Canada: Takeover Battles: New Limits On Maximizing Shareholder Value?

Last Updated: July 16 2007
Article by Michael Schafler and Matthew Fleming

Directors of a company that is 'in play' have a fiduciary obligation to maximize shareholder value. One would have thought that this rule would always prevail. However, in Ventas Inc v Sunrise Senior Living Real Estate Investment Trust1 the courts of Ontario preferred to subject the rule to an important exception: a 'superior proposal' that would otherwise maximize shareholder value will be prohibited from being considered by the target's directors and shareholders if it is made in contravention of the auction process established to sell the target company.


In September 2006 the board of trustees of Sunrise Senior Living Real Estate Investment Trust, a Canadian public real estate investment trust whose units are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, determined that it would conduct a sale of the units or assets of Sunrise through a confidential auction process. Purchasers that were approached by Sunrise's financial advisers and were interested in exploring a possible acquisition were required to enter into confidentiality agreements which also contained standstill provisions. Two of the parties which entered into confidentiality agreements with Sunrise and made initial bids included Ventas, Inc, a healthcare real estate investment trust with shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and Health Care Property Investors, Inc, a self-administered real estate investment trust. Ventas's agreement with Sunrise included a provision whereby the standstill clause would no longer apply if Sunrise entered into an agreement to sell more than 20% of its assets to a third party. Health Care Property Investors' agreement did not contain a similar provision.

Following the first round of bidding, Sunrise invited Ventas and Health Care Property Investors to conduct further negotiations and submit final binding bids, warning each that they should not assume that they would be given the opportunity to renegotiate or improve their offer. At this stage, Ventas submitted a second offer, while Health Care Property Investors withdrew from the auction. Thereafter, Sunrise and Ventas entered into an acquisition agreement pursuant to which Ventas would acquire all of Sunrise's assets for approximately C$1.138 billion, representing a price of C$15 per Sunrise unit, provided that Sunrise's unit holders voted in favour of the acquisition. Sunrise subsequently issued a press release to this effect, notified Health Care Property Investors of the agreement with Ventas, requested the return of Sunrise's confidential materials and reminded Health Care Property Investors of its obligations under the terms of its confidentiality and standstill agreement with Sunrise.

Health Care Property Investors then submitted a proposal to acquire all of Sunrise's assets at an amount representing C$18 per Sunrise unit and issued its own press release announcing that it had done so. Ventas and Sunrise each filed urgent applications in the Commercial List (a specialized section of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice with expertise in commercial matters) and Health Care Property Investors was joined as a necessary party.

First Instance Decision

In essence, the issue was whether (i) as argued by Ventas, Clause 4(4)(8)(v) of the purchase agreement required Sunrise to enforce the standstill provisions of its confidentiality agreement with Health Care Property Investors, or (ii) as argued by Health Care Property Investors and Sunrise, Clause 4(4)(3) of the purchase agreement provided for a 'fiduciary out' that allowed the trustees to consider Health Care Property Investors' proposal and thereby maximize unit holder value. The salient provisions of the purchase agreement were as follows:

"4.4(1) Following the date hereof, Sunrise shall not...

(i) solicit, initiate, encourage or otherwise facilitate… the initiation of any inquiries or proposals regarding, or other action that constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to lead to, an actual or potential acquisition proposal;

(ii) participate in any discussions or negotiations in furtherance of such inquiries or proposals or regarding an actual potential acquisition proposal or release any person from, or fail to enforce any confidentiality or standstill agreement or similar obligations to Sunrise or any of its subsidiaries...

(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 4(4)(1), until the unit holder approval, nothing shall prevent the board from withdrawing or modifying, or proposing publicly to withdraw or modify its approval and recommendation of the transactions contemplated by this agreement, or accepting, approving or recommending or entering into any agreement, understanding or arrangement providing for a bona fide written, unsolicited acquisition proposal (that did not result from a breach of Section 4(4)) if and only to the extent that …

(ii) the board, believes in good faith (after consultation with its financial adviser and legal counsel) that such acquisition proposal constitutes a superior proposal and has promptly notified the purchasers of such determination …

(8) Sunrise shall …

(v) not amend, modify, waive or fail to enforce any of the standstill terms or other conditions included in any of the confidentiality agreements between Sunrise and any third parties."2

The applications judge interpreted Section 4(4) of the purchase agreement to impose a clear and unambiguous obligation on Sunrise to enforce the standstill provisions of its confidentiality agreement with Health Care Property Investors and any other third parties. In doing so, the judge found, among other things, that the scheme of the purchase agreement was to enforce standstill agreements that had been signed as part of the auction process. The court found that it was a reasonable form of protection for Ventas, which also permitted Sunrise to consider proposals in good faith from third parties which were not subject to standstill provisions. The applications judge also referred to the fact that the parties to the purchase agreement were sophisticated and had been represented throughout by prominent law firms and financial advisers.

Ontario Court of Appeal Decision

In dismissing subsequent appeals by Sunrise and Health Care Property Investors, the Ontario Court of Appeal defined the central issue in the same narrow fashion as the court of first instance - namely, whether the provisions of Section 4(4) of the purchase agreement imposed an obligation on Sunrise to enforce the standstill provisions of its agreement with Health Care Property Investors. This can be contrasted with at least one potential alternative characterization of the issue before the court - that is, whether an apparent obligation to enforce standstill provisions could be sustained where the enforcement of the standstill would deprive unit holders of greater value for their units.

