A specialized tribunal in Quebec recently decided in Dubois v. Diocèse de Trois-Rivières1 that a parish priest was neither in the employment of the diocese that appointed him nor the parish corporation for which he was selected to perform his services. Tasked with determining whether an employment relationship existed under the Quebec Occupational Work and Safety Act (the "Act"), the Tribunal concluded that the relationship was a spiritual one and effectively denied the priest's claim.
Through his appeal to the Tribunal, the priest was seeking compensation for the pulmonary disease and asthma, the state of general anxiety and depression, as well as the posttraumatic stress disorder he suffered during the course of his tenure as parish priest. There quickly ensued a debate between the bishopric that appointed him and the parish corporation that ensured the payment of the services rendered, as to who would foot the bill.
In her reasons inspired in part by canon law, Commissioner Lajoie found no employment relationship for either party. For the Tribunal, it could hardly have been said that the priest's evangelical mission could have been equated to a work relationship, even less to an employment contract. The tasks performed by the priest consisted of pastoral mandates that came within the scope of a spiritual and religious vocation. Priests act on behalf of the Catholic Church to the benefit and enlightenment of their parishes and parishioners. They do not perform work within the meaning of the Act. Moreover, the Tribunal found that there was no subordination between the priest and the bishop nor the parish corporation. The relationship between the priest and the bishop was spiritual in nature and closer to a paternal connection than to a legal relationship. Even though the relationship between the priest and the parish corporation was more commercial in nature in that the parish supplied the priest's salary and other religious items, the corporation exerted no control over the priest's activities nor divine ministry.
This decision sends a message to the priests whose responsibilities tender more to the immaterial than the legal world : their religious services are more likely to fall within the spiritual realm than the contractual sphere.
Footnote
1. 2015 QCCLP 542.
*The author would like to thank Josée Beaudoin, Articling Student at Norton Rose Fulbright LLP for her contribution to this post.
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Norton Rose Fulbright is a global legal practice. We provide the world's pre-eminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. We have more than 3800 lawyers based in over 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.
Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.
Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.
Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members ('the Norton Rose Fulbright members') of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
