Canada: The Top Ten Franchise Law Cases And Developments Of 2014

Last Updated: January 15 2015
Article by Derek Ronde

1. The Supreme Court of Canada Addresses The Duty of Good Faith

Although not a franchise-specific decision, the Supreme Court of Canada recently weighed in on what constituted the duty of good faith in its decision in Bhasin v. Hrynew. This is important to Canadian franchising because Canadian courts have already held that there is a duty of good faith and fair dealing in the franchise context, and this duty has been enshrined in legislation in five provinces.

The Court found that parties to a contract were under an obligation of good faith and that they should "perform their contractual duties honestly and reasonably and not capriciously or arbitrarily." It focused on the duty of honest performance, and held that parties to a contract should "not lie or otherwise knowingly mislead each other about matters directly linked to the performance of the contract." However, the Court specifically held that the duty of good faith at common law did not contain a duty of disclosure.

Parties litigating franchise disputes in Canada will likely be faced with claims stemming from the reasoning in the Bhasin decision, in addition to the statutory duty of good faith found in all five provincial franchise laws, as parties will attempt to use to the Supreme Court's principle of honest performance as the basis of duty of good faith breaches.

A copy of the Cassels Brock e-Lert on this decision can be found here.

2. Cassels Brock Litigators Successful in Obtaining Partial Summary Judgment for Franchisor in $100 Million Class Proceeding

Cassels Brock litigators representing Pet Valu Canada Inc. ("PVCI") were successful on a partial summary judgment motion in a class proceeding between PVCI and some of its franchisees. The Ontario Superior Court dismissed five of the seven common issues of the action brought by the franchisees. The common issues dealt with claims of breach of contract; breach of the statutory duty of fair dealing under the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000 (Ontario's franchise legislation); unjust enrichment; and the relevant orders that should flow from affirmative answers to those claims.

On the motion for summary judgment, the central common issue related to whether PVCI was contractually obligated to share volume rebates that it received from suppliers and manufacturers and, if so, whether it complied with that duty. In arriving at his decision, the Court examined broad principles of contractual interpretation and earlier franchise cases. It concluded that while PVCI had a contractual obligation to share volume rebates, it had a wide-ranging discretion in determining the amount of the rebates it would share, so long as that discretion was exercised reasonably. It then found that there was "overwhelming evidence" that PVCI had indeed shared all of the volume rebates with its franchisees after adding a reasonable mark-up. The plaintiff conceded that it was within PVCI's rights to add such a mark-up.

A copy of the PVCI decision can be found here.

3. Potential Franchise Legislation in the Province of British Columbia

On March 31, 2014, and after months of consultation with industry stakeholders, the British Columbia Law Institute (BCLI) issued its "Report on a Franchise Act for British Columbia." This report recommended that the Government of British Columbia enact franchise legislation similar to the legislation already in force in Alberta, Ontario, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Manitoba.

On September 10, 2014, the Government of British Columbia launched a consultation on a proposed Franchises Act. Parties had until December 10, 2014, to submit comment on proposed legislation. Upon reviewing the results of this consultation, Ministry of Justice staff will provide recommendations for proposed new legislation.

The Cassels Brock summary of the BCLI's recommendations can be found here.

4. Ontario Re-Introduces Menu Labelling Legislation

On November 24, 2014, the Government of Ontario reintroduced legislation regarding menu labelling for restaurants in Ontario. The Healthy Menu Choices Act, 2014 ("the Act") revives previous legislation (Making Healthier Choices Act, 2014) that was shelved in early 2014 due to the provincial election in Ontario. The legislation, if passed, would require food service chains with twenty (20) or more premises in Ontario to display the caloric information of their menu items. This includes bars, restaurants, convenience stores, grocery stores or other establishments which sell food or drinks prepared for immediate consumption either on the premises or elsewhere.

Liability for breaching the Act extends to persons (including corporations) that own or operate a chain with more than 20 premises in Ontario along with the directors and officers of corporations that own or operate such a chain, and can extend to both franchisees and franchisors. Penalties can be as high as $1,000 a day for individuals or $10,000 a day for corporations for second or subsequent offences.

A copy of the Cassels Brock summary of the previous iteration of this legislation can be found here.

5. Ontario's Franchise Legislation Declared Inapplicable to a Single Trademark License

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice confirmed that the province's franchise legislation, Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure) (the "Wishart Act"), did not apply to the license of a single trademark.

In MGDC Management Group Inc. v. Estate of Marilyn Monroe, LLC1, the Applicants and Respondents were parties to a License Agreement, through which the Respondents licensed the trademarked name Marilyn Monroe to the Applicants for use in their restaurants. The Applicants brought an Application seeking rescission of the License Agreement and damages, arguing that the License Agreement was a franchise agreement, entitling them to the right of full disclosure as provided by the Wishart Act. The Respondents' position was that the License Agreement was not a franchise agreement and the rights and remedies granted by the Wishart Act did not apply. The Respondents brought a motion to dismiss the Application on that basis.

In granting the Respondents' motion and dismissing the Application, the Court determined that the Wishart Act does not apply to an arrangement of this nature, as it is not a franchise arrangement but rather a single trademark licensing arrangement. Accordingly, the parties were not subject to the obligations imposed and the remedies granted by the Wishart Act.

The Cassels Brock analysis of this decision can be found here.

6. Canada Introduces Anti-Spam Legislation

On July 1, 2014, certain provisions of Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation ("CASL") came into force and now govern how businesses can communicate with Canadian recipients. Given its scope, CASL is one of the most stringent commercial electronic messaging laws in the world. CASL also regulates the installation of computer programs. This law has been put into place to address issues related to (i) unsolicited electronic messages (colloquially known as "SPAM") and (ii) spyware/"phishing" issues. CASL is of particular interest to businesses operating in the Canadian marketplace due to its impact on electronic communications practices and the significant penalties for non-compliance (including Administrative Monetary Penalties of up to $10 million for businesses and $1 million for individuals).

The Cassels Brock summary of this legislation can be found here.

7. Summary Judgment Used By Franchisor To Defeat Rescission Claim

The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Hryniak has ushered in the broader use of summary judgment motions as a means for parties to resolve disputes in the courts. We are now seeing summary judgment and the Hryniak principles being used by franchise litigants to obtain early and final resolution of matters before the courts. ( The Cassels Brock summary of the Hryniak decision can be found here.)

In the judgment of Caffé Demetre Franchising Corp v 2249027 Ontario Inc, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed the defendants' counterclaim seeking the statutory rescission of the franchise agreement. The Court ruled that the alleged deficiencies of the disclosure document did not amount to material facts that should have been included or were not so egregious as to amount to no disclosure at all.

The Cassels Brock summary of this decision can be found here.

8. Ontario Court Overturns Wrongful Termination of Franchise Agreement by Franchisor

Franchisee terminations for breach of contract often result in litigation between the parties due to the "bet the house" stakes involved. In the recent case of ANC Business Solutions Inc. v. Virtualink Canada Ltd. in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the Court examined what constitutes proper grounds for termination and the notice requirements for termination. Specifically, the Court considered whether Virtualink, the franchisor of a franchise system offering "executive office suites," had unlawfully terminated ANC, one of its franchisees.

The case illustrates the risk to a franchisor that terminates a franchisee without complying with the notice requirements in the governing franchise agreement. The case also shows that a settlement agreement will not supersede or modify the notice requirements in a franchise agreement, unless it is explicit.

The Cassels Brock summary of the decision can be found here.

9. Alberta Court Finds That Parties Must Preserve Arbitration Claims or Face Limitations Period Issues

Parties to an arbitration agreement may not always agree whether a dispute is subject to arbitration. However, a 2014 Alberta decision, Suncor Energy Products Inc. v. Howe-Baker Engineers, Ltd., has held that parties must take steps to identify the applicable limitation period for arbitration and bring an arbitration claim in time if there is even a possibility that a case is subject to arbitration. Doing so will allow the claimant to preserve its right to arbitrate and prepare the respondent to defend against a potentially stale claim – regardless of their respective positions regarding the applicability of the arbitration clause. In other words, a party's claims may be statute-barred under limitation period legislation if that party fails to commence an arbitration in time while disputing the arbitrability of the dispute.

The Cassels Brock summary of the decision can be found here.

10. Mixed Decisions on Whether a Franchisor is the Employer of its Franchisee's Employers

Joint employer liability in the franchise context is currently a hot topic in the American franchising community. There has been a variety of decisions in Canada that address this topic, and the findings have been mixed. A general discussion of the issue by Cassels Brock can be found here.

Other related decisions include the Kumon case (discussed below), the McDonalds Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision ( see the Cassels Brock summary here), the Best Western Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision (found here) and the Tim Hortons Québec personal injury decision (in relation to the court's willingness to impute the conduct of franchisees to franchisors – a summary can found here.)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions