Canada: The Latest On Private M&A Deal Points: Part I – Indemnification

The Market Trends Subcommittee of the Mergers and Acquisitions Committee (the ABA Subcommittee) of the Business Law Section of the American Bar Association recently released its latest edition of the Private Target M&A Deal Points Study (the US Study) which analyzes acquisition agreements for transactions completed in 2014 involving US private targets being acquired by US public companies. Last year, the ABA Subcommittee released the 2014 Canadian Private Target M&A Deal Points Study which analyzes acquisition agreements for transactions signed in 2012 and 2013 involving Canadian private targets being acquired by Canadian public companies (the Canadian Study). This article is a first in a two part series highlighting and comparing various deal points reported by the US Study and the Canadian Study as well as those reported by the prior editions of these Studies.1 The focus of this article is on indemnification matters. The trends revealed by these Studies are interesting but it is important to bear in mind that referring to deal point studies is not a substitute for reasoned negotiations.

The Study Sample

The US Study and the Canadian Study have a number of differences in terms of study samples. The US Study, like prior editions, is based on a much larger sample: it includes almost double the number of agreements reviewed in the Canadian Study. Also, even with an increase in the proportion of Canadian transactions with values over C$100M, a comparison of the US Study and the Canadian Study show that US deals are still typically larger than Canadian deals.

  Prior US Study US Study Prior Canadian Study Canadian Study
Number of Deals 136 117 64 60
Range of Transaction Values US $17.2M to US$4.7B US $17M to US$5B C$5M to C$2.25B C$5.6M to C$5.8B
Transactions Over $100M 63% 65% 11% 31%


Survival Periods

Purchase agreements typically specify the time period during which representations and warranties (and sometimes covenants) survive closing. The US Study and the Canadian Study show that the survival period for representations and warranties in most deals is between 12 and 18 months with more transactions in the 18-month category. A survival period around 18 months is typical in both countries as most problems may be uncovered with that period: buyer will have had time to run the business and will be able to perform at least one post-closing audit. The US Study and the Canadian Study show that Canadian deals are, however, still more likely to have a survival period that is greater than 18 months. Parties to a purchase agreement will also typically agree that certain representations and warranties should have a different survival period for a number of reasons (these are referred to as carveouts), including when they are an essential component of the deal (also known as core representations). The US Study and the Canadian Study also show some differences in the use of certain carve outs to survival. For example, the representation on capitalization is carved out in 76% of deals included in the subset in the US Study, while in the Canadian Study, the representation on capitalization is carved out in 33% of deals included in the subset. However, this may at least partly be explained by the fact that there is almost double the percentage of asset deals in the Canadian Study when compared to the US Study (33% versus 17%).

  Prior US Study US Study Prior Canadian Study Canadian Study
Survival Period : Less than 12 months 2% 1% 1.7% 0%
Survival Period: 12 months to 18 months 83% 75% 32.4% 58%
Survival Period: More than 18 months 12% 16% 57.2% 35%
Silence 1% 0% 7% 4%
Express No Survival 2% 6% 1.7% 4%

Types of Damages/Losses Covered

These deal terms are largely consistent with the Prior US Study and the Canadian Study. Very few agreements limit damages to out of pocket expenses. Most agreements are more likely to be silent on incidental damages. Most agreements are also more likely to be silent on diminution in value and almost equally likely to expressly exclude consequential damages or be silent on that heading. When the parties are silent on a heading of damages, they are leaving it up to a court of competent jurisdiction to determine whether such damages are recoverable under applicable law and in light of the definition of damages chosen by the parties. According to the US Study and the Canadian Study, one difference between Canada and the US remains punitive damages: Canadian agreements are almost equally likely to be silent or exclude punitive damages, whereas most US agreements expressly exclude punitive damages. The higher percentage of agreements that are silent with respect to punitive damages in Canadian deals is likely as a result of punitive damage awards being rare in Canada, and when granted, the awards being smaller: accordingly, punitive damages are likely less to be of a concern for many sellers.

  Prior US Study US Study Prior Canadian Study Canadian Study
Damages Limited to Out of Pocket Expenses 9% 5% 0% 4%
Silent on Incidental Damages 67% 74% 69% 75%
Includes Incidental Damages 16% 4% 9% 7%
Excludes Incidental Damages 17% 22% 22% 18%
Silent on Diminution in Value 69% 72% 85% 78%
Includes Diminution in Value 14% 11% 7% 13%
Excludes Diminution in Value 17% 17% 8% 9%
Silent on Consequential Damages 44% 44% 54% 45%
Includes Consequential Damages 2% 7% 14% 11%
Excludes Consequential Damages 54% 49% 32% 44%
Silent on Punitive Damages 25% 21% 65% 51%
Includes Punitive Damages 0% 1% 3% 7%
Excludes Punitive Damages 75% 78% 32% 42%

Indemnity Baskets

Indemnity baskets establish the minimum dollar amount of certain types of losses a party must suffer under the purchase agreement before the other party is obliged to indemnify it. Baskets can be (i) deductible: once a party's losses exceed the amount specified in the agreement, the other party has to indemnify only for losses exceeding the specified amount; or (ii) first dollar: once a party's losses exceed the specified amount, the other party has to indemnify for all losses starting from dollar one. A basket may also be a "combination" of a deductible and first dollar. These deal terms are largely consistent with the Prior US Study. Both in the US and Canada, most deals have baskets and those baskets cover seller's/target's representations and warranties. However, according to the US Study and the Canadian Study, Canadian and US practices diverge on (i) the type of basket used, with first dollar baskets being more common in Canada and deductible baskets being more common in the US; (ii) the size of the basket, with baskets being larger in Canada; (iii) the use of certain carve outs from basket, such as, for example, fraud which is carved of 80% of deal in the US while it is only carved out in 48% of deals in Canada; and (iv) whether baskets cover breach of seller's/target's covenants, with such coverage being more common in Canada. In our experience, basket size as or percentage of transaction value tends to be greater the lower the purchase price. This may explain why Canadian basket percentages tend to be higher. It should also be noted that with respect to whether baskets cover breach of seller's/target's covenants, our experience would suggest that actual Canadian practice is more similar to US practice where baskets are unlikely to apply to covenants.

