Canada: Canadian Tax @ Gowlings – September 2006

Last Updated: October 19 2006

Edited by Vince F. Imerti

Contents

  • Gowlings National Tax Practice Group Adds to Its Tax Dispute Resolution Team
  • The Canadian General Anti-Avoidance Rule and Treaty Shopping
  • Article XIII(8) of the Canada–U.S. Tax Convention–What It Was Then and What It is Now

Gowlings National Tax Practice Group Adds to Its Tax Dispute Resolution Team

The Gowlings National Tax Practice Group is pleased to announce that Steve Novoselac has joined the team in the Toronto office. Steve brings to the Gowlings' tax team extensive experience in resolving tax disputes with the Canada Revenue Agency, as well as provincial and other taxation authorities. Steve has represented taxpayers at all levels of Canadian courts, from the Tax Court of Canada all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Canadian General Anti-Avoidance Rule and Treaty Shopping

The subject of so-called limitation of benefits provisions and the Canada Revenue Agency's ("CRA") position on the potential application of Canada's "general anti-avoidance rule" ("GAAR") to perceived abuses of Canada's bilateral tax treaties was the subject of a previous article in Canadian Tax @ Gowlings (see Volume 1, Number 2). This topic received its first judicial consideration in the very recent Tax Court of Canada decision in MIL (Investments) S.A. v. The Queen, 2006 T.C.C. 460. In the MIL case the Tax Court of Canada allowed a taxpayer's claim of treaty protection under the Canada-Luxembourg Tax Convention ("Treaty") in respect of the disposition of shares of a Canadian mining corporation. In very general terms, an individual, Mr. Boulle ("Boulle"), and his wholly-owned corporation incorporated in the Cayman Islands, MIL (Investments) S.A. ("MIL"), initially held more than 12% of a Canadian public corporation named Diamond Field Resources Ltd. ("DFR"). In June of 1995, MIL sold some of the DFR shares to another Canadian corporation, Inco Limited ("Inco"), on a tax-deferred share exchange rollover basis, with the result that the aggregate DFR shareholding by Boulle and MIL was reduced to less than 10%. MIL was then continued into Luxembourg, a jurisdiction with which Canada has entered into a tax treaty. Within a few months of the continuance and after several offers from Inco and another corporation, MIL entered into an agreement with Inco to sell the remaining DFR shares ("Sale") and realized a capital gain of approximately $425 million. MIL claimed protection under the Treaty from Canadian tax on the gain realized on the Sale. The CRA disagreed with the position of MIL.

Under paragraph 4 of Article 13 of the Treaty, capital gains derived by a resident of Luxembourg from the disposition of shares forming part of a substantial interest in the capital stock of a company the value of which shares is derived principally from immovable property situated in Canada is taxable in Canada. A substantial interest exists when the resident and related persons own 10% or more of the shares of any class or the capital stock of a company. Accordingly, as MIL and Boulle (related persons) did not have a substantial interest in DFR, the capital gains arising from the disposition were not taxable in Canada pursuant to the capital gains exemption under paragraph 4 of Article 13 of the Treaty.

The CRA challenged the availability of the capital gains exemption under the Treaty on the basis that the GAAR under section 245 of the Income Tax Act (Canada) applied to deny the benefits of the Treaty. In the alternative, the CRA argued that an anti-abuse rule inherent in the Treaty itself would deny the exemption. In general terms, the application of GAAR as set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in the leading case of Canada Truscto v. Canada depends on the following three tests: (i) the existence of a tax benefit arising from the impugned transaction or series of transactions; (ii) the determination that the transaction, or series of transactions, may reasonably be considered to have been undertaken or arranged primarily for bona fide purposes other than to obtain the tax benefit ("avoidance transaction"); and (iii) the determination that the avoidance transaction is abusive. MIL conceded that the application of the Treaty gave rise to a tax benefit. However, the Court denied the application of GAAR on the basis that the share exchange and continuance into Luxembourg were not part of the same series of transactions as the Sale, stating that "the Sale cannot be included in that series because of a mere possibility [at the time of the exchange and continuance] of a future potential sale of any shares". As a result, the Sale could not be an avoidance transaction and therefore, GAAR could not be applied to it.

Having concluded that there were no avoidance transactions, the Court did not have to consider whether the transaction was abusive. However, the Court went on to state that "the shopping or selection of a treaty to minimize tax on its own cannot be viewed as being abusive", and that if Canada is concerned with the preferable tax rates of any of its treaty partners, it should seek recourse by attempting to renegotiate selected tax treaties rather than to apply the GAAR.

With respect to CRA's alternative argument that the Treaty should be read to include an "inherit" anti-abuse rule that would deny the treaty exemption, the CRA argued that this was the case in light of the lack of an explicit reference to anti-avoidance rules in the Treaty and that the OECD commentary should be interpreted without reference to revision subsequent to the signing of the Treaty. The Court was unimpressed with these arguments and found that there was no ambiguity in the Treaty permitting it to be construed as containing an inherent anti-abuse rule. Therefore, the ordinary meaning of the Treaty allowing MIL to claim protection from capital gains taxation had to be respected.

On the basis of the Court's decision, it might be argued that a non-resident of Canada, resident in a particular jurisdiction, can structure its investment in shares in Canadian corporations through a holding corporation resident in a different jurisdiction to take advantage of that other jurisdiction's tax treaty with Canada and to avoid Canadian taxes on capital gains. However, given that the comments of the Court in respect of treaty shopping were not part of the reasons on which the disposition of the case depended (in other words, they were obiter dicta), one should be cautious in this regard. Clearly, we have not heard the last word on this issue.

Article XIII(8) of the Canada–U.S. Tax Convention–What It Was Then and What It is Now

A substantial proportion of international M&A activity in Canada involves transactions between Canadian and U.S. business enterprises. Due to the divergence of domestic tax legislation in the two countries, cross-border corporate reorganizations, or similar transactions that are otherwise tax-deferred in the U.S., can result in the recognition of profit, gains or income in Canada under the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the "Act") in respect of dispositions or deemed dispositions of Canadian subsidiaries, assets or business operations of a U.S. resident. In many instances, the Canada–U.S. Tax Convention (1980) (the "Convention") will not preclude Canadian taxation of such profits, gains or income at the time of these dispositions or deemed dispositions. If a disposition or deemed disposition is not taxable in the U.S. in the same taxation year as they are in Canada, a timing mismatch occurs, and foreign tax credit relief for the Canadian taxes may not be available in the U.S. in that year or a future year, potentially giving rise to double taxation.

Article XIII(8) of the Convention attempts to harmonize Canadian and U.S. tax rules applying to corporate reorganizations, or similar transactions, and allows for a deferral of the recognition of the profit, gain or income resulting from the disposition of property for Canadian income tax purposes. If requested by the acquirer of the property, the Canadian Competent Authority may enter into an agreement with the acquirer to defer the recognition of the profit, gain or income in accordance with Article XIII(8) of the Convention and section 115.1 of the Act. However, allowing such a deferral is entirely at the discretion of the Competent Authority.

The Canadian Competent Authority will only consider agreeing to a deferral where, among other requirements: (1) there is evidence that the purpose of the reorganization is commercially motivated; (2) a deferral is required to avoid potential double taxation; (3) a deferral would be available if the acquirer and vendor were residents of Canada; (4) there is no applicable deferral provision in the Act that may be used; (5) the transaction for which a deferral is sought is not specifically prohibited or precluded for non-residents on a deferred basis under the Act; (6) in the opinion of the Canadian Competent Authority, no component of the reorganization or other transaction would be subject to the general anti-avoidance rule in section 245 of the Act; and (7) the Canadian Competent Authority can administer the agreement.

Past Practice

Prior agreements concluded by the Canadian Competent Authority were subject to a number of terms and conditions, some of which referred to "triggering events". The occurrence of a triggering event would result in the immediate recognition of the deferred profit, gain or income in Canada. In the past, these triggering events included changes to the Convention or U.S. income tax law that would negatively impact the subsequent Canadian taxation of the disposition if the acquirer ceases to be a United States resident, and when a property ceases to meet the definition of real property situated in Canada pursuant to a transaction to which section 245 of the Act applies. In addition, agreements often included a condition that the shares of any corporation involved in the transaction could not be transferred, exchanged, encumbered or otherwise dealt with in any manner for a period of two years without the permission of the CRA.

As well, previously, the Canadian Competent Authority typically required that the taxpayer provide a letter of confirmation from the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") that the transaction in question qualified for non-recognition treatment under the Internal Revenue Code.

Recent Changes

The Canadian Competent Authority has recently undertaken a significant policy review of Article XIII(8). Consequently, some terms and conditions that may have been used in prior Article XIII(8) agreements have been removed, and certain new terms and conditions, including certain new triggering events, have been introduced. For instance, once a taxpayer provides a description of the transactions concerned, and an explanation of their purpose and intent, confirmation from the IRS regarding the non-recognition treatment of the transactions for U.S. tax purposes is no longer required. Instead, taxpayers will generally only be required to provide an opinion letter from U.S. counsel attesting to the non-recognition status of the transactions. This is a welcomed step toward improving the timing of an Article XIII(8) deferral request.

On the other hand, the nature of the new triggering events now listed in Article XIII(8) deferral agreements are more restrictive and more extensive, and will likely prove to be highly burdensome for taxpayers. As an example of one of the new triggering events, assume that a U.S. company ("US Vendor") has sold the shares of its Canadian subsidiary ("CanSub") to another U.S. company ("US Acquiror") in a transaction that is a non-recognition event for U.S. tax purposes (the "Initial Disposition"), and has concluded an Article XIII(8) deferral agreement with the Canadian Competent Authority in respect of any taxable gain in Canada. By virtue of the triggering events now being included in these agreements, US Vendor may become subject to tax on the Initial Disposition if at anytime in the future CanSub pays (or is deemed to pay) a dividend to US Acquiror in contemplation of a sale of its shares by its US Acquiror to an arm's length party.

While we expected most of the recent changes to the Competent Authority's policy regarding Article XIII(8) deferral requests, it is regrettable that these changes have entailed such cumbersome conditions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions