Canada: Court Of Appeal Upholds Recognition Of UK Solvent Scheme Of Arrangement In Canada

Last Updated: June 13 2006
Article by Liz Pillon and Brian Rose

In May 2005, we reported that Canadian courts had for the first time opened the door to the recognition of foreign solvent schemes in re Cavell Insurance Company Limited1. That decision was appealed to the Ontario Court of Appeal, which on May 23, 2006 unanimously affirmed Mr Justice Farley’s decision to recognize and implement a UK order initiating a solvent scheme of arrangement2. This confirmation of the UK Order and the application of the principles of comity, provides both the recognition and the procedure necessary to ensure that foreign solvent schemes of arrangement can be implemented and enforced in Canada.


In recent years, section 425 of the UK’s Companies Act 1985 (the Companies Act) has been utilized by increasing numbers of UK insurers and reinsurers to effect solvent schemes of arrangement with their policyholders in order to accelerate the agreement and settlement of policyholders’ claims and achieve finality in these claims. While courts in the US have on a number of occasions granted orders recognizing foreign proceedings relating to such solvent schemes pursuant to section 304 of the US Bankruptcy Code, until the proposed scheme of arrangement of Cavell Insurance Company Limited, the issue of whether UK solvent schemes ought to be recognized in Canada had not been determined by a Canadian court.

Cavell is a UK-incorporated insurance company that, until 1993, wrote reinsurance business in the London market as well as overseas through branch operations in South Africa, Australia, New Zealand and Canada. In Canada, the Cavell branch was registered with the Canadian federal regulator, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI). In 1993, Cavell ceased underwriting business, and its activities from that point onward consisted of the run-off of the reinsurance risks that it had written. The run-off of Cavell’s business was predicted to take in excess of forty years. Cavell prepared a scheme of arrangement (the Cavell Scheme) under section 425 of the Companies Act for proposal to its creditors. In Canada, Cavell’s creditors were essentially cedants to Cavell.

On December 20, 2004, Mr. Justice Park of the UK High Court of Justice granted an initial order in respect of the Cavell Scheme proceedings (the UK Order), granting leave to Cavell to convene a meeting of creditors for the purpose of considering, and, if thought fit, approving, the Cavell Scheme. The UK Order also provided for procedural matters such as notice of the creditors’ meeting.

Canadian Recognition of the UK Scheme Proceedings

  • Justice Farley’s Decisions

On December 21, 2004, Cavell applied to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the Canadian Court) for an order recognizing both the UK proceedings and the UK Order. The order being sought also included procedural and notice terms specific to Canadian cedants, as well as a Canadian forum for Canadian claimants. Mr. Justice James Farley granted the order sought by Cavell (the Canadian Order), holding that it was appropriate in the circumstances. In his endorsement released the same day3, he found that there was a real and substantial connection between the subject matter of the UK Order (Cavell, a UK company, and its Scheme), and the jurisdiction of the UK Court, thereby recognizing the UK Court’s jurisdiction over the Scheme proceedings. Justice Farley found that he had jurisdiction to recognize the UK Order under the inherent jurisdiction of the Canadian Court as well as the Canada-UK Convention Providing for the Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, which had been incorporated into the law of Ontario through the Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments (U.K.) Act (1990).

Subsequent to the granting of the Canadian Order, a number of Canadian insurance companies that had reinsured with Cavell brought motions before Justice Farley seeking, among other things, to have the Canadian Order set aside4. Justice Farley dismissed their motions, affirming his original decision and holding that Cavell had in this situation met the onus of demonstrating that this was a "fair and legitimate case" for the recognition of the UK Order by the Canadian Court. He noted in his endorsement that the Canadian insurers, having contracted with a UK company, should be "taken to know that they could be subject to a plan of compromise or arrangement pursuant to the UK Companies Act." In drawing analogies between the provisions of section 425 of the Companies Act and plans of arrangement provided for within Canadian corporate law statutes, Mr Justice Farley determined that the UK solvent schemes were neither "foreign nor repugnant" to the Canadian courts, as had been suggested.

