Canada: The Migration Law Review, July 2006

Last Updated: September 20 2006

Edited by Guidy Mamann


  • About The Migration Law Review
  • The Strange Case of Horvath v. Canada
  • Entrepreneurial Work Permits And Temporary Intent
  • H-1B Cap Met In Record Time
  • Officers’ Discretion To Defer Removal
  • Relinquishment Of Permanent Resident Status
  • CSIC’s Code Of Conduct A Useful Tool

The Migration Law Review

is a monthly review of current developments in Canadian and American immigration and naturalization law. It is a publication of the lawyers and attorneys at the Toronto law firm of Mamann & Associates P.C. The articles contained herein are intended for lawyers, immigration professionals, community agencies and other consumers of professional immigration services.

For a free subscription of The Migration Law Review™, The Corporate Relocation Quarterly or Guidy Mamann’s weekly immigration column, please visit our website at

The Strange Case of Horvath v. Canada
By Ron Poulton, B.Sc., LL.B.

IRPA contains provisions which suspend a refugee hearing once extradition begins in section 105, and which bar a PRRA from being initiated after extradition has started in section 112(2). However, IRPA has no provision suspending the consideration of a PRRA if it has been initiated prior to an extradition proceeding.

Mr. Horvath, a national of Hungary, applied for a PRRA on a date prior to the commencement of extradition proceedings against him. His PRRA application was approved and he was determined to be a protected person. Extradition proceedings then commenced. Arguments were made to the Minister of Justice that to send a protected person to a country which would persecute him would be conduct that would "shock[ed] the conscience" and be in violation of section 7 of the Charter.

The Minister of Justice sought advice from the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Monty Solberg. In an extraordinary opinion, Minister Solberg overruled the PRRA officer and decided that Mr. Horvath would not be at risk if extradited to Hungary, ignoring the finding made on the PRRA following an oral hearing when Mr. Horvath gave credible evidence of the anti-Roma sentiments of the police who arrested him and of the judge who was to try him. He had suffered beatings, stabbings and racist taunts. His wife and son were accepted in Canada under the PDRCC program on the basis of the treatment of Mr. Horvath in Hungary. Evidently, Mr. Solberg believed that the very police who had tried to kill him previously, would provide protection to Mr. Horvath in the future.

On the basis of this opinion, the Minister of Justice issued a surrender order, authorizing the extradition to Hungary of Adolf Horvath. The case has been appealed and is presently before the Ontario Court of Appeal.

Entrepreneurial Work Permits And Temporary Intent
By Jennifer Nees, B.A., M.Hr., J.D.

The over-riding consideration with any entrepreneur work permit application made pursuant to Regulation 205 (a) is convincing an officer that the applicant has a temporary intent upon entering Canada. An applicant can make an application for permanent residence simultaneously with such an application for a work permit. However, the FW Manual clearly states that it is a "rare applicant who could satisfy an officer that their entry into Canada would provide a significant benefit before their eligibility for permanent residence has been assessed."

The Manual also notes, "However, there will be situations where the business or the intended period of work is genuinely temporary, i.e., the applicant intends to leave Canada after starting a business, and either close the business (it being seasonal), or hire a Canadian to operate it." Officers will frequently ask the applicant, ‘why would you come to Canada to set up a business if you do not intend to reside here permanently?’ This is a tender question that applicants might struggle with.

Another issue to consider is that the applicant must show that the proposed business will create a significant benefit to Canada. The entrepreneur must control at least 50% of the business that s/he intends to establish. Section 5.30 of FW1 requires officers to ascertain "Is the work likely to create a viable business that will benefit Canadian workers or provide economic stimulus?" Applicants must also show that the "profits and economic spin-offs generated by the enterprise" will sufficiently reside in the Canadian economy. The applicant must demonstrate that s/he has sufficient capital to fund the business proposal. While some businesses can be started very with a very a modest investment, others require an enormous amount of capital.

Officers must also ask themselves "Does this worker have a particular background of skills that will improve the viability of the business?" This becomes an important consideration in the interview process. The interviewing officer will attempt to ascertain whether the applicant has the business acumen necessary to run a business in Canada. This means a working knowledge of one of Canada’s official languages and a thorough understanding of the Canadian business climate.

The documentation that each applicant submits will vary depending on the type of business and the applicant’s background. Generally, the applicant should provide records of individuals s/he has spoken to in regards to establishing the proposed business in Canada, records of exploratory visits to Canada, financial records, and proof of management ability. This includes a business plan, educational documents, proof of experience, as well as any number of personal references. There is no requirement to show that the applicant has run this type of business before, only that they would have the ability to operate it at this time. For some applicants, key documents to be provided are letters of intent from Canadian businesses. This becomes crucial in occupations such as film editing. Evidence that there are Canadian companies who are not only interested in the applicant’s work, but who cannot find the same skill set in Canada, is very persuasive in such cases.

There are special considerations when an entrepreneur applicant is being considered by a provincial government as a candidate for a provincial nominee program. Applicants should seek a letter from the province where the business is to be established confirming the benefit to be derived from such a business. This will provide the reviewing officer a firm basis for determining that there is a significant benefit to Canada. Under this program, a work permit is to be issued for a two-year period and cannot be renewed. During this period there should be a determination made with respect to the applicant’s provincial nominee program.

H-1B Cap Met In Record Time

On June 1, 2006, USCIS announced that it had received enough applications to meet the FY 2007 H-1B cap as of May 26, 2006. This is record-breaking, indicating that 65,000 H-1B applications were received by USCIS between April 1 and June 1, 2006. The start date for these applications is October 1, 2006.

The H-1B visa is used by skilled workers who are needed by US employers to fill a labour shortage. This cap has been addressed by the recent Senate bill which proposed raising the cap to 115,000. However, the House passed a bill in December, 2005 which contained no such provision.

However, for those individuals who have achieved an "advanced degree", a new quota of H visas became available flowing from the H-1B Visa Reform Act of 2004. The Act allows for an additional 20,000 H-1B visas for foreign workers with a Masters or higher level degree from a U.S. academic institution.

If the foreign worker does not have a Masters or higher degree from a US institution, the applicant may wish to have an academic equivalency assessment conducted with respect to their non-US degree. An evaluation of work experience can be accomplished by:

  1. an evaluation from an official who has the authority to grant college level credits
  2. a recognized college level equivalency exam
  3. an evaluation by a reliable evaluation credential service
  4. evidence of certification or registration from a nationally recognized professional association;
  5. a determination from the Department of Homeland Security that the requisite education requirement has been reached through an evaluation of the applicant’s work experience. (See Immigration Law Sourcebook Ira J. Kurzban 9th edition, page 513)

As of July 26, 2006, 19,390 H-1B visas had been given with respect to this category leaving only 610 remaining for FY 2007.

Officers’ Discretion To Defer Removal
By Ron Poulton, B.Sc., LL.B.

The Federal Court Trial Division applies a tripartite test of serious issue, irreparable harm and balance of convenience in deciding whether or not to grant a stay of removal.

On a challenge to a removal officer’s decision, the "serious issue" test is elevated from demonstrating that the case is not frivolous or vexatious to that of a high probability of success, a standard similar to that used at a hearing for judicial review. The limits to the discretion of a removal officer have been the subject of competing decisions at the Trial Division level with judgments such as Simoes v. MCI stating that the discretion is limited to considering travel related issues, such as flight availability and health issues, to whether a humanitarian application has been filed in a timely manner and has been outstanding for a considerable period.

In other cases such as Harry v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)[2000] F.C.J. No. 1727 and Paterson v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)[2000] F.C.J. No. 139, the Court adopted a broader interpretation of this discretion, to include a requirement that the best interests of any affected children be considered. As these cases were all interlocutory decisions, their precedential value is limited.Last year, the Court released a decision on a judicial review application on the limits of the discretion of a removal officer. The case, Ramada v. Canada [2005] FCJ No. 1384, issued on August 18, 2005, is highly significant because it is a decision rendered on judicial review and as such is of higher precedential value than decisions rendered on motions. In addition, the Court adopts a broader perspective on the discretion of a removal officer. While recognizing that removal officers have limited discretion to delay removal, the Court noted that officers can consider whether there are good reasons to delay removal. Good reasons may include the person’s inability to travel owing to illness, the need to accommodate other commitments such as school or family obligations, or compelling humanitarian and compassionate circumstances. The Court then added the following to the list of a removal officer’s duties;

" officer must consider whether exigent personal circumstances, particularly those involving children, justify delay."

In Ramada the Court quashed the decision of the officer because she failed to consider relevant evidence on the best interests of the children which had been put before her in the request for deferral.

With the issuance of the decision in Ramada, the limits of the discretion of a removal officer set forth by the Court in Simoes on an interlocutory motion have now been surpassed. The question of whether the best interests of children must be considered by removal officers has been answered. Clearly, they must.

The Ramada decision has been applied by a different Federal Court judge on a stay motion in Mateka v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) [2005] IMM-7291-05.

Relinquishment Of Permanent Resident Status
By Guidy Mamann, LL.B.

Does a person who voluntarily relinquishes their permanent status in writing actually lose such status?

This question recently arose in the case of a permanent resident who was required to surrender permanent residency status in Canada in order to accept an offer of employment. This individual was in full compliance with his residency obligations and was not otherwise reportable under IRPA. When he approached CIC, he was presented with Form IMM5539B "Declaration: Relinquishment of Permanent Resident Status/Residency Obligation Met" which he duly signed.

Section 46 of IRPA specifies only four conditions under which a permanent resident loses such status. The section allows for the loss of permanent residence upon the acquisition of Canadian citizenship; a final determination made outside of Canada regarding the failure to meet the residency obligation; the coming into force of a removal order; and upon a final determination vacating a decision allowing a refugee claim or allowing an application for protection.

While section 9 of the Citizenship Act provides five conditions which must be met for the relinquishment of Canadian citizenship there is no similar provision found in IRPA for the relinquishment of permanent resident status.

Paragraph 7.10 of ENF 23 sets out the department’s policy in these situations but offers no underlying statutory authority for the procedure. The argument that "the intent to abandon status" must be given effect seems unconvincing when considering that the notion of "intention" which was central to the question of loss of permanent residency status in the former Act was completely dropped in IRPA.

Nonetheless, the IRB-AD reached a different conclusion when it considered the effect of the execution of the declaration in question in Hozayen v MCI, [2004] IADD No. 933. The Board found that there is "no legal impediment to the capacity to relinquish one's status as one obtains this status through an application in the first place. The Act does not limit an individual's freedom to act on his own behalf…"

This reasoning does not appear to have yet been endorsed by the Federal Court and so the legal validity of such declarations remains open to debate. While there is good reason to hold that there is no statutory basis for this procedure, such a conclusion would make it impossible for permanent residents who have good reason to shed their status, to do so.

CSIC’s Code Of Conduct A Useful Tool
By Joel Sandaluk, B.A., LL.B.

One of the realities of practicing immigration law in Canada is that the quality of advocacy varies greatly both within the immigration bar as well as among immigration consultants. Occasionally, when assuming carriage of an immigration matter where prior counsel was involved a matter of counsel competence arises. Incompetence of counsel may give rise to a breach of natural justice in appropriate circumstances [Shirwa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1994] 2 F.C. 51 (T.D.) and Sheikh v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1990] 3 F.C. 238 (C.A.)].

In the past, the Court took a caveat emptor approach to clients who chose to hire an immigration consultant given that consultants were not subject to any professional standards, had no code of professional conduct, and was not subject to a disciplinary mechanism. The Court’s logic was that providing relief to people whose cases had been prejudiced by the negligence or incompetence of their representative would have the effect of subsidizing consultants in their competition with the bar. [Robles v. MCI (2003) FCT 374, 2 Admin. L.R. (4th) 315, Cove v. MCI 2001 FCT 266, [2001] F.C.J. No. 482]

This situation has changed with the creation of the Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants ("CSIC") and the imposition of a code of professional conduct. It is now easier to substantiate a claim that a consultant behaved incompetently where they breached their own standards of professional conduct. It also answers the Federal Court’s opinion that if a person who chooses to hire an unregulated representative they must accept whatever quality of service they receive. It is necessary to file a complaint with the Discipline Manager of CSIC whenever an allegation of incompetence is being asserted in court against a consultant.

The existence of a code of professional conduct raises the standard expected of regulated consultants which makes them more susceptible to an allegation of incompetence.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.