Canada: Unionized Workers Not Entitled to Reasonable Notice Under the Civil Code of Québec

On January 27, 2006, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered two much-anticipated decisions confirming that unionized employees who are permanently dismissed for economic reasons are not entitled to receive reasonable notice prior to termination, or payment in lieu thereof, pursuant to the Civil Code of Québec ("Civil Code").

The Facts

Following a decision to close their businesses for financial reasons, in 1999 and 1998 respectively, two Québec-based companies dismissed their unionized employees. In the first case, Isidore Garon Ltée. v. Syndicat du bois ouvré de la région de Québec Inc. (C.S.D.), the collective agreement provided that in the event of a layoff for six consecutive months or more, the employer’s obligation was to provide the employees with the notice of termination requirements contained in the Québec’s Act Respecting Labour Standards ("LSA"). The LSA requires employers to give employees notice of termination, or pay in lieu thereof, which varies between one to eight weeks, depending on an employee’s continuous years of service, when terminating or laying off employees for six or more months. In this case, the employer provided nine weeks of notice to all employees, without regard for their years of service. In the second case, Fillion et Frères (1976) Inc. v. Syndicat national des employés de garage du Québec Inc. (C.S.D.), the employer complied with the notice requirements of the LSA but did not provide notice over and above the LSA’s minimum requirements, arguing that no provision existed in the collective agreement which required the giving of any other notice prior to termination.

Both unions filed grievances on behalf of the affected employees, alleging that the employees were entitled to reasonable notice of termination of employment, or pay in lieu thereof, as required by Articles 2091 and 2092 of the Civil Code.

Prior to hearing the case on the merits, a preliminary objection as to the jurisdiction of the arbitrator was raised to the effect that the reasonable notice requirements of the Civil Code apply only to non-unionized employees since Article 2091 is found in a chapter of the Civil Code that pertains exclusively to individual contracts of employment.

Decisions From Which The Appeal to The Supreme Court Emanates

In both cases, the arbitrators dismissed the objections, agreeing with the unions’ position that Article 2091 is a public order provision that must co-exist with a collective agreement and as such, they assumed jurisdiction to hear the grievances on the merits. Many legal analysts agreed that this conclusion was surprising as it has long been recognized in Canadian labour law that an individual contract of employment could not apply where a collective agreement is in force between the parties.

Both cases were heard under judicial review before the Superior Court of Québec where opposite conclusions were reached. In Isidore, the Superior Court dismissed the employer’s motion, holding that the arbitrator did have jurisdiction to hear the grievance while in Fillion, the Superior Court quashed the arbitrator’s decision, holding that the grievance could not be decided by the arbitrator.

Both cases were appealed before the Québec Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal concluded that both arbitrators had correctly asserted jurisdiction over the grievances.

The Court of Appeal held that a grievance arbitrator necessarily has an obligation to recognize that the protection afforded by the public order provisions of the Civil Code apply to a unionized employee who is permanently terminated. According to the Court of Appeal, Article 2091 applies without regard to the unionized or non-unionized status of an employee.

Decision of the Supreme Court

On January 27, 2006, by a 4-3 majority decision, the Supreme Court overturned the decisions of the Court of Appeal, holding that unionized workers whose employment is terminated following a plant closure are not entitled to reasonable notice of termination pursuant to the Civil Code. Deschamps J., writing for the majority, held that the rules governing collective labour relations constitute a body of law whose governing principles are distinct from the rules that serve as foundations for the individual contract of employment under the Civil Code. The majority concluded that a rule which is incompatible with the collective labour relations scheme (such as that contained at Article 2091 of the Civil Code) cannot be incorporated within the collective agreement and must be disregarded. Three reasons were advanced for this conclusion:

First, as a condition of employment, notice of termination for unionized employees is necessarily bargained for collectively, in advance, by the union and the employer. On the other hand, the notice provided for under Article 2091 of the Civil Code is agreed upon as an individual matter between the employer and employee at the time employment is terminated. Apart from the minimum notice standards provided in the LSA, the length of notice to be given to unionized employees is a matter to be determined solely within the bargaining process between the union and the employer.

Second, the right of an employee to claim reasonable notice pursuant to Article 2091 of the Civil Code is the counterpart of an employer’s right to terminate the employment relationship by providing notice, or pay in lieu thereof, without being required to show good and sufficient cause. Conversely, in the collective labour relations context, since the employer’s right to dismiss is limited, with re-instatement being the most common remedy, the reasonable notice provided by Article 2091 is simply not applicable.

Finally, the Supreme Court stated that the legislative history of Article 2091 of the Civil Code militates in favour of the view that the Québec legislature did not intend to incorporate the notice requirement of Article 2091 into the collective labour relations context. More specifically, Article 2091 was enacted solely for the purpose of protecting employees who are in an inferior bargaining position. As Deschamps J. stated: "[t]o say that an employee is isolated or vulnerable when he or she is represented by a union would be an affront to organized labour." The Court added that a proposal to use the Civil Code as the general framework for all labour relations had, ultimately, been rejected by the Québec legislature.


In light of the above, the Supreme Court held that the arbitrators in the Isidore and Fillion cases were without jurisdiction to hear the grievances filed by the union.

The Supreme Court’s decision has finally brought some clarity to the issue of the applicability of Article 2091 within the unionized context and is sure to have important consequences on the financial assessment of the costs associated with closing a business which employs unionized employees.

With a strong dissent by three of the Court’s seven judges, it remains to be seen whether this issue is closed for good.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions