Canada: Enjoin the Picketers?

Originally published July 2005

In 2002, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that picketing is a form of expression protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In so ruling, the Supreme Court of Canada made it clear that the lawfulness of picketing will be determined by the conduct of the picketers, not their location. Prior to this ruling, it was considered illegal per se for picketers to exert economic pressure on third parties, such as customers and suppliers, unless those third parties were "allies" of the employer. The distinction between primary picketing and "secondary picketing", picketing at a location other than the premises of the employer whose employees are on strike, has now been abolished. Secondary picketing is permissible unless it can be shown to be wrongful or unjustified.

For companies that are third parties to labour disputes, it may be surprising that picketing of their premises is considered permissible. However, the laws of intimidation, trespass, nuisance and inducing breach of contract continue to apply to picketers, and picketers may not unduly impede access to or exit from the picketed premises. To minimize the potential for adverse impact upon its business, a company threatened with picketing action should focus on preparing an appropriate contingency plan and on gathering evidence of unlawful conduct. With evidence of unlawful conduct, including threats and undue prevention of access to the company’s premises, an injunction may still be available.

This bulletin provides basic information a company should consider in the event that picketing threatens to disrupt its business. It should be noted that each situation is unique, and legal advice should be obtained in the event that a company receives notice its business may be disrupted as a result of picketing. Specific questions should be directed to a member of McMillan Binch Mendelsohn LLP’s Litigation or Labour Groups.

I. Is Injunctive Relief Available to Restrain Picketing?

Injunctive relief may be available if the picketing involves conduct that is tortious or criminal. A company does not have an automatic right to enjoin picketing activities, even where there is considerable negative economic impact to their business. Therefore, how successful the company is in gathering evidence of the picketers’ criminal or tortious conduct will be critical to whether an injunction is granted.

II. General Test for an Injunction to Restrain Picketing

To obtain an injunction, the company should be able to show (i) a strong prima facie case that the picketers have been participating in unlawful behaviour; (ii) damages are an inadequate remedy; and (iii) the balance of convenience favours granting an injunction. When injunctive relief is being sought from picketing, the first element, that of a prima facie case, is generally determinative. As noted above, the distinction between primary and secondary picketing has been effectively abolished. Consequently, proceedings for injunctions with respect to these two forms of picketing are held to the same test.

A. The company has a strong prima facie case that the picketers have been participating in unlawful conduct

Since picketing is not itself unlawful, a company must establish a strong prima facie case that the picketers have engaged in criminal or tortious conduct in order to seek injunctive relief. When relying on allegations of tortious behaviour, the company must ensure that its allegations are specific and, if proven, would meet the relevant test for the alleged criminal offence or tort.

1. Differentiating between Lawful and Unlawful Picketing

(a) Lawful Picketing Activities

Lawful picketing may include picketing for the purpose of communicating information, obtaining information, or peacefully persuading employees to support the picketers’ position. It is not unlawful for large numbers of picketers to be involved.

(b) Unlawful Picketing Activities

Unlawful picketing usually includes tortious behaviour (e.g. intimidation, inducing breach of contract, defamation) or criminal behaviour. Specifically, unlawful picketing may include:

  • trespass on private property (unless the property is one in which the public is normally granted access);
  • conduct that is disorderly (not peaceful);
  • the use of force or threats;
  • damage to property;
  • oral or written communication which is slanderous or libellous;
  • unduly hindering access or egress from the premises;
  • any type of picketing which prevents patrons, suppliers, or employees from entering the premises; or
  • threatening patrons, suppliers, or employees with injury or damage to personal property.

2. Commonly Relied on Torts when Seeking Injunctive Relief from Picketing

As noted above, injunctive relief is generally only available if the conduct of the picketers involves tortious or criminal activity. Canada’s Supreme Court has stated that picketing is not permissible if it breaches the criminal law or one of the specific torts like trespass, nuisance, intimidation, defamation or misrepresentation. Companies may also receive basic protections through the tort of interference with contractual relations. The more commonly relied on torts are described in more detail below.

(a) Nuisance

Picketing activities that amount to the tort of nuisance are unlawful. Nuisance consists of a substantial and unreasonable interference with an occupier’s interest in the beneficial use of his land. In order for the tort of private nuisance to be made out, the nuisance must involve private property. For the tort of public nuisance to be made out, there must be some damage beyond the general damage of inconvenience.

(b) Defamation

The use of injunctive relief to restrain defamation is only permissible in the rarest and clearest of cases, where the defamation is so manifestly defamatory that any verdict to the contrary would be considered perverse. There must also be evidence, or grounds upon which to infer, an intention that the defamation would be repeated or published.

(c) Interference with Contractual Relations

The elements of the tort of interference with contractual relations include: (i) the existence of a valid and enforceable contract; (ii) awareness by the defendants of the existence of a contract; (iii) breach of the contract procured by the defendants; (iv) wrongful interference; and (v) damages. This tort can only be established in the context of picketing if the interference is caused by an independently actionable wrongful or unlawful act.

