Canada: July 2016 Pensions Newsletter

CURRENCY CONVERSION FOR TAXATION OF WORKPLACE BENEFITS

Korfage v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 69

Herman Korfage was a Canadian resident receiving pension income from the United States. In 2000, he elected to convert his pension amount from American dollars to Canadian dollars, using the applicable exchange rate: the average exchange rate over the 36 months preceding his last month of employment. This exchange rate was 1.47.

In 2010, Mr. Korfage received C$59,753 from the plan. Under the Canada-United States Convention with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital (Treaty), there was a tax exemption available to Mr. Korfage for US$12,024 of pension income, based on the amount of pension income that would be non-taxable under U.S. tax law. In order to claim this deduction, Mr. Korfage was required to convert US$12,024 into Canadian dollars. The exchange rate used in this calculation is the subject of this dispute.

Over the preceding eight years, Mr. Korfage had been applying the Bank of Canada annual average exchange rate for each year for the purposes of calculating the deduction. In 2009, however, he requested a refund from Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) on the grounds that he should have been using the 1.47 exchange rate used in 2000, when he elected to convert his pension from American to Canadian dollars. To determine which exchange rate to use, the Tax Court of Canada had to determine the date the tax-exempt amount "arose."

Mr. Korfage argued that the tax-exempt amount arose on the date of his retirement, so every calculation should use the exchange rate as of that date. The Crown argued that the tax exempt amount arises on a monthly basis with each benefit payment received by Mr. Korfage

Justice Lamarre sided with the Crown. She ruled that according to documents related to the U.S.-based pension plan, as well as Internal Revenue Service tax guidance documents, it was clear that the tax-exempt amount arose on a monthly basis when Mr. Korfage received his benefit payment. According to section 261(1) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (ITA), the "relevant spot rate" for a currency conversion is the rate quoted by the Bank of Canada on the day the amount arose, or another rate acceptable to the Minister of National Revenue (Minister). In this case, the Minister accepted an annual average exchange rate, which fell within the definition in section 261(1) of the ITA.

Tax Court of Canada Decision

Ferlaino v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 105

Natale Ferlaino was granted stock options in 2000 and 2002, but he exercised them in 2010 and 2012. The benefit was paid in American dollars. For tax reporting purposes, the benefit had to be converted to Canadian dollars. The question in this case was how to calculate the benefit with respect to the conversion to Canadian dollars. The structure of the benefit was such that Mr. Ferlaino was granted the option to purchase the shares in the future at a set price. When Mr. Ferlaino exercised his option to purchase the shares in 2010 and 2012 (at US$35.25 and US$33.50 respectively), the shares were worth far more on the open market (US$75.75 and US$78.60). Mr. Ferlaino immediately sold his newly acquired shares on the open market for a substantial profit. His benefit, therefore, was the amount he sold his shares for, minus the amount he bought them for.

In declaring this benefit under section 7 of the ITA, Mr. Ferlaino calculated the sale price of the shares on the open market using the exchange rate at the time of exercise (when the two currencies were close to par), and calculated his own cost of the shares using the exchange rate at the time the options were granted (in 2000 and 2002, when the U.S. dollar was worth approximately 1.5 Canadian dollars). This had the effect of dramatically increasing the tax cost of the shares and consequently decreasing the value of the declared benefit, netting Mr. Ferlaino major tax savings.

Justice Smith ruled that the wording of section 7 of the ITA indicated that a stock option benefit is not recognized for tax purposes until the stock (or cash consideration in lieu thereof) is in the hands of the taxpayer. While the granting of an unexercised stock option conveys theoretical value to an employee, as a matter of policy the ITA ignores this value's existence until its benefit is quantifiable.

Section 261 of the ITA deals with converting income to Canadian currency for tax reporting. This section indicates that the day on which the taxable amount arose determines the appropriate exchange rate to use.

Justice Smith ruled that both the sale price and the cost base of the shares to which the relevant options related should be valued based on the exchange rate at the time of the exercise of those stock options.

Tax Court of Canada Decision

PENSION ADMINISTRATION

Groskopf v. Shoppers Drug Mart Inc., 2016 ONCA 486

As discussed in the December 2015 Pensions Newsletter, the applicants in Boys v. Shoppers, 2015 ONSC 5870 had the value of statutory grow-in benefits received in connection with their registered pension plan entitlements excluded in (and effectively deducted from) the calculation of their additional entitlements under a supplementary executive retirement plan (SERP). This decision centred on the interpretation of the text of the SERP and the extent to which grow-in benefits were to be considered in determining the benefit payable from the underlying registered plan (and deducted from the value of the member's pension benefit, calculated without reference to ITA maximum pension limits). The applicants appealed that decision to the Ontario Court of Appeal. The appeal was denied on the grounds that the Superior Court judge's interpretation was reasonable as it: (1) correctly applied principles of contractual interpretation, (2) was alert to the sponsor's exclusive right reserved under the plan text to interpret the plan and make conclusive determinations with respect to benefit entitlements, (3) was supported by the plan text, and (4) in the face of conflicting actuarial testimony, reasonably accepted the testimony of the administrator's actuary.

The Court of Appeal also declined to reverse the lower court finding that costs were not payable from the SERP.

Ontario Court of Appeal Decision

McKearney-Morgan v. Morgan, 2016 NSSC 79

Upon termination of the parties' very brief marriage, Justice Legere Sers of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, Family Division awarded the applicant, Michelle Marie McKearney-Morgan, a 35-per-cent interest in the respondent's, John Bernard Morgan, workplace pension pursuant to section 4(1) of the Matrimonial Property Act (Nova Scotia) (MPA). This interest — valued at C$44,818.90 — was substantially more than the maximum benefit available to Ms. McKearney-Morgan under section 74(2) of the Pension Benefits Act (Nova Scotia) (PBA), which limits marital property divisions to 50 per cent of the pension benefit earned during the marriage. In this case, the maximum division under section 74(2) was valued at C$2,822. Therefore, the marital division order was directly at odds with the PBA.

Mr. Morgan's pension plan administrator (Administrator), after consultation with the Nova Scotia pension regulator, declined to follow the judge's order on the basis of the conflict with the PBA. It instead transferred the maximum permitted amount under the PBA, C$2,822. Ms. McKearney-Morgan brought this motion for directions so that she could enforce the order and obtain the additional interest in her former husband's pension.

The jurisprudence regarding conflicts between the MPA and the PBA holds that the two statutes can be interpreted such that they can coexist. In Morash v. Morash, 2004 NSCA 20, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal concluded that the two statutory provisions were not in conflict because the PBA does not purport to govern entitlement. It merely provides a mechanism for the division of pension benefits. In other words, the Administrator is solely responsible for administering the order while the courts, under the authority of the MPA, determine entitlement.

The court noted that this does little to prevent the situation at hand, where a court order under the MPA can be effectively frustrated by the PBA, and identified necessary legislative action to resolve this conflict between statutes. Due to this legislative impasse, the court concluded that its only recourse was to establish a trust over the portion of the pension benefit (which had been transferred to a locked-in retirement account) that represented the balance of the former wife's marital property entitlement, and order that the former husband serve as trustee on behalf of his former wife. The court acknowledges that this is a less than satisfactory remedy because it depends on the cooperation of the husband and does not guarantee that her entitlement will be realized in the future.

Supreme Court of Nova Scotia Decision

CLASS ACTIONS

Lacroix v. CMHC and McCann v. CMHC, 2016 ONSC 2641

As discussed in our April 2015 Pensions Newsletter and July 2015 Pensions Newsletter, the class action proceeding in Lacroix v. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. was first certified by consent order in 2000, and a companion action, McCann v. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. was certified in 2002. Certain additional common issues were added to the certification order in Lacroix v. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp., 2015 ONSC 387 and McCann v. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp., 2015 ONSC 496. The defendants, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, appealed from these 2015 decisions. The appeal of the certification decision was dismissed.

Ontario Divisional Court Decision

FAMILY LAW

Parrett v. Parrett, 2016 BCCA 151

In our December 2015 Pensions Newsletter, we discussed W.G.P. v. D.F.P., 2015 BCSC 1791, regarding the division of a judge's judicial annuity under section 52.16 of the Judges Act (British Columbia). In that case, Justice Hinkson ruled that a judicial annuity divided pursuant to a separation order should not be subject to further divisions for the purposes of spousal support variation later on. He ruled that this would amount to double recovery and is also explicitly prohibited by the Judges Act.

This decision was overturned on appeal. The B.C. Court of Appeal found that the lower court decision did not consider whether it would be appropriate to divide the portion of the annuity that had accrued since the separation. That portion of the annuity had not been subject to division under the original division (because it did not exist yet), and therefore double recovery would not be an issue. Furthermore, the relevant portion of the Judges Act prohibiting more than one division of an annuity specifically states that it only applies "in respect of the same period." The B.C. Court of Appeal interpreted this to mean that more than one division of an annuity could occur, provided the amounts being divided related to separate periods of time.

British Columbia Court of Appeal Decision

Lade v. Perreault, 2016 BCSC 535

The respondent, Paul Edmond Perreault, had worked for B.C. Rail for many years. Upon termination of his employment in 2002, a portability election was made and the commuted value of his B.C. Rail pension benefits was transferred to a locked-in registered account (LIRA). Mr. Perreault and the claimant, Betty Lade, married after the transfer to the LIRA and separated in 2013. The issue in this decision was how to characterize Mr. Perreault's LIRA for the purposes of the division of marital property.

Ms. Lade argued that the LIRA was an asset under section 5 of the Family Law Act (British Columbia) (FLA) while Mr. Perreault argued that it was a pension under section 6 of the FLA. If it were considered a pension, it would not be divided at all and would stay with Mr. Perreault because the entire period of accrual occurred prior to the marital relationship. If it were considered a family asset, then Ms. Lade would be entitled to one half of the growth of the LIRA during the marriage, which amounted to C$54,575.50.

Justice Hyslop ruled that the LIRA was an asset under section 5 of the FLA because it was a registered retirement savings plan (RRSP). According to section 96 of the Pension Benefits Standards Regulation (British Columbia), an RRSP is a LIRA if it includes locked-in money. The court concluded that there is ample support for the argument that an RRSP is an asset, not a pension, for the purposes of family property. Therefore, Ms. Lade was entitled to half of the LIRA's earnings accrued over the course of the relationship.

British Columbia Supreme Court Decision

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.