Canada: Enfish Swims Over The Reefs Of Subject-Matter

Last Updated: May 26 2016
Article by Ken Bousfield

In Enfish, US 6,151,604 concerned a self-referential data storage and retrieval system for a computer memory. The invention improved the functioning of the computer by permitting faster database searching, and by having more easily modified database architecture.

At trial claim 17 was held invalid under 35 USC 101 for lack of patent-eligible subject-matter; invalid under 35 USC 112 for indefiniteness; and not infringed in any case. On appeal, the Federal Circuit reversed on 35 USC 101 and on 35 USC 112, but upheld the finding of non-infringement.

Somewhat ironically, the reversal on indefiniteness was also the Plaintiff's undoing on infringement.  The District Court had found the "means for" language of claim 17 indefinite. The Federal Circuit held that the "means for" was supported under 35 USC 112, 6th para., by a three-step functional description in the specification. However, when Enfish argued that the steps were optional permutations, and so encompassed the Microsoft product, the Federal Circuit bound Enfish to the embodiment described – which was not alternative: 35 USC 112, 6th para., is a two-sided blade.

Enfish has attracted attention under 35 USC 101, beginning with the understatement: "This court, as well as the Supreme Court, has long grappled with the exception that "[l]aws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas are not patentable"1.

The Federal Circuit applied a two-step Mayo/Alice test: first, to "... determine whether the claims at issue are directed to a patent-ineligible concept"2; second to "consider the elements of each claim both individually and 'as an ordered combination' to determine whether the additional elements 'transform the nature of the claim into a patent-eligible application."3

The Court noted: "The Supreme Court has not established a definitive rule to determine what constitutes an "abstract idea" sufficient to satisfy the first step of the Mayo/Alice inquiry"4 – bearing out the criticism heaped on "Abstract" by Stevens J., in Bilski.5

The Federal Circuit observed

  1. "fundamental economic and conventional business practices are often found to be abstract ideas, even if performed on a computer".6
  2. the "directed to" inquiry of Alice applies to whether the character of a claim as a whole is directed to excluded subject matter;7
  3. "The Supreme Court has suggested that claims purport[ing] to improve the functioning of the computer itself" or "improv[ing] an existing technological process" might not succumb to the abstract idea exception."8

Enfish leans away from discussions of "abstract", and more toward technology:

"We do not read Alice to broadly hold that all improvements in computer-related technology are inherently abstract ... Indeed, some improvements in computer-related technology ... are undoubtedly not abstract .... Nor do we think that claims directed to software, as opposed to hardware, are inherently abstract ... Software can make non-abstract improvements to computer technology just as hardware improvements can, .... We thus see no reason to conclude that all claims directed to improvements in computer-related technology, including those directed to software, are abstract ..."

"For that reason, the first step ... asks whether the focus of the claims is on the specific asserted improvement in computer capabilities  ... or, instead, on a process that qualifies as an "abstract idea" for which computers are invoked merely as a tool."

Enfish is thus an encouraging confirmation of Chatfield 9,10. The Markey C.J. opinion in Chatfield continues to stand as a beacon of common sense on software.

Labels like "software" and "algorithm" tend to be distractions that obscure the fact that all software and algorithms are, ultimately, collections of method steps11Chatfield, itself, is the descendant of Boulton v. Bull12. As in Enfish and Chatfield, Watt's invention pertained to an improved way of operating existing machinery.  At the time, it was controversial whether methods were included within the meaning of "manufactures" under s. 6 of the Statute of Monopolies. Watt's method was the "software" of its day.

The inclusion of the expansive statutory classes in the US Patent Act of 1790 was a reaction to that controversy, intended to leave no doubt that everything within Science and the Useful Arts of Art. 1, s. 8 of the Constitution was potentially patent-eligible.

The statement that "fundamental economic and conventional business practices are often found to be abstract ideas" is really a recognition that business practices lie outside Art. 1, s. 8,13 not because they are "Abstract" but because they are neither Science nor the Useful Arts. The purpose of the Statute of Monopolies was to outlaw business practice monopolies, primarily to curtail the power of the Guilds.  Section 6 was the exception.

Under US Patent law, since well before 1890, there has always been a requirement that patent eligible inventions must have (a) a creative component, i.e., an idea;  (b) a practical component; and (c) coherence between (a) and (b) to form a unified whole. Without all three, there is no invention, patent-eligible or otherwise.

The prohibition in Diehr and Prometheus against cosmetic enhancement through conventional pre- and post-processing steps is about coherence:  the invention "as a whole" must be "directed to" patent-eligible subject-matter.  Lack of coherence cannot be solved by clever drafting: it requires an actual invention.

Subject-matter analyses based on "Abstract", "Natural Phenomena" and "Laws of Nature" tend to provide little guidance.  A more reliable approach is:

  1. Has an actual invention been made? Is there (a) a creative idea; (b) a practical means; and (c) coherence between (a) and (b)?
    Many diagnostic and software claims fail the coherence test.  Enfish passed easily: the software was about improved operation of the machine.
  2. Is the invention within Science and the Useful Arts?
    This is where business and financial software claims fail.  Enfish passed easily.
  3. Is the invention within at least one statutory class?
    If an invention is within Science and the Useful Arts, it is almost impossible to be outside the statutory classes.
  4. Do the claims "particularly point out and distinctly claim" the subject-matter of the invention?  I.e., has the invention been claimed intelligibly?
    Many software claims, and some diagnostic claims, fail under 35 USC 112, 2nd para. Enfish scraped past, saved by 35 USC 112, 6th para.

On subject-matter, Enfish was an easy case.

Footnotes

1 Enfish, p. 9, lines 10 – 13.

2 Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int'l 134 S. Ct. 2347, 2355 (2014).

3 Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Inc., 132 S. Ct. 1289, 1298, 1297 (2014).

4 Enfish, p. 9, lines 27 – 30.

5 Bilski v. Kappos, 561 US 593 (2010).

6 Enfish, p. 10, lines 4 – 7.

7 Enfish, p 10, lines 22 – 26.

8 Enfish, p. 10, lines 31 – 34

9 Application of Chatfield – 545 F 2d 152, 191 USPQ 730 (Cust & Pat App, 1976). See also In re Iwahashi, 888 F 2d 1370 (Fed Cir 1989);  Ex Parte McNabb and Voss, 127 USPQ 456 (Pat Off Bd App, 1960).

10 The Canadian equivalent is Honeywell Information Systems Inc., Re (1986), 13 CPR (3d) 462 (PAB).  See also: CA 1,180,813 of Dialog Systems (1984), 5 CPR (3d) 423.

11 Ex Parte Kahn, 124 USPQ 51 (Pat Off Bd App, 1960) The method of operating the machine more efficiently did not become unpatentable simply because it was called an "algorithm": See Diamond v Diehr, 450 US 175 (1981) at 187: "Our earlier opinions lend support to our present conclusion that a claim drawn to subject-matter otherwise statutory does not become nonstatutory simply because it uses a mathematical formula, computer program, or digital computer."

12 Boulton & Watt v Bull (1795), 2 H Bl 463, 126 ER 651; Hornblower v Boulton (1799), 8 Term Rep 95.

13 In the Canadian context, s. 27(3)(b) of the Patent Act.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Ken Bousfield
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions