Canada: 2014 Securities Class Actions Year In Review

Five Developments That Will Change The Landscape

The year 2014 brought further development and maturity to Canadian securities class action regimes but the case law continues to reveal discordant themes.

Preliminary issues relating to jurisdiction, the leave test and certification remained a primary focus, while the Supreme Court of Canada's granting of leave in four securities class actions will open the door to a new level of appellate guidance that will hopefully resolve some of the most significant controversies arising from the early cases interpreting Part XXIII.1 of the Ontario Securities Act (OSA) and its provincial counterparts. These controversies include the interpretation of the statutory limitation provision, the leave standard, and the appropriateness of certifying "common-law claims" advanced in tandem with statutory secondary market misrepresentation claims.

As the case law continues to develop, active securities class actions are piling up. Eleven new securities class actions were filed in Canada in 2014, including eight in Ontario. According to trends data compiled in a recent report by NERA Economic Consulting,1 these figures match the number of actions filed in 2013 and bring the total number of pending actions in Canada to 60, more than double the number five years ago. These active securities class actions represent more than C$35-billion in total claims. Additionally, six securities class actions were settled or tentatively settled in 2014, collectively worth C$38.4-million. The average of these settlements was C$6.4-million, and the median was C$6.4-million.

The Trilogy: Limitation Period Rulings and Implications

In February 2014, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned one of its own recent precedents regarding the interpretation of the limitation period for commencing a secondary market class action under Part XXIII.1 in a trilogy of cases: Green v. CIBC, IMAX v. Silver and Celestica v. Millwright Regional Council of Ontario Pension Trust Fund (altogether referred to as the Trilogy). The Supreme Court, which heard the Trilogy appeal on February 9, 2015 and now has the decision under reserve, will now have the final say on how the statutory limitation period should be applied.

In 2012, the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed, in Sharma v. Timminco, that plaintiffs must obtain leave to pursue a claim under Part XXIII.1 within three years of the alleged misrepresentation in accordance with section 138.14 of the OSA. However, the Court of Appeal panel that heard the Trilogy appeal reversed Timminco, holding that the section 138.14 limitation period is suspended as long as plaintiffs issue a statement of claim asserting common-law misrepresentation claims and plead an intention to seek leave to plead the statutory cause of action within the requisite three-year period. The Court of Appeal concluded that members of the proposed class are protected from the expiry of the limitation period from the point in time when the representative plaintiff "asserts" the statutory cause of action under Part XXIII.1. It held that an action is "asserted" when a statement of claim expressing the intention to pursue such a claim is issued.

In July, the Ontario legislature amended the OSA. It now provides that the limitation period governing a Part XXIII.1 claim is suspended on the date the application for leave is filed with the court and resumes running on disposition of the motion. While the amendment arguably addresses the controversy over how the statutory limitation period is to be applied going forward, several other issues that the Supreme Court will consider remain central to the future of securities class action litigation in Canada.

For example, the Supreme Court may consider whether the Court of Appeal appropriately considered section 138.14 within Part XXIII.1 as a whole, keeping in mind that the underlying purpose and policy objectives of the secondary market liability regime and that its various provisions are intended to operate harmoniously. Commentary from the Supreme Court about the interpretative approach taken by the Court of Appeal will likely influence the approach taken by lower courts interpreting other provisions of Part XXIII.1.

The Leave Standard

As the appeal in the Green case stemmed from the denial of leave and certification at the motions level, the Supreme Court will also consider the appropriate application of the leave test under the OSA. The OSA provides that leave for a proposed secondary market class action should only be granted if the claim is brought in good faith and the plaintiff has a "reasonable possibility of success at trial."

The Court of Appeal agreed with the motions judge in Green that the leave requirement constitutes "a preliminary low-level merits based leave test" but went on to observe that further judicial guidance as to the application of the test is unnecessary because it was the same as the test applied to determining the adequacy of a pleading. In other words, the Court of Appeal arguably lowered the threshold for granting leave below the standard that earlier motions judges have articulated.

In December 2014, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Bayens v. Kinross Gold Corporation, a further decision considering the leave standard. The decision clarifies the standard for obtaining leave to advance statutory claims for secondary market misrepresentation. The Court of Appeal upheld the trial court's decision denying leave, confirming that the "reasonable possibility of success" standard for leave is the correct standard and that it is a "relatively low threshold, merits-based test." The Court of Appeal in Bayens clarified the comments of the Trilogy panel about the test for leave and its relationship to a motion to strike. It stated that the leave standard is the same standard applied when deciding certification motions or whether to strike a pleading, but that the evidentiary basis in each scenario is different. In the latter instance, no evidence is filed and the facts pleaded are assumed to be true. On the leave motion, however, evidence must be adduced and scrutinized.

The Certification of Common-Law Claims

The motions judge in Green confirmed that both the "fraud on the market doctrine" and the "efficient market theory," which are recognized and affirmed by U.S. courts as supporting theories of class-wide reliance and have enabled the certification of secondary market misrepresentation cases, are not applicable in Canada. Accordingly, absent legislation allowing otherwise, each member of the class must prove individual reliance on an impugned misrepresentation in order to pursue a common-law misrepresentation claim.

The motions judge in Green determined that a class proceeding would not be the preferable procedure for resolving reliance-based claims because it would "give rise to individual issues of causation and reliance that would be unmanageable." Part XXIII.1 was enacted, in part, to overcome the difficulty of proving reliance on a class-wide basis. Significantly, if common-law misrepresentation claims were pursued in the form of securities class actions, various protections that Part XXIII.1 offers to defendants, including liability limits that in some cases would significantly reduce a defendants' liability exposure will not apply.

On appeal, the Trilogy panel concluded that inferred reliance may provide a basis for the certification of common-law misrepresentation claims in certain limited circumstances. However, it agreed with the motions judge that it would not be appropriate to certify the reliance-based common issues in the particular circumstances of Green. The panel disagreed with the motions judge's determination that other proposed common issues that related to the common-law claims but that did not raise individual issues should not be certified. The appeal panel certified these common issues and observed that individual trials could be ordered to determine the individual issues of reliance and damages raised by the common-law claims.

The Court of Appeal in its subsequent decision in Bayens further clarified that a denial of leave for statutory misrepresentation claims does not automatically mean that a class action will not be the preferable procedure for pursuing common-law claims. Nonetheless, it noted that standalone common-law negligent misrepresentation claims in securities cases are generally unsuitable for certification given the difficulty of managing individual issues of causation and reliance. For this reason, the Court of Appeal, in Bayens, concluded that a class action was not the preferable procedure for resolving the common-law claims, meaning that neither the statutory nor the common-law misrepresentation claims would proceed as class-wide claims.

Without definitively ruling out the possibility of securities class actions premised entirely on common-law claims, the Bayens decision suggests that such claims will have a low prospect of certification. The seemingly discordant approaches taken by the motions judge in Green and the Court of Appeal in Bayens on one hand, and the Court of Appeal in Green on the other, is characteristic of many seemingly incongruous positions that have emerged from the early Part XXIII.1 cases and highlights the need for the Supreme Court to bring greater consistency to the interpretation of the secondary market liability provisions.

To read this Review in full, please click here.


1. NERA Economic Consulting's complete report, Trends in Canadian Securities Class Actions, is available at:

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
16 Oct 2018, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join Blakes lawyers for our 10th annual overview of recent legal and regulatory developments and practical strategies to navigate the changing regulation of Canada’s payments industry.

26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions