Canada: Stock Options: ´Backdating and Springloading´ - Are Your Records in Order?

Last Updated: October 12 2006

By Eric C. Belli-Bivar and Liana L. Turrin

Just when you might have thought that the dust had settled on the series of scandals that have rocked corporate America, the latest chapter in this continuing saga - involving stock options - is just being written. Currently, the practices of ‘backdating’ and ‘springloading’ are the focus of investigation by US securities regulatory authorities and US federal prosecutors, as well as being the subject of several class-action lawsuits by shareholders.

The recent announcement by the Chief Criminal Investigator of the FBI, Mr. Chip Burrus, that it is probing the conduct of executives and officials at 52 companies, and that more cases are underway, underscores just how seriously the practices of backdating and springloading are being dealt with south of the border. Mr. Burrus notes that where his agency becomes involved "there are allegations of criminal misconduct".

The list of casualties in this ever-widening scandal seems to grow day by day. For example, at McAfee, the general counsel left after the company’s investigation into options timing. At Comverse Technology, the CEO and 2 other executives quit in May 2006 after the company found that grants had been backdated. Broadcom Corp. has announced that it expects a restatement of financial results to increase expenses by more than US $1.5 billion. Broadcom’s CFO also recently ‘accelerated’ his retirement following the internal investigation.

Perhaps the most egregious case that has come to light to date was announced by Cablevision Systems Corp. which, in a company filing, reported that options had been awarded to the company’s vice-chairman after his 1999 death but backdated to make it appear as though the options were granted while he was alive. The company had previously delayed releasing its second quarter results and said that it would likely restate earnings because of an internal probe into option grants. In addition, 2 directors of Cablevision have stepped down from the compensation and audit committees in the wake of several shareholder lawsuits naming them, among others, as defendants.

Evidence that companies in Canada are not immune from this latest corporate scandal came in the form of an announcement on September 28, 2006 by RIM - the maker of the iconic wireless email Blackberry devices - that it is reviewing its stock option grant practices as a consequence of the "heightened public awareness and concern regarding stock option grant practices by publicly traded companies".

RIM reported that its audit committee has already made a preliminary determination that "accounting errors" have been made in connection with stock options granted as far back as 1998, as a result of which RIM delayed reporting full 2nd quarter results. A company spokesman noted that the options review may require the company to reduce the amount of previously reported earnings by between US $25 and US $45 million dollars, and restate past results. RIM declined to provide any details as to the nature of the "accounting errors" giving rise to the restatements.

Where It All Started

The current controversy over options backdating was sparked by the research of an unlikely champion of corporate governance, a Norwegian academic by the name of Erik Lie, who is an assistant professor of finance at the University of Iowa.

In his ground-breaking research, Professor Lie examined the proxy statements of more than 2000 large S&P companies to determine whether there was any empirical evidence to support his hypothesis that the dates of option grants were deliberately selected to coincide with a date on which the stock price was particularly low. His research found abnormally low stock returns before grant dates, and unusually high returns after those grant dates. This observation led him to conclude that "unless executives possess an extraordinary ability to forecast the future market-wide movements that drive these predicted returns, the results suggest that at least some of the awards were timed retroactively".

The conclusion reached in Professor Lie’s paper was that the abnormally high stock returns following stated option grant dates were consistent with his hypothesis that the official grant date must have been retroactively selected, and that the actual timing of option grants were not being properly recorded.

How Does Backdating Occur?

Options are frequently granted by public companies as a form of future compensation to motivate or incentivize employees (especially senior executives to whom the bulk of options have typically been awarded) and to align their interests with those of shareholders. The theory is that executives to whom grants are made will be motivated to increase the value of the company’s stock, and therefore the value of the awarded options. Investors expect options to be awarded ‘at the money’, that is, the exercise price of the options is equal to the price of the stock on the grant date. In fact, for TSX listed issuers, options must be issued at the then prevailing stock price of the underlying security.1

Backdating can occur in at least a couple of ways. The first is to declare a stock option at a board (or committee) meeting without setting the exercise price at the time. At a subsequent meeting, having the benefit of hindsight as to how the stock has performed in the intervening period, a lower price during that period is selected as the exercise price. A second - and potentially fraudulent - variation occurs where there is a substitution of the actual date of the grant with a different date when the stock price is lower. In this case, the original grant date is simply erased, and the actual date is substituted with a more favourable one.

Another questionable practice concerning the timing of stock option grants has been referred to as ‘springloading’. This involves making a grant of options (whether scheduled or unscheduled) and delaying or deferring the release of positive corporate information until a time following the date of the grant. The expectation being that following the release of the information, the stock price will rise.

Why Does Backdating Matter?

As a consequence of Professor Lie’s research, the SEC had, at last count, launched investigations against more than 100 companies for civil fraud, and the US Justice Department has laid criminal charges against several companies and executives. Expectations are that the number of companies and executives under investigation could significantly increase.

