Canada: Torys’ Top 10 M&A Trends For 2007

Last Updated: January 13 2007

Article by Torys' M&A Group

Merger and acquisition activity during 2006 continued at record levels, and no end is in sight. We are in the midst of a "perfect storm" of circumstances that could cause a huge movement of large public companies out of the hands of public shareholders and into the hands of private equity and institutions.

The impetus for this shift is being fuelled by cash-rich private equity funds; the emergence of clubs that enable these funds to do much bigger deals; the growing unfriendliness of the regulatory environment for public companies; and the pressure for short-term earnings growth.

What are the implications of this movement for the economy, for regulators and for acquirors, targets and investors?

  1. Going-Private Transactions Will Increase
  2. Sarbanes-Oxley Will Spur M&A Activity and Result in the Increased Importance of Non-U.S. Stock Exchanges
  3. Income Trust M&A Will Grow
  4. Defensive Tactics Will Proliferate and Strengthen
  5. Private Equity Club Transactions Will Continue to Increase
  6. Shareholder Activism Will Strengthen
  7. Use of Go-Shop Clauses Will Increase
  8. Independence of Financial Advisers Will Be Scrutinized
  9. Telecom/Media Businesses Will Consolidate
  10. India Will Expand Activity

1. Going-Private Transactions Will Increase

Over the last few years, there have been relatively few going-private transactions for large Canadian public companies in which management or significant shareholders have participated.

Notable examples include KKR’s acquisition of Masonite; Magna’s acquisition of the public’s stake in its Intier, Decoma and Tesma subsidiaries; and the announced acquisition of Four Seasons Hotels by a group of investors, including the controlling shareholder.

Going-private transactions are legally complex and involve serious execution risk. Under Canadian securities rules, a going-private transaction that involves manage-ment or a significant shareholder will generally require a formal, independent valuation supervised by a special committee of independent directors and approval by a majority of the shareholders who are not associated with the acquiror or management.

Private equity acquirors often wish to work closely with management to formulate their strategy and conduct effective due diligence, and require management to maintain an ongoing equity stake in the business. However, management’s involvement in these transactions presents a difficult challenge in light of a board’s desire to have an even-handed, conflict-free auction.

Despite the complexity and challenges, we expect to see an increasing number of going-private transactions in 2007 as a result of the following factors.

  • U.S. and other private equity funds are under pressure to effectively deploy the large amounts of capital they have raised in recent years. Private equity funds have the capital resources, financial expertise and ability to handle the complexity that can give them an edge over strategic buyers. With the advent of "club deals" (see trend #5), even very large public companies can potentially be acquired. In addition, interest rates remain relatively low, and lenders seem eager to participate in leveraged buyouts.
  • It is easier for management to focus on and execute a long-term business strategy if the company is held privately. Canadian investor confidence laws, modelled on Sarbanes-Oxley, and Ontario’s new liability-for-disclosure laws require boards of directors to pay serious attention to governance, disclosure and liability matters. Shareholders and financial markets are scrutinizing quarterly and other short-term performance objectives and results; long-term business strategies may be more difficult for public companies to execute.
  • Two uniquely Canadian factors are also at play. First, the federal government’s decision to tax income trusts similarly to the way it taxes corporations has significantly affected the market value and viability of some income trusts. Many income trusts are now considering going private. Second, Canada has a relatively high proportion of family-controlled companies that can deliver control to a buyer without an auction. This was seen in Bell Globemedia’s acquisition of CHUM and the recent proposal to take Four Seasons Hotels private.

2. Sarbanes-Oxley Will Spur M&A Activity and Result in the Increased Importance of Non-U.S. Stock Exchanges

Concern that the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq are now less attractive markets on which to list, particularly for foreign or emerging companies, has affected the competitiveness of U.S. capital markets. Sarbanes-Oxley is often blamed, with particular criticism aimed at the section 404 internal control requirements, which require public companies to assess their controls to ensure accurate financial reporting and require an external auditor to attest to the effectiveness of those controls. One survey calculated that the average cost of section 404 compliance in the initial 2004 year was US$3.8 million, with the average cost in subsequent years dropping more slowly than expected. The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board are seeking to reduce this burden, partly by focusing the standard on matters that are material. Other factors lessening the attractiveness of being a public company in the United States include the costs of regulation generally and the threat of class-action lawsuits.

