Canada: Trade Mega-Deals And The WTO

Last Updated: October 25 2014
Article by Len Edwards

Do prospective regional trade "mega-deals" such as the TPP and TTIP pose a threat to the WTO and the multilateral system? Not likely.

For decades, the proponents of the multilateral system have worried about the proliferation of bilateral free trade deals (FTAs) and regional trade agreements (RTAs). They have regarded these agreements as complicating the governance of international trade, distracting countries from the tough work of multilateral trade liberalization, and creating closed systems that mainly benefit stronger players while disadvantaging or leaving out weaker countries — especially the least-developed nations that need access to good markets the most, but have little to offer in return.

Businesses have welcomed FTA's and RTA's as helpful to their interests.  Yet they have also complained about the added complexities and costs in navigating multiple agreements and unraveling their accompanying "rules of origin", particularly frustrating in today's world of multi-country value chains.

The Rise of the Mega-Deal

The Doha Round launched in 2001 was intended to drive a new phase of multilateral trade liberalization: improving access in traditional areas, drawing the agriculture sector fully into multilateral disciplines, setting up rules in some new areas, and bringing significant benefits to developing countries under its featured "DOHA Development Agenda". 

Instead, the Round's failure has left those most interested in making further progress little choice but to give even more emphasis to bilateral and regional approaches.

The United States has led the way in shifting its trade policy away from the frustrations of the Doha Round.  It has adopted a strategy of focusing on major regional negotiations both to lower trade barriers for American businesses, but also to put in place rules around certain new issues, such as the behavior of state owned enterprises, not yet subject (or only marginally so) to international trade disciplines. 

This has resulted in the ambitious Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations, and the recently launched Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) talks between the USA and the European Union.

Proponents argue that the positive outcomes of these "mega-deals" — so-called because they involve countries that together account for large portions of the global economy — could eventually be folded into an eventual revitalized WTO round.  However, skeptics worry that they will lead elsewhere: to separate regional "systems" and a permanent weakening of the WTO-centered multilateral approach to the governance of international trade.

Are these fears misplaced? Three reasons suggest that the danger is not great.

The first is that the TPP and TTIP deals are by no means assured.

Although the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations have made significant progress, they have missed deadline after deadline.  The addition in mid-2013 of Japan has further complicated matters.  The TPP is now essentially the framework for a huge bilateral deal between the 1st and 3rd largest global economies.  And in late September, the latest USA/Japan talks ended with a Japanese walkout.

Every passing day diminishes the chances of the TPP being concluded before presidential election politics take over the USA agenda at the end of 2015.  Even if there were a breakthrough between Japan and the USA in the coming months, the lack of congressional "fast track" authority (which gives the Administration authority to negotiate a deal subject to a single yes/no vote by Congress) and the uncertainties of American domestic politics together constitute a serious hurdle. 

Why would America's trading partners in the TPP make important final concessions without knowing that Congress will not take the deal apart clause by clause and impose additional demands as the price of its approval?

Meanwhile the USA/EU negotiations are just getting underway.  The size and complexity of this negotiation are enormous.  If you add America's political situation to Europe's preoccupations with its flagging economy, the arrival of a new Commission leadership in Brussels, and the internal power jockeying among the Commission, member states and the European Parliament, it's hard not to imagine that this "mega-deal" could be "mega-years" in the making.  And Russian aggressiveness in Eastern Europe has become a major political/security distraction.

Second, even if these strong head winds do not stall or blow off course the TPP and TTIP negotiations in the medium term (the TTIP would sit alongside the now complete Canada-Europe Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement or CETA), these "mega-deals" are still not likely to become game changers.

While the TPP and TTIP together include 40 countries representing about 60% of the global economy, they still leave a significant 40% of world economic activity and 119 members of the WTO on sidelines. 

In the days when the "Quad" (USA, Europe, Japan and Canada) dominated world trade and largely determined the course of multilateral trade negotiations, these two proposed mega-deals could have been decisive in determining the future direction of the trading system.  But as we have seen in the Doha Round, the rise of new economic players, the shift in global economic power, and a feistier developing world generally, have forever changed this dynamic. 

In this respect, neither the TPP nor the TTIP include Brazil, India or most importantly China.  Mexico's presence at the TPP table is the one exception to the inclusion of a major emerging market.  Measured in nominal GDP, Brazil, India and China are predicted to be the world's 4th, 3rd and largest economies respectively by mid-century, with China achieving number 1 status before 2030. By 2050, today's emerging economies generally are expected to account for up to 70% of global trade.

