Canada: Ex Parte Redux - Justice Hughes Revisits Without Notice Injunctions in Copyright Cases

Last Updated: May 22 2006

Article by Mark Hayes and Antonio Turco, ©2006, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Intellectual Property, Special Copyright Issue, May 2006

In Netbored Inc. v. Avery Holdings Inc. et al., the Federal Court confirmed that ex parte injunctions and Anton Piller orders are only to be granted in "exceptional cases" and that a party seeking such an order must make "full and frank" disclosure to the Judge hearing the application for the order.

The decision by Mr. Justice Hughes arose out of a motion to review an ex parte injunction and Anton Piller order granted in an action involving allegations of copyright infringement, breach of confidentiality and breach of fiduciary and contractual duties as between an employer and ex-employee.

Ex Parte Injunctions and Anton Piller Orders

An ex parte proceeding is one brought without notice to the other side. An Anton Piller order is a court order that compels the defendant, upon threat of a finding of contempt, to permit the plaintiff to enter upon the defendant’s premises in order to search for and remove certain specified items. Anton Piller orders are almost always obtained on an ex parte basis.

A critical factor in respect of a proceeding taken ex parte, and, in particular in Anton Piller situations, is the heavy obligation of the applicant to make full and frank disclosure of all material facts relating to the application, including facts detrimental to the applicant’s own case. The consequences of failing to make such disclosure can be severe, and include the setting aside of the order and an award of costs against the applicant.

To obtain an interim injunction, an applicant must establish that (i) there is a serious issue to be tried; (ii) if the injunction is not granted, it will suffer irreparable harm that cannot be compensated in damages; and (iii) the balance of convenience favours granting the injunction. If the injunction is to be granted without notification to the defendant, the applicant must also demonstrate why it is necessary to obtain the relief sought without giving the defendant notice of the hearing or providing it with an opportunity to be heard.

Anton Piller orders are extreme remedies that can easily be abused. Courts are, therefore, wary about granting them. One concern is that the order will amount to the judicial legitimization of a fishing expedition through a defendant’s records. Another concern is that there is a potential for the order to be sought for the sole purpose of destroying a defendant’s business.

Against this background, courts have set three essential pre-conditions for granting an Anton Piller order in addition to the usual requirements in an ex parte injunction application. First, there must be a strong prima facie case. Secondly, the damage, potential or actual, must be very serious for the plaintiff. Finally, there must be clear evidence that the defendants have in their possession incriminating documents or things, and that there is a real possibility that they may destroy such material before a motion on notice to the defendant can be made. A fourth condition was noted by Justice Hughes, namely that the inspection would do no real harm to the defendant or its case.

In his decision, Justice Hughes examined whether this case raised "exceptional circumstances", meeting the four criteria, and whether full and frank disclosure had been made by the plaintiff.

Background to the Case

The plaintiff Netbored Inc. (Netbored) is an Ontario-based corporation that offers its products, notably plasma television sets and audio equipment, to its customers exclusively via the Internet. Netbored operates a number of different Web sites through which it offers its products for sale, including

The defendant Avery Holdings Inc. (Avery) is also an Ontario- based corporation involved in a similar business, through its Web site,, which it launched in September 2003. Two other defendants were the principals of Avery. The final defendant was the brother of one of the Avery principals, who had previously worked for Netbored and provided assistance in designing Avery’s Web site.

The practice of offering and selling products to retail customers exclusively via the Internet is known as e-tailing. Customers usually located Netbored through Internet search facilities, the principal one being Google. It is important for an e-tailer to maximize the possibility that a customer will find its Web site through a search facility like Google. While the manner in which Google searches the Internet and ranks the results is not a matter of public record, it is widely believed to be influenced by meta tags (text which is contained in the coding of a Web site but is not ordinarily shown on the user’s display). It is also believed that Google changes the manner in which it ranks its results so as to frustrate those who may artificially seek high rankings. This is known in the trade as the "Google dance".

Netbored alleged that, in mid-October 2003, it noticed that traffic to its Web site, and its ranking on the Google search engine, had dropped significantly, resulting in a decrease in sales. Netbored discovered the existence of Avery’s Web site and alleged that much of the text, images and compilations of materials were identical or substantially identical to the material on Netbored’s Web site.

Netbored attempted to have Avery’s Web site, at the time hosted in the United States, taken offline through the "notice and takedown" provisions of the United States Digital Millennium Copyright Act. After being taken offline twice by its U.S. host at Netbored’s insistence, Avery moved the Web site to a Canadian server. Netbored continued to make demands of the host that the Web site be taken down. In an effort to cease this perceived harassment, Avery commenced an action in the Ontario courts against Netbored and its principal. At the time the Anton Piller order was issued in the Federal Court, the parties, through their lawyers, were discussing a date for the delivery of a statement of defence.

In the meantime, and without notice to Avery, Netbored commenced an action in the Federal Court. Netbored sought, ex parte, an interim injunction and an Anton Piller order. Netbored’s application was twice denied by one of the judges of the Federal Court who was not satisfied that a strong prima facie case had been made. On the third try, a different judge of the Federal Court heard the matter and granted the order sought by Netbored. The Anton Piller order was executed the next day.

The Review Motion

On the review motion, Justice Hughes found that there was no strong prima facie case of copyright infringement. The Court found Netbored had not properly pleaded or particularized the works in which it claimed ownership and there was no evidence that any of the works were owned or authored by Netbored, other than assertions from its principal.

Specifically, Netbored had been vague about what was the subject of its copyright claim. Justice Hughes made it clear in this case that copyright claims must be pleaded and proved with particularity. Specifically, he stressed that it is not sufficient to allege copyright infringement without elaborating on "what the particular subject matter is, how copyright in that subject matter subsists in Canada, and how it is that the plaintiff asserts ownership in that copyright".

Justice Hughes reviewed certain aspects of copyright law in Canada. The Copyright Act provides that copyright subsists in a variety of works and compilations provided that the author was a citizen of Canada or other qualified country (such as a Berne Convention country) and, if the work was published, it was first published in Canada or such country. Thus, a claim alleging copyright infringement must state the identity of the work, describe it as a work or compilation within the meaning of the Copyright Act, and state the nationality of the author and place of first publication. These elements were missing from the pleading. A copyright registration, while not required, provides prima facie proof of the requisite factors as to identity, authorship and publication. Even without such a registration, on a prima facie basis, the subsistence of copyright in an identified work will be presumed, as will the authorship and ownership if the name of the author and/or owner appear on the work. However, such facts were not pleaded.

The Court questioned whether meta tags possessed copyright at all or whether they were "simply formulae derived arrangements designed to serve a business function." The Court noted that the meta tags could be analogous to the arrangement of information in telephone directories discussed in Tele-Direct (Publications) Inc. v. American Business Information. With respect to confidential information, Justice Hughes noted that the Federal Court does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine issues as to confidential information.

On the issue of serious damage to Netbored, Justice Hughes found that no damage had been demonstrated by Netbored in the Anton Piller sense. He stated that the damage that must be alleged to obtain an Anton Piller order must be connected to the need to preserve documents and materials, rather than in respect of some continuing business activity as in the case of an ordinary injunction.

The plaintiff also alleged that it had suffered damage because Avery copied and used the plaintiff’s meta tags and, thereby, hurt the plaintiff’s Google ranking. The Court stated that this was ultimately an issue for trial and, at the preliminary stage of the action, that damage was largely speculative and unproven.

Finally, Justice Hughes found no basis to justify a finding of a real possibility that evidence may be destroyed by the defendants. He noted that much evidence upon which the plaintiff’s case rested, i.e., Avery’s Web site, was publicly available to anyone accessing the Web site.

Justice Hughes noted that what Netbored was really after was an interim injunction. He found that Netbored had failed to meet the test for an injunction since it had, at best, shown a possible monetary loss which was compensable in damages. In addition, there was no reason why such an injunction could not have been sought on notice to the defendants.

With respect to Netbored’s duty of candour, Justice Hughes found that Netbored’s submissions and evidence in support of the ex parte orders lacked candour in two important aspects. One was that Netbored had not disclosed to the Court that one of the premises it wanted to enter was a residential apartment leased to someone who is not a defendant. The second was the failure of Netbored to disclose the ongoing discussions between its lawyers and Avery’s lawyers in the context of the Ontario action.

For all these reasons, the Court vacated the interim injunction and the Anton Piller order. Another interesting aspect of the Court’s decision was how it dealt with costs. The principals of Avery were granted their costs on a full indemnity basis since "no case" had been made against them. As a result, the plaintiff will likely end up with a very expensive lesson in how not to seek ex parte relief.


The decision confirms that the bar is set very high for a plaintiff in terms of making full and frank disclosure in the context of seeking an ex parte injunction or Anton Piller order. A plaintiff must ensure that all relevant facts are disclosed to the Court, even where those facts are less than favourable to its position.

With respect to copyright pleading and proof, Justice Hughes’ decision reinforces that allegations of copyright must be fully pleaded and particularized and that issues of ownership and chain of title must be dealt with. Although these requirements have always been there, this decision, and others recently rendered by Justice Hughes, serve as a warning that from now on plaintiffs must plead and prove their copyright claims with greater particularity.

The authors successfully represented some of the defendants in the motion.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

3 Nov 2016, Other, Vancouver, Canada

“Risk” is the new black. It’s on the lips of every CEO, CFO, GC and board member — as it should be. Can you spot it? How do you analyze it? Are you equipped to manage it?

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.