The globalization of capital markets and the growth of local exchanges, both senior and junior, including the London Stock Exchange’s Alternative Investment Market (AIM), have also affected U.S. capital markets. AIM concentrates on small and growing companies, and the exchange has posted significant growth of late, including listings of U.S. and Canadian companies. AIM offers more liberal listing requirements than the principal U.S. exchanges (e.g., no minimum company size, number of shareholders or financial track record) and less onerous regulation. The Toronto Stock Exchange and TSX Venture Exchange are also attracting initial public offerings of U.S. companies that consider themselves too small for the U.S. markets or wish to avoid the cost of U.S. regulation. A TSX listing offers liquidity as well as a less costly regulatory regime (e.g., no requirement for auditors to attest to internal control over financial reporting).

In 2007, we expect that the costs and onerous regulatory regime facing U.S. public companies will continue to provide opportunities for private equity firms to take companies private and for other exchanges to obtain new listings. We also believe that companies will continue to structure their M&A transactions to avoid full U.S. regulation if suitable alternatives exist.

3. Income Trust M&A Will Grow

Income trusts had been increasing their M&A activity over the past several years as management teams looked to grow their businesses, aided by easy access to robust equity markets. Even with a relatively soft IPO market for income trust issuers in 2006, numerous public and private market M&A transactions took place (e.g., Avion’s acquisition of Atlas Cold Storage; Canadian Public Sector Pension Investment Board’s acquisition of Retirement Residences REIT; Welsh, Carson, Anderson and Stowe’s acquisition of ACS Media; and Macquarie Infrastructure’s proposed acquisition of Halterm).

The big news for income trusts, of course, was the federal government’s October 2006 announcement that income trusts would be taxed similarly to corporations. The new taxation rules are expected to come into effect in 2007 for all income trusts that become publicly traded on or after November 1, 2006, and in 2011 for all existing income trusts. This announcement shocked the income trust sector, sending issuers and their advisers scrambling. Unfortunately, a great deal of uncertainty remains while we await the implementation of the new tax regime.

We expect that income trust M&A activity will increase as units trade at depressed values and issuers become more affordable takeover targets, and that this heightened activity will accelerate during 2007. These transactions may take the form of management buyouts (supported by funding from private equity firms) or public takeover bids within the income trust sector. The takeover transactions will be either friendly or hostile and may be strategic or consolidation acquisitions.

4. Defensive Tactics Will Proliferate and Strengthen

In recent years, several high-profile Canadian public companies have been acquired by non-Canadian companies, with large acquisitions in the mining, steel, and oil and gas industries. These transactions have raised concerns about the hollowing out of corporate Canada and strategic national security. Some experts believe that Canadian public companies are unusually vulnerable to international acquisitions because Canadian laws restrict defensive tactics more than the laws of other countries do. Canadian regulators have arguably moved too far in ensuring that sale decisions are made by the shareholders, who may be overly focused on short-term gains at the expense of longer-term corporate and industry strength.

There are signs that the government and regulatory authorities are reviewing the broad area of takeover defences and that 2007 will see moves to strengthen takeover defences in Canada.

It remains to be seen whether Canadian regulators and courts will permit shareholder rights plans to stay in place in appropriate circumstances (instead of insisting in all cases that eventually the "plan must go"), giving more scope to directors of Canadian public companies to "just say no" as is permitted in the United States and other jurisdictions. However, the federal government has announced a review of the effectiveness of the Investment Canada Act in the case of proposed acquisitions by entities related to foreign governments.

5. Private Equity Club Transactions Will Continue to Increase

Large buyout firms combined to make several important acquisitions in 2006. Examples of these "club deals" include the announced US$21.8 billion buyout of Kinder Morgan by Goldman Sachs Capital Partners, American International Group and The Carlyle Group; the US$33 billion buyout of HCA by a consortium including KKR, Bain Capital Partners and Merrill Lynch Global Private Equity; and the announced sale of Freescale Semiconductor for US$17.6 billion to a consortium including The Blackstone Group, Texas Pacific Group, The Carlyle Group and Permira Advisers.

By joining forces, private equity firms significantly increase their range of potential acquisition targets. Club deals also allow firms to spread the costs and risks of larger investments across a broader pool of investors and to partner with strategic investors or other sponsors that have sectoral experience.

Club deals are not without risk. Participation by several investors brings added complexity to deal execution and ongoing management of the acquired company; multiple investors may complicate workouts if an investment gets into financial difficulty; and these deals can give rise to antitrust and competition law issues. In early October 2006, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) requested information from a number of prominent U.S. private equity firms regarding their participation in club deals, including their bidding practices. In November 2006, a class action alleging antitrust violations stemming from recent club deals was started in New York district court against 13 major private equity firms. Although it is too early to predict the outcome of the DOJ investigation, it is unlikely that club deals in and of themselves raise significant competition law issues under Canadian law.

We expect to see club deals continue in 2007 as cash-rich private equity funds pursue larger deals. In Canada, pension funds are likely to continue their move into the private equity space, with some funds executing transactions on their own, and an increasing number of pension funds participating in club deals, as co-investors with private equity firms.

6. Shareholder Activism Will Strengthen

We expect shareholder activism, particularly through hedge funds and mutual funds, to increase in 2007. Fund activists buy a stake in a company to influence corporate policy, force change and, ultimately, increase shareholder value. They accumulate a significant stake, usually more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the target entity, and then disclose that stake to the market. The market tends to respond by driving up the stock price in the short term. Some funds go further, engaging in proxy battles (or even launching takeover bids) for the company to effect a sale or an increase in dividends or to change management and control. In 2006, this technique was employed by Third Avenue Management when it made a partial bid for the shares of Catalyst Paper, ultimately acquiring a significant block of outstanding shares and securing representation on Catalyst Paper’s board of directors.

Hedge funds also buy shares of companies that are already in play or the subject of one or more outstanding bids. Large holdings by hedge funds can influence the outcome of a bidding war. As hedge funds typically have a short-term investment strategy, they tend to look for short-term gains and are unlikely to be swayed by the promise of long-term gains through synergies or other management strategies. This dynamic was evident in 2006 during the bidding war for Falconbridge. Inco’s promise to deliver higher value in the long term was ultimately rejected by hedge funds in favour of Xstrata’s higher all-cash bid.

In one extreme response to these practices, the Institute for Governance of Private and Public Organizations recently called for new rules banning shareholders from voting unless they have owned shares for at least one year. Although we believe that this proposal is probably not workable, it is an indication of the concerns raised by what is seen to be short-term thinking by hedge funds.

7. Use of Go-Shop Clauses Will Increase

We expect to see increased use in 2007 of "go-shop" clauses in merger agreements and support agreements. A go-shop clause is the opposite of the usual "no-shop" clause (which prevents a target from actively soliciting buyers). It provides the target with a limited period of time to canvass the market for other purchasers and is intended to give the target board comfort that it can satisfy its fiduciary obligations when there has been only a limited auction or none at all. Typically, the board will agree to pay a smaller-than-usual break fee if a competing transaction is agreed to during the go-shop period. The break fee will usually increase after the go-shop period expires.

Go-shop clauses are being used more frequently in the United States but are still rare in Canada. In a recent example, Airsource Power Fund agreed to support an offer by Algonquin Power Income Fund, but included a go-shop clause that allowed Airsource’s independent liquidity committee to solicit alternative proposals.