Unless these three emerging economies in particular are engaged by the USA, Europe, Japan and Canada in these or other new mega-arrangements, it is very doubtful that the TPP and TTIP alone will have the critical weight to transform the international trading system's rules and set the new standard for global trade governance.  They will have an impact, certainly, but it will not be decisive.

It is worth noting that the only other potential "mega-deal" of any size is the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, or RCEP, now being negotiated among the 10 members of ASEAN and the six other Asia Pacific states with which ASEAN has a trade agreement: China, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and India.  China is a leading advocate of this rather low-key negotiation.  It is proceeding slowly despite its end-2015 deadline, and is expected to be much less ambitious that the TPP, possibly creating a competing and less demanding "model" to that being pursued by the USA.

Lastly, it is likely the global trade community will come back to the multilateral approach to trade governance whatever happens with the TPP, TTIP and RCEP, for the following reasons:

  • While, for developing countries, the Doha Round has not delivered its promised dividends, they will come back to the WTO simply because it gives them the best chance of negotiating the best conditions for their exports versus the largest economies, and ensures a level playing field with each other in the competition for foreign markets and the inward flows of investment so necessary for internal growth;
  • For advanced countries, like Canada, the multilateral system was their creation, despite the appeal of FTAs and even mega-FTA's they are regarded as supplementary to the WTO which remains "bred in the bone" 
  • Among emerging economies, China's leadership will be critical. Beijing seems still committed to the WTO, diligent in implementing its accession commitments.  It has shown interest in the WTO-based plurilateral negotiations on services and on environmental goods, and is supporting the trade facilitation agreement agreed at last December's WTO trade ministers' meeting in Bali even while India's new government has pulled its agreement to the pact
  • The WTO's new leadership under a Brazilian DG, Roberto Azevedo, and his team has brought some fresh air and new drive to the institution and to the search for a way forward; and finally,
  • International businesses still prefer the multilateral to more fragmented approaches to trade governance, since only the WTO can provide the simpler and all-encompassing global framework for building and accessing the global value chains that now dominate international commercial relationships.

Nursing the WTO system back to good health

In the meantime, and until the above factors favouring the WTO come into alignment — still possibly several years away — there are things that WTO members could be doing to facilitate the restoration of the multilateral system to good health.

As a first step, those governments toiling away on current mega-deals should introduce a bias in the negotiating outcomes that complement rather than compete with the multilateral system, and make it easier for the multilateral approach to re-assert itself at a later date. 

In this regard, trade specialists have suggested negotiators and governments do the following:

  • ensure the planned mega-deals as transparent and non-threatening as possible, and are open to accession by non-participants;
  • shape the terms of these arrangements in ways that make them more not less adaptable to eventual multi-lateralization in the WTO;
  • limit the use of "hard" preferences among parties to mega-deals that are highly discriminatory against non-participants.

Another bridging tool would be for the TPP and the TTIP to use the WTO's excellent and well-oiled systems for dispute settlement, rather than create their own tribunals or processes.  The WTO also offers excellent secretariat and statistical services that could be contracted where they are required.

Another interesting option would be to back away from a high ambition TPP (something that appears already compromised by bringing in Japan), and use it more as a stepping-stone to a higher level WTO agreement in due course, and a means of bringing along at least one of Asia's two emerging economy giants: China or India.  China is the obvious choice.  In recent months Beijing has ramped down its earlier criticism that that the TPP was part of the broader U.S. geopolitical strategy of containing a resurgent China.

Inviting in China now, to help shape the TPP, will mean some "water in the wine" of ambition.  Yet, it is arguably better to have China part of a system evolving to higher levels of liberalization and discipline rather than to set the standards so high and exclusionary that China is given little choice but to create its own competing system either in Asia (through the RCEP), or in the worst case, through a mega-deal among other BRICs and developing countries.  It is unlikely that China will join a TPP in which they have not played a formative role.

Finally, efforts should be redoubled to make today's WTO work as a successful negotiating body, starting with reforms to the governance model in line with the new political and economic power dynamic.  This will not be easy for advanced countries.  We have seen the resistance within the U.S. and EU to implementing the governance reforms in the IMF and World Bank agreed to in 2009 at the Pittsburgh G20 Summit that would give emerging economic powers more voice. 

On a positive note, WTO members have shown themselves more flexible over the past months in looking at the expanding the use of negotiations among interested parties, such as on services, which others might join later.  These approaches should be encouraged, restoring confidence and a sense of positive momentum.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions