
trans people and to be more inclusive for everyone
Any exceptions must be legitimate in
the circumstances, and trans people must be provided any needed
accommodation unless it would cause undue hardship
The issue of gender identity and expression is one that has
recently earned much publicity and is quickly becoming a greater
and more frequent reality in the workplace.
Proactive employers should be updating their workplace
discrimination and harassment policies and training their
management and staff on this emerging area of employment and human
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The Ontario Court of Appeal has held that the words "accept business", in what the employer intended to be a non-solicitation clause, served to restrict competition and is therefore not merely a non-solicitation clause.
A shelter support worker's persistent pattern of sexual comments to five female coworkers justified his dismissal for cause, despite the coworkers' failure to promptly report the incidents, a labour arbitrator has decided.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).