Canada: End Of Life Health Care Planning - Be Careful What You Wish For

Last Updated: August 10 2015
Article by Geoffrey W. White

Here is one statistic you can rely on: 100% of Canadians will die. Benjamin Franklin said it first, "In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes." Yet more than 80% of Canadians have never considered the need to plan ahead for decisions about their health care at the time of their death. The legal rules about "health care decision making" are complex, and have been significantly affected by recent court cases. No matter the size of their estate, wealthy or modest, Canadians are becoming more concerned about the need for not only a good life, but also a good death.

Two of the most important recent cases are: a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada about physician assisted death in Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5; and a decision about the refusal of end of life care by the BC Court of Appeal in Bentley v. Maplewood Seniors Care Society, 2015 BCCA 91.

The Basics of an Advance Care Plan

The Court of Appeal in Bentley set out the need quite clearly:

"...persons who wish to make provisions for their care and decision-making in their declining years should not only record their wishes clearly, but also obtain legal advice as to what exactly can be accomplished by so-called "living wills", representation agreements, advance directives and related appointments." [at 6]

The tools we use in British Columbia to make advance care plans include:

A "living will" – this document records your preferences about future care. Although there is no reference to living wills in BC legislation, it is clear that wishes expressed about your future health care while you are capable are legally binding on anyone who makes decisions for you when you have become incapable.

A "representation agreement" – this document allows you to identify a person as your decision maker for a time in the future when you may become incapable. It is often thought of as a power of attorney for health care matters.

An "advance directive" - this document is a living will that has the ability to replace a substitute decision maker. If the proper wording and process has been used, then this document may become your legally binding consent to the treatment described in it. In that case, there would be no need, and in fact no ability, to involve another person to make decisions for you.

The court also referred to "related appointments." This covers the default system that applies if you have not made any of the above documents. The Health Care (Consent) and Care Facility (Admission) Act sets out a hierarchy of who will be appointed as a temporary substitute decision maker ("TSDM") starting with your next-of-kin and extending to the government office of the Public Guardian and Trustee.

A good advance health care plan should at the very least include identification of who will be your substitute decision maker, and some record of your preferences for treatment. Most often, this will be best accomplished with a representation agreement and a living will.

In 2015, the recent cases of Carter and Bentley have significantly affected this typical planning.

Carter

In Carter, the Supreme Court of Canada carved out an exception to the long-standing criminal code prohibitions against one person assisting another person in ending their life. The court determined that a capable adult who has a grievous and irremediable condition that causes enduring and intolerable suffering may make a clear request for a physician to assist them in dying. The exception will come into effect on February 6, 2016.

The exception will only apply to assistance by a physician and the requesting patient must be an adult. The patient's condition needs to be "grievous" but the court did not require that the condition be terminal. Also, the condition needs to be "irremediable", but only in the context of treatments that would be acceptable to the patient – it is open to the patient to refuse treatments, and still make a request for assistance in dying.

Importantly for advance care planning, the decision must be made by the capable patient themselves. The court has not extended the exemption to permit a request by a substitute decision maker for a patient who has become incapable. This means that your living will or advance directive can provide instructions to refuse treatment that could end your life, but it cannot authorize a decision by your substitute to request physician assistance in ending your life.

Nonetheless, if the option of physician assisted dying is important to you, you may wish to ensure that your living will is not inconsistent with that wish. Many popular samples of living will wording include a phrase such as "While I believe that no one should hasten death...I request that pain relief medication be administered ...". Until the Carter decision, this wording was important to ensure that pain relief medication could be used to alleviate suffering even if it resulted in a hastened death. The primary focus on pain relief was thought to avoid an allegation of "assistance" in causing the patient's death. Of course, now after the Carter decision, it is legal to "hasten death" in certain circumstances and for many Canadians it may be their wish to have that option. For those Canadians, the old living will wording should be modified.

The Carter decision also raises challenges for physicians and health care providers, some of whom are opposed to providing assistance in dying. The court noted that its decision would not compel the provision of assistance, but that governments and physicians' colleges would need to reconcile the right of a patient to seek assistance and the right of a professional to opt out.

The effect of the exemption was deferred to February 6, 2016 to give governments a chance to respond, but it is designed to take effect on that date even without legislation. Without a framework of principled rules, there will be an unfair burden on physicians to act as gatekeepers without clear guidance and accountability.

As of this writing, other than Quebec's Act Respecting End-of-Care (that was proposed before the Carter decision), no other government, federal or provincial, has provided any legislation or guidance. Many organizations are working to fill the absence of legislation with recommendations. The Canadian Bar Association will consider a draft policy at its 2015 summer conference. Many provincial medical colleges, not-for-profit organizations, and education institutions are meeting to develop safeguards and harmonization across the provinces.

Bentley

In Bentley, the Court of Appeal confirmed that no matter what advance plan you put into place today, any specific future decision will be guided by your consent at the time, even if you are severely impaired at the time.

Mrs. Bentley is in the last stages of Alzheimer's dementia and is being spoon fed at her care facility. Her family believes very strongly that she did not wish to live in this condition and wished to refuse any food at this stage. They applied to court to stop the care facility from feeding Mrs. Bentley. The health authority, on behalf of the care facility, submitted that:

  1. Mrs. Bentley, by accepting the spoon into her mouth was consenting to be fed;
  2. Mrs. Bentley's prior wishes were not clear (there were two written documents with inconsistent language about feeding and heroics);
  3. Even if her wishes were clear, the family had no authority to refuse spoon feeding because it was "personal care" and not "health care"; and
  4. To stop spoon feeding would amount to neglect and therefore is not something the facility would be permitted to do.

The judge at the first court level agreed with the health authority. On appeal, the Court of Appeal also agreed that Mrs. Bentley's actions would constitute legal consent. However since the decision about Mrs. Bentley's consent was enough by itself to justify the continued feeding, the Court of Appeal confirmed that no binding decision was being made about the remaining positions of the health authority. Whether the other three statements about the state of the law by the health authority and judge (at the first level) are correct, will need to be determined by legislative clarifications, or by a future litigated case.

Until those clarifications arrive, we can take away a few key lessons from the Bentley decision.

Living wills and any other statements of wishes should be carefully drafted and defined. General preferences against "heroics" or "artificial" treatments may be of limited value since those terms themselves are not well-defined. Yet, it is also problematic to be too specific about particular treatments in the absence of a diagnosed condition and prognosis from a physician.

As a pre-planning tool, it may be far better to express your motivations behind the wishes. What aspects of living are so important to you that certain conditions could be worse than death? Severe pain; reliance on artificial feeding and breathing; inability to speak, think or interact? There are questionnaires and other tools that can help you define your tolerances and wishes for such situations. These documents can help you think about situations in which you would not want medical treatments intended to keep you alive. These days, many treatments can keep people alive even if there is no chance that the treatment will reverse or improve their condition. You can identify what you would want in these situations if the treatment would not reverse or improve your condition.

Why Bother?

Advance health care planning is important. It is your chance to ensure that your preferences for very personal decisions are known and followed. It is also important that the planning is done correctly. The Bentley case demonstrates that you must "be careful what you wish for". Unclear language can undermine your wishes. The Bentley case also emphasizes the importance of good "legal advice", so that you will know "what exactly can be accomplished."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Geoffrey W. White
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions