Canada: Enforcing Non-Competition & Employment Agreements

Last Updated: February 1 2005

This article was originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Labour & Employment - February 2005

Article by Connie Reeve, ©2005 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Two types of clauses in employment and non-competition agreements frequently become the subject of litigation, usually on the issue of enforceability. This article addresses some key enforcement issues employers should note before, during and after executing these agreements.

The most commonly litigated clause attempts to restrict competition following the end of the employment relationship. The second most frequently litigated is the termination clause.

Non-Competition & Non-Solicitation Covenants

One of the leading cases on the enforceability of post-employment restrictions is still the 1935 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Maguire v. Northland Drug Company Limited. As recently as January 2003, a judge of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice confirmed Maguire is good law in Ontario.

In Maguire, the Supreme Court identified a number of questions that had to be addressed when the enforceability of a restrictive covenant was being considered, including:

  • What are the rights that the employer is entitled to protect by a restrictive covenant?
  • Is the covenant, as drafted, limited to trying to protect those proprietary rights?

It is well established that any post-employment restriction on competition or solicitation that goes beyond what is "reasonably required" to protect a company’s proprietary rights, such as confidential marketing or pricing information or its client relationships, will not be enforceable. When imposing post-employment restrictions on employee’s activities, particular attention must therefore be paid to the scope of the activities restrained, the length of the proposed restrictions, and the geographical scope of the restrictions. The overriding question courts ask is whether or not the clause goes beyond what is reasonable to furnish appropriate protection to the business.

A decision about whether a clause is reasonable turns on the facts of the case or, as described by the Supreme Court of Canada in Elsey v. J.G. Collins Insurance Agency Ltd., "… upon an overall assessment of the clause, the agreement within which it is found, and all of the surrounding circumstances." As such, in evaluating reasonableness, courts will look at the nature of the employment, the employee’s duties and responsibilities, the geographic scope of the employee’s activities, whether the employee has access to truly confidential information, and whether the employee has, or can develop through his or her employment, a "special relationship" with clients or suppliers.

As the law in Canada has developed, it is clear the courts will only uphold non-competition clauses in exceptional cases. A 2000 decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal applied what it described as the "general rule" that non-solicitation clauses are to be preferred over non-competition clauses where non-solicitation clauses would adequately protect a company’s interests. The Court of Appeal said a "non-competition clause is a more drastic weapon in an employer’s arsenal. Its focus is much broader than an attempt to protect the employer’s client or customer base; it extends to an attempt to keep the former employee out of the business."

For example, in one recent case, a mutual fund company sought to enforce a non-competition covenant that prohibited a fund manager’s employment or association with any company soliciting, servicing or catering to any of the clients of its group of companies. The court found this covenant was unreasonable because the scope of the restricted activities was too broad in light of the fund manager’s actual duties and contained no geographical restriction. It is reasonable to assume that if the fund company had drafted a non-solicitation covenant limited to restricting the former fund manager’s contact with the brokers and entities with whom she had regular contact, the company would have had a much better chance of successfully restraining her post-employment activities. Further, the absence of a specific geographical limitation would not be relevant if the non-solicitation restriction was limited to a specific list of clients and brokers with whom the employee had regular contact.

Other recent cases relating to the enforceability of non-competition agreements include those discussed below:

  • In Moffatt (c.o.b.) Rising Sun Martial Arts v. Sanchez, a non-competition agreement that restricted the defendant from teaching at, owning or operating a martial arts school within a 10-mile radius of the Rising Sun Academy, was upheld. The trial judge was satisfied that the unique relationship between student and teacher was such that a student would want to follow a teacher who left the martial arts studio. Here, restricting solicitation would not be effective since the students would probably go to the new studio even in the absence of solicitation. The court also found the temporal and spatial features of the covenant to be reasonable.
  • Non-competition and non-solicitation covenants contained in an agreement between an H&R Block franchisee and its employees were found to be overly broad in the case of 947535 Ontario Ltd. (c.o.b.) H&R Block v. Jex. First, with respect to the geographical scope of the non-competition covenant, the court found the operations of the relevant franchise itself was limited to the city limits of Owen Sound, but the covenant sought to include an area within a 25-mile radius of the city. Second, the two-year time limit was held to be too long, given that the former employees were temporary employees who only worked approximately five months a year for H&R Block. Third, the scope of the covenants included many clients with whom the defendants had never had contact, including clients whom the defendants never serviced and clients of the franchisor’s other location.
  • In Valley First Financial Services Ltd. v. Trach, a court also held that non-competition and non-solicitation clauses were too broad to be enforceable. The defendants were not involved in selling life insurance, general insurance or financial services, yet the clauses restricted the defendant’s activities in all areas of the plaintiff’s business. Further, it should be noted that the court explicitly held that the offending parts of these clauses could not be severed from the unoffending parts, and declared the covenants unenforceable in their entirety. The courts will also not "write down" excessively broad clauses.

Based on the cases discussed above, it is clear that before asking legal counsel to draft non-solicitation or non-competition covenants for an employment or confidentiality agreement, employers should consider:

  • What are the proprietary interests the company wants to protect?
  • Can these interests be adequately protected by a confidentiality clause?
  • What is the narrowest form of post-employment restriction that would be effective in protecting the company’s proprietary interests?
  • Would the proposed restriction keep the employee "out of the business"?

Termination Provisions

The battleground in respect of termination provisions largely concerns the validity of contractual provisions that seek to limit an employee’s entitlements on termination to payments required by employment standards legislation. This is fertile ground for litigation because of the significant differences between statutory and common law notice obligations.

The starting point is usually the 1983 decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Wallace v. Toronto-Dominion Bank. In that case, the provision in an employment agreement limiting the plaintiff’s entitlement to the minimum standards found in the Canada Labour Code was challenged as unenforceable when the plaintiff was constructively dismissed after eight years of service. The trial judge found that the contractual limitation was unfair and that it did not limit the plaintiff’s entitlement to receive damages in lieu of reasonable notice. On appeal, the Bank prevailed. The majority judgment in the Court of Appeal frankly admitted that there was no proper evidentiary foundation laid at trial for setting aside the contract or refusing to enforce its terms. There was no claim in the pleadings that the contract should be avoided on the ground of unfairness or unconscionability, and only "meagre evidence" with respect to the formation of the contract.

The Court, however, left a door open, saying that there can be circumstances when "a contract between an employer and an employee may, in a given factual situation, contain terms so onerous or blatantly unfair as to warrant judicial intervention."

Subsequent cases have tried to produce a different result, but with little success. In a recent decision, Lloyd v. Oracle Corp. Canada, the plaintiff’s employment letter contained a clause regarding termination without cause that only required notice in accordance with the Ontario Employment Standards Act.

At the time of termination, the plaintiff was a Regional Vice-President earning $206,976 per year. The plaintiff argued that the clause established a floor for the notice period, but not a ceiling.

The court found the language of the clause was sufficiently clear to rebut the presumption of reasonable notice. The court therefore agreed with the defendant company that the termination clause provided a ceiling for the notice required to terminate the plaintiff’s employment. Of note is the fact that the court found that the plaintiff did negotiate the terms of the employment agreement, even though the plaintiff was told that the termination clause itself was not negotiable. According to the evidence, the plaintiff had demanded and received a grant of stock options, possibly in return for accepting the clause.

Of course, a termination provision that fails to comply with the minimum statutory notice provisions of an employment standards statute will fail. Further, it appears that trial judges are increasingly concerned with issues of fairness and conscionability. Courts have expressly recognized that the contract of employment has many characteristics that set it apart from an ordinary commercial contract, among them the lack of free bargaining power.

As such, in assessing whether a termination provision that limits an employee’s entitlement to the minimum standards found in employment standards legislation will be enforced, it is important to consider:

  • The employee’s level of sophistication
  • Whether the employee had an adequate opportunity to consider the contract
  • Whether there was access to legal advice
  • Whether there has been a substantial or significant change in the essential nature of the employee’s responsibilities since the date of execution of the employment agreement.


In summary, care must be taken if an employer wants to rely on a non-competition agreement or a termination provision limiting an employee’s entitlement on dismissal to that provided by employment standards legislation. Employers should be mindful of the factors the courts will consider when assessing the enforceability of such provisions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.