Canada: Recent Developments in Canadian Merger Law

Competition Bureau Concerned About Mergers and Information Exchanges
Last Updated: August 22 2006
Article by Mark C. Katz

In March 2006, the Competition Bureau released a "Technical Backgrounder" outlining its analysis with respect to a merger involving Quebecor Media Inc. and Sogides Ltee, a publisher of French language trade books in Quebec.1

According to the Backgrounder, the Bureau was not concerned that the merger would result in a sub- stantial prevention or lessening of competition in the publishing and distribution of French language trade books. However, in the course of its review, the Bureau learned that the president of Sogides (a Mr. Lesperance) had an interest in, and was a director of, a Quebec-based bookstore chain (Renaud-Bray) which competed against another chain of bookstores owned by Quebecor. The Bureau was concerned that this could lead to potentially anti-competitive information exchanges between the two bookstore chains, with Mr. Lesperance serving as the intermediary. Accordingly, the parties agreed (in a consent agreement registered with the Competition Tribunal) that: Mr. Lesperance would resign as a director of Renaud- Bray; an independent agent would assume this position; and limitations would be placed on the type of information that could be communicated to Mr. Lesperance about Renaud-Bray.2

It is noteworthy that the Bureau’s Backgrounder does not contain any analysis of the bookstore market in Quebec to support its view that Mr. Lesperance’s board position could have resulted in anti-competitive effects following the merger. Obviously, however, the parties preferred to agree to the Bureau’s demands rather than incur the time and expense to contest them. That is not unusual in circumstances such as these, where the priority is to get the merger completed.

As a result, until the Bureau’s theories on competitive harm are challenged, merging parties can expect that (i) Canadian merger review will involve a probing assessment of director, officer and minority shareholder relationships between the merging parties and other firms that compete with them; and (ii) where such relationships exist, the Bureau may seek commitments to eliminate the linkages or restrict the exchange of competitively sensitive information between the parties in respect of markets in which they compete, even in the absence of the type of thorough analysis that the Bureau would normally conduct in respect of areas of direct competition between the merging parties.

Competition Bureau Explains Decision in Whirlpool/Maytag Merger

On May 31, 2006, the Competition Bureau released another merger-related "Technical Backgrounder", this one summarizing the main findings from its review of the acquisition of Maytag Corporation ("Maytag") by Whirlpool Corporation ("Whirlpool").3

Two key points emerge from the Bureau’s analysis.

First, one of the interesting market share questions raised by the transaction was how to account for the fact that Whirlpool, Maytag and other appliance manufacturers sell their products both under their own brand names and to retailers for sale under "house brands". In other words, should market shares be calculated on a "brand" basis (i.e., limited to the manufacturer’s own-brand sales at retail) or on a "manufacturing" basis (i.e., incorporating sales of all products manufactured, regardless if sold under another brand). The Bureau resolved this issue by deciding that shares should be calculated on a "brand" rather than a "manufacturing" basis. Among other things, the Bureau noted that (i) house brands are owned and controlled by the retailer, which is solely responsible for all pricing and marketing decisions; and (ii) retailers are also often responsible for their own warehousing and distribution and provide their own warranties and servicing. This should provide a helpful precedent for other industries in which there are also high levels of controlled label manufacturing. Second, the Bureau concluded that the proposed transaction would result in market shares exceeding 35% in two relevant markets: the "laundry" market (consisting of all washers and dryers) and the narrower market for top-load washers. The Bureau uses a 35% market share threshold as a general indicator for mergers that may create potential competition issues. Nonetheless, the Bureau concluded that grounds did not exist for opposing the transaction in this case. In particular, the Bureau found that: (i) effective competition would remain in the market from a combination of foreign and North American- based manufacturers; (ii) there was evidence over the past few years of numerous new entrants whose market shares had increased noticeably since their entry, in part because of support from national big-box retailers; (iii) Canadian retailers would continue to have relatively strong bargaining and purchasing power postmerger; and (iv) there was no evidence that the transaction would increase the likelihood of coordinated behavior on the part of remaining manufacturers.

The Bureau’s conclusions on market share are important because statements under the prior Commissioner’s administration had created some concern that the Bureau was moving towards a more rigid approach in assessing the impact of market shares in its merger review process. Thus, in the context of evaluating several transactions, the Bureau had intimated that it would likely presume a merger to be anti-competitive if it led to post-merger market shares exceeding certain thresholds (e.g., 55% +), regardless of other factors. The Whirlpool/Maytag decision signals that there no longer needs to be the same degree of concern about this type of approach to merger review still holding sway at the Bureau. Consistent with the clear intent of the Competition Act, the Bureau’s analysis recognizes that market shares ought not to be the defining consideration in merger review and that other factors must be examined before deciding whether a transaction is likely to have anti-competitive effects.

Competition Bureau Agrees to Long-Term Behavioral Remedies

On June 23, 2006, the Competition Bureau announced that it had entered into an agreement to resolve its concerns arising from the merger of the electronic television audience measurement ("TAM") operations of BBM Canada ("BBM") and Nielsen Media Research Limited ("NMR"). BBM and NMR are the only providers of TAM services in Canada.4

Following an apparently detailed investigation, which included interviews with broadcasters, advertisers and advertising agencies, the Bureau concluded that the BBM/NMR merger would likely prevent or lessen competition substantially in respect of electronic TAM services in Canada. Unfortunately, the Bureau’s Information Notice on the transaction did not explain the nature of this likely anticompetitive effect. Indeed, the Information Notice said that the Bureau had found strong industry support for the creation of a standard TAM system in Canada, which is already the norm in the United States, Britain and Australia. The Bureau also found that the merger would likely result in a decrease in the overall cost of TAM services for the majority of purchasers.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Bureau sought and obtained BBM/NMR’s agreement to a series of behavioral remedies as a condition for allowing the merger to proceed. The terms of this settlement are contained in a consent agreement filed with the Competition Tribunal, which is to remain in effect for 15 years or until another person establishes an electronic TAM operation in Canada.5

One of the obligations imposed by the consent agreement is that the merged entity undergo independent audits if and when it (a) implements new electronic TAM technology, (b) makes major adjustments to such technology and/or (c) considers providing electronic TAM in new markets in Canada. The results of any such audits must be forwarded to the Bureau and made available to BBM’s members upon request (BBM’s members consist of broadcasters, advertisers and advertising agencies). According to the Bureau, these audits will provide BBM’s members with access to the impartial information required to determine whether the new services meet their needs or whether the system requires improvement.

The consent agreement also requires that the merged entity follow BBM’s current processes for choosing new technology and deciding whether to enter new markets, which processes may be modified from time to time with notice to the Bureau.

Finally, the consent agreement requires that BBM treat all persons eligible for membership in the same manner, i.e., services should be available to similarly situated BBM members at comparable rates and terms, whether or not they were BBM members prior to the merger.

The use of behavioral remedies to alleviate the Bureau’s concerns about the BBM/NMR merger, without requiring any divestitures, is noteworthy because it is still unusual for the Bureau to agree to a merger remedy that consists of stand-alone behavioral measures. (The Bureau’s official position is that it will accept stand-alone behavioral remedies only "rarely".) It may be that the Bureau’s willingness to agree to stand-alone behavioral remedies in this case was influenced by the strong industry support for the merger and the efficiencies associated with it.

Industry-Specific Proposals to Alter Merger Review Process

As described in the May 15, 2006 issue of NAFTIR, an expert panel established to review Canada’s telecommunications industry issued a report in March 2006 recommending the creation of a new Telecommunications Competition Tribunal ("TCT"), whose mandate would include, among other things, the review of mergers involving telecom companies. The TCT would draw resources and staff from the Competition Bureau and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission ("CRTC"), which currently share concurrent jurisdiction over telecom mergers.