3. Examples of Where Courts Have Granted Injunctive Relief

Injunctions have been granted to prevent picketing in the following situations:

  • where the conduct of picketers in denying entry or exit to the picketed premises constituted the tort of nuisance and criminal mischief (the court found that undue delay of to persons seeking to enter or exit premises is unjustified and that picketers do not have an unrestricted right to a blockade of the picketed premises);
  • where the picketing involved the use of signs alleging that the picketed group committed criminal offences and were disseminators of communicable diseases (only the unlawful activity was restrained and other picketing activities were permitted);
  • where the picketers impeded access to the courts; and
  • situations where the safety of picketers or others is threatened.

B. The company will suffer irreparable harm that cannot be compensated by damages if an injunction is denied

In cases where tortious or criminal actions are shown to have occurred, irreparable harm is readily established and compensation by damages is not realistically an available option. Irreparable harm includes harm to the public, as well as harm to the picketers themselves. Excessive economic harm can be irreparable harm, but the Supreme Court of Canada has held that even evidence of considerable economic harm to third parties will not justify restraint on otherwise lawful picketing activities.

C. The balance of convenience favours the granting of the injunction.

Where there is evidence that the picketing conduct is unlawful, the company does not have to meet this part of the test. However, in order to minimize impact and to further balance the convenience, injunctive relief granted may be limited in nature. The court will not interfere with lawful, non-tortious and non-criminal picketing. Rather, it is only the unlawful conduct that is in need of prohibition in order to impact the rights of the picketers as minimally as possible. The wide, injunctive relief requested by a moving party may be denied in favour of an order restraining only the wrongful actions of the picketers.

III. How to Seek Injunctive Relief

A. Steps Relevant to any Motion for an Injunction to Restrain Picketing

1. Gather First-Hand Accounts of Any Wrongful Conduct

In advance of seeking an injunction, evidence should be gathered from as many first-hand sources as possible. Whether or not injunctive relief will be granted is critically dependent upon whether the party seeking the relief has put forward sufficient evidence that the picketing is wrongful and unjustified.

2. Make Reasonable Efforts to Obtain Police Assistance

Prior to initiating proceedings to seek injunctive relief, the court must be satisfied that reasonable efforts were made by the moving party to "obtain police assistance, protection and action to prevent or remove any alleged danger of damage to property, injury to persons, obstruction of or interference with lawful entry or exit from the premises in question or breach of the peace have been unsuccessful". Supporting materials, in the form of affidavits confined to statements of fact within the knowledge of the deponent, will be required for such a motion to be made. While it is not absolutely clear that this requirement applies to secondary picketing activities, out of an abundance of caution, the police should be contacted in all circumstances.

B. Picketing Activities with No Connection to a Labour Dispute

Where the picketing activities occur at premises of a company with no connection to a labour dispute, injunctive relief can be sought through a motion under section 101 of the Courts of Justice Act. Where there is any suggestion that a labour dispute may be underlying the picketing activities, a telephone call to the appropriate labour representatives is required prior to seeking injunctive relief.

C. Picketing Activities Arising in Connection with a Labour Dispute

Where the secondary picketing arises in connection with a labour dispute, a company must consider whether or not the additional requirements found in section 102 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, are applicable.

Section 102 applies to picketing "in connection with a labour dispute". The scope of what will be considered to be "in connection with a labour dispute" is not yet settled. At least one Ontario court has suggested that neutral parties should not have to meet the additional requirements in section 102 when seeking injunctive relief; however, the court held that where there is a close inter-relationship with the picketed third party company and the struck employer, the picketing is "in connection with a labour dispute". It should be noted that the trend in Canadian courts has been to favour the rights of striking employees during labour disputes. Caution dictates that, where circumstances permit, companies subjected to secondary picketing comply with the additional requirements of section 102.

In addition to the meeting the general requirements described above for obtaining injunctive relief, a company seeking to restrain conduct "in connection with a labour dispute" has additional obligations.

1. Shorter Period Permitted for Interim Injunctions Restraining Picketing in Labour Disputes

It should be noted that under section 102, an interim injunction will only be granted for a maximum of four days.

2. Notice Requirements

(a) The general rule is that least 2 days notice is required before a motion for an injunction. Notice to a union can be effected by personal service on an officer or agent of the union. If the picketing employees are not members of a union, notice can be given by posting the notice in a conspicuous place at the place where the picketing occurs, where it can be read by any persons potentially affected.

(b) To seek an injunction without notice, the following must be established through oral evidence of relevant material facts:

(i) it is a proper case for an interim injunction;

(ii) notice could not be given because the delay would cause irreparable damage or injury, a breach of the peace, or an interruption in an essential public service; and

(iii) reasonable notification (by telephone or otherwise) has been given to an officer of the labour organization.

3. Evidence

Where an injunction is sought in connection with a labour dispute, affidavit evidence submitted by the company must be confined to the personal knowledge or opinion of the deponent, and not based on his information and belief. Evidence from security guards, management, and police should be provided. In addition, an injunction is more likely to be granted if the company can link a relatively large proportion of the picketers to the unlawful or inappropriate conduct. If the conduct can be viewed as simply bad behaviour on the part of a few individuals, an injunction restraining the picketing is unlikely to be granted.

The foregoing provides only an overview. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, a qualified lawyer should be consulted.

© Copyright 2005 McMillan Binch Mendelsohn LLP

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions