On October 19, Canadian citizens aged 18 and over will elect the
next federal government. As an employer, what are your obligations?
Do you have to give your employees time off to vote?
Employers must give paid time off to employees whose hours of
work do not allow them three consecutive hours to vote
Under the Canada Elections Act, any employee who is
eligible to vote must be allowed 3 consecutive hours to vote on
Voting hours by time zone:
Newfoundland: 8:30 a.m. - 8:30 p.m.
Atlantic: 8:30 a.m. - 8:30 p.m.
Eastern: 9:30 a.m. - 9:30 p.m.
Central: 8:30 a.m. - 8:30 p.m.[*]
Mountain: 7:30 a.m. - 7:30 p.m.[*]
Pacific: 7 a.m. - 7 p.m.
[*] In Saskatchewan, voting hours are from 7:30 a.m. to 7:30
So for example, in the Eastern time zone, if your employees start
work after 12:30 p.m. or end work by 6:30 p.m., you are not
required to give them time off. Otherwise, you must allow them a
period of 3 consecutive hours to vote, at the time of day that
best suits you.
Time off must be compensated as though the employees had worked
their usual hours.
The requirement to grant time off does not apply to an employee of
a company that transports goods or passengers by land, air or water
who is employed outside his or her polling division in the
operation of a means of transportation, if the additional time
cannot be allowed without interfering with the transportation
What are the consequences of non-compliance?
Because voting is so important, stiff penalties are imposed on
employers who break the law. An employer who fails to give 3
consecutive hours of time off work to an employee or who deducts
any amount from an employee's wages for time off is liable to a
fine of up to $2000 and/or imprisonment for up to three
An employer who intimidates or exerts undue influence on an
employee or otherwise interferes with an employee's right to
take 3 consecutive hours of time off to vote is liable on summary
conviction to a fine of up to $20,000 and/or imprisonment for up to
one year and, on conviction on indictment, to a fine of up to
$50,000 and/or imprisonment for up to five years.
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Norton Rose Fulbright is a global legal practice. We provide
the world's pre-eminent corporations and financial institutions
with a full business law service. We have more than 3800 lawyers
based in over 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada,
Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central
Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all
the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy;
infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and
innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.
Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global
business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to
provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of
our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of
Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia,
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South
Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright &
Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members
('the Norton Rose Fulbright members') of Norton Rose
Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein
helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright
members but does not itself provide legal services to
The content of this article is intended to provide a
general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be
sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Unfortunately, reasonable accommodation for employees in the workplace continues to be the source of significant litigation and even today we continue to see outrageous examples of employers behaving badly.
A former teacher at Bodwell High School has learned a valuable lesson from the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal— it is not discriminatory for an employer to offer child-related benefits to only employees with children.
We are now beginning to see reported cases involving charges and subsequent fines laid against employers for failing to provide information, instruction and supervision to protect a worker from workplace violence.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).