It should be noted that, although Justice Farley paid a great deal of deference to the UK Court’s jurisdiction over the Scheme and all Scheme creditors (including the Canadian reinsureds), he was careful to ensure that the Canadian Order did not result in undue unfairness to Cavell’s Canadian creditors. In that respect, the Canadian Court had been asked by the moving parties in the comeback motions to review and address the substance and procedures of the Cavell Scheme, including the merits of creating a separate class for the Canadian reinsureds. While Justice Farley declined to do so, holding, among other things, that he did not see the merit in creating such a separate class, he did make the recognition of the UK Order conditional upon four "adjustments" or "safeguards." These adjustments and safeguards related to: (i) the methodology of valuing the Canadian reinsureds’ claims; (ii) the appeal rights of the Canadian reinsureds from a decision of the scheme adjudicator; (iii) a requirement to videotape the meeting of creditors; and (iv) the duty of the scheme adjudicator and scheme administrator to act in good faith and to treat the Canadian reinsureds fairly. Upon a subsequent motion for clarification brought by Cavell, Justice Farley reaffirmed his conclusion that a separate Canadian class was not required in the circumstances, and further discussed the Canadian Court’s willingness to exercise comity in favour of the UK Courts.

  • The Ontario Court of Appeal Decision

The Ontario Court of Appeal heard the appeal from Justice Farley’s decisions on November 29, 2005. In a unanimous decision, written by Justice Goudge, the Court of Appeal upheld Justice Farley’s recognition of the UK Order based on the common law rules of private international law.5

At the outset, the Court of Appeal focussed on Justice LaForest’s decision in Morguard Investments Ltd. v. De Savoye6 in describing the need to modernize rules of private international law "to accommodate the increasingly transnational nature of commercial transaction that accompanies the inexorable evolution towards a global economy," emphasizing that of "central importance in this task of reappraisal is the doctrine of comity", a doctrine "grounded in the need in modern times to facilitate the flow of wealth, skills and people across state lines in a fair and orderly manner."

The Court of Appeal then looked to the principles of "real and substantial connection" and "order and fairness" as outlined in Morguard and held that both principles were met in respect of the Cavell Scheme, and that it had therefore been appropriate for Justice Farley to recognize the UK Order. In its analysis, the Court of Appeal recognized that the subject matter was a scheme of arrangement proposed by a UK company under UK legislation and therefore a sufficient connection existed between the UK jurisdiction and the subject matter of the proceedings.

In response to the argument raised by the appellants that the UK Order could not be recognized as it was not final, the Court of Appeal held that although traditionally finality was a requirement to the recognition to a foreign judgment, the lack of finality did not have any substantive effect on the recognition in the present circumstances, as the underlying purposes for the requirement of a final order were nonetheless met.

Not only did the Court of Appeal find that the technical grounds for recognition were met, but also that there were strong policy grounds to support recognition of the UK Order. These policy considerations included the longstanding respect paid by Canadian Courts to the UK Courts, existing statutory procedures in commercial legislation in Ontario which are analogous to the UK scheme of arrangement statutory provisions, and the fact that the UK statutory process is one which is familiar to the Ontario courts. The Court of Appeal stressed the importance that a party ultimately affected by the scheme be permitted to participate effectively from the beginning, concluding that a recognition order at the initial proceedings achieved this goal, fairness being enhanced rather than diminished in such circumstances.


1 Re Cavell Insurance Co. (2004), 6 C.B.R. (5th) 11 (Ont. S.C.J. [Commercial List], December 21, 2004)
Re Cavell Insurance Co., Toronto 04-CL-5647 (Ont. S.C.J. [Commercial List], February 17, 2005 and
Re Cavell Insurance Co., Toronto 04-CL-5647 (Ont. S.C.J. [Commercial List], April 22, 2005

2 Cavell Insurance Company Limited (Re) (May 23, 2006), Docket C43657

3 Re Cavell Insurance Co. (2004), 6 C.B.R. (5th) 11 (Ont. S.C.J. [Commercial List], December 21, 2004)

4 The Canadian Order contained a "comeback" clause providing that any interested party could apply to the Court for cancellation, amendment or other variation of the Canadian Order.

5 The Court held that the Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments (U.K.) Act and Rule 73 of the Rules of Civil Procedure were not available, as the Initial UK Order had not been obtained following service of the original application record in the UK nor was the UK order a final order, and as such the formal requirements of Rule 73 were not met.

6 Morguard Investments Ltd. v. De Savoye [1990] 3 S.C.R., 1077

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions