Canada: Court Of Appeal Upholds Ruling That Drug Detector Dog Search At School Violates Students’ Charter Rights

Last Updated: September 27 2006
Most Read Contributor in Canada, September 2016


On April 28, 2006, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision that a drug detector dog search conducted at a school violated provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, protecting against unreasonable search and seizure.

The principal of St. Patrick’s High School in Sarnia, Mr. Bristo, had issued a standing invitation to the Sarnia Police Force to come into the school, if they had drug detector dogs available, to conduct a search. St. Patrick’s High School has a zero tolerance policy for drugs. Students are aware of the policy and are also aware that to enforce the policy, the school authorities may resort to the use of police officers with drug detector dogs.

On November 7, 2002, police officers of the City of Sarnia Police Force and the Ontario Provincial Police arrived at the school. Mr. Bristo was not aware that the police were coming to the school. The officers attended the school with their dog and asked for permission to search for drugs. Mr. Bristo gave them that permission. To facilitate the search, Mr. Bristo announced over the school’s P.A. system that a search was about to be conducted, and directed students to remain in their classrooms while the search was carried out. The police conducted the search in a manner they determined to be appropriate and, once finished, asked Mr. Bristo if there were other areas he wanted searched. He directed the officers to one of the school gymnasiums.

One of the teachers accompanied certain police officers to the gymnasium. A dog named "Chief" identified a specific backpack in the gymnasium. The police officer searched the bag and found five bags of marijuana and a container with another five bags of marijuana. He also found ten magic mushrooms, a drug known as psilocybin. The backpack in which the drugs were found belonged to a student named A. M.

At trial, counsel for A.M. moved to exclude the evidence of the drugs found in the backpack on the basis that the search by the police was unreasonable and therefore offended section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The trial judge accepted the submissions of counsel and excluded the evidence related to the drugs. As a result, A.M. was acquitted of the charges.

The Crown then appealed the acquittal. Counsel for the Crown raised the following arguments in the appeal:

  1. The police were acting as agents of the school authorities;
  2. The dog sniff was not a search;
  3. If the dog sniff was a search, it was reasonable;
  4. The search of the backpack was reasonable; and,
  5. The trial judge erred in excluding the evidence.

Justice Armstrong, delivering the judgment of the Court, dismissed the appeal.

Agents of the School Authorities

Justice Armstrong ruled that the search was conducted by the police, not by the police as agents for the school authorities. Cited as reasons for this decision were the fact that no school authority requested the presence of the police on the day in question, the principal received no notice of the intention of the police to conduct a search and neither the principal nor any teacher played an active role in the search.

The fact that the principal of the school had issued, two years prior to the search, a "standing invitation" to the police to search the school with a sniffer dog did not "turn the search…into a search by school authorities in police uniforms".

The Dog Sniff Search

It was unnecessary for Justice Armstrong to decide whether the dog sniff was a search, as the Crown conceded that point following a cross-examination of the dog’s handler. However, Justice Armstrong did agree with the submission of counsel for the Canadian Civil Liberties Association that:

The dog is a necessary, direct, and integral part of the police officers' search of the classrooms, gymnasium and backpacks. The dog is, in essence, a physical extension of its handler and is directly and immediately connected to the consequent physical search of the backpack.

Justice Armstrong distinguished the case from the Supreme Court Tessling decision, that ruled a plane taking heat patterns emanating from a building suspected of housing a marijuana grow operation was not a search, on the basis that "a trained police dog sniffing at the personal effects of an entire student body in a random police search" was significantly different. Justice Armstrong noted that the Supreme Court has ruled that police officers were engaged in an "olfactory search", that engaged the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure, when they attended at a door for the purpose of sniffing for the odour of marijuana.

Reasonableness of the Search

Justice Armstrong agreed with counsel for A.M. and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association "that a backpack should be afforded at least the same degree of respect as an adult’s briefcase". The Court concurred with the following submission of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association as it related to the circumstances of the case:

A student's backpack is in effect a portable bedroom and study rolled into one. It will contain personal items such as journals, photos, letters, personal hygiene items, medication, clothing and school records. Backpacks are often in reality the only way for students to carry and use items that are personal and important to them. These items are shielded from view and access.

There are no contextual factors that diminish students' legitimate expectation of privacy, dignity, and autonomy in their backpacks. Students' expectation of privacy in their backpacks is objectively reasonable. Backpacks are not searched in the normal course of a school day, nor do students come to school expecting that their backpacks will be searched. The students did not consent to their backpacks being searched on November 7, 2002, and the Principal certainly could not consent on their behalf.

As police conducted the search without a warrant it was prima facie unreasonable; the onus shifted to the Crown to rebut the presumption of unreasonableness. The Crown failed to rebut the presumption of unreasonableness with respect to the unauthorized warrantless random search.

Justice Armstrong observed, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in R v. M.R.M., that this presumption does not apply in the context of searches by school authorities on reasonable grounds. The approach to be taken in considering searches conducted by school authorities was summarized by the majority in R. v. M.R.M. as follows:

  1. A warrant is not essential in order to conduct a search of a student by a school authority.
  2. The school authority must have reasonable grounds to believe that there has been a breach of school regulations or discipline and that a search of a student would reveal evidence of that breach.
  3. School authorities will be in the best position to assess information given to them and relate it to the situation existing in their school. Courts should recognize the preferred position of school authorities to determine if reasonable grounds existed for the search.
  4. The following may constitute reasonable grounds in this context: information received from one student considered to be credible, information received from more than one student, a teacher's or principal's own observations, or any combination of these pieces of information which the relevant authority considers to be credible. The compelling nature of the information and the credibility of these or other sources must be assessed by the school authority in the context of the circumstances existing at the particular school.

In determining whether a search conducted by a teacher or principal in the school environment was reasonable, the majority of the Supreme Court outlined the following factors to be considered:

  1. The first step is to determine whether it can be inferred from the provisions of the relevant Education Act that teachers and principals are authorized to conduct searches of their students in appropriate circumstances. In the school environment such a statutory authorization would be reasonable.
  2. The search itself must be carried out in a reasonable manner. It should be conducted in a sensitive manner and be minimally intrusive.
  3. In order to determine whether a search was reasonable, all the surrounding circumstances will have to be considered.

Justice Armstrong held that even if school authorities had done the search, through the agency of the police, there was nothing in the Education Act or the subsidiary policies that would grant the authority to conduct such a search.


As a result of this case, educators assessing whether to undertake a search of a student should recognize that a search should only be conducted when there are reasonable grounds to believe that there has been a breach of school rules or discipline. The following may constitute reasonable grounds: information received from one student considered to be credible, information received from more than one student, a teacher’s or principal’s own observations, or any combinations of these pieces of information which the relevant authority considers to be credible.

A warrant is not essential in order to conduct a search of a student by a school authority. However, where the police are seeking to conduct a search on school premises, including locker searches or property searches, they are required, absent exigent circumstances, to first obtain a search warrant. Exigent circumstances may include a bomb threat, a person possessing a weapon or a fire on school property. It should also be recognized that random or dragnet searches will likely not be regarded as reasonable in the eyes of a court. Unlike personal or locker searches that are aimed at a particular student or students, dragnet searches target a whole class or school. Under these circumstances, it is unlikely that a court would treat this search as reasonable, since it is intrusive and sweeping.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.