Canada: Ross River Dena Council v. Yukon: The Duty To Consult And Wildlife Management

Last Updated: December 16 2015
Article by John J.P. Donihee and Nicole Petersen

On November 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of Yukon (the "Court") released its decision in Ross River Dena Council v. Yukon.1 This is not the Ross River Dena Council's ("RRDC") first challenge to Government of Yukon ("Yukon") consultation practices.2 The issues in this case were whether Yukon has a duty to consult and accommodate the RRDC when issuing wildlife hunting licences, permits, and seals and at what point the duty arises.

The RRDC applied for a declaration that Yukon has a duty to consult and accommodate the RRDC prior to the annual issuance of hunting licences, permits and seals. The Court found that Yukon does in fact owe the RRDC a duty to consult and accommodate in managing wildlife and issuing hunting licences that affect part of the RRDC traditional area. The Court found, however, that Yukon provided evidence showing that it satisfied its duty to consult and accommodate in this matter. Although on the facts in this case the Court rejected the RRDC's application for a declaration that this duty must be satisfied each year prior to issuing hunting licences and seals, the Court did find that regular consultation on the effects of hunting on first nation harvesting were advisable.

The RRDC is a Yukon First Nation whose members are part of the Kaska Nation. The Ross River Area is an area of the RRDC's traditional territory that is of particular importance to the RRDC for harvesting.3 The RRDC has asserted claims to Aboriginal title and rights in the Ross River Area. Yukon has knowledge of the RRDC's asserted claims in the area and regularly consults with the RRDC on hunting, trapping and related matters within the RRDC's traditional territory.4 The RRDC's land claims are not settled and no Final Agreement has been signed with the Crown. The Court's duty to consult analysis was based on asserted Aboriginal title and rights rather than the law related to settled land claims agreements or modern land treaties, as we have seen in recent consultation cases from Yukon. The Court thus determined Yukon's duty to consult by applying the test found in Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) ("Haida")5 and the reasoning in Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia ("Tsilhqot'in6").

The Court also relied heavily on a 2012 Yukon Court of Appeal (the "Court of Appeal") decision, Ross River Dena Council v. Government of Yukon, 2012 YKCA 14 ("RRDC #1"), in which it was held that Yukon owes a duty to consult the RRDC in exercising its authority relating to the mineral rights system in the Yukon.7 In RRDC #1, the Court of Appeal granted the declaration sought by the RRDC that a duty to consult arises at the point that Yukon determined whether mineral rights on Crown lands within the Ross River Area were to be made available to third parties under the Quartz Mining Act.8 We wrote about RRDC #1 here (see page 5).

Yukon's Wildlife Management Regime

The Yukon Wildlife Act and Regulations set out the licensing and permitting scheme and the game management "sub-zones" for the territory that apply to Yukon residents.9 A Yukon resident must obtain a hunting licence and a seal, or seals, to hunt big game in any area of the Yukon.10 A hunter may also be required to obtain a permit to hunt a particular species in a specific game management "sub-zone."11 All licenced big game hunters are required to report their hunting activities including kill dates and the "sub-zone" where the hunting took place.12 Yukon's wildlife management regime does not apply in the same way to non-aboriginal Yukon residents and RRDC members. RRDC members do not need to obtain a licence, permit, or seal to hunt for subsistence purposes in the Ross River Area or anywhere in the territory.13

The Yukon Fish and Wildlife Management Board ("YFWMB") was established pursuant to Chapter 16 of the Umbrella Final Agreement between Yukon and First Nations, to address fish and wildlife management in the territory. The RRDC has not yet signed a Final Agreement and is not represented on the YFWMB.14 Yukon's Department of the Environment ("Environment Yukon") is the primary organization responsible for addressing concerns and issues raised by the RRDC about hunting in the Ross River Area. Environment Yukon issues licences and seals, and collects data from licenced hunters.

The Ross River Area is a popular area for hunting by licenced hunters. This area is easily accessible by major roads and 83 of the 443 game management "sub-zones", in which hunting is permitted, are located in the Ross River Area. The Ross River Area is home to a variety of large game and wildlife including caribou, moose, tinhorn sheep, mountain goats, grizzly bears, black bears and wolves. Seven mountain caribou herds are found within the Ross River Area.

The Finlayson caribou herd remains entirely within the Ross River Area and is an important resource for members of the RRDC.15 Environment Yukon has consulted with the RRDC about the management of the Finlayson herd several times. Environment Yukon and the RRDC have collaborated to monitor the Finlayson herd and to establish permit hunts between 1995 and 2007. Environment Yukon has consulted with the RRDC about another caribou herd, as well as mountain goat, moose, and wolf populations.16

Yukon owes the RRDC a Duty to Consult

Since the RRDC has not signed a Final Agreement, the Court applied the test in Haida to determine whether Yukon owes the RRDC a duty to consult. The Court found that Yukon owes the RRDC a duty to consult about the issuance of hunting licences.

The Court found that Yukon had knowledge of RRDC's asserted Aboriginal title and rights in the Ross River Area. This was sufficient to meet the first part of Haida test. The Court followed its decision in RRDC #1 and found that Yukon had admitted knowledge of the RRDC claim for Aboriginal title, rights and interest in the Ross River Area.17

The Court also found that Yukon's issuance of hunting permits was sufficient conduct to satisfy the second part of the Haida test. Yukon had argued that the duty to consult would be triggered at the earlier stage of the process which Yukon called the "higher wildlife management level"18 which includes permit hunts, threshold hunts and closure of licenced hunting or early hunting season closures. The Court was not so specific and stated only that in determining whether Crown conduct triggers the duty to consult the issue is "really whether there is Crown conduct or decision and whether the duty to consult should occur before that conduct."19 Of particular note, the Court disagreed with Yukon's argument that the annual issuance of licences and seals is simply an administrative task that could not trigger the duty to consult. The Court followed its reasoning affirmed by the Court of Appeal RRDC #1 and rejected the argument that an absence of statutory discretion absolves the Crown of its duty to consult.20

The Court also found that there was sufficient evidence to meet the third element of the Haida test. The Court reasoned that Yukon's annual issuance of hunting licences, insofar as it allows licenced hunters to harvest wildlife in the Ross River Area, has the potential to adversely affect the RRDC's Aboriginal title and right to hunt in the Ross River Area.21 The Court found that hunting has a direct impact on wildlife resources. The Court went on to cite Tsilhqot'in and say that the issuance of licences and seals that allow hunting in the Ross River Area affect the RRDC's claim to title as hunting, to some extent, infringes on the RRDC's asserted claim to Aboriginal title and the right to use and control the land and to reap the benefits flowing from it.22

As stated in Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia, 2014 SCC 44, "Aboriginal title confers the right to use and control the land and to reap the benefits flowing from it." To some extent, Yukon's issuance of hunting licences and seals can be said to permit conduct inconsistent with claimed Aboriginal title."23

The Court also clarified that the Haida test requires only that the RRDC prove there is a potential for adverse effects on its asserted rights and not the "material evidence" of an actual impact to asserted rights argued by Yukon.24

Yukon Satisfied the Duty to Consult

The Court found that Yukon satisfied its duty to consult and accommodate the RRDC. The Court stated that declarations are discretionary remedies that should be used sparingly and that because consultation had already taken place between Yukon and the RRDC, a declaration would serve no real purpose to the parties in this case.25

The Court heard evidence that Yukon had a well-developed wildlife management system which included a co-management framework. The RRDC did not participate directly in this co-management because it had not settled its land claims but the RRDC was regularly invited to participate in such decisions. The Court found that the RRDC provided no evidence to show that Yukon breached its duty to consult and that Yukon provided evidence of extensive consultations with the RRDC about wildlife management. The Court found that when it came to the Finlayson Caribou herd permits and other populations within the Ross River Area, Yukon consulted with the RRDC before the annual issuance of hunting licences and seals.26

The Court did not make a declaration that the duty to consult in the Ross River Area arises before the issuance of Yukon-wide licences and seals because it found that Yukon satisfied its duty to consult and accommodate the RRDC. The Court further found that the sought after declaration was not appropriate because it contemplated consultation for the issuance of licences and seals for the whole of the Yukon, not just the Ross River Area. However, Justice Veale shared his view that Yukon may benefit from consulting on a more regular and predictable basis when dealing with hunting regulations, as an effective way of ensuring that RRDC's claims to title and hunting rights within the Ross River Area are recognized.27


This decision has important implications in the areas of wildlife law and consultation. This is especially so for wildlife management regimes where non-Aboriginal hunting could adversely affect subsistence harvesting by native people whose rights have priority. This ruling should be considered by governments making wildlife allocation decisions in areas without the co-management regimes established by comprehensive land claim agreements.

Broadly based wildlife allocation decisions may now require consultation with Aboriginal rights and title claimants and treaty rights holders whose opportunities to hunt are adversely affected by government allocation and licensing decisions.

Consultation is grounded in reconciliation and the honour of the Crown. These are the fundamental guiding principles in land use planning, wildlife and resource management that must be adhered to by federal and provincial government decision-makers.

For more on reconciliation, consultation and the honour of the Crown, see our article about the Yukon Court of Appeal's decision in First Nation of Nacho Nyak Dun v. Yukon here.


1 2015 YKSC 45 [RRDC #2].

2 Ross River Dena Council v. Government of Yukon, 2012 YKCA 14.

3 Ibid at para 2.

4 Ibid at paras 64-65.

5 2004 SCC 73.

6 2014 SCC 44.

7 Leave to appeal to SCC refused.

8 RRDC #2 supra note 1 at para 8.

9 RSY 2002, c.229.

10 RRDC #2 supra note 1 at para 11.

11 Ibid.

12 Ibid at para 18.

13 Ibid at para 12.

14 Ibid at para 14.

15 Ibid at para 22.

16 Ibid at para 33

17 Ibid at para 46.

18 Ibid at para 50.

19 Ibid at para 51.

20 Ibid at para 49.

21 Ibid at para 58.

22 Ibid at para 56.

23 Ibid at para 56.

24 Ibid at para 57.

25 Ibid at paras 99 .

26 Ibid at para 80.

27 Ibid at para 99.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

John J.P. Donihee
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.