The court found that the applications judge had correctly applied the relevant principles of contractual interpretation and agreed that an important purpose of Section 4(4) was the enforcement of standstill agreements entered into by participants in the auction process. The court further rejected Sunrise's and Health Care Property Investors' arguments that the fiduciary out clause applied to any 'acquisition proposal', as that term was defined in the purchase agreement, finding instead that it applied only to proposals which were not in breach of Section 4(4) of the purchase agreement.

The court effectively held that a superior bid by a participant in the auction process which remained subject to a standstill was not in good faith and, therefore, was not permitted under the fiduciary out clause in Section 4(4)(3).3 Moreover, the court noted, like the applications judge, that the fiduciary out clause could have read as follows: "Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 4(4)(1) or Section 4(4)(8)." Further, the court declined to apply the US authorities relied upon by Sunrise and Health Care Property Investors, which suggested that a target vendor can place no limits on the directors' right to consider superior offers and that any provision to the contrary is invalid and unenforceable.4 In this regard, the court concluded as follows:

"The trustees did not contract away their fiduciary obligations. Rather, they complied with them by setting up an auction process, in consultation with their professional advisers, that was designed to maximize the unit price obtained for Sunrise's assets, in a fashion resembling a 'shotgun' clause, by requiring bidders to come up with their best price in the second round, subject to a fiduciary out clause that allowed them to consider superior offers from anyone save only those which had bound themselves by a standstill agreement in the auction process not to make such a bid. In this case that turned out to be only Health Care Property Investors.

An auction process is well accepted as being one - although only one - appropriate mechanism to ensure that the board of a target company acts in a neutral manner to achieve the best value reasonably available to shareholders in the circumstances... I do not think the trustees can be said to have failed in the exercise of their fiduciary obligations to their unit holders in these circumstances simply by agreeing in the purchase agreement to preclude earlier bidders, which had bound themselves under standstill agreements not to do so, from coming in after the auction was concluded and the successful bidder had showed its cards and attempting to top up that bid."5


The applications judge and the court of appeal both commented that the Sunrise unit holders had the option of voting against the Ventas transaction (which would permit Sunrise to terminate the purchase agreement) if they were of the view that a better offer might be possible. Although both courts couched these statements in general terms, it is clear that they were referring to the possibility that Health Care Property Investors might resurface with its bid should Sunrise unit holders reject the transaction with Ventas. Curiously, the courts may thereby have inadvertently paved the way for entities such as Health Care Property Investors to interfere with transaction agreements between a target and a prospective purchaser. In the future other bidders which find themselves subject to standstill agreements might announce bids which they know are likely to be in contravention of their standstill obligations in order to disrupt acquisition agreements subject to shareholder votes, in the hope of persuading enough shareholders to reject the transaction on the basis that a more favourable offer might surface.(6)

Some might express surprise at the apparent lack of difficulty the courts had in overriding the principle of shareholder value maximization. However, others would likely insist that the decision simply enforces the importance of maintaining the integrity of the auction process. In any event, it is clear that contracts must be drafted clearly and unambiguously to ensure that the intended result is achieved.


1. 2007 CarswellOnt 1705 (CA), affirming 2007 CarswellOnt 1704 (SCJ - Comm List).

2. In addition to the no-shop and fiduciary out provisions of Section 4(4) reproduced herein, the purchase agreement contained a right-to-match provision and contemplated that Ventas would receive a break fee if it declined to match a superior proposal.

3. Supra note 1 at Paragraphs 59 to 61.

4. Paramount Communications, Inc v QVC Network Inc, 637 A 2d 34 (Del 1994), and ACE Ltd v Capital Re Corp, 747 A 2d 95 at 105 (Del Ch 1999).

5. Supra note 1 at Paragraphs 55 to 56.

6. This assumes that after shareholders reject a proposed transaction, the directors would waive the standstill in respect of the competing bidder in order to permit the superior proposal to be made to shareholders. This also assumes that the jilted bidder would not initiate proceedings against the competing bidder seeking damages in tort for interference with economic relations or inducing breach of contract or, alternatively, proceedings against the target on the basis that it failed to fulfil its contractual obligations to enforce the standstill of the competing bidder (provided grounds exist to do so). Notably, Ventas commenced an action against Sunrise on April 5 2007 for its alleged failure to enforce the terms of the standstill agreement with Health Care Property Investors, just days before the scheduled unit holder vote. Six days later, on April 11 2007 Ventas and Sunrise announced that the purchase agreement had been amended to increase Ventas's bid to C$16.50 per unit. It was also announced that the action would be settled conditioned on the closing of the transaction. Ultimately, a majority of Sunrise shareholders approved Ventas's revised bid.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
23 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Dentons and SheEO are coming together for an evening of #radicalgenerosity on October 23, 2017. Meet Vicki Saunders, Founder of SheEO, and learn about how SheEO is changing the landscape for female entrepreneurs.

23 Oct 2018, Seminar, Montreal, Canada

Dentons is pleased to invite you to join us for a breakfast seminar as part of the Les Matinées Dentons series on issues relevant to you and your business.

24 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

If you build it, claims may come. Join the Dentons Construction group for breakfast and an informative discussion on current topics in construction law.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions