Canada: Trade Mega-Deals And The WTO

Last Updated: October 25 2014
Article by Len Edwards

Do prospective regional trade "mega-deals" such as the TPP and TTIP pose a threat to the WTO and the multilateral system? Not likely.

For decades, the proponents of the multilateral system have worried about the proliferation of bilateral free trade deals (FTAs) and regional trade agreements (RTAs). They have regarded these agreements as complicating the governance of international trade, distracting countries from the tough work of multilateral trade liberalization, and creating closed systems that mainly benefit stronger players while disadvantaging or leaving out weaker countries — especially the least-developed nations that need access to good markets the most, but have little to offer in return.

Businesses have welcomed FTA's and RTA's as helpful to their interests.  Yet they have also complained about the added complexities and costs in navigating multiple agreements and unraveling their accompanying "rules of origin", particularly frustrating in today's world of multi-country value chains.

The Rise of the Mega-Deal

The Doha Round launched in 2001 was intended to drive a new phase of multilateral trade liberalization: improving access in traditional areas, drawing the agriculture sector fully into multilateral disciplines, setting up rules in some new areas, and bringing significant benefits to developing countries under its featured "DOHA Development Agenda". 

Instead, the Round's failure has left those most interested in making further progress little choice but to give even more emphasis to bilateral and regional approaches.

The United States has led the way in shifting its trade policy away from the frustrations of the Doha Round.  It has adopted a strategy of focusing on major regional negotiations both to lower trade barriers for American businesses, but also to put in place rules around certain new issues, such as the behavior of state owned enterprises, not yet subject (or only marginally so) to international trade disciplines. 

This has resulted in the ambitious Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations, and the recently launched Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) talks between the USA and the European Union.

Proponents argue that the positive outcomes of these "mega-deals" — so-called because they involve countries that together account for large portions of the global economy — could eventually be folded into an eventual revitalized WTO round.  However, skeptics worry that they will lead elsewhere: to separate regional "systems" and a permanent weakening of the WTO-centered multilateral approach to the governance of international trade.

Are these fears misplaced? Three reasons suggest that the danger is not great.

The first is that the TPP and TTIP deals are by no means assured.

Although the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations have made significant progress, they have missed deadline after deadline.  The addition in mid-2013 of Japan has further complicated matters.  The TPP is now essentially the framework for a huge bilateral deal between the 1st and 3rd largest global economies.  And in late September, the latest USA/Japan talks ended with a Japanese walkout.

Every passing day diminishes the chances of the TPP being concluded before presidential election politics take over the USA agenda at the end of 2015.  Even if there were a breakthrough between Japan and the USA in the coming months, the lack of congressional "fast track" authority (which gives the Administration authority to negotiate a deal subject to a single yes/no vote by Congress) and the uncertainties of American domestic politics together constitute a serious hurdle. 

Why would America's trading partners in the TPP make important final concessions without knowing that Congress will not take the deal apart clause by clause and impose additional demands as the price of its approval?

Meanwhile the USA/EU negotiations are just getting underway.  The size and complexity of this negotiation are enormous.  If you add America's political situation to Europe's preoccupations with its flagging economy, the arrival of a new Commission leadership in Brussels, and the internal power jockeying among the Commission, member states and the European Parliament, it's hard not to imagine that this "mega-deal" could be "mega-years" in the making.  And Russian aggressiveness in Eastern Europe has become a major political/security distraction.

Second, even if these strong head winds do not stall or blow off course the TPP and TTIP negotiations in the medium term (the TTIP would sit alongside the now complete Canada-Europe Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement or CETA), these "mega-deals" are still not likely to become game changers.

While the TPP and TTIP together include 40 countries representing about 60% of the global economy, they still leave a significant 40% of world economic activity and 119 members of the WTO on sidelines. 

In the days when the "Quad" (USA, Europe, Japan and Canada) dominated world trade and largely determined the course of multilateral trade negotiations, these two proposed mega-deals could have been decisive in determining the future direction of the trading system.  But as we have seen in the Doha Round, the rise of new economic players, the shift in global economic power, and a feistier developing world generally, have forever changed this dynamic. 

In this respect, neither the TPP nor the TTIP include Brazil, India or most importantly China.  Mexico's presence at the TPP table is the one exception to the inclusion of a major emerging market.  Measured in nominal GDP, Brazil, India and China are predicted to be the world's 4th, 3rd and largest economies respectively by mid-century, with China achieving number 1 status before 2030. By 2050, today's emerging economies generally are expected to account for up to 70% of global trade.

Unless these three emerging economies in particular are engaged by the USA, Europe, Japan and Canada in these or other new mega-arrangements, it is very doubtful that the TPP and TTIP alone will have the critical weight to transform the international trading system's rules and set the new standard for global trade governance.  They will have an impact, certainly, but it will not be decisive.

It is worth noting that the only other potential "mega-deal" of any size is the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, or RCEP, now being negotiated among the 10 members of ASEAN and the six other Asia Pacific states with which ASEAN has a trade agreement: China, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and India.  China is a leading advocate of this rather low-key negotiation.  It is proceeding slowly despite its end-2015 deadline, and is expected to be much less ambitious that the TPP, possibly creating a competing and less demanding "model" to that being pursued by the USA.

Lastly, it is likely the global trade community will come back to the multilateral approach to trade governance whatever happens with the TPP, TTIP and RCEP, for the following reasons:

  • While, for developing countries, the Doha Round has not delivered its promised dividends, they will come back to the WTO simply because it gives them the best chance of negotiating the best conditions for their exports versus the largest economies, and ensures a level playing field with each other in the competition for foreign markets and the inward flows of investment so necessary for internal growth;
  • For advanced countries, like Canada, the multilateral system was their creation, despite the appeal of FTAs and even mega-FTA's they are regarded as supplementary to the WTO which remains "bred in the bone" 
  • Among emerging economies, China's leadership will be critical. Beijing seems still committed to the WTO, diligent in implementing its accession commitments.  It has shown interest in the WTO-based plurilateral negotiations on services and on environmental goods, and is supporting the trade facilitation agreement agreed at last December's WTO trade ministers' meeting in Bali even while India's new government has pulled its agreement to the pact
  • The WTO's new leadership under a Brazilian DG, Roberto Azevedo, and his team has brought some fresh air and new drive to the institution and to the search for a way forward; and finally,
  • International businesses still prefer the multilateral to more fragmented approaches to trade governance, since only the WTO can provide the simpler and all-encompassing global framework for building and accessing the global value chains that now dominate international commercial relationships.

Nursing the WTO system back to good health

In the meantime, and until the above factors favouring the WTO come into alignment — still possibly several years away — there are things that WTO members could be doing to facilitate the restoration of the multilateral system to good health.

As a first step, those governments toiling away on current mega-deals should introduce a bias in the negotiating outcomes that complement rather than compete with the multilateral system, and make it easier for the multilateral approach to re-assert itself at a later date. 

In this regard, trade specialists have suggested negotiators and governments do the following:

  • ensure the planned mega-deals as transparent and non-threatening as possible, and are open to accession by non-participants;
  • shape the terms of these arrangements in ways that make them more not less adaptable to eventual multi-lateralization in the WTO;
  • limit the use of "hard" preferences among parties to mega-deals that are highly discriminatory against non-participants.

Another bridging tool would be for the TPP and the TTIP to use the WTO's excellent and well-oiled systems for dispute settlement, rather than create their own tribunals or processes.  The WTO also offers excellent secretariat and statistical services that could be contracted where they are required.

Another interesting option would be to back away from a high ambition TPP (something that appears already compromised by bringing in Japan), and use it more as a stepping-stone to a higher level WTO agreement in due course, and a means of bringing along at least one of Asia's two emerging economy giants: China or India.  China is the obvious choice.  In recent months Beijing has ramped down its earlier criticism that that the TPP was part of the broader U.S. geopolitical strategy of containing a resurgent China.

Inviting in China now, to help shape the TPP, will mean some "water in the wine" of ambition.  Yet, it is arguably better to have China part of a system evolving to higher levels of liberalization and discipline rather than to set the standards so high and exclusionary that China is given little choice but to create its own competing system either in Asia (through the RCEP), or in the worst case, through a mega-deal among other BRICs and developing countries.  It is unlikely that China will join a TPP in which they have not played a formative role.

Finally, efforts should be redoubled to make today's WTO work as a successful negotiating body, starting with reforms to the governance model in line with the new political and economic power dynamic.  This will not be easy for advanced countries.  We have seen the resistance within the U.S. and EU to implementing the governance reforms in the IMF and World Bank agreed to in 2009 at the Pittsburgh G20 Summit that would give emerging economic powers more voice. 

On a positive note, WTO members have shown themselves more flexible over the past months in looking at the expanding the use of negotiations among interested parties, such as on services, which others might join later.  These approaches should be encouraged, restoring confidence and a sense of positive momentum.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
8 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

The prospect of an internal investigation raises many thorny issues. This presentation will canvass some of the potential triggering events, and discuss how to structure an investigation, retain forensic assistance and manage the inevitable ethical issues that will arise.

22 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

From the boardroom to the shop floor, effective organizations recognize the value of having a diverse workplace. This presentation will explore effective strategies to promote diversity, defeat bias and encourage a broader community outlook.

7 Dec 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

Staying local but going global presents its challenges. Gowling WLG lawyers offer an international roundtable on doing business in the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia. This three-hour session will videoconference in lawyers from around the world to discuss business and intellectual property hurdles.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.