The Federal Commissioner for the Environment and Sustainable
Development ("Commissioner") tabled her audit findings on January 26,
2016 of the management of pesticides by Health Canada's
Pest Management Regulator Agency ("PMRA"). The
Commissioner reviewed PMRA's efforts to protect Canadians and
the Environment from the unacceptable risks associated with the use
of pesticides. The report concluded
With respect to conditional registrations, re-evaluations,
special reviews, and cancellations of registrations ... the Agency
had not always acted in a timely manner to fulfill its statutory
objective of preventing unacceptable risks to the heath of
Canadians and the environment from the use of pesticides.
The Commissioner found that eight of nine pesticide products
conditionally registered for over a decade are neonicotinoids that
are believed of being a risk to bees and other pollinators and
negatively impact the environment – both soil and
groundwater. The Commission found that the PMRA had failed to
assess the cumulative effects of the pesticides on human health,
despite being required to do so by legislation.
The report is critical of the PMRA for not immediately
cancelling the registration of numerous pesticides despite
determining that they pose an unacceptable risk to Canadians and/or
their environment. The report indicated that the PMRA took between
four and eleven years to remove pesticides from the market,
resulting in unnecessary and unacceptable exposure to workers, the
public, and the environment.
John Bennett of Friends of the Earth Canada stated, "The audit findings confirm our
worst fear that the PMRA delivers on industry interests and not
those of people and the environment."
The Commissioner's report likely had an impact on the
decision of the PMRA to end the practice of conditional
pesticide registrations, as
announced in February.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The Imperial Oil refinery pled guilty to one offence for discharging a contaminant, coker stabilizer, thermocracked gas, into the natural environment causing an adverse effect and was fined $650,000...
Ontario's Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change continues to roll out its Climate Change Action Plan with its proposed GHG guide for projects that are subject to the province's Environmental Assessment Act.
In June, 2016, Justice Faieta of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded damages of $57,712.31 plus interest against legal counsel who failed to file a claim within the required limitation period.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).