Canada: The OEB Approves Hydro One’s Acquisition Of Norfolk Power: A New Market Standard For The Next Wave Of LDC Consolidation In Ontario?

On July 3, 2014, the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) released its decision approving Hydro One Inc.'s (Hydro One) proposed acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Norfolk Power Inc. (Norfolk Power), a municipally owned utility that operates an electricity distribution system in Norfolk County, Ontario, as well as the transfer of Norfolk Power's electricity distribution system to Hydro One Networks Inc. (HONI).    

Brief background on consolidation in Ontario's LDC sector

The OEB's decision in Norfolk should be read in the context of the current state of Ontario's electricity distribution system, which is divided between a number of provincially licensed electricity distributors, generally referred to as "local distribution companies" or LDCs most of which are municipally owned. In April 2012, Ontario's Minister of Energy established the Ontario Distribution Sector Review Panel with a mandate to "conduct an analysis of the current system with a view to determine what financial advantages and savings could be realized, particularly for rate payers, from consolidation of Ontario's local distribution companies". The Panel's report, released December 13, 2012 and entitled "Renewing Ontario's Electricity Distribution Sector: Putting the Consumer First" is summarized here.

As noted in the Panel's report, the last major wave of LDC consolidation in Ontario occurred in the late 1990s, reducing the number of separately owned LDCs from 307 to 89. The Panel's report made several key recommendations, including consolidating Ontario's LDCs into eight to twelve larger regional distributors. The Panel's report stated that such a consolidation would facilitate cost savings in the order of $1 billion, net, over 10 years, while equipping tomorrow's LDC's to respond to the reinvestment requirements and the technological changes and opportunities expected for the sector. The Panel recommended voluntary, commercially driven, consolidations followed, if required, by legislation mandating completion of the consolidation process. A few months after the issuance of the Panel's report Ontario's Ministry of Energy issued a letter indicating that it favours voluntary consolidation of Ontario regulated electricity distributors but that it would not force it upon the sector. Consolidation is not without controversy and it is opposed by some from within and outside the LDC sector.  

Many LDCs and their municipal shareholders are now left to weigh their options on their own, often in the face of both mounting pressure for new capital investment in the electricity distribution system itself and the rapid pace of technological innovation. Technological innovation in the energy sector at large (including the increasing deployment of distributed generation) may erode the customer base and revenues of certain LDCs by decreasing customer consumption (a significant driver of LDC revenue historically). A number of those challenges are summarized here.

Background on the OEB's Norfolk application  

The proceedings before the OEB to approve the acquisition of Norfolk Power provoked opposition and controversy, which we previously explored in two earlier articles that can be found here and here.

The OEB eventually approved the transaction, subject to certain conditions including an 18-month time period within which to complete the acquisition. The OEB also approved a proposal for a 1 per cent reduction in rates, relative to 2012 base levels, for existing Norfolk Power customers, which is explored further below.

Summary of the OEB's decision on the Norfolk application  

The OEB noted the Panel's report at the outset of its decision, stated that it was aware of negotiations currently taking place concerning the consolidation of other distributors and expressed its expectation that its decision in Norfolk would inform parties contemplating future consolidations. In that sense, the OEB is clearly signalling that it is aware of the current efforts to consolidate the LDC sector and the desire of many in the sector for guidance from the regulator on its views regarding the public interest in consolidation activity.  

With respect to application itself, the OEB applied the "no harm" test in much the same fashion as it has applied it to past transactions, meaning that the OEB must be satisfied that the proposed transaction will not have an adverse effect in relation to any of the five objectives under section 1 of the Energy Board Act. The OEB focused its attention on the first two objectives (which refer to consumer protection and economic efficiency) and noted that there was no issue with the other three objectives (promotion of electricity conservation and demand management, implementation of a smart grid in Ontario and promoting the use and generation of electricity from renewable energy sources).

The OEB's decision examined whether the proposed consolidation would have the effect of reducing the underlying cost structures involved with distributing electricity to Norfolk ratepayers. In making this assessment, the OEB noted that the large difference in size and scope of HONI and Norfolk Power made it impossible to determine the effect of the acquisition on the cost structures by simply comparing the rates of the two distributors.

Several intervenors appeared before the OEB opposing the application and argued that in applying the "no harm" test and assessing the potential impact of the transaction on Norfolk ratepayers, the OEB should consider the following:

  1. Historically, ratepayers of utilities acquired by Hydro One have experienced an increase in rates.
  2. HONI's current operations, maintenance and administration ("OM&A") cost per customer is higher than that of Norfolk Power.
  3. HONI's application for 2015-19 rates, currently before the OEB, shows significant increases in HONI rates, which will affect future Norfolk Power rates.
  4. Hydro One has not substantiated adequately the various types of projected savings due to the acquisition.

The OEB rejected all four of the intervenors' arguments, accepting instead Hydro One's contentions that the larger electricity distributor resulting from the acquisition would likely result in lower OM&A and capital costs from efficiencies due to geographic integration, economies of scale, administrative, managerial and planning integration, and lower financing costs. The OEB did note that it could not accurately assess Hydro One's projected cost savings as Hydro One did not provide a detailed breakdown of its calculations. The Board also made clear its expectation that:

(i) The proposed 1 per cent reduction in Norfolk rates for five years does not address the "no harm" assessment as it is not driven by any contemplated change in the underlying cost structure (thereby signalling that cost structures beyond the period of the proposed rate freeze will be assessed in future rate applications).

(ii) An assessment of projected cost structures is required.

(iii) At the time of rebasing of rates, Hydro One will propose rate classes for Norfolk customers that reflect costs to service the Norfolk service area, as affected by the productivity gains arising from the consolidation.

While it is basic regulatory law that one hearing panel cannot bind a future hearing panel, the Board has made clear its expectation that rate freezes and token rate reductions will not meet a "no harm test," and that more sustainable efficiencies must be demonstrated and are expected to benefit the ratepayers of the acquired LDC.

The total purchase price for Norfolk Power amounted to $93 million, which included a "purchase price premium" of $39.1 million over the $53.9 million book value of Norfolk Power's assets. The  intervenors argued that the significant purchase price premium would potentially compromise the rational consolidation of the LDC sector as it "...would cause Hydro One Inc. to become a dominant buyer," and this would be contrary to the public interest in a competitive and diverse consolidation process. The OEB rejected this argument on the basis that the premium was not a relevant consideration since such premiums are never allowed to be included in rates. In a policy set in 2007, the Board indicated that distributors applying for approval of a consolidation transaction may defer the rate rebasing of the consolidated entity for up to five years after the date of closing. The purpose of such a deferral is to allow the consolidated distributor to offset its transaction costs by reaping additional profits from the resulting cost savings. The OEB accepted the applicants' proposal to defer rate rebasing until the approval of 2020 rates. In other words, the purchase price premium would be borne entirely by the shareholder. (Hydro One) and not recovered from ratepayers through increased electricity rates. Hydro One is, of course, wholly owned by the Province of Ontario. The Board also rejected consideration of the broader public interest in a rational and competitive consolidation process as beyond the scope of its considerations, determining instead that it would defer to the negotiations between a willing buyer and seller, subject to foreknowledge of the Board's expectations in respect of future cost structures and rates (essentially signalling that the Board will expect sustainable and demonstrable cost reductions).

Implications from the Norfolk decision — A new "Market" standard for LDC consolidations? 

It should be noted that Hydro One's acquisition of Norfolk Power resulted from a competitive bidding process. In a typical competitive bid prospective buyers must submit sealed offers to a seller in a "blind auction" process in which they do not know the contents of any other bid. The process is intended to yield an optimal result for the seller with respect to purchase price and contractual terms. In terms of process, a seller typically provides a form of share purchase agreement with instructions to bidders to provide a revised version containing the terms upon which they are prepared to complete the transaction. Usually, a "seller friendly" form of share purchase agreement is issued, which contains terms that favour the seller (in some cases, those terms can greatly favour a seller). The structure of a competitive blind auction can yield two results: (i) discourage prospective buyers from making extensive changes to the terms of the draft purchase agreement in order to prevail as the preferred proponent, and (ii) encourage prospective buyers to include "sweeteners" (e.g., additional promises or commitments) to induce a seller to choose their bid over another, especially in circumstances where the difference in purchase prices between competing offers is negligible.

The share purchase agreement for Norfolk Power filed in connection with the application contained employment and location guarantees for employees of Norfolk Power (and its subsidiaries) for a period of one year following the closing date, support for local community events in Norfolk County, maintaining a local presence (i.e., maintaining the central operating facility and all operations within Simcoe, Ontario) for a minimum period of three years following the closing date, maintaining Norfolk Power's capital expenditure budget and forecast for a  period of three years following the closing date and, as noted above, a 1 per cent reduction of rates for Norfolk County customers for a period of 5 years following the closing date until HONI's rates are re-based in 2020.

From a policy perspective it can be difficult to reconcile how employment and location guarantees, commitments to maintain a local office presence (e.g., the former "head office" of the LDC) and promises to continue a certain level of capital expenditures within the acquired service territory facilitate a rationale consolidation of the LDC sector.  By their nature, these provisions would appear (on their face) to undermine some of the very efficiencies that could be realized through consolidation, such as reduced headcount and centralized back office functions, at least for as long as those provisions in the purchase agreement remain in force. 

Subsequent developments — proposed acquisition of Brant County Power Inc. and Woodstock Hydro Services Inc.

Two further LDC acquisition transactions have recently been announced after Norfolk Power: Cambridge and North Dumfries Hydro's application to purchase Brant Country Power (Brant County) and Hydro One's application to purchase Woodstock Hydro Services (Woodstock Hydro).   

The purchase agreements for Woodstock Hydro and Brant County filed with the OEB contain the same provisions found in the Norfolk County deal, as described above; in addition,  the purchase agreement for Woodstock Hydro refers to a new operations centre to be located in the City of Woodstock and, in the case of Brant County, the employment and location guarantees last for three years and 18 months respectively (as opposed to one year for Norfolk Power), and the commitment to maintain a local presence in Brant County lasts for five years (the application for Brant County does not contain a rate reduction of 1 per cent as with Norfolk Power and Woodstock Hydro but rather contains a four year rate freeze until that utility's rates are rebased in 2019). 

The OEB's decision in Nofolk, in largely disregarding issues arising from (i) the size of the purchase price, (ii) the use of "sweeteners," and (iii) the broader public interest in a competitive consolidation environment, will likely result in de-emphasizing concerns around regulatory approval in the structuring of offers for LDCs. Some caution on the part of would-be acquirers is warranted, though, since the OEB was clear that it expects that cost structures and associated rate impacts on acquired utilities will reflect efficiencies upon rebasing;  accordingly, too many current "sweeteners" may well erode the acquiring shareholder's ability to recover future purchase price premiums.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions