Canada: Does A Discharge Of A Receiver Mean Liability Of The Receiver Is At An End?

Last Updated: July 28 2015
Article by Barry A. Cohen QC

A recent decision of Justice McEwen dealt with an interesting issue concerning whether a party in receivership can sue the Receiver after an order discharging the Receiver.

In the case at hand (Canadian National Railway Company ("CN") and Scott Holmes ("Holmes") et al – Court File CV-08-7670-00CL citation 2015 ONSC3038), CN obtained both a Mareva Order and Anton Pillar Order against Holmes, Jennifer Lynn Flynn ("Flynn") and various corporations controlled by them. On August 26, 2008 Schonfeld Inc. ("Schonfeld") on consent was appointed as a Monitor.

The Monitor's powers were set out in paragraph 2 of the Monitor Order and were primarily for managing assets of the Monitored Parties and paying legal fees and disbursement of the Monitored Parties.

The Monitor's powers included:

"2. THIS COURT ORDERS that the Monitor is hereby empowered and authorized, but is not obligated, to act at once in respect of the Property. The Monitor is granted this power in order to facilitate the management of the assets of the Monitored Parties pursuant to a Mareva Injunction granted by the Honourable Justice Lederman on August 8, 2008, as continued and amended by Order of the Honourable Justice Newbould dated August 18, 2008 ("Mareva Injunction") and the documents reflected in the Anton Piller Order granted by the Honourable Justice Lederman on August 8, 2008, as continued by the Order of the Honourable Justice Newbould on August 18, 2008, ("Anton Piller Order") and as more particularly reflected in a Supplementary Interim Agreement dated August 14, 2008 between the plaintiff and the Monitored Parties. Without in anyway limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Monitor is expressly empowered and authorized to do the following:

(a) To monitor and review the Property and any and all proceeds, receipts and disbursements arising out of or from the Property;

(b) To enter into and assess, on satisfactory disclosure by the Monitored Parties, the business and undertaking of the Holmes Companies and related entities and the assets of Holmes, Flynn and the Trusts;

(c) To make a recommendation as to the future of any or all of the Holmes Companies, including the wind-down of any or all of them, and to supervise the implementation of those steps;

(d) To determine and recommend the necessary expenditures for purposes of achieving such recommended steps, including wind down, and meeting the necessary ongoing obligations of the Holmes Companies, including:

(i) Who the necessary employees of the Holmes Companies are; and

(ii) Who is on the payroll of the Holmes Companies, but not providing necessary services to them......."

(k) To take any steps reasonably incidental to the exercise of these powers,

and in each case where the Monitor takes any such actions or steps, it shall be exclusively authorized and empowered to do so, to the exclusion of all other Persons (as defined below) and without interference from any other Person....."

The Monitor Order also contained usual protective language given to Monitors and Receivers. In particular, paragraph 7 and 8 of the Monitor Order provided:

"6. The Monitor Order also provided the usual types of protections afforded to monitors in paragraphs 7 and 8:


7. THIS COURT ORDERS that no proceeding or enforcement process in any court or tribunal shall be commenced or continued against the Monitor except with the written consent of the Monitor or with leave of this Court;


8. THIS COURT ORDERS that the Monitor shall incur no liability or obligations as a result of its appointment or the carrying out the provisions of this Order, save and except for any gross negligence or wilful misconduct on its part..."

Subsequent to the Monitor reporting to the Court, the Monitor was appointed as a Receiver of the Monitored Parties. The Receivership Order authorized the Receiver to liquidate certain identified assets of the Monitored Parties and to pay a fixed amount to Holmes and Flynn for living expenses and for their professional advisors.

The Receivership Order contained a limitation of liability and, as part of the Receivership Order, there was a provision relating to the prior Monitor Order which stated:


25. THIS COURT ORDERS that the Receiver shall incur no liability or obligation as a result of its appointment or the carrying out of the provisions of this Order, save and except for any gross negligence or wilful misconduct on its part. Nothing in this Order shall derogate from the protections afforded by the Receiver by section 14.06 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act ("BIA") or any other applicable legislation.


26. THIS COURT ORDERS that this order should be read in conjunction with the Monitor Order and that nothing in this Order shall derogate from the powers of and protections of the Monitor/Receiver described in the Monitor Order. All the provisions of the Monitor Order shall continue to apply to activities of the Receiver in respect of this Order."

The Receiver, having completed its duties, obtained a Discharge Order on September 26, 2011 (not opposed) which order included:


8. THIS COURT ORDERS AND DECLARES that the Receiver has duly and properly discharged all of its duties, liabilities and obligations as Monitor/Receiver of the Monitored Parties (as defined in the Order of Spence J., dated August 26, 2008 and the Order of Campbell J., dated December 4, 2008)......

10. THIS COURT ORDERS that the Receiver is discharged from its duties, liabilities and obligations, in its dual capacity as either Monitor or Receiver of the Monitored Parties property and assets is discharged, save for its duties with respect to the Claim, and is also released from any duties, liabilities and obligations arising from the Mareva Order of Lederman J., dated August 8, 2008 (as amended).

11. THIS COURT ORDERS that upon filing the Initial Completion Certificate the Receiver shall continue to remain Receiver and continue to have authority as Receiver in order that it may complete its ongoing duties with respect to the Claim until such matters are complete. The Receiver shall continue to have the full benefit of the provisions of all Orders made in this Monitor/Receivership, including all approvals, protections and stay of proceedings in favour of the Schonfeld Inc. in its dual capacity as Monitor/Receiver.

12. THIS COURT ORDERS that upon completion of all Claim matters, the Receiver shall file a Supplementary Certification of Completion with this Court and shall at that time be forever discharged and released of any further Receivership duties and obligations."

In February 2014, Holmes and Flynn commenced an action in Hamilton against Schonfeld and the Holmes/ Flynn accounting firm, seeking $2,500,000 in damages arising from potential tax liabilities that CRA claimed against them for failure to repay shareholder loans for the 2006- 2009 tax years. These assessments became known to Holmes and Flynn in 2012 as a result of a series of correspondence between them and CRA.

Of note is that the loans were all made to Holmes and Flynn prior to the appointment of Schonfeld as Monitor.

Claim of Holmes and Flynn Against Receiver

Holmes and Flynn claimed Schonfeld failed to exercise a reasonable duty of care, supervision and control over management of their affairs and claimed Schonfeld was obliged to engage in reasonable tax planning while handling their assets and assets of their corporations. Holmes and Flynn asserted that Schonfeld should be liable for the tax liability that Holmes and Flynn only became aware of after the Discharge Order.

Schonfeld brought a motion to have the claim dismissed for failure to seek leave of the Court to allow the claim to be issued against Schonfeld.

Holmes and Flynn Position on Receiver's Motion

Holmes and Flynn argued no leave was required because they only sued Schonfeld as Receiver and the Receivership Order did not specify the usual leave of the Court provision regarding suing the Receiver.

Schonfeld's Position

Schonfeld acknowledged the Receiver Order did not contain the usual "leave of the Court" wording but relied on paragraph 26 of the Receivership Order and asserted it preserved to the Receiver the leave requirement spelled out in the Monitor Order.

Paragraph 26 provided that nothing in the Receiver Order derogates from the powers and protections of the Monitor/Receiver described in the Monitor Order and that all provisions of the Monitor Order continue to apply to the activities undertaken by the Monitor/Receiver as Receiver.

Paragraph 7 of the Monitor Order contained a prohibition against any proceeding against the Monitor except with leave of the Court.

In addition, the Discharge Order contained inter alia the following release of liability wording:


17. THIS COURT ORDERS AND DECLARES that the Receiver is hereby released and discharged from any and all liability that the Receiver now has or may hereafter have by reason of, or in any way arising out of, the acts or omissions of the Receiver while acting in its capacity as Receiver and/or Monitor herein, save and except for any gross negligence or wilful misconduct on the Receiver's part. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Receiver is hereby forever released and discharged from any and all liability relating to matters that were raised, or which could have been raised, in the within Receivership/Monitor proceedings, save and except for any gross negligence or wilful misconduct on the Receiver/ Monitor's part."

