Worldwide: Anti-Corruption

Last Updated: February 19 2016
Article by Paul M. Lalonde, Stephen L. Hill Jr and Emma Radmore

Focus on the US

An active FCPA docket anticipated

When compared to prior years, 2015 was relatively quiet for Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) enforcement actions in the US. Although the total number of enforcement actions was slightly higher than the previous year, there was an absence of the very large monetary settlements that garnered enormous attention in the recent past. This record, combined with continued criticism that their enforcement actions in the past failed to hold individuals accountable for violations of federal law, including the FCPA, may be the reasons for two significant changes in the government's approach to enforcement. This raises the question as to whether the coming year will be much less quiet than the previous year.

In a September 2015 DOJ Memorandum titled, "Individual Accountability for Corporate Wrongdoing", US Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates hit the reset button on policies that govern the investigation and possible prosecution of corporate misconduct. The most significant portion of the memorandum for legal counsel representing business organizations was the following: "[I]n order to qualify for any cooperation credit, corporations must provide to the Department all relevant facts relating to the individuals responsible for the misconduct..." Applying this policy to FCPA enforcement investigations would require the company to disclose information it had regarding any employees, business partners or anyone else that had a role in the bribery violation to get the "cooperation credit." This "cooperation credit" has in the past been a key mitigating factor in the DOJ's charging decisions and subsequent punishment for corporate wrongdoing. Whether intended or not, the Yates Memorandum makes the in-house counsel's job much harder. In simple terms, in-house counsel and their outside counsel will have to carefully consider the legal and ethical issues that present themselves when it appears not everyone in the conference room agrees with what course to take to mitigate the legal risks associated with bribery allegations.

The second noteworthy FCPA development was a public acknowledgement by the DOJ last October that it would use a more proactive approach to its investigations. This approach stands in stark contrast to prior years when it relied heavily on corporate self-disclosure to generate investigative leads. The change, according to DOJ spokesperson Peter Carr, was designed to focus on "bigger, higher impact cases." The different approach, coupled with a tripling of the agents responsible for FCPA investigations, suggests that the Department will use high-profile actions, including prosecutions of culpable individuals, to address what it believes to be an opportunistic environment for anti-bribery investigations and prosecutions. Based on similar increases in investigative agents in the past (i.e., relating to health care fraud), it is likely that 2016 will see a significant increase in the volume, size and magnitude of FCPA investigations and possible prosecutions.

What remains unclear is the collateral or secondary repercussions of these changes. While it is clear that US-based individuals have greater exposure after these developments, it is less clear whether the countries where the conduct took place will also step in following the mandated disclosure under the Yates Memorandum and initiate their own prosecutions. The policy will certainly make it easier for them to prosecute their citizens after the company discloses their conduct. History suggests they will do so as there were instances in 2015 when countries used disclosures and settlements made in the US, as well as formal and informal agreements to collaborate with that country's investigative agencies, to pursue their own enforcement actions. It is uncertain where this strategy will be used in 2016; the only way to know for certain is to put the question to enforcement personnel where the secondary action might be brought. In the meantime, the US government's recent course changes certainly suggest an active anti-bribery docket in 2016.

Focus on the UK

Serious Fraud Office agrees to first Deferred Prosecution Agreement and more are likely

Since the UK Bribery Act (UKBA) took effect in mid-2011, we have been waiting for the first prosecution for the "failure to prevent bribery offence—the UKBA's initiative to make covered businesses responsible for bribery committed by agents and intermediaries (and not necessarily affiliates) anywhere in the world for the benefit of the covered business. Since February 2014, UK enforcement agencies have had the power to agree to so-called deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) with corporations who commit a range of offences, including offences under the UKBA and money laundering legislation. Following a court hearing in November 2015, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) confirmed the approval of the first DPA. The DPA relates to the conduct of an affiliate of Standard Bank plc (now ICBC Standard Bank plc) in connection with a fundraising for the Tanzanian government. Two senior executives of the sister company appointed an agent, with the promise of paying it one percent of the amount raised. Two of the three shareholders of the agent were related to the government, and the transaction moved swiftly after the agent's appointment. Standard Bank was ultimately alerted and made reports to the SFO and the UK agency then responsible for processing reports of money laundering suspicions. The SFO and the relevant judge agreed there was no prospect of Standard Bank claiming it had adequate procedures (which would have been a defence), and that it had, therefore, breached the UKBA. The SFO and the judge agreed on a DPA rather than an immediate prosecution, so provided Standard Bank meets the conditions of the DPA, the prosecution, currently stalled, will be dropped in three years' time.

The SFO said that the case had proved where the "high bar" for co-operation could be. The SFO had previously indicated that for it to consider a DPA as an appropriate alternative, there would need to be a high degree of willingness to cooperate and that this should prove to be the case in fact. The SFO advised that any company considering this route should take note that, although "adequate procedures" were not discussed in this particular case, the important thing is to assess the situation as it arises and take appropriate action. For example, regardless of what any procedures might say, if a red flag seems obvious, it should be treated as such. The judge's comments on how Standard Bank acted once it became aware of the problem were also of key importance. The SFO has suggested the bank's conduct was a prime reason for the SFO deciding a DPA was appropriate, and stressed it would use DPAs only when a narrow set of specific factors suggested it would be the best route. But we expect at least one more to follow soon.

While we still await the first prosecution or DPA that analyzes whether procedures were "adequate" for the purposes of the defence to a "failure to prevent" an offence, this case is the first illustration of how DPAs are likely to operate in the future. It also shows that the SFO expects to be alerted sooner rather than later, so the timing of liaising with enforcement agencies will be essential.

In other legislative developments in 2015, the government confirmed it would not be extending the "failure to prevent" offence to other financial crimes but introduced statutory protection for those who report suspicions of money laundering in good faith.

Focus on Canada

Continued anti-corruption crackdown

In 2015, Canada saw a crackdown on anti-corruption as enforcement authorities laid charges and investigated a number of cases under the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (CFPOA).

For example, in January 2015, RCMP officers raided the Toronto office of MagIndustries Corp., a public company listed on the TSX that is controlled by a Chinese company and has subsidiaries in the Republic of Congo, where it is developing a CA$1.5 billion potash mine. The allegations reported (none of which have been proven) include improper payments to Congolese officials. There is wide speculation that the RCMP could lay charges in 2016.

In February 2015, the RCMP charged SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. and affiliated entities (SNC) with one count of corruption under the CFPOA (as well as fraud under the Criminal Code). The corruption charge stems from SNC's business dealings in Libya. It is alleged that over a period of 10 years, commencing in 2001, SNC, through agents, gave, or offered to give, approximately CA$48 million to Libyan officials, including the son of former Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi, for the purpose of securing benefits. The RCMP investigation led to convictions in Switzerland of former SNC executives for corruption and money laundering related to SNC's activities in Libya. In a related development, SNC announced in December 2015 that it had reached an administrative agreement with Public Works and Government Services Canada, allowing it to avoid a federal bidding suspension (which otherwise would have applied under the federal government's Integrity Regime).

Looking ahead, it is reasonable to assume there will be more enforcement activity under the CFPOA in 2016. Enforcement authorities have demonstrated in recent cases that they are willing to bring charges of international corruption against individual executives of companies (either located in Canada or abroad), in addition to the companies themselves. They are expected to do so with ever increasing vigor, particularly if they achieve some measure of success in any of the ongoing cases.

Domestic corruption was also the focus of attention in 2015, and this is likely to continue in 2016. November 2015 saw the publication of the final report of the Québec Commission of Inquiry on the Award and Management of Public Contracts in the Construction Industry (better known as the "Charbonneau Commission"). The report detailed extensive corruption, bribery and other improper schemes in public contracting for construction services in the province and made 60 recommendations on how to clean up the problem. The Government of Québec has insisted that it is keen to implement the recommendations of the report and there is likely to be significant activity on this front in 2016.

One of the recurring themes of the Charbonneau Commission inquiry was that the problems observed in Québec were also present in other provinces. Accordingly, as the Government of Québec deals with its serious construction industry corruption problems, it is expected that other provinces will closely monitor the situation and may decide to follow some of the steps taken by Québec.

Whistleblower protections were also a key theme that acquired fresh prominence in 2015. The Charbonneau Commission report made a number of recommendations touching upon improvements to whistleblower protections but perhaps the most profound change in this regard was the announcement by the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) that it would be introducing a whistleblower bounty program, the first time in Canada that significant whistleblower bounties have been proposed by a regulatory authority. The new policy—which is expected to come into force in the Spring of 2016—demonstrates the importance the OSC attaches to encouraging whistleblowers to come forward with information about violations of securities law, and it will be interesting to see whether information received under the new policy will lead to more enforcement and whether other regulatory authorities will follow with their own whistleblower bounty programs.

About Dentons

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Dentons is pleased to sponsor the Global Property Market Forum taking place November 27, 2018 in Toronto.

27 Nov 2018, Conference, Toronto, Canada
Dentons is pleased to sponsor the Global Property Market Forum taking place November 27, 2018 in Toronto. This one day forum provides participants with an intimate and informative opportunity .
30 Nov 2018, Conference, Toronto, Canada

Dentons is proud to be the presenting sponsor for Autonomous Vehicle P3s: Visions of the Future at this year’s CCPPP conference in Toronto on Nov 5-6, 2018.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions