Canada: Carriage Motions Come Of Age With Approval Of Evidentiary Records

Last Updated: December 17 2014
Article by Glenn Zakaib and Jeremy Martin

Should class counsel rush to the courthouse with skeletal pleadings, or invest time and money in preparing a comprehensive claim? If a carriage motion results, should they bring forth the evidence they intend to use at trial, in full view of the defence, or keep those cards close to their chest?

Last week, the Ontario Superior Court addressed these issues in deciding a carriage motion between two groups of experienced plaintiff-side class action counsel. Both had moved before the Court to be designated as counsel to a class consisting of certain shareholders.

In the course of the hearing, the Court effectively rejected simple, quick measures to determine carriage – first to file, firm reputation, expediency of proposed proceeding – and instead approved the practice of sinking substantial costs into preparing comprehensive pleadings and vigorously prosecuting a carriage motion.

"Carriage motions" – the hearings in which multiple lawyers seek to be judicially recognized as the official counsel for a large group of absent, non-participating class members – occasionally take place in class actions as class action counsel compete over which firm should lead the prosecution of a proposed class claim.

In order to determine which counsel should be awarded carriage of a class action, judges must decide which appointment would be in the best interests of the class, having regard to the following factors:

(1) the nature and scope of the causes of action advanced;

(2) the theories advanced by counsel as being supportive of the claims advanced;

(3) the state of each class action, including preparation;

(4) the number, size and extent of involvement of the proposed representative plaintiffs;

(5) the relative priority of the commencement of the class actions;

(6) the resources and experience of counsel; and

(7) the presence of any conflicts of interest.1

The Court's recent decision in Mancinelli v. Barrick Gold expanded upon these factors in a number of important ways.2 

Legal Fees a Relevant Factor

In his decision, Justice Belobaba openly mentioned the cost of legal counsel as a relevant – and potentially determinative – consideration in a carriage dispute. Had the proposals of the two groups otherwise been equal, His Honour considered that the lower contingency fee arrived at in a "reverse auction" would be a deciding factor.

As class counsel frequently retain between 20-30% of the funds awarded to the classes they represent, this factor has clear relevance to the best interests of the class. In a class action, a 10% difference in contingency arrangements could potentially translate into a difference to the recovery of the class members in the millions of dollars.

Legal Specialization, Filing Date and Funding are Irrelevant Factors

Justice Belobaba also made three interesting determinations of neutral factors in his decision:

  • Provided that the competing firms all have sufficient expertise in the subject area of the claim, no preference will be given to a firm that is more specialized or experienced than the other.
  • The Court reiterated that Ontario is not a 'first to file' jurisdiction and did not afford any weight to the fact that one firm filed its claim five months before the other. The later filing was ultimately the successful one.
  • The fact that one group of counsel had a funding arrangement in place was a neutral factor, on the assumption that another group would be able to secure such an arrangement as well.

Evidence was Heard on the Motion

The Court ultimately ruled that one consortium of law firms ("RGG") would be awarded the action over a second consortium ("KMG"), while ruling that both were "elite" groups entirely capable of effectively managing the action. RGG had advanced several claims on the action, including conspiracy and fraudulent concealment, whereas KMG focused on a number of environmental misrepresentations and promised a more streamlined, efficient proceeding.

In the course of finding that the best interests of the class lay with the more comprehensive action, the Court considered several expert reports and substantial evidence put forward by RGG.  While noting that it was inappropriate to compare the merits of the case and the likelihood of success on a carriage motion - particularly with defence counsel present - the Court did weigh evidence in considering whether or not there was a sufficient basis for RGG to plead its additional causes of action, or whether the additional causes of action were not sufficiently well-founded to be of any benefit to the class.

A plaintiff is generally required to show that there is "some basis in fact" for its claims in a class action at the certification stage.3  Without making explicit reference to that test, the Court appeared to apply that same standard to the different pleadings advanced by RGG on this carriage motion, determining that their expanded claims were "not 'kitchen sink' type claims" and were "supported by the evidence collected to date".4 

Preparation in Drafting the Pleadings was Determinative

The ultimate decision in this carriage dispute rested on the vastly superior level of preparedness exhibited by RGG – but importantly, the difference in the parties' level of disclosure was not driven by a difference in skill or dedication, but rather a strategic schism between these two groups of experienced counsel.

KMG put forward comparatively thin pleadings in line with their streamlined approach to the litigation, and with a view to depriving the defendant of valuable evidence at this early stage, far in advance of certification. RGG's submissions, on the other hand, openly disclosed expert evidence on which they intended the class to rely, reflecting months of in-depth investigation both through review of documentary evidence and extensive interviews and investigations at the site of the alleged tort.

KMG "minimized and even ridiculed" the efforts of RGG at the hearing, calling it a "rookie mistake" to file expert evidence on the merits of the case at a carriage motion attended by the defendant.5  The impetus to limit disclosure on a carriage motion has been part of the established wisdom of class proceedings practice since the inception of the carriage motion in Ontario jurisprudence.

The Court disagreed strongly with this proposition, ruling that the additional evidence had demonstrated that it was objectively in the best interests of the class to award the action to the more prepared team of counsel.

New Developments

It appears from this case that carriage motions have the potential to become a more expensive and time-consuming stage of the class proceeding process, at least in notable cases attracting the attention of multiple class counsel. Although this may add to the cost and delay involved in bringing a contested class action, this decision bears the benefit of encouraging counsel to draft sober and intelligent pleadings grounded in evidence that will serve the class well through certification and beyond by minimizing disputes over meritless aspects of a claim.


1. Vitapharm Canada Ltd. v. F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. (2000), 4 C.P.C. (5th) 169 (Ont. S.C.).

2. Mancinelli v. Barrick Gold, 2014 ONSC 6516 ("Barrick Gold").

3. Hollick v. City of Toronto, 2001 SCC 68.

4. Barrick Gold, supra note 2 at para. 20.

5. Ibid. at para. 46.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.