Canada: User Fee Design By Canadian Municipalities: Considerations Arising From The Case Law

Last Updated: December 1 2014
Article by Kelly Farish

Abstract

Municipal governments in Canada have come to rely increasingly on user fees to fund local services, as they struggle to deal with the combined pressures of federal and provincial devolution of responsibility for such services and the political costs of raising property taxes. While there is a substantial body of literature regarding the rationale for user fees, little information exists about how to design and implement a user fee so as to ensure that it satisfies the legal requirements for imposing this type of levy. The authors provide a detailed review of the existing Canadian case law to highlight key legal, technical, and administrative issues facing municipalities in designing and implementing user fees. The discussion focuses in particular on the principal legal tests for user fees and the application of those tests in specific cases. Through their analysis, the authors draw attention to several unresolved issues and inconsistencies in the application and interpretation of the tests, which need to be navigated and addressed by the courts.

Introduction

A growing concern for Canadian municipalities is their ability to generate sufficient revenue to fund activities, using the most appropriate policy instrument, while balancing complex policy challenges. As "creatures of the provinces," Canadian municipalities may raise revenue only through means authorized by the provinces.1 As a result, fewer revenue-generating instruments are available to municipalities as compared with those available to the provincial and federal governments. These concerns have led Canadian municipalities to turn increasingly to user fees as an alternative to property taxes.2

While the rationale for user fees is well established in the literature,3 little information exists on how to satisfy the Canadian legal requirements for the imposition of user fees, despite the presence of significant relevant case law.4 In fact, the legal requirements for user fees do not appear to be well understood, if they are even considered, in the existing literature. There is evidence suggesting that municipalities have experienced legal difficulties in implementing user fees. Not only have municipal user fees in a number of forms faced legal challenges across Canada (examples include campground fees,5 volumetric gravel removal fees,6 and waste disposal fees7), but they have also been the subject of negative internal audit reviews.8

The primary purpose of this article is to assess the current state of the law on user fees in Canada and to highlight key issues that present challenges to Canadian municipalities in ensuring that user fees are legally permissible and appropriate.9 By carrying out a detailed review and critique of the existing case law, we aim to provide clarity with respect to the principles developed in the jurisprudence on the topic of user fees, particularly from a municipal implementation perspective. Our main focus is on the legal tests and criteria that are relevant for municipal public administrators. While these tests may address some questions regarding the legitimacy of user fees, the law in this area is complex and not definitive. As a result, many legal questions remain unresolved, creating uncertainty with respect to the specific requirements that must be met in designing municipal user fees. Our intention in highlighting these grey areas of the law is to illuminate the inconsistencies between the existing legal tests, not only to ensure that municipalities are aware of potential vulnerabilities but also to guide courts toward resolving these inconsistencies. An important caveat of our work is that, because municipalities derive their authority to charge user fees from their enabling legislation, the analysis presented here cannot and should not supplant careful review of such legislation by any municipality contemplating the introduction of user fees.

The discussion that follows is divided into six sections. In section one, we outline the constitutional authority for municipalities to charge user fees. Then, in section two, we explain the legal tests for user fees and review the leading cases establishing these tests and their respective criteria. Our discussion focuses on those cases in which the legal criteria have been elaborated or clarified; by no means do we attempt to cover all municipal user fee cases. However, we do include user fee cases outside municipal law where the judgment would apply in the municipal context. Drawing on this case-law review, in section three we identify and explain a number of unresolved issues related to the existing legal tests, and make recommendations for clarification of the test. Then, in section four, we address an important complication that arises in the jurisprudence—the difference between a user fee and a regulatory charge. Again, our review of the case law highlights several unresolved questions related to the distinction between a user fee and a regulatory charge, and these are discussed in section five. Section six presents a few brief concluding comments.

To read this article in full, please click here.

Originally published by Canadian Tax Journal.

Footnotes

1 The expression "creatures of the provinces" is often used in reference to, and is derived from, the constitutional status of municipal governments in Canada, discussed in the next section of the article. Throughout the article, the term "provinces" is used in a broad or general sense and may include one or more of Canada's three territories.

2 On average, revenues from municipal user fees have grown at an annual rate of 2 percent since 1988, surpassing the growth rate in property taxes: Federation of Canadian Municipalities, The State of Canada's Cities and Communities 2012 (Ottawa: Federation of Canadian Municipalities, 2012), at 4. (www.fcm.ca/Documents/reports/The_State_of_Canadas_Cities_and_Communities_2012_EN.pdf).

3 See, for example, Richard M. Bird, Charging for Public Services: A New Look at an Old Idea, Canadian Tax Paper no. 59 (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1976); Harry M. Kitchen, Local Government Finance in Canada (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1984); Harry M. Kitchen, Municipal Revenue and Expenditure Issues in Canada, Canadian Tax Paper no. 107 (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 2002); Harry Kitchen, "Pricing of Local Government Services," in Paul A.R. Hobson and France St-Hilaire, eds., Urban Governance and Finance: A Question of Who Does What (Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1997); Richard M. Bird and Thomas Tsiopoulos, "User Charges for Public Services: Potentials and Problems" (1997) 45:1 Canadian Tax Journal 25-86; Donald N. Dewees, "Pricing Municipal Services: The Economics of User Fees" (2002) 50:2 Canadian Tax Journal 586-605; and David G. Duff, "Benefit Taxes and User Fees in Theory and Practice" (2004) 54:4 University of Toronto Law Journal 391-447.

4 We note, in particular, one Canadian study and three US studies on the legal criteria applicable to user fees: Catherine Althaus, Lindsay M. Tedds, and Allen McAvoy, "The Feasibility of Implementing a Congestion Charge on the Halifax Peninsula: Filling the 'Missing Link' of Implementation" (2011) 37:4 Canadian Public Policy 541-61, briefly summarize the key Canadian case law on the legal criteria for a user fee in Canada, to evaluate whether a congestion charge could be designed to satisfy the legal requirements for a user fee; Wisconsin, Legislative Audit Bureau, Joint Legislative Audit Committee, Best Practices Report: Local Government User Fees (Madison, WI: Legislative Audit Bureau, April 2004) (http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lab/reports/04-0UserFeesFull.pdf), provides a brief overview of the statutory and case law that governs the distinction between a tax and a user fee in Wisconsin; Leslie A. Powell, "User Fee or Tax: Does Diplomatic Immunity from Taxation Extend to New York City's Proposed Congestion Charge?" (2009) 23:1 Emory International Law Review 231-71, uses statutes and case law to determine whether the city of New York's proposed congestion charge meets the legal criteria to be considered a user fee and therefore not subject to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations; and Hugh D. Spitzer, "Taxes vs Fees: A Curious Confusion" (2003) 38:2 Gonzaga Law Review 335-65, considers the case law for distinguishing a tax and a user fee in the state of Washington.

5 Carson's Camp Ltd. v. Amabel, 1998 CanLII 14917 (ONSC).

6 Allard Contractors Ltd. v. Coquitlam (District), [1993] 4 SCR 371.

7 Antigonish (Town) Waste Disposal Charges Bylaw, Re (1999), 7 MPLR (3d) 165 (NSSC).

8 For example, City of Ottawa, Office of the Auditor General, 2010 Audit Report (Ottawa: Office of the Auditor General, 2011) (www.ottawa.ca/city_hall/mayor_council/auditor_general/audit_reports/2011/annual_report_2010_en.pdf), where the auditor general wrote, first, that there was no comparison of planned amounts and actual costs and volumes to validate the user fees charged by the city of Ottawa; second, that city council was not provided with the details of the costing used to justify the user fees; and finally, that some user fee calculations included costs that were in no way attributable to the service being provided.

9 While our work focuses on issues related to municipal user fee design, many of the lessons that we expound can also be applied to user fees designed by other levels of government. Municipalities, however, operate within a constrained fiscal environment that serves as a backdrop for the application of these legal principles. Other levels of government are not so constrained, and some of the considerations that we outline would not apply beyond municipal governments. This is not to suggest that there are no restrictions on the fiscal powers accorded to the federal and provincial governments. Governments at both levels are constrained not only constitutionally but also procedurally. In particular, the Constitution Act, 1867 stipulates that before a tax can be enacted, it must be approved by Parliament or a provincial legislature, as the case may be. See sections 91 and 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 (UK), 30 & 31 Vict., c. 3. Failure to meet this procedural requirement would result in "taxation without representation."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Kelly Farish
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions