Canada: U.S. And Canadian Securities: Regulatory Reform In 2006 And The Implications For 2007

Securities Trends in Canada

Impact of Changes re Taxation of Income Trusts

The announcement of the Canadian Government on October 31, 2006 rocked not only the tax world but the Canadian public markets and the Canadian corporate finance world as well. While it seems relatively clear what the immediate impact on conversion of businesses into income trusts will be, the medium to long-term impact on Canadian corporate finance and M&A activity remains to be seen.

What is known at this stage is that real estate investment trusts are not negatively impacted in the same manner as "business trusts" and that REITs are expected to continue to be a significant investment vehicle in Canada. The Canadian Government has been lobbied by the energy trust sector for differential treatment and there are calls for a 10-year as opposed to a 4-year phase-in of the new taxation rules.

The announcement and clarification in mid-December of the so-called "undue expansion" rules will have an impact on M&A activity among income trusts themselves. What is not evident is what impact the new rules will have on Canadian M&A activity in general. There may be a significant impact with respect to the approach of strategic/industry players. The developments could also have an impact on private equity M&A activity.

If one believed the media reports, the announcements were expected to create a "cheap pool" of Canadian assets held by business trusts that were ready for the taking by foreign buyers. The Canadian market was told to prepare itself for an influx of acquisitions by foreign acquirors. However, the potential for re-conversion back to a conventional corporate structure may play against that anticipated phenomenon. Private equity buyers have traditionally viewed income trust conversions as one of the principal ways to create value and as a primary avenue in their exit strategies in that regard, it is not clear what impact, if any, the announcements could have on private equity M&A activity in the near term but acquisitions by private equity buyers is expected to be a continuing phenomenon.

Civil Liability

On December 31, 2005, a new regime of civil liability for secondary market disclosure came into force in the province of Ontario. Other Canadian provinces, including Québec, have now announced or begun the process of introducing similar regimes. While there has yet to be any real meaningful use of the Ontario provisions, the measure constituted a significant legislative development for participants in the Canadian public markets.

In implementing the regime, the Ontario legislator had the benefit of decades of judicial application and analysis of Rule 10b-5 under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (or "10b-5" as it is generally known) and made a conscious choice not to import the rule into Canada in its U.S. form. It remains to be seen whether the Ontario regime will be more effective than 10b-5 in policing and deterring misrepresentations and omissions or whether it will lead to a rash of abusive and speculative litigation, including class actions, despite the regime's built-in protective mechanisms. While they share certain similarities, the Ontario regime is not quite "10b-5 North". The provisions do share the same basic purpose, to establish a basis for statutory civil liability for misrepresentations or omissions. However, in their scope and application, the regimes are much more cousins than they are siblings.

The expected flood of securities class actions in Canada has not yet taken place as predicted when Ontario introduced its regime and the jury is still out on the merits of the new system. It is possible that 2007 will bring with it increased use of the provisions and shed some light on the utility and benefits, or harm, of a Canadian regime for civil liability for secondary market disclosure as other provinces usher in their regimes and litigants seek to make use of the new avenues for actions.

Regulatory Enforcement

If the last few years following the corporate scandals in the United States have been about rule implementation, it is expected that 2007 will continue the trend evidenced and announced by the securities regulators of a focus on enforcement. It is becoming clear that securities regulators have come to the realization that a complex regime of specific rules tailored to prevent scandal and fraud without a functioning enforcement regime is not worth much more than the paper on which such elaborate rules are written.

It is expected that, while securities regulators will continue their mission of implementing rules to deal with potential corporate wrongdoing, there will be increased focus on enforcement. In this regard and by way of example, both the Toronto Stock Exchange and the Canadian Securities Administrators have issued staff notices to deal with the granting of options at a time when there is material, undisclosed information and the phenomenon of "option backdating" that has received much media and regulatory attention, particularly in the United States, in the latter half of 2006. (See discussion below.) It is expected that regulatory scrutiny will continue and intensify in this area in 2007.

Securities Trends in the U.S.

In the United States, the trends that we will be following include developments in the options backdating "scandal", changes to the securities offering processes in the light of the securities offering reform adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission just over a year ago, potential relief from some of the perceived burdens of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, especially for smaller companies, and, possibly, increased use of tender offers in reaction to the recent amendments to the "best-price rule" under the United States' tender offer regulations.

Options Backdating Scandal

In 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission revealed its wide-ranging investigation into options backdating. In July, the SEC brought two enforcement actions, one relating to Brocade Communications Systems and another involving Comverse Technology. In both cases, parallel criminal charges were also brought against senior company executives.

While the Brocade and Comverse cases were the first to be brought in the crackdown on options backdating, they were merely the tip of the iceberg: the SEC has indicated that there are over 100 companies currently under investigation and many executives at other companies have resigned or been dismissed in the scandal.

The Brocade and Comverse cases involved fraudulent schemes of intentional backdating and, in the case of Comverse, more elaborate schemes of granting backdated options to fictitious employees. The conduct alleged against Brocade and Comverse was apparently not isolated and the SEC has indicated that, while it does not expect to bring enforcement actions against all of the companies that it has investigated (many of which may be guilty only of sloppy procedures and record keeping), it will be bringing more cases against the worst conduct. In addition, boards of directors continue to launch their own internal investigations into options backdating to determine whether there have been abuses and, if so, to take remedial action before the SEC and/or the U.S. Attorney's office takes the initiative.

Whether or not the SEC takes enforcement action, companies discovering options backdating practices will nevertheless have to grapple with significant tax and accounting consequences. Companies will have to restate their earnings to reflect compensation expense for the granting of in-the-money options which don't enjoy the favorable accounting treatment that at-the-money options once enjoyed. In addition, the Internal Revenue Service will likely seek to recover uncollected tax from offending companies and from the recipients of in-themoney options. While the SEC might not institute proceedings in every case, shareholder litigation has been widespread.

For 2007, we can expect more announcements of enforcement actions and more executive resignations. In addition, the scandal may have an impact on policy development as the scandal fuels demands for change of executive compensation practices generally.

Securities Act Reform

The SEC's new securities offering reform rules and rule amendments have now been in effect for about a year. We expect to continue to see offerors availing themselves of the reforms of the offering process afforded by the rules, including liberalized communications before and during the offering process and the streamlining of the registration process, especially for the largest issuers (well-known seasoned issuers, or "WKSIs"), and that practices will continue to be refined in light of the changes to the rules determining liability for disclosure in public offerings at the time that investors make their investment decisions.

Liberalized Communications. Under the rules, WKSIs are generally free to continuously communicate with the market, including making offers of securities, without regard to previously applicable "gun jumping" restrictions. All other issuers may now publish or otherwise communicate information without committing a "gun jumping" violation if the information is communicated at least 30 days before a registration statement is filed and does not refer to a securities offering. In addition, the rules permit the use of the "free-writing prospectus" in addition to the traditional prospectus used in connection with an offering. While the use of term sheets as free-writing prospectuses, particularly in the context of debt offerings, has become rather commonplace, as expected, the use of other, more marketing focused documents as free-writing prospectuses has not been as widespread.

Streamlining the Securities Registration Process. The most significant change to the registration process was the creation of "automatic shelf registration", which is available only to WKSIs and provides for automatic effectiveness of the registration statement immediately upon filing without any SEC review. Required information in the base prospectus is minimal, with offering-specific information to be provided by posteffective amendment, prospectus supplement or incorporation by reference to the issuer's Exchange Act reports. Automatic shelf registrations are good for three years, at which time a new registration statement must be filed. Almost 600 automatic shelf registration statements have been filed by U.S. companies since the rules became effective, and over 30 non-U.S. companies had filed automatic shelf registration statements as of the end of 2006. It is anticipated that ultimately most WSKIs will file these registration statements.

Liability for Prospectus Disclosure. Previously, under the Securities Act, liability for misstatements in or omissions from a prospectus used in a registered public offering was determined by reference to the final prospectus, which was generally not delivered to investors until several days after they had made their investment decisions. Under the new rules, prospectus liability will be determined by reference to whatever information has been "conveyed" to an investor at or prior to the time of sale (i.e., when the investor orally or otherwise confirms his purchase), and any information conveyed after that, including information in the final prospectus, will not be taken into account. As a result, the process for conveying pricing and price-related information, particularly in debt offerings, has become more formalized, primarily through the use of term sheets delivered by facsimile or email to investors which confirm their purchases. Although the new liability regime is not applicable to Rule 144A and other unregistered offerings, underwriters are increasingly using term sheets to convey pricing information in these transactions as well as part of their "best practices". There have also been changes in underwriting agreements, and the legal opinions and accountants' comfort letters required to be delivered to the underwriters, as a result of the new regulatory landscape. These changes include the introduction of the concept of a "disclosure package" or "information package" concept, which includes all of the information, including information contained in a free-writing prospectus, that is delivered to the investors at the time of purchase, and the requirement that the representations and warranties, as well as legal opinions, cover all the information contained in the disclosure package or information package, as opposed to being limited to the registration statement and related prospectus, as was the case prior to the implementation of the reform rules.

Interpretive Guidance for Section 404 Implementation

In December 2006, the SEC proposed for public comment interpretive guidance for management regarding their evaluations of internal control over financial reporting required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and amendments to the rules under the Act that would make it clear that a company choosing to perform an evaluation of internal control in accordance with the interpretive guidance would satisfy the annual evaluation required by those rules. The proposals were made in response to widespread commentary that implementation of the internal control evaluations was proving to be overly burdensome for reporting issuers, especially smaller issuers, in comparison to the protection afforded investors by such requirements.

The proposed guidance is described as a "risk-based" approach that is intended to address many of the concerns that have been raised to the SEC, including: excessive testing of controls generally; excessive documentation of processes, controls, and testing; and the ability to scale the evaluation to smaller companies. According to the SEC, the proposed guidance is principles-based guidance that is organized around two important principles that it believes will permit companies of all sizes and complexities to implement the SEC's rules more effectively and efficiently.

  • First, management should evaluate the design of the controls that it has implemented to determine whether there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement in the financial statements would not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. This principle is designed to permit management to focus on those controls that are needed to prevent or detect material misstatement in the financial statements.
  • Second, management should gather and analyze evidence about the operation of the controls being evaluated based on its assessment of the risk associated with those controls. The purpose of this principle is to allow management to align the nature and extent of its evaluation procedures with those areas of financial reporting that pose the greatest risks to reliable financial reporting.

The proposed interpretive guidance addresses four specific areas, including:

  • Identification of risks to reliable financial reporting and the related controls that management has implemented to address those risks.
  • Evaluation of the operating effectiveness of controls.
  • Reporting the overall results of management's evaluation.
  • Documentation.

If the proposed interpretive guidance and amendments to the SEC's rules are adopted, they, together with the new auditing standard on internal control over financial reporting being proposed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, should enable U.S. reporting companies, especially smaller companies, to conclude that more efficiently structured internal control evaluations will satisfy the requirements of the SEC's Section 404 rules.

Amendment to the "Best Price" Tender Offer Rule

On December 8, 2006, amendments to the U.S. tender offer best price rule (Rule 14d-10 under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934) approved by the SEC became effective. The best price rule provides that no one may make a tender offer unless the consideration paid to any security holder during the tender offer is the highest consideration paid to any other security holder. As a result of certain courts finding that the payment or grant of executive compensation by a target company in connection with a tender offer (even if agreed to and made outside the tender offer period) constitutes disparate treatment of shareholders in violation of the best price rule, business combinations over the last several years have been primarily structured as one-step mergers if the grant of additional compensation to the subject company's executives is necessary or desirable. The amendments to the best price rule are intended to clarify that the rule applies only to the consideration paid for securities tendered in a tender offer and that employment compensation, severance or other employee benefits should not be considered part of the price being paid in a tender offer.

The amendments to the best price rule, which apply to both issuer and third-party tender offers, clarify that the rule applies only with respect to the consideration offered and paid for securities tendered in a tender offer, rather than consideration paid to any security holder pursuant to and during the tender offer. The exemption in connection with employment compensation, severance or other employee benefits is not limited to directors or employees of the target company, but includes all security holders of the target company. An arrangement will satisfy the exemption if it "is not calculated based on the number of securities tendered or to be tendered" and the arrangement "is being paid or granted as compensation for" services rendered or to be rendered. The amendments also provide for a safe harbor that would allow an independent compensation committee of the subject company (and the directors of the bidder if the bidder is a party to the transaction) to approve an employment compensation, severance or other employee benefit arrangement and, in doing so, satisfy the requirements of the exemption to the best price rule. The amendments to the rule may lead to an increased use of tender offers in the context of friendly acquisitions if practitioners become convinced that the amendments have substantially reduced the likelihood of successful lawsuits based on the rule.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.