Justice McEwen held that the Receivership Order, by virtue of the language in paragraph 11 of the Receiver Discharge Order, had the benefit of the leave requirement included in it and therefore leave was required.

Nunc Pro Tunc Argument

Holmes and Flynn then argued that if leave was required, it should be granted nunc pro tunc.

The test for granting leave to institute a claim involves:

  1. is there any prejudice or substantial injustice to Schonfeld if an order granting leave is given; and
  2. if no prejudice or substantial injustice would result, would leave have been granted had it been initially sought.

Justice McEwen found no prejudice or substantial injustice would result by granting leave nunc pro tunc.

As to the second part of the test, Justice McEwen stated that leave will be generally granted unless it is clear there is no foundation for the claim or the claim is frivolous or vexatious.

A stricter standard under which a plaintiff must demonstrate a strong prima facie case may be appropriate where issues raised in the action could have been raised in the discharge provisions.

Holmes and Flynn argued they did not know about the CRA claim until after the Discharge Order and therefore the strong prima facie standard did not apply.

Justice McEwen reviewed paragraph 17 of the Discharge Order (the release of liability position) and held it was sufficiently broad to encompass a release of the alleged misconduct of the Receiver.

The Court went on to state that when seeking leave to sue a Court appointed Receiver, a plaintiff must establish a factual basis for the proposed claim and the proposed claim must disclose a cause of action.

On the basis of the wording of the Monitor/Receiver Orders, Holmes and Flynn needed to establish a factual basis for gross negligence/wilful misconduct by the Receiver.

The Court found that nowhere in the Monitor/Receiver Orders was there any requirement for the Receiver to provide any form of accounting services or tax planning to Holmes and Flynn or their corporations.

Holmes and Flynn had argued the Receiver failed to take reasonable care of their assets by not minimizing tax liabilities while managing their assets and by failing to maintain a sufficient reserve to ensure there was funds in the estate to cover future tax liabilities.

The Court found no foundation for the claim that the Receiver's conduct constituted a marked departure from the standards by which a reasonable and competent Receiver in similar circumstances would have acted.

The Court found:

  1. The liabilities of Holmes and Flynn began prior to the appointment of the Monitor/ Receiver
  2. Holmes/Flynn knew about the shareholder loans
  3. Holmes/Flynn had received accounting services and tax advice from their own accountants (who were also being sued).
  4. There was no mandate for the Monitor/Receiver to provide tax and accounting services to Holmes/Flynn
  5. Holmes/Flynn either consented or didn't oppose any orders that limited the Receivers liability, nor did they oppose the Discharge Order.

In the absence of gross negligence/ wilful misconduct, the wording in paragraph 17 of the Discharge Order covered the matters now complained of and thus no reasonable cause of action was advanced.

Points to Note

When drafting the appointment order, counsel needs to be aware of the "leave" provision as well as the mandating authority and obligations granted to the Monitor or Receiver.

One wonders how often the standard Commercial Court Receiver Order is drawn up with a mere glossing over of these provisions as "standard" and only become important, when things go wrong.

When acting for a Receiver, the language of the Discharge Order needs to be carefully reviewed and drafted as wide as possible in favour of the Receiver. Counsel for a Respondent must carefully review the release language and try to limit it to usual Commercial Court language.

In addition, the time to raise issues is prior to, or at the discharge motion (preferably having objected prior thereto) as failure to do so can come back to, in essence, bar the claim.

Of other interest in the decision is the finding that matters outside the scope of the appointment order are not obligations of the Receiver.

Consider if the same result would occur if they involved tax issues arising from a significant tax orientated disposition of assets by a Receiver to a third party purchaser.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Barry A. Cohen QC
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.