            Prior US Study US Study Prior Canadian Study Canadian Study
No Basket 4% 2% 20% 8%
Deductible Basket 59% 65% 14% 36%
First Dollar Basket 32% 26% 59% 50%
Combination Basket 5% 7% 7% 6%
Mean Basket as % of Transaction Value 0.58% 0.65% 0.51% 0.87%
Basket as % of Transaction Value:
-Greater than 1%: 12% 10% 8% 28%
-1% or less: 88% 90% 92% 72%
Basket Coverage – Seller's/Target's Representations and Warranties 99% 99% 100% 100%
Basket Coverage – Seller's/Target's Covenants 27% 17% 72% 68%

Another type of basket is known as an eligible claim threshold or a minimum loss basket. An eligible claim threshold will provide that a party is not required to indemnify the other party for an individual claim where the loss relating to the claim is less than a specified amount, the idea being that any claim below the specified amount is not a significant enough given the scope of the transaction. According to the US Study and the Canadian Study, eligible claim thresholds are used in roughly one third of transactions, and slightly on the rise on both sides of the border.

  Prior US Study US Study Prior Canadian Study Canadian Study
Eligible Claim Threshold 30% 38% 19% 27%

Indemnity Caps

Purchase agreements may also contain a cap on certain indemnification obligations which sets out the maximum amount a party can recover for losses. The US Study and the Canadian Study indicate that in the US, all, and in Canada, almost all, deals with a survival provision include a cap, but that (i) caps are generally lower in the US; and (ii) certain carve outs are more common in the US, such as for example, the due authorization representation, which is carveout of 76% of deal in the US and only in 22% of deals in Canada, even though our experience would suggest that Canadian practice on many of these carveouts are similar to US practice.

  Prior US Study US Study Prior Canadian Study Canadian Study
No Cap Specified 4% 0% 28% 10%
Mean Cap as % of Transaction Value 16.6% 13.2% 33.6% 49%
Median Cap as % of Transaction Value 10% 10% 25% 40%
Cap as % of Transaction Value:

-Less than 10%

48% 50% 3% 8%


12% 9% 0% 10%

-Greater than 10% to 15%

29% 22% 7% 5%

-Greater than 15% to 25%

4% 11% 18% 20%

-Greater than 25% to 50%

2% 5% 18% 15%

-Greater than 50% but Less than Purchase Price

0% 0% 14% 17%

– Purchase Price

6% 3% 40% 25%

Double Materiality for Indemnification Purposes

A purchase agreement can provide that materiality qualifications in representations and warranties will be disregarded either for the purposes of calculating damages only or for all indemnifications purposes (in which case the materiality qualifications in the representations and warranties exist solely for the purpose of closing conditions or to allow the seller to make representations and warranties it could not otherwise truthfully make without a qualification). This is often referred to as a double materiality scrape. The US Study shows a major shift: 70% of deals with a basket included a double materiality scrape, up from 28% in the Prior US Study (and half of these scrapes were limited to the purpose of calculating damages only). According to the Canadian Study, Canadian practice on these points is significantly different: a double materiality scrape is unlikely to be included and, if it is, it will be limited to the purposes of calculating damages. This is consistent with what the authors are seeing in their practices, although we predict that the proportion of deals with double materiality scrapes will rise in Canada.

  Prior US Study US Study Prior Canadian Study Canadian Study
Double Materiality Scrape Included 28% 70% 11% 11%
If Included, Limited to Calculation of Damages 41% 43% 62.5% 0%

Third Party Claims

For the first time, the US Study reports on the provisions that apply when a third party makes a claim or brings an action against the buyer or acquired business after closing. The Canadian Study does not provide information on third party claims provisions (although it will likely be included in the next study). According to the US Study, most deals in the US are likely to (i) be silent on whether buyer can be indemnified for third party claims absent a breach of representation and warranty; (ii) do not require the indemnifying party to acknowledge its liability prior to taking control of the defense of third party claims; (iii) provide some exceptions to the ability to control the defense; and (iv) set limits on the ability of a defending party to settle claims.

  US Study
Silent on Whether Buyer Can Be Indemnified For Third Party Claims Absent a Breach of Rep 78%
Buyer Can Be Indemnified for Third Party Claims Absent a Breach of Rep 19%
Buyer Cannot Be Indemnified for Third Party Claims Absent a Breach of Rep 3%
Indemnifying Party Can Control Defense of Third Party Claims 85%
Indemnifying Party Cannot Control Defense of Third Party Claims 15%
Where Indemnifying Party Can Control Defense of Third Party Claims, Indemnifying Party is not First Required to Acknowledge Liability 62%
Where Indemnifying Party Can Control Defense of Third Party Claims, Indemnifying Party is First Required to Acknowledge Liability 38%
Where Indemnifying Party Can Control Defense of Third Party Claims, Includes Exceptions to Indemnifying Party's Ability to Control Defense of Third Party Claims 78%
Includes Limits on Ability of Defending Party to Settle Claims 90%

The authors would like to thank Kim Ton-That for her contribution to this article.


1 The Prior US Study analyzes acquisition agreements for transactions completed in 2012 involving US private targets being acquired by US public companies and the Prior Canadian Study analyzes acquisition agreements for transactions completed in 2010 and 2011 involving Canadian private targets being acquired by Canadian public companies.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.