Canada: Impact Of Redwater Energy Outside Alberta: A British Columbia Perspective

Last Updated: July 8 2016
Article by Lisa Hiebert and Rick Williams

Most Read Contributor in Canada, September 2016


Since the Honourable Chief Justice of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench released the decision in Redwater Energy Corporation (Re), 2016 ABQB 278 ("Redwater"), much has been written about its implications for various stakeholders in Alberta. What has received less attention is the impact that Redwater may have outside of Alberta.

Although Redwater concerned a relatively small producer, it attracted significant interest since it highlighted growing tensions between secured lenders and regulators. This is a battle of increasing interest as insolvencies mount and environmental issues command greater attention. It is also a dispute that plays out across the country in a variety of industries.

We will not attempt a full recap of the Redwater decision, which has been ably and fully discussed in earlier articles.


However, by way of brief background, Redwater Energy Corporation ("REC") was an oil and gas company with a number of licensed properties throughout Alberta. Its primary secured creditor (Alberta Treasury Branches) appointed Grant Thornton Limited ("GTL") as receiver of REC in May 2015. GTL took possession of REC's assets, and in July 2015 disclaimed 107 out of 127 licensed assets. This allowed GTL to take possession of REC's most valuable assets, renouncing the non-producing wells and facilities. The value of the disclaimed assets was less than the anticipated costs to meet their end of life environmental obligations. GTL proposed to sell the remaining valuable assets, and sought court approval for a sales process for those remaining assets.

The Alberta Energy Regulator and Orphan Well Association jointly applied for a declaration that the disclaimer was void, and for an order compelling the receiver to fulfill the licensee's obligations with respect to abandonment, reclamation and remediation of REC's licensed assets.

Redwater involved two key questions:

  1. whether receivers and trustees in bankruptcy could disclaim licensed assets; and,
  2. whether the regulator could force receivers/trustees to comply with the applicable abandonment and reclamation obligations.

The Court held that receivers and trustees in bankruptcy can disclaim licensed assets. This, effectively, allows the receiver/trustee to pick and choose assets and avoid the statutory obligations and regulatory orders that accompany certain assets.

Similarly, the regulator did not have authority to force the receiver or trustee in bankruptcy to assume the monetary consequences of abandonment or reclamation. The obligation is that of the debtor company, and for those amounts, the regulator cannot claim priority over other creditors of the bankrupt licensee.

The regulator has appealed. However, until the Alberta Court of Appeal issues its decision, Redwater will remain in effect.


The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985 c.B-3 ("BIA") s.14.06(4) provides clear authority for trustees to renounce assets, without any personal liability for environmental abandonment and remediation work. This authority is broad and empowers receivers and trustees to disclaim any asset(s) it considers uneconomic.

The Alberta Energy Regulator argued, among other things, that the trustee had to act, at least in part, in the public interest and that allowing a licensee to ignore its statutory obligations would conflict with the Alberta Oil and Gas Conservation Act, R.S.A. 2000 c.O-6 (the "Alberta OGC") and the Alberta Pipeline Act, R.S.A. 2000 c.P-15 (the "Alberta PA"). The Alberta OGC and the Alberta PA definitions of "licensee" included receivers and trustees.

The Court in Redwater found that there was an operational conflict between the BIA and the Alberta OGC and the Alberta PA. This created two problems for the provincial legislation: (a) compliance with both the provincial and federal legislation was impossible; and (b) the provincial legislation frustrated the legislative purpose of the BIA by purporting to impose restrictions, conditions or limitations on the powers conferred by the BIA and by purporting to impose liability that is not consistent with the BIA.

Redwater confirms that where a BIA disclaimer triggers environmental obligations, to the extent those obligations are monetary, the cost cannot be claimed against the receiver/trustee or as a priority claim against the debtor's other assets.

This is consistent with the approach taken in cases pursuant to the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985 c.C-36 (the "CCAA") which establish clear authority for environmental orders to be stayed and compromised in insolvency proceedings where those orders are monetary in nature.

In reaching its decision, the Court in Redwater considered the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Newfoundland and Labrador v. AbitibiBowater Inc. ("Abitibi") (and its application by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Nortel Networks Corporation (Re), 2013 ONCA 599 ("Nortel") and Northstar Aerospace Inc. (Re), 2013 ONCA 600 ("Northstar")). Each of Abitibi, Nortel and Northstar concerned CCAA proceedings. In Abitibi, the Supreme Court of Canada established a three-part test for determining whether environmental orders are "provable claims" that can be stayed and compromised in insolvency proceedings. Satisfying the Abitibi test generally hinges on whether it is "sufficiently certain" that the regulator will perform the remediation required by the order and to seek reimbursement. If it is, then it is subject to the insolvency process (as was the outcome in Abitibi and Northstar). If it is not, then it is not subject to the insolvency process (as was the outcome in Nortel).

In that regard, it is important to recall that the BIA s.14.06(7) provides that government claims for remediation costs are secured by a charge against the affected property. That charge ranks above any other claims, charges or security, including secured lenders. However, the charge is limited to the affected property and does not extend to any of the debtor's other assets. The practical effect is that where remediation costs exceed the value of the property, it is ceded to the applicable government. Where the debtor holds a number of properties, those with equity can be retained and sold, with the proceeds distributed in accordance with the priorities (with the secured lenders being paid first, with the exception of certain super-priority claims, including taxes and the realization costs).

It is also important to recall that the BIA sections 14.06(4) and 14.06(7) track the language of the CCAA sections 11.8(5) and 11.8(8). The language between these sections of the BIA and CCAA contain only non-material differences. Accordingly, the decision in Redwater would apply equally in proceedings under the CCAA (whether those proceedings were a restructuring or liquidation.)

Implications of Redwater in BC

As noted above, the Alberta OGC and the Alberta PA definitions of "licensee" included receivers and trustees. The Alberta Energy Regulator used that, in part, to argue that a receiver or trustee is bound by environmental orders and directors. The equivalent definition in the British Columbia Oil and Gas Activities Act, S.B.C. 2008 c.36 (the "BC OGAA") is a "permit holder". The definition of "permit holder" does not include receivers or trustees. Accordingly, BC regulators could not raise the same argument that was raised by the Alberta Energy Regulator (and rejected by the Court) in Redwater.

More broadly, British Columbia producers are also subject to the Environmental Management Act, S.B.C. 2003 c.53 (the "EMA") and the Contaminated Sites Regulation, B.C. Reg. 4/2014 (the "CS Regulation"). The EMA and the CS Regulation each contain provisions with respect to remediation and clean-up costs. To the extent that these provisions are consistent with the BIA, Redwater would not change their effect and application. In particular:

  • The EMA provides that the government has a priority lien for clean-up costs if it carries out the remediation, but the lien is limited to the contaminated site (but not the debtor's other properties). This is consistent with the BIA s.14.06(7).
  • The CS Regulation specifies that receivers and trustees cannot be personally liable for remediation of contaminated sites. This is consistent with the BIA s.14.06(2).

The CS Regulation also provides that receivers can be responsible for remediation "to the extent of the receivership", which is defined as: (a) the limit of available funds; and (b) the period between the receiver's appointment and discharge. If a receiver doesn't have sufficient funds to carry out the remediation, they notify the regulator and that ends the receiver's obligations.

There may be some possibility that BC regulators argue that the "limit of available funds" relates to the debtor's cash assets, regardless of other creditors or security interests. To the extent such an argument is raised, pursuant to Redwater, the CS Regulation conflicts with the BIA and is inoperative to the extent it purports to grant priority. However, it is also important to note that nothing in the CS Regulation specifically addresses priorities, and the only provision of the EMA with respect to priority provides that the remediation expenses have priority only over the contaminated site. Even aside from the conflict with the BIA, this interpretation appears to conflict with the EMA priorities. It would seem to be an unreasonable interpretation of the CS regulation and the EMA to say that remediation costs have priority over all assets if the receiver does the clean-up work, but only over the contaminated site if it is done by the government.

Finally, the OGAA provides that the BC Oil and Gas Commission (the "BC Commission") has the authority to impose conditions on permits as it considers necessary. In practice, the BC Commission applies a formula to identify producers whose liabilities exceed their assets (the liability management rating or "LMR"). Where the LMR is less than 1.0, the BC Commission requires that the producer post security. The requirement to post security can be imposed on any producer, including those in receivership (if they wish to maintain the validity of their permit). However, Redwater makes clear that the receiver can disclaim assets to improve the LMR and avoid the security requirement.

Redwater confirms that provincial legislation cannot limit the trustee's disclaimer power, disrupt BIA priorities or purport to give the regulator or government additional security for reclamation or remediation obligations. This applies to any industry with environmental implications and possible reclamation obligations, including mining, forestry and oil and gas.

This gives receivers and trustees significant power to cull uneconomic assets to maximize value for the debtor's stakeholders, but transfers the remediation costs and economic risks to the regulators and governments. If the applicable government (regulator) has not taken cash security, or has not taken sufficient cash security, its recourse will be limited to the contaminated asset.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.