Canada: Regulation Of Foreign Investment And Merger Regulation

REGULATION OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT

The Investment Canada Act (the "ICA") is federal legislation that provides a framework to review investments by non- Canadians to ensure "net benefit" to Canada. Most investments by non-Canadians require only that the Director of Investments (an officer appointed under the Investment Canada Act) be notified of the investment while other, usually larger or culturally sensitive, investments by non-Canadians require an application, followed by a review by the Director and approval by the Industry Minister. Investments in culturally sensitive business activities are reviewed and approved by the Canadian Heritage Minister.

Notification Procedure

All establishments of new businesses in Canada, with the exception of "culturally sensitive" businesses, and all nonreviewable acquisitions by non-Canadians of Canadian businesses are generally subject to a notification procedure only. The form of notice requires information concerning the non-Canadian investor; the nature of the investment; a description of the Canadian business being established or acquired; details relating to the investor's officers, directors and shareholders; its sources of financing for the proposed investment; the transaction documents (or the principal terms and conditions, including the estimated total purchase price of the investment); whether the investor is owned, controlled or influenced, directly or indirectly, by a foreign government; and information to permit enterprise value information to be collected.

The notice is filed with the Director of Investments who issues a receipt if the notice is complete. The receipt indicates that the establishment, or acquisition, of the business is not reviewable under Part IV of the ICA.

Review Thresholds: WTO Transactions

By reason of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO) between Canada and certain other countries (there are currently 161 WTO members), the review threshold for direct acquisitions by non-Canadians who are WTO investors or for direct acquisitions of Canadian businesses controlled by WTO investors will, as a result of amendments to the regulations made under the ICA effective April 24, 2015, be based on "enterprise value" of the acquired Canadian business (an increase from the 2015 threshold of C$369 million based on book value of the assets of the acquired business). The review threshold for WTO investments (by investors other than State-Owned Enterprises ("SOE"), which is addressed below) is C$600 million in "enterprise value," which will apply for a two year period ending in 2017, increasing to C$800 million for the next two years ending in 2019, followed by an increase to C$1 billion. For subsequent calendar years, the review threshold will be indexed annually to changes in Canada's nominal GDP, in accordance with the formula in the ICA.

Regulations made under the ICA in March of 2015 provide for a detailed methodology for calculating the enterprise value when an acquisition of control of a Canadian business has occurred. The calculation of enterprise value depends on the type of transaction contemplated (i.e., where the acquired entity is a publicly traded entity, a non-publicly traded entity, or if the transaction involves the acquisition of assets).

Under the new rules, where any portion of the total consideration to be paid by the investor is not known at the time the investment is implemented, the value of this unknown portion is deemed to be the amount that the investor represents and determines in good faith to be the fair market value. This provision will be applicable to contingent payment scenarios, including transactions with potential earn-outs the value of which may not be known at the time of the closing of the investment transaction. The provision also ascribes value in scenarios in which there is inadequate market price information, such as non-publicly traded shares.

Indirect acquisitions of control of non-cultural Canadian businesses by non-Canadians (i.e., by acquiring control of a non-Canadian parent of a Canadian subsidiary) are not subject to review for WTO investors (or for non-Canadian WTO sellers).

These newly established review thresholds (as well as the statutory exempt review for indirect acquisitions of control) are not applicable in certain enumerated circumstances set out in the ICA (see below).

Review Thresholds: Non-WTO Transactions

For the few non-WTO transactions, a book value method for determining the value of an acquired Canadian business will continue to apply. Direct acquisitions of shares of Canadian corporations carrying on Canadian businesses or acquisitions of the assets of such corporations are reviewable where the book value of the assets of the subject corporation is C$5 million or greater. Indirect acquisitions of control of a Canadian business are also reviewable, but the asset value thresholds for review are higher (C$50 million) unless the value of the assets of the Canadian business is C$5 million or greater and represents more than 50% of the book value involved in the international transaction.

Cultural Heritage or National Identity

Investment proposals, including indirect acquisitions of control, that might ordinarily be only notifiable can be ordered for review where the business is related to Canadian cultural heritage or national identity. Currently, these "culturally sensitive" businesses include the publication, distribution and sale or exhibition of books, magazines, periodicals, newspapers, films, videos and music. These acquisitions are subject to review where the book value of acquired assets exceeds C$5 million, while indirect acquisitions of control are subject to review where the book value of the acquired assets exceeds C$50 million (the federal Cabinet retains discretionary authority to review an investment in a cultural business falling below these thresholds).

State-owned Enterprises

In 2007, the Canadian government released guidelines on what additional considerations the Industry Minister would take into account when reviewing proposed investments by SOEs. In late 2012 and in response to two investments made by SOEs in Canadian energy assets, including the Canadian oil sands, new guidelines (the "2012 SOE policy") were published amplifying the scope of the elements the government will consider important in determining the extent to which an investor is an SOE. The 2012 SOE Policy sets out additional factors that the Industry Minister will take into account when assessing proposed investments by SOEs (see below). In addition, as part of the June 2013 Amendments, a definition of an SOE was enacted to include "an entity that is controlled or influenced, directly or indirectly, by a government or agency" of a foreign state. As well, the Industry Minister has been given the power to determine that an otherwise Canadian-controlled entity is in fact not a Canadian-controlled entity if the Minister is "satisfied that the entity is controlled in fact by one or more" SOEs.

Direct acquisitions by non-Canadian WTO SOE investors are subject to review where the book value the assets of the acquired business exceeds C$369 million (the applicable threshold for transactions closing in 2015). Indirect acquisitions of control by WTO SOE investors remain exempt from review.

Factors

Where a proposed investment is reviewable, the Industry Minister (or the Canadian Heritage Minister in the case of "culturally sensitive" businesses) will approve the investment where the proposal is considered to be of "net benefit" to Canada. In assessing net benefit, the Minister will consider, with no particular weighting, such factors as the effect of the proposed investment on economic activity in Canada, participation by Canadians in the business, productivity, competition, the compatibility of the investment with national, industrial, economic or cultural policies and the contribution by the business to Canada's ability to compete in world markets.

As well, the 2012 SOE policy states that SOE investors will have to satisfy the Minister about the investment's "commercial orientation; freedom from political influence; adherence to Canadian laws...that promote sound corporate governance and transparency; and positive contributions to the productivity and industrial efficiency of the Canadian business."

National Security

In 2009, amendments were enacted to the ICA concerning investments that may be considered injurious to national security. The amendments introduce a process similar to that found in the United States under the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States ("CFIUS") review process, pursuant to which CFIUS is authorized to review, investigate and block any transaction or investment that could result in the control of any U.S. businesses or assets by a foreign person that may raise national security concerns, or involve critical infrastructure.

Under the national security provisions of the ICA, if the relevant Minister has reasonable grounds to believe that an investment by a non-Canadian "could be injurious to national security," the Minister may send the non-Canadian a notice under Part IV.1 of the ICA (within 45 days of a notification or application for review) indicating that an order for review of the investment may be made. The review of an investment on the grounds of national security may occur whether or not an investment is otherwise subject to review on the basis of net benefit to Canada or otherwise only subject to notification under the ICA. Moreover, a national security review can occur even if there is no "acquisition of control" of a Canadian business (i.e., minority investments that do not transfer de facto control). There is no process for investors to request pre-closing approval in order to obtain comfort.

To date, there is neither legislation nor guidelines published on the meaning of "injurious to national security." Discussions with government officials suggest that very few investment proposals will cause a review under these new sections. There has been one reported case under the ICA dealing with national security issues. However, it is known that the Industry Minister has chosen, on at least a few other occasions, to apply the national security provisions to an investment.

There are significant time periods in the event of a national security review under Part IV.1 of the ICA. In March 2015, these periods were extended further for various stages of a national security review (once an investor has received a notice indicating that an order for review of the investment may be made). A national security review timeframe under the ICA that previously would have lasted for 130 days can now, under the new rules, be extended to 200 days (or longer with the consent of the investor).

Moreover, significant transaction uncertainty arises, particularly in the context of notifiable investments (i.e., those not ordinarily subject to review), in view of the 45-day waiting period under Part IV.1 in which the Minister may notify the non-Canadian investor of a possible national security review. To foreclose any risk of such a review arising after closing for investments that would not otherwise be subject to review, parties will often send the requisite notification to the Director of Investments at least 45 days before closing, thereby achieving certainty that no national security issues will arise.

History

To date, more than 20,000 investment proposals have been filed with the Director of the Investment Review Division of Industry Canada and a number of other proposals with Cultural Sector Investment Review of Canadian Heritage. Most of these investment proposals have been filed by way of the notification procedures, which investments have not been subjected to review. Those proposals requiring the application and review procedure have all eventually been approved or otherwise withdrawn, with the exception of i) some culturally sensitive cases handled by Canadian Heritage; ii) one case handled by Industry Canada under the traditional Part IV net benefit provisions and iii) one case handled under the Part IV.1 national security provisions. Often the applicant has negotiated undertakings with the Director, which undertakings are designed to satisfy the Part IV net benefit to Canada criteria.

MERGER REGULATION

Mergers

The Competition Act (Canada) is a federal statute that gives the Competition Tribunal (a tribunal established pursuant to the Competition Tribunal Act) (the "Tribunal") upon application by the Commissioner of Competition (the "Commissioner"), an officer responsible for administering the Competition Act, the power to make certain orders in connection with mergers that prevent or lessen or are likely to prevent or lessen competition substantially in Canada. A "merger" is defined to mean the acquisition or establishment, direct or indirect, by one or more persons (whether Canadian or non-Canadian), whether by purchase of shares or purchase or lease of assets, by amalgamation or combination or otherwise, of control over or significant interest in the whole or a part of a business of a competitor, supplier, customer or other person.

The Competition Act provides a list of factors for the Tribunal to consider in assessing whether a merger lessens competition substantially, including: competition from imports and by foreign competitors; the solvency of the target business; the availability of product or service substitutes; trade and other barriers to entry; and the competitive effect of other firms in the relevant market.

If the Tribunal finds that a merger or a proposed merger prevents or lessens, or is likely to prevent or lessen competition substantially, the Tribunal is permitted to make certain orders, including the prohibition of a merger before it occurs, the dissolution of a merger after it has occurred and the disposition of assets or shares. Subject to the issuance of an advance ruling certificate (see below), the Commissioner may challenge a merger by applying to the Tribunal for an order within one year following the date upon which the merger is substantially completed, notwithstanding the compliance by parties to a proposed transaction with the transaction notification provisions of the Competition Act.

Transaction Notification

As is the case in the United States under the Hart-Scott- Rodino ("HSR") notification process, the Competition Act provides that the parties to certain large transactions must notify the Commissioner prior to completing a transaction. While the Commissioner may review all mergers irrespective of size, the Competition Act requires notification of a proposed transaction if both a parties' threshold and a transaction threshold are exceeded.

The parties' threshold is exceeded if the parties to the proposed transaction, together with their affiliates, have combined assets in Canada or gross annual revenues from sales "in, from or into" Canada exceeding C$400 million. The transaction threshold is exceeded where, in respect of the following five forms of transactions:

(a) the acquisition of assets in Canada of an operating business;

(b) certain acquisitions of shares (see below) of the target corporation carrying on an operating business or of corporations carrying on an operating business controlled by that corporation;

(c) amalgamations of two or more corporations if one or more of those corporations carries on an operating business, or controls a corporation that carries on an operating business;

(d) other forms of non-corporate combinations; or

(e) an acquisition of an interest in a combination that carries on an operating business otherwise than through a corporation,

the target (or the entity formed by amalgamation/combination) has assets in Canada or revenues from sales in or from Canada exceeding C$86 million (the relevant transaction threshold for the remainder of 2015, which amount may be changed annually, by regulation, based on Canadian nominal gross domestic product).

Where both the parties' threshold and the transaction threshold are exceeded, notification under the Competition Act is required where persons, together with their affiliates, acquire more than 20% of the voting shares of a corporation that is publicly traded, or will acquire more than 50% if, prior to the proposed transaction, such persons owned more than 20%. In the case of voting shares of a corporation (none of the voting shares of which are publicly traded), the Competition Act requires notification (when the thresholds are exceeded) where persons acquiring such shares together with their affiliates would, as a result of the proposed transaction, own in the aggregate more than 35% of the voting shares or will acquire more than 50% if, prior to the proposed transaction, such persons owned more than 35%.

Where the above-noted parties' and transaction thresholds are exceeded, the parties to the proposed transaction must notify the Commissioner by supplying information in accordance with the Competition Act and Section 16 of the Notifiable Transaction Regulations before completing the merger. Typically, counsel for the acquiring party will also file a submission concerning the competitive impact of the proposed transaction. While all of the information provided to the Commissioner is treated as confidential under the Competition Act, the Commissioner has taken the position that the confidentiality provisions in the Competition Act permit the Competition Bureau to share the information filed with them and their review with others on the grounds that such exchanges are made for purposes relating to the administration or enforcement of the Competition Act. Also, the Competition Bureau has the power to speak with affected parties and others for the purposes of gathering information as part of their review. In the ordinary course filing parties are aware of certain of and consent to these activities by the regulatory authorities.

A notification must include all studies, surveys, analyses and reports "prepared or received by an officer or director ... for the purposes of evaluating or analysing the proposed transaction." This broad information requirement is similar to that found in Item 4(c) of the HSR notification reporting form which must be submitted under the U.S. pre-merger notification rules. Once the notification form is filed with the Commissioner, the parties must wait 30 days before completing the transaction, unless the Competition Bureau issues a supplementary information request, or SIR, within 30 days of the original filing, in which case the 30-day waiting period will commence once the parties have complied with the SIR. The Bureau has indicated that it "will only issue a SIR when the proposed transaction raises significant competition issues and additional information is required." In cases where the Commissioner has no concerns about the proposed merger, an advance ruling certificate (see below) or a "no-action letter" may be issued that will allow the parties to proceed with the proposed transaction even if the 30-day waiting period has not expired.

The Competition Act imposes criminal sanctions for failure to comply with the notification or waiting requirements. In addition, administrative monetary penalties of up to C$10,000 per day may be assessed for non-compliance. Typically, a transaction will proceed following the expiry of the waiting period, unless the Commissioner applies or threatens to apply to the Tribunal to prevent the proposed transaction from proceeding in cases where the Commissioner believes that substantive competition issues will arise from the proposed transaction.

The Competition Act provides limited exemptions to the notification requirements when a transaction otherwise exceeds the two financial thresholds referred to above. For example, transactions between affiliated parties are exempt from the notification requirements.

Advance Ruling Certificates

Parties to a proposed merger, whether or not subject to transaction notification, may apply to the Commissioner for an advance ruling certificate (an "ARC") with respect to such merger. If issued, the ARC certifies that the Commissioner is satisfied that the proposed merger will not prevent or lessen competition substantially. Parties will often apply for an ARC when it is clear that no substantive competition issues will arise in connection with the proposed transaction and will often couple such application with the transaction notice filing.

Receipt of an ARC exempts the parties from the transaction notification requirements which otherwise may apply. Upon issuing an ARC, the Commissioner cannot apply to the Tribunal in respect of the proposed merger solely on the basis of information that is the same or substantially the same as the information on the basis of which the ARC was issued, provided the merger has been substantially completed within one year following the issuance of the ARC.

CANADA'S ANTI-CORRUPTION LEGISLATION

Bribery Offences

In 1999, Canada ratified the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions through the enactment of the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act ("CFPOA"). The legislation was largely unenforced, with only one conviction under the CFPOA in the first six years after enactment. Canada has since, however, begun to commit resources to anti-corruption, with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police establishing dedicated enforcement units.

Under the current CFPOA, every person commits an offence who, in order to obtain or retain an advantage in the course of business, directly or indirectly gives, offers or agrees to give or offer a benefit of any kind to a foreign public official or to any person for the benefit of a foreign public official. Additionally, it is an offence under the CFPOA to keep false books or records for the purpose of bribing a foreign public.

The CFPOA provides exemptions for payments that are not illegal under the domestic law of the foreign country or the payment of certain reasonable expenses incurred in good faith by the foreign public official on their behalf. Amendments to the CFPOA not currently in force will remove a currently available exemption for facilitation payments.

Transparency in the Extractive Sector

The stated purpose of the Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act ("ESTMA") is "to implement Canada's international commitments to participate in the fight against corruption through the imposition of measures applicable to the extractive sector."

The ESTMA affects commercial developers of "oil, gas or minerals" who have a sufficient connection to Canada. Developers who meet certain criteria must report to the Minister regarding payments they make to various parties (payees).

The ESTMA defines "payee" broadly to include any domestic or foreign government, trust, board, commission, corporation or other body or authority, including bodies established by two or more governments, or government delegates. For financial years starting after June 1, 2017, Aboriginal governments will also be considered payees.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.