Canada: Anticipating The Effects Of Bhasin v. Hrynew Through The Evolution Of Good Faith In Quebec

Last Updated: March 27 2015
Article by Soizic Reynal De St. Michel

Most Read Contributor in Canada, September 2016

Bhasin v. Hrynew

The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Bhasin v. Hrynew clarifies Canadian common law with respect to the doctrine of good faith in contractual relationships. The court held that good faith is a general organizing principle of the law of contracts and gives rise to a duty to act honestly in the performance of contractual obligations and in the exercise of contractual rights. How will this decision affect the day-to-day performance of construction contracts throughout common law provinces?

Justice Cromwell wrote the unanimous decision and explained that the duty to perform honestly accords with the reasonable expectations of commercial parties. In other words, the moral obligation to perform contractual obligations honestly has always existed, but it is now recognized as an enforceable duty in Canadian common law jurisdictions. The failure to act honestly in the performance of contractual obligations or in the exercise of contractual rights now amounts to a breach of contract. This duty will most likely take an increasing part in the litigation and the resolution of contractual disputes. Until the Supreme Court released the Bhasin decision, when a party suspected dishonest conduct on the part of their contracting party, they could allege fraud, misrepresentation, or malice but ran the risk of very serious adverse cost consequences if they were unable to prove the stand-alone causes of action at trial. In the future, we can expect a number of court decisions applying the "new" duty to a growing range of fact situations and identifying specific types of behaviours from which bad faith and failure to perform honestly can be inferred. This article briefly reviews the principle of good faith in Quebec, its application, and resulting duties in recent Quebec Court of Appeal decisions involving construction disputes. This review may provide a few clues on possible developments resulting from Bhasin and may also raise a few cautionary flags for the construction industry. The obligation to act in good faith was expressly codified in Quebec for the first time in articles 6, 7, and 1375 of the Civil Code of Quebec, which read as follows:


6. Every person is bound to exercise his civil rights in good faith.

7. No right may be exercised with the intent of injuring another or in an excessive and unreasonable manner, and therefore contrary to the requirements of good faith.


1375. The parties shall conduct themselves in good faith both at the time the obligation arises and at the time it is performed or extinguished.

Justice LeBel has identified a fundamental difference in contract law between Quebec and common law provinces in a conference he gave in 2011 at McGill University. In Quebec, contract law does not just flow from the pure meeting of the minds and contractual freedom as it does at common law. Instead, it is founded on the principle of contractual justice, because a free and equitable society requires a legal system that does not condone a "law of the strongest" but instead supports the principle that no one should benefit from their own wrongdoing. On this point, Justice LeBel quoted an article by late former Justice Gonthier:

In the execution of contractual obligations, the requirements of good faith protect against an abusive exercise of individualistic rights, however lawful the exercise of those rights may be in themselves. [...] Bad faith violates these values that form the basis of harmonious and mutually beneficial relationships in our society and runs counter to the spirit and core values of fraternity.

The current version of the Civil Code of Quebec was enacted in 1991 and came into force in 1994, but starting in the late 1970s, the Civil Code Revision Office and the courts were already considering the idea of an overarching principle of good faith in Quebec. In 1990, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered a decision of critical importance, Houle c. Canadian National Bank, which recognized the doctrine of abuse of contractual rights and held that proof of malice is not necessary to establish abuse of rights. Instead, the parties' conduct is measured against the standard of the prudent and reasonable individual. The Supreme Court took the next incremental step in the application of good faith in contracts in Quebec, with the Bank of Montréal v. Bail ltée decision in 1992, when it held that a duty to inform arises from the obligation of good faith in the performance of contracts. This duty includes both the duty to inform and the duty not to give false information. The court held that there are three unique factors to construction contracts with high risks and high stakes, which affect the implied duty to inform:

  • the allocation of risks (The party assuming the risk (e.g., during tenders) must inform itself, but the other party must not mislead it by its action or inaction.)
  • the relative expertise of the parties (The party who designed the plans and specifications (or obtained them from their own designer) is more informed and has more expertise; its obligation to inform increases accordingly.)
  • continuous disclosure of information (The continuing contract formation during the lengthy performance of most construction contracts, with often numerous changes and extras, requires continuous disclosure of information to ensure continued meeting of the minds.)

Twenty years later, the implied obligations imposed on contracting parties in Quebec go as far as a positive obligation to cooperate. In the last two years, the Quebec Court of Appeal rendered three important decisions for the construction industry. In all three cases, Birdair inc. c. Danny's Construction Company Inc., Hydro-Québec c. Construction Kiewit Cie., and Dawco Electric inc. c. Hydro-Québec, the dispute arose from a familiar succession of events: the plaintiff contractor or subcontractor had to perform substantial changes in the contract or subcontract for additional work or unforeseen work and as a result incurred escalating costs, delays, and damages for which it claimed against the owner or general contractor. In a recent presentation at the 25th Construction Superconference in Montreal, Quebec, counsel John Murphy concluded from his review of these decisions that the obligation to cooperate includes, among others, the following:

  • acknowledgment of the facts specific to the project (delays and changes)
  • the diligent exchange of information before and throughout the project
  • cooperation between the parties before the start of the project or the start of work on any change in scope the protection of the parties' reasonable expectations
  • the intensification of the obligation relative to the project size (in scope, time and price) and to any inequalities between the parties.

In Bhasin, the court clearly set the general duty to perform honestly in common law provinces apart from the duty to cooperate in Quebec:

This means simply that parties must not lie or otherwise knowingly mislead each other about matters directly linked to the performance of the contract. This does not impose a duty of loyalty or of disclosure or require a party to forego advantages flowing from the contract. I am at this point concerned only with a new duty of honest performance and, as I see it, this should not be thought of as an implied term, but a general doctrine of contract law that imposes as a contractual duty a minimum standard of honest contractual performance.

This distinction between a positive "duty of disclosure" and the duty "not to knowingly mislead" may not remain as clear, depending on the fact situations brought before the courts in the future. As the Supreme Court noted in Houle, both withholding relevant information and providing false or misleading information generally represent two sides of the same coin.

The distinction between a duty to act honestly and the Quebec duty of loyalty may be a difference only in semantics. For example, in Kiewit, the contractor relied on the owner's representations regarding additional compensation for changes in the scope of work. Kiewit relied on these representations and continued to perform the additional work. The court held that Hydro-Québec could not, in good faith, rely on the four corners of the contract to avoid paying Kiewit, as doing so would represent a breach of its duty of loyalty.

Let us consider a similar situation in Ontario: unexpected conditions surface in the course of the project, an error in the initial design causes substantial changes in the scope of work, or the project is delayed for reasons outside of the control of the plaintiff contractor. The contractor can prove that the owner acknowledged that it would satisfy a claim for additional compensation but then refused to pay (disputing quantum or hourly rates, for example). A court would not find that the owner breached its duty of loyalty, because there is no such duty in Ontario. The court's reasoning, however, will likely be that there was a meeting of the minds between owner and contractor at the time, because the owner's only alternative was to watch the project come to a grinding halt, that the owner misled the contractor so the contractor would complete and finance the work. The court would then probably conclude that the contractor is entitled to just compensation and that the owner cannot benefit from its own wrongdoing.

Justice Cromwell carefully acknowledged that good faith contractual performance is a general organizing principle of the common law of contracts and merely imposes a new duty to perform honestly. He also repeatedly qualified this change as an "incremental change", suggesting that further applications of the principle of good faith may come in time and must be incremental. The evolution of the obligation of good faith and resulting duties in Quebec was also an incremental one, from the 1991 enactment of the Civil Code of Quebec until now. It would be prudent for owners, contractors, and subcontractors (or their lawyers) to consider some of the features of the duty to cooperate that John Murphy identified and start adjusting their contractual practices. For example, once an owner acknowledges legitimate delays and scope changes, that owner should make regular payments for those changes and delay costs rather than force the contractor to finance them in the expectation that "there may be back-charges" for deficiencies, contractor delays, or billing disputes. A practical and conservative approach would dictate that any act or omission that has the effect of giving party A to the contract an unfair advantage over party B and/or preventing party B from meeting its reasonable contractual expectations will be closely examined against the new duty to act honestly.

Supreme Court of Canada

McLachlin C.J.C., LeBel, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell,
Karakatsanis, Wagner JJ.
November 13, 2014

Originally published in Construction Law Letter Volume 31, No. 4

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.