Canada: Impact Of Redwater Energy Outside Alberta: A British Columbia Perspective


Since the Honourable Chief Justice of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench released the decision in Redwater Energy Corporation (Re), 2016 ABQB 278 ("Redwater"), much has been written about its implications for various stakeholders in Alberta. What has received less attention is the impact that Redwater may have outside of Alberta.

Although Redwater concerned a relatively small producer, it attracted significant interest since it highlighted growing tensions between secured lenders and regulators. This is a battle of increasing interest as insolvencies mount and environmental issues command greater attention. It is also a dispute that plays out across the country in a variety of industries.

We will not attempt a full recap of the Redwater decision, which has been ably and fully discussed in earlier articles.


However, by way of brief background, Redwater Energy Corporation ("REC") was an oil and gas company with a number of licensed properties throughout Alberta. Its primary secured creditor (Alberta Treasury Branches) appointed Grant Thornton Limited ("GTL") as receiver of REC in May 2015. GTL took possession of REC's assets, and in July 2015 disclaimed 107 out of 127 licensed assets. This allowed GTL to take possession of REC's most valuable assets, renouncing the non-producing wells and facilities. The value of the disclaimed assets was less than the anticipated costs to meet their end of life environmental obligations. GTL proposed to sell the remaining valuable assets, and sought court approval for a sales process for those remaining assets.

The Alberta Energy Regulator and Orphan Well Association jointly applied for a declaration that the disclaimer was void, and for an order compelling the receiver to fulfill the licensee's obligations with respect to abandonment, reclamation and remediation of REC's licensed assets.

Redwater involved two key questions:

  1. whether receivers and trustees in bankruptcy could disclaim licensed assets; and,
  2. whether the regulator could force receivers/trustees to comply with the applicable abandonment and reclamation obligations.

The Court held that receivers and trustees in bankruptcy can disclaim licensed assets. This, effectively, allows the receiver/trustee to pick and choose assets and avoid the statutory obligations and regulatory orders that accompany certain assets.

Similarly, the regulator did not have authority to force the receiver or trustee in bankruptcy to assume the monetary consequences of abandonment or reclamation. The obligation is that of the debtor company, and for those amounts, the regulator cannot claim priority over other creditors of the bankrupt licensee.

The regulator has appealed. However, until the Alberta Court of Appeal issues its decision, Redwater will remain in effect.


The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985 c.B-3 ("BIA") s.14.06(4) provides clear authority for trustees to renounce assets, without any personal liability for environmental abandonment and remediation work. This authority is broad and empowers receivers and trustees to disclaim any asset(s) it considers uneconomic.

The Alberta Energy Regulator argued, among other things, that the trustee had to act, at least in part, in the public interest and that allowing a licensee to ignore its statutory obligations would conflict with the Alberta Oil and Gas Conservation Act, R.S.A. 2000 c.O-6 (the "Alberta OGC") and the Alberta Pipeline Act, R.S.A. 2000 c.P-15 (the "Alberta PA"). The Alberta OGC and the Alberta PA definitions of "licensee" included receivers and trustees.

The Court in Redwater found that there was an operational conflict between the BIA and the Alberta OGC and the Alberta PA. This created two problems for the provincial legislation: (a) compliance with both the provincial and federal legislation was impossible; and (b) the provincial legislation frustrated the legislative purpose of the BIA by purporting to impose restrictions, conditions or limitations on the powers conferred by the BIA and by purporting to impose liability that is not consistent with the BIA.

Redwater confirms that where a BIA disclaimer triggers environmental obligations, to the extent those obligations are monetary, the cost cannot be claimed against the receiver/trustee or as a priority claim against the debtor's other assets.

This is consistent with the approach taken in cases pursuant to the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985 c.C-36 (the "CCAA") which establish clear authority for environmental orders to be stayed and compromised in insolvency proceedings where those orders are monetary in nature.

In reaching its decision, the Court in Redwater considered the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Newfoundland and Labrador v. AbitibiBowater Inc. ("Abitibi") (and its application by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Nortel Networks Corporation (Re), 2013 ONCA 599 ("Nortel") and Northstar Aerospace Inc. (Re), 2013 ONCA 600 ("Northstar")). Each of Abitibi, Nortel and Northstar concerned CCAA proceedings. In Abitibi, the Supreme Court of Canada established a three-part test for determining whether environmental orders are "provable claims" that can be stayed and compromised in insolvency proceedings. Satisfying the Abitibi test generally hinges on whether it is "sufficiently certain" that the regulator will perform the remediation required by the order and to seek reimbursement. If it is, then it is subject to the insolvency process (as was the outcome in Abitibi and Northstar). If it is not, then it is not subject to the insolvency process (as was the outcome in Nortel).

In that regard, it is important to recall that the BIA s.14.06(7) provides that government claims for remediation costs are secured by a charge against the affected property. That charge ranks above any other claims, charges or security, including secured lenders. However, the charge is limited to the affected property and does not extend to any of the debtor's other assets. The practical effect is that where remediation costs exceed the value of the property, it is ceded to the applicable government. Where the debtor holds a number of properties, those with equity can be retained and sold, with the proceeds distributed in accordance with the priorities (with the secured lenders being paid first, with the exception of certain super-priority claims, including taxes and the realization costs).

It is also important to recall that the BIA sections 14.06(4) and 14.06(7) track the language of the CCAA sections 11.8(5) and 11.8(8). The language between these sections of the BIA and CCAA contain only non-material differences. Accordingly, the decision in Redwater would apply equally in proceedings under the CCAA (whether those proceedings were a restructuring or liquidation.)

Implications of Redwater in BC

As noted above, the Alberta OGC and the Alberta PA definitions of "licensee" included receivers and trustees. The Alberta Energy Regulator used that, in part, to argue that a receiver or trustee is bound by environmental orders and directors. The equivalent definition in the British Columbia Oil and Gas Activities Act, S.B.C. 2008 c.36 (the "BC OGAA") is a "permit holder". The definition of "permit holder" does not include receivers or trustees. Accordingly, BC regulators could not raise the same argument that was raised by the Alberta Energy Regulator (and rejected by the Court) in Redwater.

More broadly, British Columbia producers are also subject to the Environmental Management Act, S.B.C. 2003 c.53 (the "EMA") and the Contaminated Sites Regulation, B.C. Reg. 4/2014 (the "CS Regulation"). The EMA and the CS Regulation each contain provisions with respect to remediation and clean-up costs. To the extent that these provisions are consistent with the BIA, Redwater would not change their effect and application. In particular:

  • The EMA provides that the government has a priority lien for clean-up costs if it carries out the remediation, but the lien is limited to the contaminated site (but not the debtor's other properties). This is consistent with the BIA s.14.06(7).
  • The CS Regulation specifies that receivers and trustees cannot be personally liable for remediation of contaminated sites. This is consistent with the BIA s.14.06(2).

The CS Regulation also provides that receivers can be responsible for remediation "to the extent of the receivership", which is defined as: (a) the limit of available funds; and (b) the period between the receiver's appointment and discharge. If a receiver doesn't have sufficient funds to carry out the remediation, they notify the regulator and that ends the receiver's obligations.

There may be some possibility that BC regulators argue that the "limit of available funds" relates to the debtor's cash assets, regardless of other creditors or security interests. To the extent such an argument is raised, pursuant to Redwater, the CS Regulation conflicts with the BIA and is inoperative to the extent it purports to grant priority. However, it is also important to note that nothing in the CS Regulation specifically addresses priorities, and the only provision of the EMA with respect to priority provides that the remediation expenses have priority only over the contaminated site. Even aside from the conflict with the BIA, this interpretation appears to conflict with the EMA priorities. It would seem to be an unreasonable interpretation of the CS regulation and the EMA to say that remediation costs have priority over all assets if the receiver does the clean-up work, but only over the contaminated site if it is done by the government.

Finally, the OGAA provides that the BC Oil and Gas Commission (the "BC Commission") has the authority to impose conditions on permits as it considers necessary. In practice, the BC Commission applies a formula to identify producers whose liabilities exceed their assets (the liability management rating or "LMR"). Where the LMR is less than 1.0, the BC Commission requires that the producer post security. The requirement to post security can be imposed on any producer, including those in receivership (if they wish to maintain the validity of their permit). However, Redwater makes clear that the receiver can disclaim assets to improve the LMR and avoid the security requirement.

Redwater confirms that provincial legislation cannot limit the trustee's disclaimer power, disrupt BIA priorities or purport to give the regulator or government additional security for reclamation or remediation obligations. This applies to any industry with environmental implications and possible reclamation obligations, including mining, forestry and oil and gas.

This gives receivers and trustees significant power to cull uneconomic assets to maximize value for the debtor's stakeholders, but transfers the remediation costs and economic risks to the regulators and governments. If the applicable government (regulator) has not taken cash security, or has not taken sufficient cash security, its recourse will be limited to the contaminated asset.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lawson Lundell LLP
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lawson Lundell LLP
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions