Canada: The Supreme Court Of Canada Addresses Contractual Interpretation And The Availability Of Appeal From Commercial Arbitration Decisions

In Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53 ("Sattva"), the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") considered the law surrounding contractual interpretation in Canada and the availability of appeal from commercial arbitration decisions under British Columbia's Arbitration Act, RSBC 1996, c 55 (the "Act"). In summary, the SCC found contractual interpretation to involve questions of mixed fact and law, as opposed to the historical position of a pure question of law. As a result, the SCC held that the British Columbia Court of Appeal ("BCCA") incorrectly granted leave to appeal in Sattva, and moving forward, appeals dealing with commercial contractual interpretation will rarely be granted under the Act. The SCC has taken the position of greatly strengthening the finality of arbitration decisions regarding commercial contractual interpretation.

The Facts and Case Progression

The issues in Sattva arise out of an agreed-upon obligation of Creston to pay a finder's fee to Sattva in the form of shares. The parties disagreed on the date that was to be used to value the Creston shares, and therefore the number of shares Sattva was entitled to receive. In reliance upon differing provisions in the contract, Sattva argued it was entitled to 11,460,000 shares based on a price of $0.15 per share while Creston argued Sattva was entitled to 2,454,000 shares based on a later price of $0.70 per share. The parties entered arbitration and the arbitrator, in considering the provisions and contract in dispute as well as the conduct of the parties, found in favour of Sattva. Leave to appeal was originally denied by the BC Supreme Court ("BCSC"), then allowed by the BCCA, returning the dispute to the BCSC. The BCSC dismissed the appeal, finding the arbitrator's decision to be correct on a standard of review of correctness. Further appealed to the BCCA, the panel found the arbitrator's decision to be incorrect on the same standard of review.

On appeal to the SCC, the SCC considered both the issue of the BC Court of Appeal's decision to grant leave as well as the court's decision on the merits of the case.

The SCC's Findings

The SCC addressed several areas of law in this case, including:

  1. the availability of granting leave pursuant to the Act,
  2. whether contractual interpretation is a question of law, and the approach to be taken in undertaking contractual interpretation,
  3. the standard of review on appeals under the Act, and
  4. whether a court is bound by comments regarding the merits of an appeal as made by an earlier court granting leave.

Each will be addressed in turn.

1. Availability of Leave under the Act

Section 31(1) of the Act limits the availability of appeal on commercial arbitrations to a) questions of law where the parties consent to the appeal, or b) questions of law where the parties do not consent but where leave to appeal is granted by the court. Similar provisions are found in other arbitration legislation across Canada. Under Alberta's Arbitration Act, RSA 2000, c A-43, s.44 outlines that appeals are limited to questions of law where the arbitration agreement entered by the parties does not provide for an appeal. This brings the SCC's attention to the question of if and when contractual interpretation is a question of law.

2. Contractual Interpretation

Historically, determining the legal rights and obligations of parties under a written contract was considered to be a question of law. In Sattva, the SCC held that it should be considered to be a question of mixed fact and law, outlining two developments that have brought about the shift in contractual interpretation. Firstly, the courts now consider the "factual matrix" when interpreting a written contract. The SCC states that this involves taking

"a practical, common-sense approach not dominated by technical rules of construction. The overriding concern is to determine 'the intent of the parties and the scope of their understanding.' (Jesuit Fathers of Upper Canada v. Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada, 2006 SCC 21, at para. 27)...To do so, a decision-maker must read the contract as a whole, giving the words used their ordinary and grammatical meaning, consistent with the surrounding circumstances known to the parties at the time of formation of the contract." (para 47, emphasis added)

The SCC addressed the nature of evidence to be relied upon in assessing the "factual matrix". In considering the "surrounding circumstances," the evidence considered should be objective evidence of background facts at the time the contract was executed. This includes a consideration of the knowledge both parties had, and ought to have had, at the time the contract was entered (para 58). This assessment is inherently a question of fact.

The SCC outlined that considering the surrounding circumstances in interpreting a contract does not offend the parol evidence rule. As per the SCC, the parol evidence rule,

precludes admission of evidence outside the words of the written contract that would add to, subtract from, vary, or contradict a contract that has been wholly reduced to writing." (para 59)

Although the parol evidence rule precludes evidence of the subjective intention of parties, it does not preclude evidence of the surrounding circumstances to a contract (paras 59, 60). Evidence pertaining to the surrounding circumstances known to the parties at the time of contract formation is consistent with the objectives and purpose of the parol evidence rule, that being to achieve finality and certainty in contractual obligations (paras 59, 60), as it is used as an

"interpretive aid for determining the meaning of the written words chosen by the parties, not to change or overrule the meaning of those words." (para 60)

The second development leading to the shift in culture regarding contractual interpretation is the meaning of a question of mixed fact and law as provided in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, where the court defined such as "applying a legal standard to a set of facts" (para 26). This definition is consistent with the "factual matrix" approach as outlined above. The SCC identified a central purpose to drawing a distinction between questions of law and those of mixed fact and law as limiting the intervention of appellate courts to cases where the results can be expected to have an impact beyond the parties to the particular dispute.

It is important to note that the SCC still recognizes the possibility of identifying an extricable question of law from a dispute initially characterized as being of mixed fact and law. However, the SCC warns that courts should take caution in identifying such in contractual interpretation disputes, as such a finding will be rare.

3. Standard of Review on Appeals under the Act

The SCC outlined that the standard of review in the context of commercial arbitration decisions is to be reasonableness, unless the question of law is one that would necessarily attract the correctness standard, such as constitutional questions or questions of central importance to the legal system as a whole.

4. Is a Court Bound by the Leave Courts Comments in Deciding an Appeal?

The SCC clarified that a court, in granting or denying leave, decides only whether the matter on appeal warrants granting leave and not whether the appeal will ultimately be successful. As such, the SCC stated that "a grant of leave cannot bind or limit the powers of the court hearing the actual appeal (para 122)."

The Bottom Line

Contractual interpretation is a question of mixed fact and law and should engage a consideration of the surrounding circumstances to contract formation. As such, appeals from arbitration decisions regarding commercial contract interpretation will be significantly limited to situations in which a question of law can be extricated from the dispute. Where appeals are rarely allowed in this context, the standard of review is reasonableness, further empowering the decision staying-power of arbitrators in commercial arbitration decisions.

The tangible application of this decision for commercial parties is three-fold.

Parties must be extremely diligent in documenting the surrounding circumstances when drafting a contract. Contracts will be assessed in their entirety should any disputes arise, and a factual analysis of the knowledge the parties had or ought to have had will be considered.

Parties should carefully consider the arbitration agreements they enter. Specifically, any provisions between the parties relating to the appeal of arbitration awards, as this may affect the availability of appeal under the arbitration legislation.

In entering arbitration, parties should be aware of the arbitrator appointed, and his or her experience with the particular industry or dispute at issue, as the decisions awarded under the Act will likely be final after the SCC's holding in this case. Although this decision was in the context of BC's Act, it is clear that the SCC favors finality in arbitration where a broad question of law relevant to more than just the parties in dispute is not present.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lawson Lundell LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lawson Lundell LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions