Canada: BC First Nation Commences Treaty 8 Infringement Action Against Province

Blueberry River First Nations (BRFN) has commenced a novel treaty rights infringement claim (Claim) against the Province of British Columbia (Province). The Claim, filed March 3, 2015, alleges that the Province has breached its Treaty 8 obligations due to the cumulative impacts of provincially authorized industrial development in BRFN's traditional territory.1

BRFN's traditional territory is located in the Upper Peace River region of northeastern BC, around and mainly north of Dawson Creek, Fort St. John and Hudson's Hope.

The Claim is significant because it is one of the first treaty rights infringement claims to be argued primarily on the basis of cumulative impacts on a First Nation's entire traditional territory. The other significant case that stakeholders are watching closely is the ongoing claim commenced in 2008 by the Beaver Lake Cree Nation in Alberta alleging that cumulative effects of resource development violates its Treaty 6 rights, discussed in more detail below.

What are the key aspects of the Claim?

BRFN claims that the cumulative impacts of provincially authorized development have reduced access to its traditional territory and caused significant damage to the lands, waters and wildlife that are integral to BRFN's mode of life. BRFN argues that the extent of development has now reached the point of infringement, whereby BRFN's members have lost their ability to meaningfully exercise their treaty rights.

BRFN seeks a court declaration that, by causing or permitting such cumulative impacts, the Province has breached its treaty and fiduciary obligations to BRFN, and has infringed on BRFN's treaty rights. It also seeks interim and permanent injunctive relief against any activities that would cause further cumulative effects. If successful, the Claim could have significant implications for current and future projects located in BRFN's traditional territory.

What are the key terms of Treaty 8?

Treaty 8 is one of Canada's historical "numbered treaties". It was first entered into in 1899 between the Crown and various Aboriginal groups. BRFN and other Treaty 8 First Nations are the descendants of those groups.

Treaty 8 is considered a "land surrender" treaty because, according to the language of the treaty, the First Nation signatories agreed to surrender their lands to the Crown in exchange for certain benefits, including reserve lands and continued rights to pursue their traditional activities of hunting, trapping and fishing within the surrendered lands, except within such tracts that the Crown may "take up" "from time to time for settlement, mining, lumbering, trading or other purposes."

When does the "taking up" of lands amount to treaty infringement?

Valid provincial authority to "take up" treaty lands while limiting treaty rights was confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) in Grassy Narrows First Nation v. Ontario (Natural Resources), 2014 SCC 48. Grassy Narrows involved Treaty 3 in Ontario, which contains similar "taking up" language as Treaty 8 (our article on Grassy Narrows is available here).

Despite the permissive language of Treaty 8 (and other numbered treaties), the SCC has held that provinces' "taking up" rights are subject to certain limits. There may be a point at which "taking up" will constitute an infringement of treaty rights (and an action for infringement of treaty rights may be available to a First Nation), in any of the following circumstances:

  1. if, in exercising its taking up powers, a province: (i) fails to uphold the honour of the Crown; (ii) breaches its fiduciary duties in dealing with Aboriginal interests; or (iii) breaches its duty to consult and accommodate treaty rights, as appropriate, whenever they are sufficiently impacted;2 or
  2. if the taking up of lands would leave a First Nation with "no meaningful right" to exercise its treaty rights within its traditional territory,3 or would result in a "meaningful diminution" of a treaty right.4

How will the Claim proceed?

BRFN has framed its Claim broadly, such that each of the above-noted grounds for treaty rights infringement could be argued. Given the expansive nature of the Claim, if it proceeds to trial, it will involve a complex factual analysis of historical and present-day evidence regarding provincially authorized land use and impacts on BRFN's ability to exercise its treaty rights, as well as interpretive analysis of Treaty 8 and the rights and obligations of the parties under the treaty, and the application of legal principles to the facts. The treaty rights infringement analysis will ultimately involve a consideration of whether the cumulative impacts of provincially authorized development have left BRFN with "no meaningful right" to exercise its treaty rights.

In an action for treaty rights infringement, the justification analysis, commonly referred to as the Sparrow test, is applied.5 If an infringement of BRFN's treaty rights is found, the Province must demonstrate how such infringement is justified. The test involves a consideration of governmental objectives and whether the Crown's actions were consistent with its fiduciary duties to the First Nation. Since Tsilhqot'in, an analysis of whether the Crown discharged its duties of consultation and accommodation may also be required. This would be a challenging test for the courts to apply in respect of BRFN's Claim, considering the factual complexities and the many competing interests involved.

Can BRFN obtain injunctive relief?

As legal proceedings can take months or even years to reach the trial stage (not to mention to proceed with any appeals), the immediate concern for many resource proponents with operations in BRFN traditional territory is the broad injunctive relief sought by BRFN pending resolution of its Claim.

While it is difficult to predict how the court may respond to BRFN's application for interim injunctive relief, in our view it will be challenging for BRFN to obtain injunctive relief against current or operating projects in its traditional territory, as it would be difficult to demonstrate how the balance of convenience favours granting the injunction in those circumstances. For reasons of procedural fairness, it also seems unlikely that a court would be willing to grant a sweeping injunction prohibiting all resource development in the region. In our view, a court may be more willing to consider injunctive relief on a case-by-case if there is a compelling case that BRFN's ability to meaningfully exercise its treaty rights is at risk.

The Other Case to Watch: Lameman v. Alberta – Beaver Lake Cree Nation Alleges Violation of its Treaty 6 Rights by Cumulative Effects of Resource Development

Another case that stakeholders are closely watching is a claim against the Alberta and Federal governments by the Beaver Lake Cree Nation (BLCN), which alleges that the cumulative effects of oil and gas, forestry and mining activities have violated BLCN's Treaty 6 rights to hunt, fish and trap (BLCN Claim). Treaty 6 was signed on September 9, 1876 and encompasses central areas in Alberta and Saskatchewan. As with Treaty 8, Treaty 6 provides that the signatory First Nations surrendered their land rights in exchange for certain benefits, including continued rights to pursue their "avocations of hunting and fishing" except for in such tracts that may be taken up by the Crown for settlement, mining, lumbering or other purposes. BLCN's traditional territory straddles the Alberta-Saskatchewan border near Lac La Biche.

The BLCN Claim was launched in May 2008. According to BLCN's Statement of Claim, there are approximately 300 resource development projects underway in the area covered by Treaty 6, in respect of which approximately 19,000 individual authorizations have been issued by the provincial and federal governments. While BLCN originally sought to have all projects and authorizations revoked, the case management judge dismissed this part of the lawsuit. BLCN now seeks damages for the governments' refusal to acknowledge treaty rights and a declaration that the cumulative effects of resource development projects have unjustifiably limited its treaty rights.

The Alberta and Federal governments also sought to have other portions of BLCN's amended Statement of Claim struck on the basis that if BLCN was permitted to argue that cumulative effects violated its Treaty 6 rights to hunt, fish and trap, the amount of evidence required for a trial would be unmanageable. However, the Alberta Court of Appeal (ABCA) delivered a decision in April 2013, Lameman v. Alberta, 2013 ABCA 148, allowing BLCN to proceed to trial based on its amended Statement of Claim. The ABCA noted, "The reality of the risk of 19,000 side trips in this litigation does not seem to have been compellingly apparent to the case management judge and we cannot say that, on the record provided to use, her instincts were incorrect."6 The ABCA also noted that, over the 5 years of the course of the litigation, no application had yet been made by BLCN for an interim injunction. The parties are now awaiting a trial date to be set.

In addition to the issue of treaty rights infringement, the BLCN Claim is being closely watched because of its potential implications for consultation and regulatory review processes. With the recent commencement of the BRFN Claim, provincial governments, First Nations and resource proponents will also be watching developments in the BLCN Claim closely due to the significance and potential implications of this case. For example, environmental assessment review processes generally require a cumulative environmental effects assessment, but a successful outcome for BLCN or BRFN could lead to changes in other permitting processes. This could add a layer of complexity to permit application processes, particularly where cumulative effects considerations need to be incorporated into regulatory reviews. This would also necessitate better information sharing among Aboriginal groups, governments and resource proponents.


[1] BRFN's Notice of Civil Claim and map of its traditional territory is available on its counsel's website:

[2] Grassy Narrows, supra at para. 52, Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Minister of Canadian Heritage) 2005 SCC 69 (Mikisew Cree) at paras. 57 – 59.

[3] Grassy Narrows, supra at para. 52; Mikisew Cree, supra at para. 48.

[4] Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia, 2014 SCC 44, at para. 139 (Tsilhqot'in).

[5] The Sparrow justification test was recently discussed by the SCC in Tsilhqot'in, in the context of Aboriginal title. Our article regarding the Tsilhqot'in decision is available here.

To view original article, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.