Canada: Property Tax Assessments: What You Need To Know For Your Appeal


On March 6, 2015, the Divisional Court of Ontario released its decision in Junvir Investments Ltd. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation1and held that the Assessment Review Board (the "Board")2did not err in failing to properly determine the current value of the appellant's property. This case is significant not only for its result, but also because it demonstrates that courts are unwilling to overturn decisions by the Board that have some evidentiary basis, no matter how minimal. In order to succeed on an appeal, property owners must point to some error of law in order to overturn a decision by the Board. This article seeks to identify the potential errors of law that property owners can raise on an appeal.


Founded in 1953, Junvir Investments Ltd. (the "Appellant") is a third-generation family owned corporation that operates an independent grocery store in central Toronto. Between 1995 and 2003, the Appellant acquired the following four properties with the intention of expanding its operations:

  • 446 Summerhill Avenue: a 15,000 sq. ft. grocery store building (the "Building"); and
  • 444, 442, and 438 Summerhill Avenue: together comprising a 26-car parking lot adjacent to the Building (collectively, the "Subject Properties").

Between 2005 and 2007, the Appellant expanded the Building to approximately 30,000 sq. ft. in order to add additional room for storage, food preparation, shopping, and a kitchen. In 2005, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation ("MPAC") provided the Appellant with the following Current Value Assessments ("CVA") for the 2006, 2007, and 2008 taxation years3using the cost approach:4

The Appellant and MPAC disagreed on both the nature of the Building and MPAC's choice of properties for comparable sales. The Appellant took the position that the Building had the characteristics of a grocery store and should be valued using the Grocery Store Model ("GSM").5In determining the value of the Building, MPAC applied the income approach using estimates of the Fair Market Rent ("FMR")6of commercial retail buildings. The Appellant, on the other hand, proposed two possible valuation methods for the Building: (i) an income approach using estimates of FMR from grocery stores and supermarkets that it asserted were comparable; or (ii) a CVA FMR of the Building, which it produced by applying the GSM.7

On March 27, 2014, the Board held that the CVA of the Appellant's four properties was $3,661,000.00 for the 2008 taxation year (the "First Decision").8This figure was ultimately reduced to $2,103,000.00 as a result of several factors that negatively affected the Building's value.9

On August 26, 2014, the Board issued an amended decision (the "Amended Decision") to correct a typographical error and mathematical miscalculations. The Amended Decision raised the CVA of the Appellant's four properties to $4,288,000.00 for the 2008 taxation year, although this figure was ultimately reduced to $2,730,000.00 as a result of the above-mentioned negative factors.10In response, the Appellant appealed both the First Decision and the Amended Decision pursuant to section 43.1 of the Assessment Act.11


On appeal, the Appellant argued that the Board had made the following errors of law with respect to the 2008 taxation year:

1. It erred in law in failing to properly determine the current value of the Appellant's properties;

2. It erred in law in failing to reference similar properties in the vicinity; and

3. It acted without jurisdiction when it amended the First Decision and issued the Amended Decision.

Justice Sachs began her decision by examining the standard of review applicable to decisions by the Board. As a general rule, the standard of review applicable to the Board's decision on questions of law is correctness. Taking into account several recent decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada,12Justice Sachs noted that there is a presumption that decisions by tribunals interpreting or applying their home statutes are reviewable on a standard of reasonableness.13

In the present case, Justice Sachs held that a standard of review analysis for the Appellant's first and second issues was unnecessary because they involved issues of procedural fairness. In such a case, the question is not whether the decision was "correct" or "reasonable", but simply whether the procedure used was fair. On the other hand, the third issue raised issues of jurisdiction and was reviewable on a standard of correctness.14

With respect to the first issue, the Appellant took the position that the Board had erroneously based its decision on only two of the comparable properties submitted for consideration. According to the Appellant, the Board erred by ignoring the eight other comparable properties that the Appellant submitted whose values were not challenged. Justice Sachs disagreed with the Appellant's position and noted that their argument "does not raise a question of law".15Crucially, Justice Sachs upheld the Board's decision because:

This is not a case where the Board's conclusion was unsupported by any evidence or where the Board ignored relevant evidence...[s]uch errors could constitute errors of law.16

Justice Sachs took a similar approach in dismissing the Appellant's second issue. Here, Justice Sachs held that the Appellant could not take the position that the Board's decision was wrong because it favoured certain comparable properties over others. It would have been improper for the Divisional Court to overturn a finding of fact by the Board regarding its opinion of the best comparables to use in its analysis.

Consequently, the two properties that the Board selected constituted "an ample evidentiary basis upon which to make this finding".17

On the third issue, Justice Sachs noted that the Board has jurisdiction to correct a typographical or mathematical error under both the Statutory Powers Procedure Act18 and the Board's own Rules of Practice and Procedure.19Notwithstanding that leave was not granted on this issue, the Court held that the Board had jurisdiction to amend the First Decision and the Amended Decision in the manner it did.

As a result of the foregoing, Justice Sachs dismissed the appeal and awarded MPAC $14,500.00 in costs for both the appeal and the motion for leave to appeal.


The Divisional Court of Ontario's decision in Junvir is significant for practitioners of property tax and assessment law for several reasons. It affirms the presumption that the standard of review for the Board's interpretation of the Act is reasonableness. Likewise, it demonstrates that courts will uphold CVAs issued by the Board so long as there is some evidentiary basis to support their decision. Property owners should not assume that they will be successful before the Board or the courts simply because they have amassed a large number of comparable properties in support of their position. Decisions by the Board will be upheld so long as they have considered all of the comparable properties and determined that a property owner's comparables are not sufficiently similar to the property in dispute.

The key lesson from Junvir appears to be that courts are only willing to overturn a decision by the Board if one of the following errors of law has been made: (i) where the Board's conclusion is unsupported by any evidence; (ii) where the Board ignored relevant evidence; or (iii) where the Board misapprehended relevant evidence.20Moving forward, property owners should structure their arguments around these points in order to maximize their likelihood of success on an appeal.

Jamie G. Walker is a Student-at-law at Miller Thomson LLP (2015).


1 Junvir Investments Ltd. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corp., 2015 ONSC 1526.

2 The Assessment Review Board is an independent adjudicative tribunal whose main function is to hear appeals from people who believe that properties are incorrectly assessed or classified. The Board also deals with some property tax appeals.

3 Junvir Investments Ltd. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corp., Region No. 09, 2014 CarswellOnt 3732, at paras. 106-107.

4 A valuation method in which the market price of a property is calculated by adding the cost of the land and the cost of construction, minus depreciation.

5 The GSM is an equation used to predict rents for grocery stores (anchor tenants only) based on negotiated rents.

6 The amount of money that a property would command if it were available for leasing at the present time.

7 Supra note 3, at para. 11.

8 Supra note 3.

9 Ibid.

10 JUNVIR Investments Ltd. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corp., Region No. 09, 2014 CarswellOnt 11770, at para. 105.

11 Assessment Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. A.31.

12 British Columbia (Securities Commission) v. McLean, 2013 SCC 67 (S.C.C.).

13 Supra note 1, at para. 5.

14 Ibid.

15 Ibid., at para. 8.

16 Ibid., at para. 8.

17 Ibid., at para. 9.

18 Statutory Powers Procedure Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.22, s. 21.1.

19 Assessment Review Board Rules of Practice and Procedure, A.R.B. Rules, r. 130.

20 Para. 8.

Originally published by Taxes & Wealth Management, May 2015.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.