This paper provides analysis of one of the foundational elements
of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and various
intergovernmental agreements (IGAs): an unambiguous place of U.S.
birth and the ability to cure (Cure) this element, thereby
rendering the account nonreportable. The IGAs generally allow the
individual to Cure his unambiguous place of U.S. birth by producing
a Certificate of Loss of Nationality (CLN) or by providing a
"reasonable explanation" of why he does not have one
despite having relinquished U.S. citizenship.
Unfortunately, however, none of the IGAs, FATCA, or legislative
history provide guidance as to what might constitute a
"reasonable explanation." Analysis of this issue is
deceptively difficult because (beginning in 2004) U.S. law
differentiated the loss of U.S. citizenship for nationality
purposes from the loss of U.S. citizenship for tax purposes.
Further, FATCA and the IGAs use the tax definition of U.S.
citizenship (and loss thereof), which incorporates elements of the
nationality definition of U.S. citizenship.
This paper provides an analytical framework for determining the
reasonableness of the explanation and provides a template that, the
author hopes, will be useful in providing guidance on this issue.
The paper also addresses the importance of clear guidance and harm
that may result if an individual attempts to Cure his U.S. place of
birth by seeking to obtain a CLN from the U.S. Department of
The harm that may result is based on the fact that a literal
reading of current U.S. law deems the individual to lose his U.S.
citizenship for tax purposes after, inter alia, giving
notice to the Department of State which results in the issuance of
a CLN, even though the issuance of a CLN is not required (and has
never been required) to terminate U.S. citizenship for nationality
purposes. Thus the individual who currently applies for a CLN may
inadvertently find himself subject to income tax obligations and
also the expatriation tax regime, even though he may have lost his
U.S. citizenship for nationality purposes years (or decades)
Specifically the paper analyzes: (1) loss of U.S. citizenship
for tax purposes and nationality purposes; (2) unambiguous place of
U.S. birth; (3) cure for unambiguous place of U.S. birth; (4) what
might constitute a "reasonable explanation" under the
Treasury regulations and the IGA; (5) whether Canada has the
authority to issue guidance on "reasonable explanation"
under the IGA; (6) whether Canada should modify its Guidance Notes
to clarify "reasonable explanation;" and (7) U.S.
expatriation tax and the consequences of Curing a U.S. place of
birth by obtaining a CLN.
To continue reading this article, please click
This paper was originally presented at the Canadian Tax Foundation Annual Conference held in Vancouver on November 30 –
December 2, 2014. An edited version of this paper will be published in Report of Proceedings of the Sixty-Sixth Tax Conference, 2014
Moodys Gartner Tax Law is only about tax. It is
not an add-on service, it is our singular focus. Our Canadian and
US lawyers and Chartered Accountants work together to develop
effective tax strategies that get results, for individuals and
corporate clients with interests in Canada, the US or both. Our
strengths lie in Canadian and US cross-border tax advisory
services, estateplanning, and tax litigation/dispute resolution. We
identify areas of risk and opportunity, and create plans that yield
the right balance of protection, optimization and compliance for
each of our clients' special circumstances.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Many Canadians have invested in US properties and businesses through US Limited Liability Limited Partnerships (LLLPs) and Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs). However, on May 26, 2016, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) announced a change in the application of Canadian tax law to US LLLPs and LLPs, which has completely altered the economics and obligations for Canadians invested in these entities.
For those of us that rely on our trusted financial advisor, thoughts of our RRSP will be put on the back shelf until early 2018, when we are scrambling to make our last-minute contributions before the deadline.
You can't say Justin Trudeau didn't warn us. He made it very clear during his campaign to become Prime Minister that he planned to introduce legislation that would be damaging to the Western Canadian oil and gas industry.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).