Canada: A Use-Less Argument

Last Updated: April 28 2015
Article by Cynthia Rowden

Cynthia Rowden outlines changes to trade mark legislation that have provoked widespread protest from Canada's IP practitioners.

Canada's slow and steady approach to changing its IP laws took a turn in 2013 and 2014, with unprecedented – and very surprising – changes to the Trade-marks Act, as well as other IP statutes. Many changes were precipitated by international trade negotiations (following hot on the heels of Government announcements to pursue a Canada-Europe trade agreement and a consequential commitment of best efforts to have Canada join the Madrid Protocol, the Singapore Treaty and the Nice Agreement), but the most surprising amendment relates to the elimination of use as a trade mark registration requirement, and the implied impact this will have on trade mark clearance, filing requirements and enforcement.

Changing directions from a system based totally on use to one in which use is not required will have long-term implications for trade mark owners and businesses operating in Canada. It is not clear that the Government fully considered these changes, since there was no advance consultation with trade mark practitioners or interested groups, and no changes to the legislation despite widespread and consistent concerns.

The following outlines the most important changes.

Combating Counterfeit Products Act

In answer to international complaints about the lack of effective border controls to prevent the importation or exportation of counterfeits, in 2013, the Government introduced Bill C-56, replaced by Bill C-8, the Combating Counterfeit Products Act ("CCPA"), proposing amendments to the Trade-marks Act and Copyright Act to clarify that infringement would apply not only to making and selling, but importing and exporting infringing goods. In addition, criminal sanctions were added to the Trade-marks Act. Acts of knowingly making, selling, importing and exporting infringing goods will now attract criminal sanction.

In addition, a new procedure, described as a "request for assistance", has been created, whereby copyright and registered trade mark owners may record their IP rights with the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness and, specifically, with the Canada Border Services Agency, permitting Customs officials to temporarily seize suspected counterfeit merchandise and provide the IP owner with enough information to determine if the goods are counterfeit. The IP owner may then elect to commence an action, in which case the goods will remain in detention, or take no action. Detention costs, which have yet to be determined, will be borne by the IP owner if an action is started.

These were the main objections to the new measures:

  • Costs of detention, if set too high, would effectively discourage brand owners from using the request for assistance procedure, especially if "bonded" warehouse detention was required. To date, there is no indication, at all, of detention costs.
  • The CCPA excluded "goods in transit" through Canada to another country from the request for assistance procedure. That exclusion has been passed into law.
  • There are no "quick" or summary proceedings as an alternative to an action.
  • Statutory damages for trade mark infringement should have been added, to ease the plaintiffs' costs of proving damages.

No changes were made in response to those concerns.

Parts of the CCPA came into force by 1 January 2015. The amendments related to requests for assistance provide that a fee may be required, but the Government has apparently elected to proceed without a fee (which would probably have necessitated regulations and delayed implementation of the amendments). A request form has been created but, as of the date of writing, the Canada Border Services Agency has had little experience with these new proceedings.

Use-less trade marks

As previously explained, the most important and controversial amendment is to eliminate the requirement to use a mark in advance of registration, a change the Government claimed, inaccurately, was required for compliance with international treaties. Canada's trade mark laws, for more than a century, have required use for both registration and enforcement.

Currently, a Canadian trade mark application must identify filing grounds, namely actual use in Canada with a named date of first use, proposed use in Canada (to be followed by a declaration of use before registration), or use somewhere, with a home country registration. The amendments permit applications with no filing grounds: only the applicant's name and address, the mark, and the goods/services must be included in the application. However, the amendments create a prerequisite to filing, namely that the applicant be entitled to use, and have used, or propose to use, the mark in Canada. Actual use before registration is not required. In addition, there is no change to the rights of registration – a registrant, even one with a registration obtained without use, would be entitled to the exclusive right to use the mark across Canada for the registered goods/ services, to sue for infringement, and presumably, unless case law establishes otherwise, obtain both damages and an injunction. At the same time, despite eliminating specific filing grounds, the Trademarks Office declared its intent to continue to examine for both inherent registrability and relative rights, and will permit oppositions based on lack of use/ intent to use. Accordingly, the new system is an interesting hybrid of the Canada and United States trade mark systems that generally require "use" for registration and enforcement, and the European system, with neither filing grounds or pre-conditions, nor relative examination.

Other amendments relating to implementation of the Madrid Protocol, and other treaties, including changing the renewal term to 10 years and classification requirements, are also included in the amendments.

Immediate reaction

Reaction was immediate and consistent. Groups including the International Trademark Association, the Canadian and American Bar Associations, and the Intellectual Property Institute of Canada, as well as major Canadian and international companies, academic research groups and trade groups including the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, and hundreds of Canadian IP lawyers and agents raised concerns about the impending clash between common law and registered rights, with concomitant uncertainty of the reaction of the courts, increased search costs and risks, over-reaching registrations that reflect hopes and dreams v actual trade mark rights, possible piracy, and the impediments to opposition analysis caused by the lack of useful information about use.

In addition, the amendments raise a very serious risk of constitutional attack based on the inability of the Federal Government to legally make these changes. Canada's constitutional system splits law-making powers between the Federal Government and the provinces. While many areas of legislative power are specifically set out in the Constitution Act, power to make laws about trade marks was omitted. Case law has held that the Federal Government can enact laws regarding trade marks to regulate interprovincial trade and commerce, or international trade. The provinces, on the other hand, retain the power to enact laws regarding property and civil rights. Earlier decisions have found specific provisions in the Trade-marks Act dealing with acts "contrary to honest commercial usage in Canada" to be ultra vires the Federal Government. Scholars and trade mark experts questioned the right of the Federal Government to enact laws that create exclusive rights in trade marks in the absence of any trade or commerce. The Government merely responded that it had considered this issue.

As Professor David Vaver wrote in Intellectual Property Law: Copyrights, Patents, Trade-Marks, 2d (Irwin Law, Toronto, 2011, at pages 471 to 472), reflecting the importance of use as a prerequisite to trade mark rights in Canada: "Without 'use' a trade-mark is nothing. It cannot be registered; if registered, it can be expunged. Anyone holding an unused mark probably cannot or does not want to invest in it, may just want to play dog in the manger and block competitors from using it, or may want to get into the business of selling marks, not goods or services. None of this is worth encouraging and the system treats him as an undesirable."

Canadian courts, including the Supreme Court of Canada, have echoed such views for decades. Despite briefs, submissions and letters from interested groups, no changes were made to the Bill. Government spokespersons dismissed concerns as being from self-interested lawyers, and asked why anyone would file an application if they didn't intend to use the mark.

As an observation, Canada sits halfway between China, where pirating of trade marks has reached epidemic proportions, and Europe, where that problem does not seem to be so bad. It certainly remains to be seen whether trade mark piracy will become an issue in Canada.

However, there has been growing discontent with other aspects of the European model, most specifically, the widespread registration of marks not in use, and for goods and services well beyond the interests of the owners, features that are bound to be copied under the new trade mark laws. Canadian law, unlike those in other countries, permits any party to challenge a registration for non-use after its third anniversary, providing some relief for overreaching and registration of marks not in use, but the costs are borne by such third parties, while the benefits of registration remain with the registrant.

The amendments to the Trademarks Act from Bill C-31 were given Royal Assent in June 2014, but have not yet been proclaimed in force. Major updating to IT systems in the Trademarks Office is required, as well as a full regulatory package.

In that regard, the Trademarks Office released a discussion document regarding regulations at the beginning of October, with a two-month period (now closed) for receipt of comments. The regulations propose a new "letter of protest" procedure permitting third parties to contact the Office to object to applications during prosecution, set new filing requirements of nontraditional marks, fully implement the Madrid Protocol by regulation, set new rules for opposition deadlines, filing of opposition documents and permit the Opposition Board to manage opposition proceedings by limiting issues, evidence and deadlines. A second consultation on classification fees, likely to impact filing and renewal costs, is expected in 2015.

A certain fall-out from the system is higher search costs, since information will no longer be included in applications or registrations permitting parties to easily determine if, or for how long, marks have been used, plus higher uncertainty and risk relating to the adoption and use of both trade marks and business/corporation names. Since the constitutional concerns were widely discussed among IP lawyers, there is no doubt this issue will arise in early decisions relating to registrations secured under this new regime. Ultimately, all agree that these changes will bring more work to trade mark lawyers in Canada.

Commentators have noted the significant IT demands of the Madrid Protocol, as well as the need for quick and accurate examination. Canada's current IT capabilities for trade marks are well behind those of other countries, and examination has been chronically slow for years. Much will need to change to keep up with the demands of the Madrid Protocol. The current best estimate of implementation of the latest round of changes is late 2015 or early 2016.

The next few years will pose interesting challenges for owners of Canadian trade marks, or businesses active in Canada. With new examination criteria, and new rights that no longer depend on use, there is uncertainty about how the Trademarks Office examining branch, the Opposition Board and the courts will respond to the new laws.

Originally published by Institute of Trademark Attorneys (ITMA) Review.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Cynthia Rowden
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Clark Wilson LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Clark Wilson LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions