On August 12, 2016, Justice Suko of the U.S. District Court
(Eastern District of Washington) ruled that Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd., a
Canadian company, was liable to the Confederated Tribes of the
Coleville Reservation for "response costs" of $8.25
million, plus prejudgment interest, under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response and Liability Act (CERCLA). The Tribe
alleged that Teck, as a result of its Canadian operations located
in Trail, British Columbia along Lake Roosevelt, deposited
hazardous substances into the Upper Columbia River and was liable
under CERCLA in the United States.
The case has had a long history and is still not over. The suit
was launched in 2004, and promptly challenged on jurisdictional
grounds by Teck, on the basis that US law could not apply to what a
Canadian company lawfully does in Canada. As we
reported in 2008, the US Supreme Court concluded that US law
could apply to a Canadian company and the suit proceeded.
Response costs include the costs of removal or remedial action
incurred by the US Government, a state or an Indian Tribe,
consistent with the national contingency plan; and for injury to,
destruction of, or loss of natural resources, including the
reasonable costs of assessing such injury, destruction, or loss
resulting from such a release (42 U.S.C. Section 9607).
Conclusions of Law declaring Defendant Teck Metals, Ltd. is
jointly and severally liable for past and future response costs ...
and determining the amount of past response costs for which Teck is
liable ... allows for a prompt appeal of the Phase I and Phase II
findings and conclusions. ... Before commencement of Phase III
litigation, efficiency is best served by full appellant resolution
of response cost liability and the amount of recoverable response
Subject to any appeals, the next phase of the litigation will be
in relation to response costs for injury to, destruction of, or
loss of natural resources. The company reports that it is reviewing its options.
As we also reported earlier this year, Teck was
fined $3 million in Fisheries Act fines for the release of
substances deleterious to fish in the Columbia River.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The Imperial Oil refinery pled guilty to one offence for discharging a contaminant, coker stabilizer, thermocracked gas, into the natural environment causing an adverse effect and was fined $650,000...
Ontario's Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change continues to roll out its Climate Change Action Plan with its proposed GHG guide for projects that are subject to the province's Environmental Assessment Act.
In June, 2016, Justice Faieta of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded damages of $57,712.31 plus interest against legal counsel who failed to file a claim within the required limitation period.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).