Canada: The Revival Of Forum Shopping for Limitations Deadlines

Last Updated: June 26 2006

Article by Bryan Duguid, ©2006 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

This article was originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Litigation - May 2006

Parties should exploit the strategic opportunities and be mindful of the potential pitfalls that arise from the double limitation period resulting from section 12 of the Alberta Limitations Act, section 27 of the Saskatchewan Limitations Act, and the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Castillo.

Limitations deadlines are unforgiving. If they are missed, the claim is extinguished. This raises important strategic considerations in connection with section 12 of the Limitations Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. L-12 (Alberta Section 12) and the related decision released in late December 2005 by the Supreme Court of Canada in Castillo v. Castillo (Castillo). Alberta Section 12 states:

"Conflict of Laws ... 12 The limitations law of the Province shall be applied whenever a remedial order is sought in this Province, notwithstanding that, in accordance with conflict of law rules, the claim will be adjudicated under the substantive law of another jurisdiction."

As confirmed in Castillo, the effect of Alberta Section 12 is to provide, perhaps unexpectedly, a double-layered limitations defence to defendants in Alberta court proceedings that are governed by the substantive law of another jurisdiction. This represents a significant change in the rules for the choice of the limitations laws to be applied by the courts in Alberta and Saskatchewan, with ramifications beyond the borders of those provinces. (Although not identical to Alberta Section 12, to the same effect is section 27 of the Saskatchewan Limitations Act, S.S. 2004, c-L-16.1 (Saskatchewan Section 27), enacted relatively recently. Accordingly, this article applies equally to Saskatchewan Section 27 and Saskatchewan limitations laws.)


A key choice of law issue is whether a particular question is a matter of substantive law or procedural law and, related to this, the identification of the substantive laws that govern the merits of the dispute (the lex causae). The procedural laws that govern the process for a dispute are those of the jurisdiction in which the dispute is heard, whereas the lex causae may derive from a jurisdiction other than the venue for the proceedings.

Any review of the law in this area should include the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Tolofson v. Jensen (Tolofson). Before Tolofson, in general, limitations laws were classified as procedural in nature under Canadian private international law. As a result, generally, the limitations deadline for a claim was based on the limitations laws of the venue for the dispute. However, this categorization exercise was not certain – it depended upon whether the limitations deadline was characterized as merely barring a remedy or instead extinguishing the underlying right of action. In any event, this encouraged forum shopping by plaintiffs to commence action in the jurisdiction with the most favourable limitations deadline because, in some cases, a claim could be pursued in some jurisdictions but not in others. This meant that fundamentally inconsistent results could flow from any given claim, simply based on the choice of venue.

Tolofson was responsible for two main developments. First, the Supreme Court of Canada held that, generally, the substantive law governing a tort claim is to be the law of the place where the activity occurred (the lex loci delicti). Second, limitation periods are to be treated as matters of substantive (not procedural) law. As a result, in general, for law suits filed in a Canadian court, the applicable limitations deadline is set by the laws of the jurisdiction that govern the merits and substance of the dispute, even if that jurisdiction is a foreign jurisdiction or a province in Canada other than where the plaintiff chooses to file the claim.

The Castillo Decision

As was the case in Tolofson, Castillo involved a car crash. The accident occurred in California on May 10, 1998. Two years less a day later, on May 9, 2000, the plaintiff filed a Statement of Claim in Calgary. The defendant applied for summary dismissal of the claim on the basis that California law (including its limitations law) applied, such that the claim was barred by the one-year limitation period under California law.

In granting the application for summary dismissal, the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench interpreted Alberta Section 12. Because the wrong occurred in California, Tolofson rendered applicable the one-year limitation deadline under California law. The Court found that Alberta Section 12 rendered also applicable the two-year limitation deadline under Alberta limitations law. The Court prescribed a twostep approach for matters in which the substantive law of the dispute is not Alberta. First, the Court must determine if there is a cause of action under the lex loci delicti (in this case, California law), including the limitations law of the foreign jurisdiction. Only if the answer to that question is affirmative does the Court proceed to the second step of the analysis based on Alberta Section 12, that is, whether the action is brought within the Alberta limitations deadline. In this particular case, since the cause of action was extinguished after one year under California law, that was the end of the inquiry. It was unnecessary to determine, based on Alberta Section 12, whether the action was brought within the Alberta limitations deadline.

This result and the two-step analysis were upheld by both the Alberta Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada.

Analysis And Strategic Considerations

Castillo means that, for cases filed in Alberta that are governed by the substantive laws of another jurisdiction, the plaintiff’s claim will avoid extinguishment by limitations defence only if the claim has been filed in time to satisfy both the limitations law of Alberta and the other jurisdiction.

While, in his dissenting opinion in Castillo, Justice Bastarache of the Supreme Court of Canada stated that there does not seem to be any legislative purpose served by allowing a defendant always to benefit from the shortest of the limitation periods available under Alberta limitations laws and the applicable foreign laws, the legislative purpose seems clear. The purposes and policy underlying limitation periods in general include the goals of protecting defendants from unjust results which can occur where litigation is based on stale evidence, allowing defendants the opportunity to advance reasonable defences, and ensuring that defendants know within a reasonable time whether they will ultimately be free from claims. Viewed in this light, it is clear that the legislative purpose for Alberta Section 12 is to impose a double limitation period on extra-jurisdictional claims brought before the courts of Alberta to grant additional protection to defendants in such actions. This provides a home field advantage to Alberta corporations or residents that are defendants in Alberta law suits.

In some cases, a claim may be statute-barred if filed in Alberta, but not elsewhere. Of course, that would cause the plaintiff to avoid filing the lawsuit in Alberta, if possible. However, that may not be possible.

If the assets of the defendant(s) are located in Alberta, the plaintiff ultimately will need to enforce, in Alberta, any judgment of the courts of an alternate jurisdiction. As a result, because recognition and enforcement of judgment requires a real and substantial connection between the dispute and the jurisdiction in which the judgment is granted, practically speaking, the plaintiff will only be able to forum-shop to avoid Alberta if another jurisdiction has a real and substantial connection with the subject matter of the dispute. Even then, the defendant may be able to raise a successful challenge to the choice by the plaintiff of the alternate jurisdiction on forum non conveniens grounds, on the basis that Alberta is clearly the most appropriate forum for the dispute. (It should be noted that, in advancing such a forum challenge, the defendant would likely be faced with a persuasive response from the plaintiff that, if the plaintiff is forced to litigate in Alberta, it would lose a juridical advantage, precisely because of Alberta Section 12.) Accordingly, if there is no alternate jurisdiction that has a real and substantial connection with the subject matter of the dispute, or if Alberta is clearly the most appropriate forum for the dispute, the plaintiff will be forced to litigate in Alberta, with the resulting elimination of its claim through the operation of Alberta Section 12.

If the plaintiff is able to identify an alternate forum that has and will exercise jurisdiction over the dispute, the shorter limitation period prescribed by Alberta Section 12 could be avoided, and a judgment of the alternate court pursued. If judgment of the alternate jurisdiction’s court is obtained, the plaintiff could apply to have the judgment recognized and enforced in Alberta. However, the need for this additional step may provide additional defences or protections to the defendant. For instance, merely the added costs, delays and risks of the subsequent recognition and enforcement process may provide a useful practical or negotiating advantage to defendants with their assets located in Alberta. In addition, if the judgment of the alternate jurisdiction’s court is not for a certain sum of money (for instance, if it is a declaratory judgment), it is currently a live question, awaiting decision from the Supreme Court of Canada, as to whether a Canadian court will recognize and enforce that type of judgment (Pro Swing Inc. v. ELTA Golf Inc., appeal heard and reserved). For further discussion of the Pro Swing decision, please see Pro Swing Drives Foreign Judgments Forward, Blakes Bulletin on Intellectual Property, October 2005. Moreover, even if the jurisdiction had a real and substantial connection with the subject matter of the dispute, the Alberta courts will not recognize or enforce the judgment of the alternate jurisdiction if the judgment is inconsistent with the public policy of Alberta, or was obtained by fraud or in a manner inconsistent with the principles of natural justice (Beals v. Saldanha).

As a result, though an attentive plaintiff might attempt to take steps to keep a dated claim alive by choosing an alternate jurisdiction in which to sue, this may not be a straightforward and trouble-free exercise.

The effect of Alberta Section 12 is clear. In no case shall a defendant in an Alberta court action be required to defend a claim on its merits if the claim is not filed in time under the limitations laws of Alberta.

Accordingly, Alberta Section 12 (and Saskatchewan Section 27) creates various strategic considerations including:

One. Increased attention must be paid to the jurisdiction in which a party has been sued (for example, in Alberta as in most jurisdictions, limitations defences must be pled expressly) or the jurisdiction in which a party chooses to sue, to ensure that the limitation period ramifications are factored into the strategic choices available.

Two. For corporations wanting to capitalize on the added protection against litigation offered by Alberta Section 12, consideration might be given to incorporating in, moving to, or relocating assets to, Alberta.

Three. By contract, parties can agree to render Alberta Section 12 inapplicable. (Obviously, this option is not available for purely extra-contractual relationships and claims.)

Four. It is necessary to set up systems to identify potential claims and to investigate the claims as soon as possible, so that they can be filed in time. While this is always a prudent course of action, its importance increases in light of Alberta Section 12 and its double limitations firewall.


Alberta Section 12, Saskatchewan Section 27, and Castillo represent a change in the choice of law rules applicable to limitations deadlines for claims that arise in any jurisdiction outside of Alberta and Saskatchewan that are filed in the courts of those provinces. The statutory provisions provide added protection to defendants in such lawsuits. Parties should exploit the resulting strategic opportunities and be mindful of the potential pitfalls. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.