There have been several additional proposals since then which, if implemented, would alter the review processes for mergers in other key Canadian industries. In particular, these proposals would significantly affect – and limit – the Bureau’s role in reviewing these mergers.

For example, in May 2006, the federal government introduced proposed amendments to the Canada Transportation Act which include provision for a new "public interest" review process for mergers involving federally regulated transportation services.6 Although the Competition Bureau would continue to examine these mergers from a competition perspective, a concurrent "public interest" review process would be undertaken by the federal Canadian Transportation Agency ("CTA") if so directed by the Minister of Transport. The Minister would then receive and consider the views of both the Bureau and the CTA, including with respect to remedies if appropriate, before providing his/her recommendation to the federal Cabinet on whether to grant or deny approval. Currently, only airline mergers are subject to this type of review process. The goal of the amendments is to extend "public interest" review more broadly to mergers involving all types of transportation undertakings falling under federal jurisdiction.

Similarly, in June 2006, a Committee of the Canadian Senate issued a report on the Canadian news media in which it recommended that "public interest" considerations form part of the review of mergers in media industries.7 The Committee criticized the Bureau’s current analytical approach to media mergers, which focuses on the potential impact on the price of advertising. The Senate Committee stated that the Bureau’s approach misses the "critical dimension" of how media concentration affects diversity in the provision of news and information. The Senate Committee contrasted the Bureau’s approach with that of regulatory regimes in other countries – such as France, the U.K., Germany, Australia and the United States – which, the Committee said, attempt to "foster a plurality of owners within specific markets and to ensure that a diversity of news and information sources is available".

To address this perceived failing, the Senate Committee recommended that the Competition Act be amended to incorporate a new section dealing specifically with media mergers. Among other things, this new section would (i) authorize both the federal Minister of Industry and the federal Minister of Canadian Heritage to order the mandatory review of a media merger if either Minister is of the view that the proposed merger might adversely affect the "public interest"; and (ii) provide for the appointment of an expert panel to conduct the merger review, which would include representatives of the Bureau (and the CRTC where broadcasting is involved), but also at least two members with working experience in the type of media businesses that is the subject of the merger. The final decision about the fate of the merger would then be made by the federal Cabinet.

Both of these proposals reflect the view that mergers in key industries should not be reviewed on the basis of competition law principles alone, but should be subject to a broad "public interest" scrutiny. Members of the competition community in Canada tend to disparage these views as attempting to inject "political" considerations into what should be an "objective", efficiency-driven analysis. However, as can be seen from the various proposals described above, this opinion is not necessarily shared outside of the competition law universe, at least insofar as key industries are concerned.


1. Competition Bureau, Technical Backgrounder, Acquisition of Sogides Ltee by Quebecor Media Inc. (March 6, 2006), http:// w w w . c o m p e t i t i o n b u r e a u . g c . c a / i n t e r n e t / index.cfm?itemID=2032&lg=e.

2 .A copy of the consent agreement is available at http://www.cttc.

3. Competition Bureau, Technical Backgrounder, Acquisition of Maytag by Whirlpool (May 31, 2006), http:// w w w . c o m p e t i t i o n b u r e a u . g c . c a / i n t e r n e t / index.cfm?itemID=2113&lg=e.

4. Competition Bureau, Information Notice, Competition Bureau fine-tunes BBM-Nielsen merger (June 23, 2006), http:// w w w . c o m p e t i t i o n b u r e a u . g c . c a / i n t e r n e t / index.cfm?itemID=2140&lg=e.

5. A copy of the consent agreement is available at http://www.cttc.

6. Transport Canada, News Release, Canada Transportation Act Amendments Introduced in Parliament (May†4, 2006), http://

7. Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications, Final Report on the Canadian News Media (June 2006), http:/ / tran-e/rep-e/repfinjun06vol1-e.htm

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Mark C. Katz
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.