We expect a go-shop clause to be used when a target company facing a proposed transaction has been unable to canvass the market or conduct an auction; such a clause would assist the target’s board in satisfying its fiduciary obligation to maximize shareholder value. The target board would have to be comfortable, however, that the go-shop clause would give it a meaningful opportunity to solicit a better offer. If some form of auction has already taken place, the go-shop clause is likely to be more restrictive (shorter period and larger break fee) and we expect that the purchaser would strongly resist any form of go-shop clause if an unrestricted auction has occurred. Another influencing factor will be the premium offered by the purchaser: the higher the premium, the less likely a purchaser will agree to a go-shop clause.

8. Independence of Financial Advisers Will Be Scrutinized

Canadian securities laws do not specifically require boards or their special committees to use advisers that are independent of the company, its management and other interested parties, except when preparing a formal valuation. Directors in Canada have been comfortable relying upon opinions of financial advisers in M&A transactions even though the advisers may have other roles or relationships with other parties in the transaction. For example, special committees often obtain a fairness opinion from the financial adviser retained to oversee the sale process, who may be entitled to a success fee on completion of the transaction. The diverse roles played by advisers in some transactions reflect the practical reality that retaining advisers who are familiar with the company and the transaction is often the most efficient way for special committees to obtain the advice they need.

Although these practices have sparked some debate over the years, that debate has intensified in light of recent high-profile corporate governance failures and a heightened focus on corporate governance practices from regulators, stock exchanges, institutional investors and the media. Directors, who are themselves subject to close scrutiny when it comes to independence, are increasingly vigilant regarding the potential for conflicts among their advisers. In the M&A context, this has led more boards and special committees to take the cautious approach of retaining separate advisers who have no other roles or relationships with other parties in the transaction.

The issue of conflicts was addressed in a recent decision of the Delaware Court of Chancery (In re Tele-Communications, Inc. Shareholders Litigation). In that decision, the Court questioned "the quality and independence of the advice received" in light of the special committee’s reliance on the company’s legal and financial advisers.

The heightened awareness of conflicts is likely to mean that fairness opinions will be requested more often from a second firm of financial advisers that will not be entitled to a success fee on the transaction. We expect that directors will pay more attention to the terms of engagement of their advisers to ensure that their advisers’ incentives are aligned with the company’s and that the fee structure does not taint the process.

9. Telecom/Media Businesses Will Consolidate

Following CHUM’s acquisition by Bell Globemedia (which owns CTV and The Globe and Mail) in 2006, we expect further consolidation in 2007 in the Canadian broadcasting and media sector.

If the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission changes its rules, this could remove hurdles to consolidation. Canada’s federal government appears to favour a free market model for telecommunications regulation in Canada, as evidenced by its recent decision regarding the regulation of VoIP and local phone services. The relaxation of foreign ownership restrictions on tele-communications and broadcasting companies and the removal or reduction of benefits payments on acquiring control of broadcast licences would likely stimulate acquisition activity.

The proposed changes to the taxation of income trusts will require trusts with media assets to reconsider their corporate structures. Private equity funds may be attracted to these trusts, given their relatively steady cash flow.

Canadian media companies may also feel the need to continue to enhance their online operations to maintain their market share of advertising dollars in the face of competition from Internet players. This may lead to acquisitions in the Internet space—a recent example being the acquisition by Torstar and Gesca (the latter a subsidiary of Power Corp.) of a 100% interest in

10. India Will Expand Activity

Greater interest from Indian companies in Canadian M&A transactions is expected, as India continues to look beyond its home market in order to grow, increase value for stakeholders and maintain competitiveness.

Canada–India relations continue to improve and Indian M&A activity in Canada may increase correspondingly, especially following trade missions from officials from both Ontario and Alberta.

While the primary focus of Indian foreign acquisitions will likely be in the energy sector, growth potential for Indian M&A activity also exists in the following sectors: (i) mining, particularly following the October 2006 Indian Mining Mission to Canada; (ii) information technology, as exemplified by recent transactions involving Celestica with HCL Technologies and Aditya Birla Group’s indirect acquisition of Minacs Worldwide; and (iii) automotive, with Indian auto manufacturers such as Bharat Forge, Tata Motors and Mahindra & Mahindra looking to gain a foreign foothold.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.