Canada: Supreme Court Rules Social Hosts Not Responsible For The Actions Of Their Intoxicated Guests

Last Updated: May 27 2006
Article by Alan D’Silva and Nicholas McHaffie

The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in Childs v. Desormeaux, 2006 SCC 18, will provide individuals hosting social events with a significant degree of assurance that they will not be held responsible for the subsequent conduct of their intoxicated guests, including innocent third-party users of the road. In a unanimous judgment, the Court found that, as a general rule, a social host does not owe a duty of care to a person injured by a guest who has consumed alcohol.

The Case in Issue

The case arose from the tragic events of a 1998 New Year’s Eve BYOB ("bring your own booze") party hosted by Julie Zimmerman and Dwight Courrier. Among their guests was Desmond Desormeaux, an admitted alcoholic. The evidence from the trial was that Desormeaux was at the hosts’ home for approximately two hours and consumed twelve beers that he had brought with him. Desormeaux drove away from the party early, after being involved in an argument with another guest. Owing to his intoxication, however, Desormeaux veered out of his own lane and collided head-on with another vehicle. One occupant of the other car was killed and another, Zoe Childs, was severely injured. Desormeaux had no insurance at the time of the accident and was virtually without assets.

The Lower Court Decisions

Ms. Childs commenced a lawsuit to recover compensation for the injuries she sustained against both Desormeaux and the party hosts. Ms. Childs claimed that the hosts, Zimmerman and Courrier, had a legal duty to prevent Desormeaux from driving while intoxicated. At trial, Chadwick J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice found that the hosts did owe such a duty of care to Ms. Childs and other users of the road. Recognizing this was a novel duty and a new kind of liability, Chadwick J. determined that he was required to apply the two-stage analysis set out in the leading authority Anns v. Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728. The Anns test requires a court to consider whether: (i) there is a sufficiently close or "proximate" relationship between a social host and third-party users of the road to find a duty of care; and, (ii) if so, there are any countervailing policy considerations that negate that duty of care.

Chadwick J. held that the hosts owed Childs a duty of care under the first stage of the Anns test because they were aware of Desormeaux’s history of alcoholism and the resulting harm to Ms. Childs from Desormeaux’s actions was therefore reasonably foreseeable. However, the trial judge declined to find the hosts legally responsible for Desormeaux’s conduct on the second part of the Anns test – the public policy grounds - because it would be against public policy to expand tort law in this fashion. On the public policy aspect of the test, Chadwick J. considered that recognizing social host liability would likely lead to a proliferation of litigation, with hosts being added as defendants in a claim every time an accident occurred following a private function. This would have wide social ramifications, leading to increased claims under homeowners’ insurance policies, with the likely result of increased premiums for all policyholders.

The Ontario Court of Appeal agreed with the trial judge that there should be no social host liability but concluded that on the facts in this case, the hosts did not act negligently, therefore vitiating any need to consider the second part of the Anns test, the public policy grounds. The Court of Appeal considered the fact that the party was a BYOB event where the hosts had not assumed control over the service of alcohol and, moreover, the hosts were not in fact aware that Desormeaux was intoxicated. Given these facts, no duty of care was owed in the circumstances. Nonetheless, the Court of Appeal left open the possibility that social hosts might be held liable in appropriate circumstances, stating as follows:

This judgment should not be interpreted to mean that social hosts are immune from liability to innocent third party users of the road caused by an impaired guest’s driving. On the contrary, I do not foreclose social host liability to innocent third parties particularly when it is shown that a social host knew that an intoxicated guest was going to drive a car and did nothing to protect the innocent third party users of the road.

The Supreme Court’s Decision

Ms. Childs appealed to the Supreme Court and the issue before the Court was whether or not social host liability ought to be recognized as part of Canadian tort law.

In considering the issue, the Court made clear that social host liability was a novel tort and was not simply analogous to existing duties of care. The Court recognized that while the law does impose special obligations on commercial hosts (i.e., restaurant and bar owners) to monitor the alcohol consumption of patrons, there were significant differences between social and commercial hosts that made extending these duties without regard to the dissimilarities between the parties inappropriate. Specifically, the Court held that: (i) supervising consumption is an inherent function of the commercial host, even if only in order to ensure payment; (ii) the parameters of a commercial host’s responsibilities were clearly articulated through legislation; and (iii) the benefit that commercial hosts derived from the sale of alcohol, namely profit, justified the imposition of a duty to monitor its consumption for the public good. These same factors were not sufficiently operative in the relationship of social hosts and their guests to justify imposing a duty of care.

In considering the first aspect of the Anns test, the Court found that the relationship between hosts and users of the public roads was not close enough to merit recognizing a new duty of care. On the facts in issue, the harm that befell Ms. Childs was not reasonably foreseeable to the hosts; the mere fact that Desormeaux had a history of impaired driving did not make the risk that such behaviour would happen again reasonably foreseeable and these hosts did not actually know that Desormeaux was intoxicated on the night of the accident.

The Court went on to note that even if foreseeability of the harm had been established, there would still be no duty to monitor a guest’s alcohol consumption. The hosts were accused of a failure to act and it is only in very limited circumstances that Canadian tort law recognizes and imposes positive duties on individuals to take action. Generally speaking, positive action is only required where there is some special relationship between the parties to justify the imposition of a duty. For example, positive duties of care may be required where the defendant in some way creates the risk of harm and profits from that creation, where the defendant acts in paternalistic role of care and control over an individual or where the defendant is engaged in some public function or commercial enterprise which has attendant responsibilities to act with special care.

The Court held that none of these limited circumstances applied to the relationship between hosts and guests, however. Hosts are clearly not acting in a public capacity, nor do they assume a paternal role over their guests. The Court similarly rejected the argument that hosting a party was anything other than a common occurrence and certainly could not be characterized as a "risky activity." Instead, the Court stressed the responsibility of the guest for his or her own conduct, noting that a person who accepts an invitation to a private gathering does not "park his autonomy at the door." The consumption of alcohol is a personal choice and a guest therefore assumes the risks of his own impaired judgment. As stated by the Court:

Holding a private party – the bare facts of this case – is insufficient to implicate the host in the creation of the risk sufficient to give rise to a duty of care to third parties who may be subsequently injured by the conduct of a guest. The host creates a place where people can meet, visit and imbibe alcohol, whether served on the premises or supplied by the guest. All this falls within accepted parameters of non-dangerous conduct. More is required to establish a danger or risk that requires positive action…. Suffice it to say that hosting a party where alcohol is served, without more, does not suggest the creation or exacerbation of risk of the level required to impose a duty of care on the host to members of the public who may be affected by a guest’s conduct.

Given that a duty of care was not recognized in law, it was unnecessary for the Court to consider whether policy considerations also weighed against social host liability under the second stage of the Anns test.

The Status of Social Host Liability in Canada

The practical outcome of this decision is twofold. First, the judgment protects hosts from indeterminate liability, making clear that individuals will not be unduly burdened by the unrealistic requirement of having to "police" their guests, monitoring their alcohol consumption and assessing their individual states of intoxication throughout a gathering.

Second, the rejection of social host liability protects private individuals (specifically homeowners) and their insurers from bearing a disproportionate share of the loss occasioned by drunk drivers. The recognition of social host liability would have led to social hosts being routinely added to claims made against drunk drivers. Under the laws of joint and several liability, which permit a plaintiff to recover a judgment entirely from any named defendant, this could have led to the unfair result of making social hosts and their insurers bear the entire cost of the intoxicated individual’s actions. Indeed, this would have been the result in the present case. While the trial judge found the hosts were only fifteen percent responsible for the damages suffered by Ms. Childs, the reality of the situation was that Desormeaux was impecunious, without assets or insurance, and could not meet his portion of the damage award. Therefore the hosts and their insurers would have been responsible for the whole damage award, despite the fact that of being found only minimally responsible for the injury to Ms. Childs.

As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in this case, the burden for the loss remains squarely on the shoulders of the party responsible for it – the intoxicated driver.

It is to be noted that the result of a similar fact pattern in Québec could be different.

Indeed, Québec’s statutory and mandatory public insurance regime for car accident completely precludes any civil suit, even against the impaired driver himself and thus certainly against the host.

If, however, this prohibition did not come into play, for example in the circumstances where, instead of a car accident, the excessive consumption of alcohol lead to a fight which resulted in serious injury, the question for the Court would then be whether such an injury was reasonably foreseeable by the host, in which case his or her liability could be engaged.

It is to be noted that Québec’s civil law is not as restrictive as the common law of tort in regards to the imposition of a positive duty, every person having a general duty to abide by the rules of conduct which lie upon him or her according to the circumstances as stipulated by s. 1457 C.c.Q. In that regard, s. 2 of the Québec’s Charter, also imposes a duty of assistance and aid towards any person in peril.

While the ultimate decision of the Court under such a scenario is hard to predict, it is likely that the recourse would also be rejected under civil law when the hosts are unaware of the intoxication of their guests, but perhaps more likely that they would be held liable if aware of this intoxication and of its foreseeable consequences.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Alan D’Silva
 
In association with
Related Video
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
Accounting and Audit
Anti-trust/Competition Law
Consumer Protection
Corporate/Commercial Law
Criminal Law
Employment and HR
Energy and Natural Resources
Environment
Family and Matrimonial
Finance and Banking
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Government, Public Sector
Immigration
Insolvency/Bankruptcy, Re-structuring
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Law
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Privacy
Real Estate and Construction
Strategy
Tax
Transport
Wealth Management
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.