Canada: The Line Is Far From Bright

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) yesterday released its decisions in Canada Trustco Mortgage Co. v. Canada ("Canada Trustco") and Mathew v. Canada ("Mathew"), the first two cases it has heard regarding the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) under the Income Tax Act. The facts in Mathew are for all practical purposes the same as those considered in OSFC Holdings Ltd. v. Canada ("OSFC"), a Federal Court of Appeal case previously considered to be the highest authority on the GAAR. The SCC unanimously dismissed both appeals; meaning Canada Trustco won and Mathew lost.

Canada Trustco won because (i) the Tax Court judge properly determined that the meaning of cost for purposes of capital cost allowance (CCA) was generally legal cost and not economic cost, and (ii) the Crown was unable to establish that the facts differed materially from a normal domestic sale-leaseback transaction. Mathew lost because (i) the Tax Court judge properly determined that the purpose of the specific provisions and the general policy of the Act is to prohibit the transfer of losses between taxpayers, and (ii) the Crown established that the only reasonable conclusion is that the transactions in question, if allowed to stand, would frustrate that policy.

Determining if an Abuse Occurred

Determining whether an abuse has occurred involves two steps. First, the Court must conduct a unified, textual, contextual and purposive analysis of the provisions giving rise to the tax benefit in order to determine why they were in place and why the benefit was conferred. This is a question of law. Second, as a question of fact, the Court must examine the factual context of the case in order to determine whether the avoidance transaction defeated or frustrated the object, spirit or purpose of the provisions in issue. If the existence of abusive tax avoidance is unclear, the benefit of the doubt goes to the taxpayer. Where, in cases such as these, the Tax Court has appropriately determined the purpose of the provisions under consideration, the Court’s determination as to whether the case in question defeated or frustrated that purpose will not be overturned absent a palpable and overriding error.

Interpreting the Act

The interpretation of a provision must be made according to a textual, contextual and purposive analysis to find a meaning that is harmonious with the Act as a whole. Even when the words of a provision are precise and unequivocal, although the ordinary meaning of the words will play a dominant role in the interpretive process, reference to the Act as a whole must be had before the apparently obvious interpretation can be confirmed.


Unless the taxpayer can meet the onus of establishing that either (i) there was not a tax benefit or (ii) there was not an avoidance transaction, the issue of abuse arises. The onus is then on the Crown to establish that the only reasonable conclusion is that the impugned transactions are an abuse of the Act.

Use of Extrinsic Materials

Although the Court commented that permissible extrinsic aids may be used in determining the object, spirit and purpose of the provisions of the Act, they gave no specific guidance as to what aids might be permissible. The Court relied on the explanatory notes issued when the GAAR was added to the Act and on commentators. However, the Court also made it very clear that Courts can not search for an overriding policy of the Act that is not based on a unified, textual, contextual and purposive interpretation of the specific provisions in issue.

Misuse and Abuse

The analysis of the misuse of a provision of the Act and of the abuse of the Act read as a whole are inseparable. The interpretation of specific provisions of the Act can not be separated from contextual considerations arising from other provisions.

Series of Transactions

The SCC endorsed the tests for a series of transactions, as adopted by the House of Lords in Craven v. White and Ramsey, as involving a number of transactions that are "pre-ordained in order to produce a given result" with "no practical likelihood that the pre-planned events would not take place in the order ordained". The Court then turned to the extended meaning of a series of transactions contained in subsection 248(10) as including transactions or events completed in contemplation of the series. In this regard, the Court held that "in contemplation of" is to be read in the broad sense of "because of" or "in relation to" the series. The phrase can be applied to events either before or after the basic avoidance transaction.

If any one transaction in a series of transactions is an avoidance transaction, then the tax benefit that results from the series may be denied under the GAAR.

Meaning of Avoidance Transaction

The GAAR does not apply to a transaction that "may reasonably be considered to have been undertaken or arranged primarily for bona fide purposes other than to obtain the tax benefit". These words contemplate an objective assessment of the relevant importance of the driving forces of the transaction. The Tax Court judge must weigh the evidence to determine whether it is reasonable to conclude that the transaction was not undertaken or arranged primarily for a non-tax purpose. The determination invokes reasonableness, suggesting that the possibility of different interpretations of the events must be objectively considered.

Economic Substance

While the "economic substance" of a transaction may be relevant at various stages of the GAAR analysis, this expression has little meaning in isolation from the proper interpretation of the specific provisions of the Act. That is, the economic substance must be considered in relation to the proper interpretation of the specific provisions that are relied upon for the tax benefit.

Canada Trustco


In 1996 Canada Trustco entered into a transaction where it paid $120 million, the majority of which was borrowed, to purchase a fleet of trailers from Transamerica Leasing Inc. ("TLI"). The equipment was then leased to a second company which, in turn, sub-leased the equipment to TLI. TLI prepaid a significant amount of its lease obligations, which was then applied against the outstanding loan.

Canada Trustco claimed capital cost allowance ("CCA") in the amount of approximately $31 million in 1997, and $67 million in subsequent years. The Minister reassessed the taxpayer by applying the GAAR to deny the CCA claim. The crux of the Minister’s argument was that it is the object and spirit of the CCA regime and of the Income Tax Act (the "Act") as a whole to permit CCA on the "real" or "economic" cost of depreciable property, not on the "legal" cost, the purchase price paid by Canada Trustco in this case. The Minister argued that the fact that TLI prepaid a significant amount of its obligations, which were applied to the outstanding loan, caused the transaction to effectively have no real cost, and that Canada Trustco was claiming CCA tax deductions despite this. As a result, the Minister argued that the legislative intent to limit CCA deductions to actual costs was ignored.

Tax Court of Canada

The trial judge, in reaching his decision, followed the process laid out in the Court of Appeal’s decision in OSFC. The trial judge concluded that the GAAR was not applicable as the transaction was consistent with the object and spirit of the relevant provisions of the Act, and was not abusive. The trial judge also found that the transactions were in all material respects a commercially normal and legitimate sale-leaseback transaction.

Federal Court of Appeal

The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the Crown’s appeal, in which the Crown argued that the Tax Court judge made a reviewable error when he concluded that the transactions in this case did not constitute a misuse of a provision of the Act or an abuse of the CCA scheme as a whole. The Court concluded that the Crown had not been able to point to "any source" that suggested that the transaction in issue constituted abusive tax avoidance.

Supreme Court of Canada

The CCA provisions use "cost" in the well-established sense of the amount paid to acquire the assets. Contextually, other provisions of the Act support this interpretation. The purpose of allowing CCA based on legal cost emerges clearly from the scheme of the CCA provisions within the Act as a whole. The applicable CCA provisions of the Act do not refer to economic risk. Where Parliament wanted to introduce economic risk into the meaning of cost related to the CCA provisions it did so expressly. The Tax Court judge, after considering all the circumstances, found the transaction was not so dissimilar from an ordinary sale-leaseback to take it outside the object, spirit or purpose of the relevant provisions. These conclusions on matters of fact should not be displaced unless there is a palpable and overriding error. The SCC may have been influenced by the fact that Canada Trustco received a deferral of tax, but not an absolute tax savings.



Standard Trust Company ("Standard") lent money on the security of mortgages on real property. Upon becoming insolvent in 1991, the Ontario Court of Justice (General Division) ordered that Standard be wound-up and appointed a liquidator for the company. To maximize the recovery from the disposition of Standard’s assets, a series of transactions using two partnerships took place which, through the operation of subsection 18(13) of the Act and the partnership rules in section 96 of the Act, allowed the taxpayers to use the losses that had accrued on a portfolio of Standard’s mortgages.

The taxpayers deducted their share of the losses incurred by the partnership in computing their taxable income. Relying on the GAAR, the Minister disallowed the deduction. Previously, in OSFC, the Federal Court of Appeal determined that there was a clear policy in the Act providing that losses cannot generally be transferred from one party to another.

Tax Court of Canada

In reaching its decision, the trial judge applied the principles established in OSFC. The trial judge held that the transactions were a series of avoidance transactions that conferred a tax benefit on the taxpayers. He also found that the transactions were an abuse of the Act as a whole, agreeing with the conclusion in OSFC that there was a clear policy against transferring losses from one taxpayer to another. As a result, the trial judge determined that the Minister properly applied the GAAR.

Federal Court of Appeal

At the Federal Court of Appeal, the taxpayers argued that the subsection 245(4) abuse analysis relied on in OSFC was incorrect. The Federal Court of Appeal concluded that it was only in exceptional circumstances that it could overrule its own prior decision.

Supreme Court of Canada

Interpreted textually, contextually and purposively, subsection 18(13) and section 96 of the Act do not permit arm’s length parties to purchase the tax losses preserved by subsection 18(13) and claim them as their own. The purpose of subsection 18(13) is to transfer a loss to a non-arm’s length party in order to prevent the transferor from realizing a superficial loss. The purpose of the broad treatment of loss sharing between partners is to promote an organizational structure that allows partners to carry on business in common. Parliament could not have intended that the combined effect of the partnership rules and subsection 18(13) would preserve and transfer a loss to be realized by a taxpayer who deals at arm’s length with the original transferor. This was essentially a series of transactions aimed at transferring unrealized losses from one arm’s length taxpayer to another. General policy against the transfer of losses between taxpayers is but one consideration to be taken into account in determining Parliament’s intent with respect to subsection 18(13) and section 96. To allow a new arm’s length partner to buy into the transferee partnership and to benefit from the loss would violate the fundamental premise underlying subsection 18(13) that the loss is preserved because it essentially remains in the transferor’s control. Absent a non-arm’s length relationship between the transferor and transferee there is no reason for the provision to apply. Therefore, the only reasonable conclusion is that the series of transactions, on which the appellants rely for the tax benefits they claim, result in abusive tax avoidance when subsection 18(13) and section 96 are interpreted purposively, in the context of the Act as a whole.

How would Shell, Duha or Neuman be decided under the GAAR?

In Shell the SCC stated that, "absent a specific provision to the contrary, (emphasis added) it is not the courts’ role to prevent taxpayers from relying on the sophisticated structure of their transactions, arranged in such a way that the particular provisions of the Act are met, on the basis that it would be inequitable to those taxpayers who have not chosen to structure their transactions that way. This approach had previously been adopted by the SCC in Duha Printers and Neuman. Unless the Act provides otherwise, a taxpayer is entitled to be taxed based on what it actually did, not based on what it could have done, and certainly not based on what a less sophisticated taxpayer might have done."

In Canada Trustco the SCC stated "the Act remains an instrument dominated by explicit provisions dictating specific consequences, inviting a largely textual interpretation. Onto this compendium of detailed stipulations, Parliament has engrafted quite a different sort of provision, the GAAR. This is a broadly drafted provision, intended to negate arrangements that would be permissible under a literal interpretation of other provisions of the Act, on the basis that they amount to abusive tax avoidance. To the extent that the GAAR constitutes a "provision to the contrary" as discussed in Shell, the Duke of Westminster principle and the emphasis on textual interpretation may be attenuated. The Court must to the extent possible contemporaneously give effect to both the GAAR and the other provisions of the Act relevant to a particular transaction."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.