The practice of backdating has drawn the ire of lawmakers, regulators and shareholder groups because it involves some or all of the following:

  • Board and committee minutes, resolutions and ancillary documents are backdated to misrepresent the actual dates of the related meetings and the associated option grants. It should be obvious to anyone who files disclosure documents with securities regulatory authorities that the falsification of documents carries with it very serious consequences.
  • Where stock options are issued at a discount, applicable accounting rules require that an associated expense be reflected in the financial statements. On the other hand, during most of the period of time under scrutiny by regulators (generally, pre-2002), accounting rules did not require any expense to be recorded for stock option grants made "at the money", i.e. without a discount. Rectifying improperly dated option grants may, therefore, entail the following:

    • company financial statements may be required to be restated to reflect the additional compensation costs of granting ‘in the money’ options
    • expenses related to compensation are increased (and in some case may be disallowed for tax purposes)
    • stated profits are reduced
    • tax returns may need to be re-filed, and additional taxes paid, by the company, thereby further reducing the company’s stated profit

  • The applicable securities laws and the rules of any stock exchange on which the company’s securities are traded may have been breached and, in the case of springloading, allegations of insider trading on the basis of undisclosed material information are raised.
  • The stated purpose to align executives’ interests with those of shareholders is subverted insofar as the executives are awarded an instant benefit, as opposed to a potential reward based on their, and the company’s performance. Option backdating allows executives to realize significant wealth without building long term shareholder value. These practices also call into question the oversight of directors and compensation committees who, some argue, failed to protect the interests of shareholders.
  • Cash compensation expenses are increased where stock delivered under the option is purchased by the company in the open market. When options are exercised, the company must either (a) issue stock from treasury, and thereby dilute the float, or (b) purchase the shares in the open market. In purchasing the shares in the market, the company must pay the difference between the exercise price and the market price which, naturally, is greater where the exercise price has been artificially depressed.

The Canadian Context

While there are many similarities to the US legal and securities regulatory regime, there are distinct differences in the current and historical Canadian rules governing the grant of options. As regards the current Canadian regulatory environment, the Canadian Securities Administrators (the "CSA") recently issued a Staff Notice (CSA Staff Notice 51-320 Options Backdating, the "Staff Notice") intended to communicate the CSA’s understanding of the backdating issue in the Canadian context. The Staff Notice identifies a number of requirements of the Canadian legal regime which it suggests may reduce the opportunity for Canadian companies to backdate or time option grants. Those factors include the TSX Exchange requirements that the exercise price of options must not be less than the market price of the stock at the time of the grant, and that the exercise price must not be based on market prices that do not reflect undisclosed material information.

The CSA Staff Notice also observes that the TSX rule which requires that all option grants must be reported to the TSX within ten days of the end of the month in which the grant was made may reduce the opportunity for Canadian companies to backdate or time option grants.2 This reporting requirement is considerably longer, however, than the applicable reporting obligations established under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act") in the US where option grants since the coming into force of that Act in 2002 are required to be disclosed within 2 days of the date of the grant. Prior to the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the disclosure obligations under applicable securities legislation were generally the same in the US as they currently exist in Canada. Interestingly, it is the accelerated disclosure obligations which were established under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act that some US commentators credit with largely eliminating the opportunity for companies to backdate options. Indeed, a follow-up study co-authored by Professor Lie suggests that the incidence of abnormal price increases following option grants have been reduced by some 80% (as compared with the pre-2002 data) as a consequence of the accelerated disclosure obligations mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.3

Practice Recommendations

Whether Canadian legal obligations make it more or less likely to identify and capture questionable practices concerning the timing of option grants is certainly a question of debate. It would seem, however, that the prevailing corporate cultures north and south of the border are sufficiently similar to warrant an investigation into whether the practices of Canadian companies as regards the timing of option grants are in full compliance with all then applicable and currently prevailing legal requirements.

Many legal commentators consider that it is incumbent on all companies to undergo their own study before one is required ‘from the outside’. It is also reasonable to assume that option award practices will be the subject of question by auditors as the traditional audit season begins in the new year. While many companies have voluntarily initiated a review of audit of option award practices, Harvey Pitt, the former SEC chairman states that "many companies are sitting back and waiting for the government to tell them if there is anything wrong. You’ve got a mindset that says ‘don’t go looking for problems’," he says, noting that small companies are reluctant to conduct such audits because of the expense involved - even though those companies are the most likely to have used stock options for recruiting purposes in the pre-Sarbanes-Oxley Act era.

In light of developments in the US, a prudent course of action for all public companies in Canada - particularly those which are also publicly listed in the US - is to conduct a comprehensive review of past option practices and documentation, and as well to establish a policy regarding future option grants and the timing thereof. On this point, the CSA Staff Notice recommends that all issuers assess their current policies, procedures and controls for option grants and equity-based awards to ensure that they comply with relevant stock exchange rules and securities legislation.

Proactive action on the part of companies which use stock options in their compensation mix will not only enhance existing stock option grant practices, but will also demonstrate your company’s commitment in upholding the highest ethical standards in the conduct of its business. Indeed, as is noted in the CSA Staff Notice, in considering what course of action to take in the event that a breach of the applicable rules is discovered, "CSA staff may take into account what steps, if any, [such] issuers took to ensure their policies and controls complied with regulatory requirements". Proactive remedial action is also the recommended course of action in the US, the FBI’s chief criminal investigator noting that "if we linger around these things, then it’s not good for them, it’s not good for us".

We would be pleased to assist you or your company in performing an appropriate review, and appreciate your comments and observations.


1 Note, however, that the TSX Venture Exchange permits options on the stock of companies whose shares are traded on that exchange to be issued at discounts ranging from 15-25%.

2 The filing deadline for “insiders” however is within 10 days of the date of the grant.

3 See Heron and Lie, “Does backdating explain the stock price pattern around executive stock option grants?” Forthcoming (2006) J. of Financial Economics

Eric C. Belli-Bivar

Eric Belli-Bivar has a broadly based corporate-commercial law practice, with a focus on corporate finance transactions. Eric is also a member of the Firm's Corporate Counselling and Governance groups, and regularly provides advice to public companies concerning their compensation and equity-incentive programs for senior executives, officers and directors.

Liana L. Turrin

Liana Turrin is a partner at Fasken Martineau. She is a corporate commercial lawyer with a broad range of experience in acquisitions and dispositions, commercial real estate, financing transactions and restructurings. Liana has acted for public and private companies in a variety of industries such as manufacturing, real estate, high tech, financial and retail, as well as financial institutions and governmental bodies.

© 2006 Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.