Canada: SARS Update on Claims Against Government Defendants

Last Updated: November 14 2005
Most Read Contributor in Canada, September 2016

By Michael McKelvey and Barbara Walker-Renshaw

Originally published Fall 2005

Unbeknownst to many Ontarians, the SARS outbreak prompted a flurry of civil claims. There is a class action being pursued on behalf of anyone who contracted SARS, or anyone related to anyone who contracted SARS, between April 20, 2003 and July 31, 2003. In addition, many of the nurses who contracted SARS are pursuing a claim and finally several groups of individual plaintiffs are suing for damages arising from the SARS outbreak. The various plaintiffs have selected different defendants to target in their litigation. The class action was brought against three levels of government – Government of Canada (Health Canada), Government of Ontario (Ministry of Health and Long Term Care) and the City of Toronto, while the nurses are claiming only against the Ontario Government. The individual actions have named a variety of defendants including the Ontario Government, hospitals and physicians.

The SARS outbreak and related litigation continues to garner media attention. Below, we aim to explain the media coverage and to outline what is happening in the SARS litigation. The government involvement in this litigation is unique. Typically, front line care providers – hospitals, nurses and physicians – are called to account in civil actions to defend the care provided to a particular patient. Plaintiffs who have sought to involve a government defendant – for example by alleging that a lack of funding contributed to substandard care – have failed. SARS may become one of the first cases in which the Ontario Government is required to defend its conduct in managing a particular issue in the healthcare system. The outcome of this litigation could have a significant impact on future claims.

Rule 21 Motion – Governments Seek to Have SARS Claims Dismissed

In each of the actions in which government defendants are named as defendants, they brought a motion seeking to have the claim dismissed. This is called a Rule 21 motion. In this type of motion a Court is required to determine, on the basis of the pleadings alone, whether there is a legal argument to support the plaintiffs’ claim. In order to have a claim against a defendant dismissed on a Rule 21 motion, it must be "plain and obvious" that the action cannot proceed. The motions in this case were heard before the Honourable Justice Cullity of the Ontario Superior Court.

In the class proceeding, Justice Cullity struck the pleadings in their entirety against the Government of Canada and the City of Toronto, accordingly, the action as against these defendants was dismissed.

In contrast, Mr. Justice Cullity ruled that the Ontario Government remain the sole defendant in the class action. Justice Cullity struck out some of the allegations made by the plaintiffs but allowed them to continue with many of the allegations. He made the same decision in a few other individual actions in which the Ontario Government has been named as a defendant.

At the motion, the Ontario Government took the position that it did not owe a private duty of care to the plaintiffs. It argued that any duty that was owed was only a duty to the public at large and did not create responsibility to any of the individual plaintiffs.

In order to establish a private duty of care against a government defendant the case law requires that the harm (contracting of SARS) be reasonably foreseeable and that there be a close and direct relationship between the parties. If the plaintiff can establish that the harm was foreseeable and the relationship was direct or proximate then the Court assumes that a duty of care has been established.

If the plaintiff crosses this hurdle, the Court must consider whether there are residual policy considerations, outside the relationship, that would override the government actor’s assumed duty of care. With respect to government defendants the courts have held that a duty of care will not be imposed where the government is acting in a policy-making role as opposed to performing an operational function, often stating that governments are to be judged for their "policy" decisions at the polls, not by a judge in a courtroom.

As expected, much of the argument at the hearing of the Rule 21 motions focused on whether the various governments were acting in a policy making or operational role during the SARS outbreak. The government lawyers suggested that it was all policy while the plaintiffs argued that the conduct was operational in nature.

Justice Cullity accepted that the Federal Government was acting in a policy-making capacity. However, he ruled that with respect to some of the allegations against the Ontario Government he could not make this decision without evidence to be heard at a trial. In coming to this decision, Justice Cullity ruled that it was not "plain and obvious" that the plaintiffs would be unable to establish proximity between the Government of Ontario and the plaintiffs in the class action. Furthermore, it was not "plain and obvious" that the Government of Ontario was acting in a policy-making rather than an operational capacity.

The City of Toronto was successful in having the claim against it struck on the basis that the Toronto Board of Health is a separate legal entity from the City of Toronto. Thus, the City of Toronto is not in law responsible for the conduct of the Board of Health. Similar motions were heard in the other individual actions involving the Ontario Government. Justice Cullity’s rulings are now under appeal. The Ontario Government is appealing in the hopes of having all of the claims against it struck out. The plaintiffs, in turn, are appealing to have the allegations that were struck out reinstated.

The ultimate outcome of these motions, after all appeals are exhausted, will have a significant impact on the legal landscape in Ontario. If the plaintiffs succeed, it will demonstrate a slight opening of the door in an effort to hold governments legally accountable for actions of an operational nature. It could also open the door to increasing litigation against government defendants, especially when governments engage in responding to unforeseen emergencies. Alternatively, if the Government prevails at the end of the day, it will be considered much more difficult to pursue a claim against a government defendant. The issues at stake are significant – both for the individual people involved and the important legal issue under debate. We would not be surprised to see these issues debated at the highest court in the land – the Supreme Court of Canada.

Michael McKelvey and Barbara Walker-Renshaw of Borden Ladner Gervais LLP represented the interests of the defendant Hospitals on these motions. The leading decision of the five Rule 21 motions can be found on line at

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.