Over the course of the next three years, PMPRB is seeking to
change to its operations with the aim of becoming a more effective
and stronger consumer protection agency.
According to its recently released Strategic Plan for 2015-2018,
the PMPRB identified a number of challenges facing the PMPRB and
Canadian consumers of pharmaceuticals. These include: the
emergence of extrinsic bodies engaging in price review, absence of
publically funded universal drug coverage, and non-transparent,
fragmented drug purchasing across the country.
In response, the PMPRB has proposed a number of changes to the
way it carries out its regulatory and reporting functions, as well
as its vision for regulatory reform.
For pharmaceutical stakeholders who interact with the PMPRB,
below is a review of the key changes that are expected in the
Reporting and Information sharing: As
part of its mandate, the PMPRB reports annually on drug prices and
price trends of prescription drugs, so as to provide all levels of
government with transparent and credible price
information.1 In its Strategic Plan, the PMPRB
raised the concern that it is no longer able to provide accurate
price information to the general public or private payers, owing to
increases in the number of confidential agreements negotiated
between public payers and manufacturers, so-called Private Listing
Consequently, to assist private payers in making pricing
decisions for the benefit of patients, the PMPRB is proposing to
pursue collaboration between public and private payers that would
facilitate and standardize sharing of pricing, use and cost
data.3 It is also proposing to work closely
with international counterparts in the sharing of information and
Regulatory reform: In the long term, PMPRB is
also proposing to examine whether changes are needed to its
regulatory framework to ensure Canadians are paying fair prices for
patented drugs. Included among the possible avenues for
regulatory reform are: (i) a broader list of comparator countries
than the existing seven used for comparing prices, (ii) to
modernize and simplify the PMPRB's existing Guidelines, and
(iii) discussions with the provinces and territories regarding
implementation of international best practices on cost
effectiveness, reimbursement and pricing.5
Targeted enforcement: As part of its
regulatory mandate, the PMPRB has the authority to hold Tribunal
hearings to review the price of a patented medicine where the PMPRB
staff have determined its price is excessive.6 As
part of its plan, the PMPRB is proposing to focus enforcement
efforts in areas that would make the PMPRB a more effective
consumer champion. According to the PMPRB, these include
areas that raise issues most relevant to payers, or that could
clarify the PMPRB's legal framework.7
A full copy of the PMPRB's Strategic Plan, 2015-2018
document can be found here.
1 Strategic Plan page 7
2 Strategic Plan page 15
3 Strategic Plan page 25
4 Strategic Plan page 26
5 Strategic Plan page 19-20, 26
6 Strategic Plan 2015-2018 at page 7 ["Strategic
7 Strategic Plan page 21
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Staying local but going global presents its challenges. Gowling WLG lawyers offer an international roundtable on doing business in the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia. This three-hour session will videoconference in lawyers from around the world to discuss business and intellectual property hurdles.
In the inaugural episode of Diversonomics, co-hosts Roberto Aburto and Sarah Willis introduce listeners to the podcast and discuss their experiences with diversity and inclusion in the legal industry. They also outline some of the obstacles the profession faces with respect to adopting new strategies and overhauling old practices.
For episode two of Diversonomics, co-hosts Roberto Aberto and Sarah Willis interview Mark Greenburgh, a partner in Gowling WLG's London office. They discuss the exciting new diversity and inclusion opportunities that have arisen since the combination of Gowlings and Wragge Lawrence Graham, as well at Gowling WLG UK's LGBT OpenHouse initiative.
Mark Greenburgh is a partner in Gowling WLG's London office, with his practice focused on employment litigation. He helps clients find solutions to workplace relationship issues and interpret the special legislation or collective agreements applicable to public sector employees.
Mark is also a Higher Rights Advocate, a Freeman of the City of London, Liveryman of the Worshipful Company of Solicitors, a member of the City of London Employment Law Committee and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts.
The Canadian Intellectual Property Office has issued a report entitled IP Canada Report 2016, discussing trends in IP use domestically, and by Canadians abroad, based on analysis of CIPO's internal data and those collected by the World Intellectual Property Organization.
The value of reliance on a trade-mark registration, as opposed to prior use, stands out sharply in the recent Federal Court of Appeal case of Pizzaiolo Restaurants Inc. v. Les Restaurants La Pizzaiolle Inc. ( 2016 FCA 256 October 28, 2016).
This is an appeal from the Federal Court's decision setting aside the Registrar of Trade-marks decision to the extent that it dismissed the applicant's opposition regarding the mark PIZZAIOLO and Design.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).